Conqueror UEV490
Submitted: Wednesday, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:30
ThreadID:
98470
Views:
2123
Replies:
2
FollowUps:
0
This Thread has been Archived
takenbyaliens (QLD member)
Hi fellow members!
Long time no speak from this end...work!!! OK so I am about to commit to a Conqueror UEV490 Extreme optioned up a bit...big $ !! I am looking for: (a)
feedback from fellow members who might have one (b) options for the webasto diesel hot water system that is priced at around $3500..got to be genuinely cheaper and as efficient systems out there...Duetto 12/240 system?? anyone got one of these??
Just done a great trip 'out there'..one of
places we stopped at on our way was Killcowera Station just west of and backing onto
Currawinya. Really good ( no relative, business associate etc etc ) if you are bird watchers like us!
OK hear from anyone....all help and advice really appreciated!!
| According to modern astronomers, space is finite..a very comforting thought particularly for people who can never remember where they left things Lifetime Member
My Profile My Blog Send Message |
Reply By: Member - Rosco from way back - Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:24
Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:24
G'day TBA
We have one and very happy with it. However without going into detail, search is your friend as there have been a number of posts along these lines.
AnswerID:
496435
Reply By: DaveO*ST-R - Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:47
Thursday, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:47
A mate has the UEV 310? and (being a different setup to the 490) had a few issues with dust ingress and some other niggly problems etc but to Conqueror's credit, they are apparently going all out to fix them up.
Spoke to a couple with a UEV 490 at the
Jardine Ferry recently on a trip to the Cape and they sang its praises. Although expensive, they were happy with their purchase. They showed us through all the bits and pieces and not one skerrick of dust had made its way past the seals on any of the doors and/or hatches. I was quite amazed, considering the dirt and dust of the PDR. Can't help you with (b) though.
AnswerID:
496438