3" Exhaust system upgrade for 100 series T/D auto
Submitted: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 at 23:30
ThreadID:
95329
Views:
3526
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
3
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Ian G (NSW)
I am considering the above modification as I now tow a (approx) 3 tonne off road c'van.
Can anyone advise what improvement in performance I could reasonably expect. I am looking more to better overtaking/towing/economy. Is this a reasonable expectation?
The vehicle is 2006 model with a DP chip fitted.
I have been quoted $800 supply and fit including a stainless steel muffler. The business owner said he does mandrel bends only where bend angle is more than 45 degrees. Does this sound normal? The price is certainly attractive.
Appreciate any advice/comments.
Reply By: Member. Rob M (QLD) - Thursday, May 03, 2012 at 09:01
Thursday, May 03, 2012 at 09:01
Hi Ian,
I have the same vehicle and had a 3" mandrel bent system installed by
Beaudesert exhausts about 12 months after I purchased it.
I don't have any exact figures for you unfortunately, but I definately noticed a difference in the whole feel of the vehicle, especially when on long inclines and the like. It seems to hold gears longer before kicking down.
You will notice the sound of the exhaust is quite a bit louder, but not unpleasant.
I didn't chip
mine but had gas injection installed which according to the dyno figiures gives 10% more power and 12% more torque. The added benefit is it burns a lot more of the diesel rather than putting it out the exhaust and apparently stops the oil from sooting as much giving a little more leeway as to oil change intervals.
I must admit I can't see why you would not mandrel bend the entire exhaust if you are going to do some of them.
AnswerID:
484874
Reply By: Member - Richard W (NSW) - Friday, May 04, 2012 at 07:56
Friday, May 04, 2012 at 07:56
Ian,
FWIW I have posted this before and it shows the stats I have kept on my fuel consumption with various mods added in order.
1) Standard
2) Tyres 285X75X16 muds (stats normalised for the larger tyre size)
3) 3" Exhaust
4) D'tronic Chip
5) Camper Trailer (750KG GVM)
Exhaust improved mid range performance but not fuel consumption.
Chip improved both low end performance and fuel consumption.
High fuel consumption was 4WD tracks.
AnswerID:
484937
Reply By: murrayman - Friday, May 04, 2012 at 08:20
Friday, May 04, 2012 at 08:20
Hi ian, i have a cruiser the same as yours. my off road van weighs 3400kg loaded. I fitted a 3"
beaudesert exhaust and it improved the pulling power up hills no end. It also hangs on much better. No difference in fuel economy, im consistent at 20 lites per 100. The only time my fuel usage is lower is when i am in the Flinders or on cold crisp mornings it goes like a cut snake and has been as low as 16 l per hundred. A bigger inter cooler would be the next mod iff i do any. The
beaudesert exhaust was the sweetest thing to fit, 2 hours to remove the old system and fit the new including dump pipe. cheers mark
AnswerID:
484939