fuel consumption yet again
Submitted: Saturday, Oct 13, 2012 at 19:03
ThreadID:
98522
Views:
3003
Replies:
11
FollowUps:
13
This Thread has been Archived
Trev&Ness B
can people please give me an average fuel consumption level between towing and around town on there 4.2turbo diesel engines, and also tell me what year and model off the car.
thanks
Reply By: Member - kym111 - Saturday, Oct 13, 2012 at 20:17
Saturday, Oct 13, 2012 at 20:17
We have a 2004/5 GU Patrol, 4.2td with gas injection. When on gas, we easily sat on 80-100kms/ph on a good gravel road recently, towing a 3 tonne 22' caravan.
On the way
home the air filter choked up, we ran out of gas, had a horrendous side/head wind and at times could barely get to 65kms/phr. Hubby did say what the fuel economy was (nothing flash!), but I can't remember the details. Something like 17ltr/100kms. May have been down to 14ltr/100kms on the good bits!
He's now considering a turbo upgrade to assist with more power, especially when we are unable to use gas due to lack of supply.
AnswerID:
496625
Follow Up By: Member - Michael and Chris (QL - Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 07:27
Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 07:27
Hi Kim111,
Based on what figures you provided, I wouldn't be too keen on changing anything on that engine. Those figures are very good results given you are towing a 3ton van. As far as the air filter getting clogged, it isn't hard to quickly clean the filter and put it back in.
FollowupID:
772351
Follow Up By: Steve M1 (NSW) - Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 08:33
Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 08:33
looking at those figures on straight diesel after the gas choked, they must've been going downhill all the way
home.
FollowupID:
772352
Follow Up By: Member - kym111 - Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:08
Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 12:08
I stand very corrected... I just checked with hubby, on the way
home we did 25ltr/100kms! Absolutely hideous!
As for the air filter, it should have been replaced before we hit the road. As it was, when it was discovered that it was clogged, a simple tap wasn't enough. Hubby cleaned the chunks of oily mud and dust out best he could (no spare....), cleaned it with petrol, let it dry and put it back in. I believe a new one went in the day after we got
home...
FollowupID:
772363
Reply By: Member - Bruce C (NSW) - Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:44
Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:44
Hi Trev,
These are towing figures only.
80 series turbo diesel Cruiser towing 2 tonne van 17.5ltr/100K various terain but contains some driving over and along the Great Divide
2003 100 V8 petrol series Cruiser over similar teraim to above towing same van 22ltr/100K
Upgraded van now close to 2.5tonne now getting 22.75ltr/100K over similar terain.
This V8 petrol vehicle was 15 to 20 grand cheaper than a comparable 2003 turbo diesel 100 series.
Cheers, Bruce.
| At home and at ease on a track that I know not and
restless and lost on a track that I know. HL.Lifetime Member My Profile Send Message |
AnswerID:
496655
Follow Up By: Steve M1 (NSW) - Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 14:28
Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 14:28
if my maths are correct, that's roughly about 66,000ks of petrol saved by going petrol. Taking your lower figure of 15 grand cheaper and fuel @ $1.50 doing a regular (not towing) 15L/100ks . So around three years or more average mileage/kilometerage "paid for". I have used diesels for a good few years now but it's a reasonable argument, as I'm sure Robin, in his 4.8 Pootrol would testify. That may be a conservative estimate but after 3 years the diesel would start to claw that back. The difference would diminish if we were talking used vehicles but whatever, it's an interesting one. All rough figures but it gives some perspective. One other thing I have found is that contrary to popular belief, I have spent no more on maintenence of my current Prado D4D (diesel) than a previous LC100 petrol.
FollowupID:
772370
Follow Up By: Member - Bruce C (NSW) - Thursday, Oct 18, 2012 at 19:26
Thursday, Oct 18, 2012 at 19:26
Hi Steve,
A mate bought a 2004 Sahara TD Cruiser for 60 grand about 12 months before I bought my 2003 GXL Petrol Cruiser which I paid 22.5 grand for.
As you can see I have been conservative with my figures concerning purchase price.
My consumption figures are acurate though.
Cheers, Bruce.
| At home and at ease on a track that I know not and
restless and lost on a track that I know. HL.Lifetime Member My Profile Send Message |
FollowupID:
772664
Follow Up By: Steve M1 (NSW) - Thursday, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:12
Thursday, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:12
yep - that price diff buys a lot of fuel Bruce. I'm doing a similar excercise with the Prado (previously also had a LC100 two cars back but not as much diff with the Prado) it's a very nice feeling on those long trips to fuel up with diesel knowing how far it has/will take you but you pay upfront for it. No simple answer that covers everybody but it's a close one these days. Diesel used to be
well below the cost of petrol but as soon as there's a market for it the barstards whack the price up.
FollowupID:
772666
Follow Up By: Steve M1 (NSW) - Thursday, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:26
Thursday, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:26
just an afterthought, I got rid of my petrol LC100 because of the fuel I was getting through but really, it's all relative and if you get a bit upset every time you need to fill up, just think of what you've saved at purchase. You can end up chasing your tail with this stuff and in the end, there's probably little in it. I can't honestly say one is better than the other on consumption but I have a leaning towards the diesel for other reasons. The same suit doesn't fit everybody though.
FollowupID:
772669
Reply By: Member - Bucky - Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:46
Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 09:46
7.5 km/lt around town
8.0 km/lt on the highway
Towing our camper... usually 5.5km/lt - 6.5 km/lt depending on head winds and road surfaces
But I don't care, I'm on holidays, when towinng
By the way
When we owned the 3.0 TD Navara,
I go 9.5 km/lt around town
10.5 km/lt on a trip
Towing the Camper... Same as the Patrol 5.5 km/lt - 6.5 km/lt
Have the Mighty 4.2 TD Partol any day
Cheers Bucky
AnswerID:
496656
Reply By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 20:10
Sunday, Oct 14, 2012 at 20:10
I have turboed my NA 1HZ 1## series cruiser and can get around 12-13 liters /100ks empty and driven conservatively, when towing a Jayco swan (3 adults, 3 kids,a little under 5 ton gross) on recent 7500 k journey the economy varied greatly mainly due to driving speeds and relative winds,
Here are my feul records
I should point out that this history started with the camper on and doesn't really reflect its good side, my cruiser tends to be sensitive to weight and stuff on the roof rack, take away the weight and keep the roof rack clear and behave in stop start traffic and it can give reasonable results.
When comparing landcruiser Turbo diesels, ensure you find out if its either a factory turbo or an aftermarket turbo, big difference in technology and vehicle purchase price, but is reflected in its fuel economy.
Shane
AnswerID:
496679
Reply By: Brian - Tuesday, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:22
Tuesday, Oct 16, 2012 at 01:22
i own an old Tojo Sahara 4 litre turbo diesel , went to the Kulin bush races ( WA ) recently , left
Australind with a full tank , drove at 80kph ( v slow ) towing an old 18ft Opal van , not sure of the weight but think its fairly heavy , was 306 ks to
campsite , then back to Kulin on the Sunday , totalling about 321 ks , to fill tank took 56.14 litres of diesel . I thought that was fairly heavy consumption . not wanting to hijack your thread mate but while everyone is on the subject thought i might get the odd comment or opinion .
AnswerID:
496761