Thursday, Feb 23, 2012 at 23:53
Craig,
Dunnies were placed at Durba (and other areas) to provide a facility that added to the amenity of the area. Having been there before the
toilets were built, you cannot imagine just how inconsiderate people were. Imagine a sole water source forever infected with Guardia and the like. That's very possibly what we were facing. The sign on the
toilets as I recall, implores all travellers to take responsibility and do their part to assist if needed. bleep it's not hard (did you like that double entendre ;-) and they're right.
Just about every member of this site could give a horror story of camping sites ruined by loo paper and rubbish. Struth go to any site on Fraser without
toilets and try and find a place to pitch a tent that isn't covered in crap! DQB in Rudall, 12, 38, 48 or any other number of Canning wells. More memorable from the dunny paper flying about and the smell these days than anything else. The Canning, like so many iconic outback tracks, is pedestrian these days. Sad but true. It's on everyone's list and with several thousand vehicles on it over the short window of the travel season, it's a main road these days.
Without starting an argument, we actually travel the Canning and stay at Durba with the blessing of the Martu people. One of the key reasons the
toilets were actually built, and later moved was because the T/O's weren't happy with people crapping all over a site that is relatively significant to them.
My point is that it only takes a few good people to make the difference. We've all seen the ugly side and or met the "Ugly Aussies" but we'll all suffer as travellers when good people consider it not worthwhile to make an effort any more.
I'll get off the soapbox now.
Cheers Mick
FollowupID:
754027