Monday, Jan 09, 2012 at 16:25
Thanks
Ross - not trying to be argumentative but trying to understand - my comments against your points.
"
Ross M posted:
If you are worried about the slipper action specifically then these are the features I don't like:
1.The slipper is not mechanically secured to the vehicle.
(Is this important as its actions are restricted so mimick as if it secured to the vehicle)
2. The slipper end slaps up and down and is noisey even though some have two spread leaves trying to stop that happening.
(If that is your experience Ok but it has not been my experience - I have had slippers since 1975 and they have been on all my trailers and vans)
3 There is friction in everything but the slipper ends have to be in a high friction sliding action all its life unlike a shackle/greased and mostly sealed, having the sliding action converted to a rotary action in a bush of some sort.
(Don't follow this point - the metal on metal action is relatively friction free once the two surfaced have worn a bit)
4. If you haven't got military wrap on the front eye end then if the spring eye broke the shackle can't move far and will upset the alignment of the axle greatly, BUT,
the slipper will just force its way back until it steers you into on comong traffic or over the edge. Will you be alert enough and have enough experience to instantly detect this happening and therefore avoid the disaster?????
It isn't very rewarding to see your $50.000 4wd crashed and destroyed and your holiday ruined because of substandard
suspension.
(I agree completely with military wrap springs but both normal and slippers can come in military wrap springs - the slippers on my box trailer are not military wrap but the slippers on my offroad van are military wrap so your point applies to springs that do not have a military wrap rather than to slipper springs.
5. If you intend to use shockers on the trailer the shock action will be somewhat reduced by the slipper spread leaf feature trying to flex open and shut as the road forces are applied to the shock and
suspension.
This flapping flexing doesn't occur with shackles to any worrying degree.
(Why - from the axle (where the shock connects) forward is the same on both type of springs so shocker action is the same - at the back end, in both cases the the end of the spring is moving back and forward with increasing and decreasing shock load. In this regard both slipper and normal springs are acting in the same way - lengthening and shortening as load increases and decreases)
6. As mentioned slippers are a cheap and nasty way of making a
suspension.
(I have had heaps of issues with spring mounts and rubbers on my normal springs but never any with the slippers - I agree most slippers are cheap and nasty but so is the $30 shackle spring from supercheap. There is nothing you have said that makes slippers worse than shackle springs when the same parameters are applied to both springs, ie same length, same number of leaves, same mil wrap etc. - the only issue I have been able to find out in all this is that there is a possibility t,hat the slipper can come put of its bracket when reversing. Other than that, based on the evidence put forward in this thread, slippers are as good as shackles assuming the same parameters are used but what seems to be happening is cheap, single wrap, short, tight slippers are being compared with more expensive, mil wrap, long and compliant shackle springs.
I am happy to be convinced otherwise)
Garry
FollowupID:
749421