Sunday, Jan 29, 2012 at 10:34
Teza
This previous post does not help your stance does it.
Regarding you own comments it is possible to do a lot of things to digitally control based equipment. But whether you are allowed to by law or warranty is another matter. My first comment was a blanket one to try and get the inexperienced person to take it to a qualified and approved shop/person and get it done. My next comment was a throw away line as a joke. In bad taste - Yes!
You are correct in so far as a user can tune a radio to a frequency that it is both workshop accredited to operate on one and also ACMA type approved to operate on. However the
tools must be standard user based tools. Anything that is controlled by the accreditation or manufacturer as non-user, ie workshop/maintenance only type
tools must not be used. As
well, a radio that is type approved to operate on 40 channels is not necessarily type approved to operate on 80 channels.
The Icom 400 specifications state:
• Frequency coverage
CB : 476.425–477.400 MHz
Private : 450.000–500.000 MHz (RX only)
• Mode
CB : 16K0F3E
Private : 16K0F3E (Wide)/8K50F3E (Narrow)
• Number of channels
CB : 40 channels/1 bank
Private : 88 channels/7 banks
The above is copied from the latest copy of it's specifications that I can find. I would question if this specific radio is type approved by ACMA to operate as an 80 channel UHF CB. We have to be careful as each one has to be treated on its own merits. With this in mind, yes, my comment was inaccurate.
Just because a radio can operate on 80 channels does not mean any Joe Blow can modify it. You must be careful that the manufacturer has had it type approved by ACMA as an 80 channel CB. They or the manufacturer may also have restrictions depicted in the supporting documentation for such an approval as to who is permitted to change to 80 channels.
I also feel that you have the idea that I believe that CB is below me as a ham. That is way, way off mark. Personally I have a healthy respect for CB. If it wasn't for CB I would never have tried for my ham licence. I thank CB for the excellent companionship and safety that both HF and UHF CB has given me.
I suggest that you have a look at the way you consider amateur radio.
Maybe a more civil approach would have been beneficial instead of a direct challenge to me.
Phil
FollowupID:
751284