Swaybars and Suspension limits
Submitted: Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 16:48
ThreadID:
99317
Views:
4002
Replies:
8
FollowUps:
9
This Thread has been Archived
Robin Miller
Many 4wders, myself included remove swaybar links or alter the
suspension with
stronger springs etc to get that all important wheel travel.
The post shows what can happen to shocks as a result of not getting in quite right.
We had a few 4wds on our motocross track over the weekend and one Patrol (no not
mine) has stronger 2in lift springs but also removed the swaybar to get a bit more
suspension travel as it was having problems with the 1/2 meter deep ruts.
Unfortunately a wheel dropped into one unseen rut and the stronger than standard springs pushed the wheel down such that it thru the shock to its maximum length very
quickly. With no swaybar to limit the extension you can see the result.
This shock is a much stronger than standard Tough Dog item with an 18mm hardened
main shaft , it looks like the shaft didn't quite come all the way out at first and
kinked over, then repeated thumps did the rest.

Over Extended Shock
Reply By: Ross M - Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:28
Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:28
Robin
To use a
suspension without the sway bars connected (except quietly driven on tracks and using the flex) is asking for disaster as the whole dynamics of the vehicle would be altered for the worse and possibly dangerous too.
The shock you have shown indicates
the springs of the vehicle have far more down ward travel than the shock has. It will therefore, when a sway bay is also disconnected, fire the shock immediately to the limit of it's travel and pull the end off.
The shock shown is was in no way matched to the extension ability of the spring, so what else would you expect the shock to do when driven past it's extension ability.
The idea is to have a shock which will allow the axle to be lowered to the extent the spring demands. Something which appears to be severely lacking here.
The shock should be just getting to the end of travel and lowering the axle as the spring is also just getting to full extent and then it won't be hammering the shock to full extension, hence no failure will/should occur.
PS. Many fitters of springs and shocks don't check much and the customer is running on an unknown level of trust.
AnswerID:
499728
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:55
Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:55
Hi
Ross
Its quite a common occurrence though.
Few I have seen use limiting straps anymore like rally cars.
It can also makes things better all round if done right - some shocks like this one also have internal rubber stoppers that cushion the end of travel forces - not enough though in this case. (It has springs using 21mm dia wire)
All a bit of a balancing act - in my own case the shocks are painted around the circumference at each end of travel and then we run them over a ramp.
FollowupID:
775725
Follow Up By: olcoolone - Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:01
Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:01
Ross you mention about the shocker length not being matched with the spring length...... if you had a shocker matched to the spring length in this application you would be limiting upwards travel and you would be punching the piston through the end or bending the shaft when the shocker topped out...... unless the upward or downward movement was equal when the vehicle was sitting at rest.
To longer shocks with no downward limiting can make the spring fall out
You will never get a shocker on a standard
suspension set up vehicle to mach the spring length...... it's all a compromise, Hence why you have bump stops to limit upwards movement and sway bars to limit downward movement. and in comp vehicles
suspension straps.
The other thing you have to watch for is spring binding.
There is noting wrong with this shocker getting used on this vehicle with these springs..... it's the person who disconnected the sway bar who was wrong. And there is nothing wrong with the factory
suspension design but there are limitations.
FollowupID:
775741
Reply By: Rockape - Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:51
Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:51
Robin,
if you owned a pre 90 troopcarrier you wouldn't have to worry about disconnecting the rear swaybar as they didn't have one.LOL.
You just get sea sick on roundabouts.
RA.
AnswerID:
499729
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:58
Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:58
Hi RA
Your comment jogged by memory - as per your troppie , my first patrol had the lightweight commodore engine and it did not have a front swaybar either - interesting.
FollowupID:
775726
Reply By: Andrew - Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:53
Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 20:53
Hi Robin
Just some thoughts to expand on your experience.
As I understand it some shocks can act as
suspension travel limiters while others are definitely not designed to do that. The second type rely on travel limiters of some sort such as straps or cables or the
suspension binds up sufficiently to provide a "soft" landing at the end of the stroke.
The reduction in
suspension binding caused by disconnection of the sway bars and the extra force of the heavier duty springs would appear to be more than enough to cause the damage you encountered.
A heavier rebound setting on the shock valveing would help reduce the shock loading as the shock tops out, but as this may interfere with normal handling, then I think fitting limit straps is a better option. This has other advantages in ensuring you brake pipes never become your limit straps (no it doesn't work), or on independent suspensions you momentarily bind up ball joints or driveshafts which then can cause them to fail later.
regards
A
AnswerID:
499731
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 21:08
Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 21:08
Hi Andrew
Good point about re-bound dampening.
I have some sets of shocks for the Patrols with different characteristics.
The Ironman set has very little dampening on extension but strong rebound - so maybe it would be worse in this case.
To confirm your comment, this broken shock has an internal rubber stopper which helps take the load on extension but this car had huge 21mm diameter wire coils to help with 80kg of winch/bullbar loading whereas my own car only has 17mm dia wire which would give less downwards kick.
(I also use no swaybars - but hopefully have set
mine up better and adjusted brake lines and breathers etc whilst on my ramp- ).
FollowupID:
775727
Reply By: Rangiephil - Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 22:06
Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 22:06
No Range Rovers had swaybars until 1989 and Discos until AFAIR 1993.
They don't seem to suffer from broken shocks any more than other brands, even with 2 inch lifts.
But some brands of shocks do fail on them notably Rancho where the top eye separates because it is made of crappy steel and not tube, just welded strap.
My guess is that the shock manufacturers design the shock for the application, and "one size fits all" shocks are more susceptable than say OEM or branded shocks such as Billies or Koni.
I have a 2 inch lift on my RRC with no swaybar on the back as
well as Polyairs and have made air while towing on several occasions in my travels and never broken a shock. My billies need a rebuild now from dents.
So IMHO it is more because of poor quality albeit expensive poor quality shocks. Who could believe otherwise when sold by a company that sells springs to centre steering with no castor.
Regards Philip A
AnswerID:
499738
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:20
Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:20
And they had fantastic articulation didn't they Phil.
Falling into the big narrow rut and bouncing out and across was just to much for this shock I think.
FollowupID:
775742
Reply By: The Bantam - Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 23:54
Monday, Dec 03, 2012 at 23:54
I doubt that removal of the sway bar alone would cause the sort of damage in the picture, it is more like the shocks and
the springs where not matched.
If a ift is being achieved by use of springs that allow the
suspension to drop further longer shocks are required.
Many shocks can be ordered as standard or in various lifted lengths.
But this is typical of people fiddling with their
suspension and not knowing what they are doing.
Most leaf spring
suspension are limited by the leaves, although some like the early landrovers had limiting straps under the axle.
If a vehicle is designed without a stabaliser bar....that is all fine and beaut......but if a
suspension is designed with one.....you had better knwo what you are doing if you want to disconnect or remove it......mostly that is is illegal
cheers
AnswerID:
499742
Reply By: Member - John (Vic) - Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:19
Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:19
Very good thread Robin.
Lots of good info to think about.
AnswerID:
499745
Reply By: gbc - Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:31
Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 06:31
Its a common enough occurence when people set out to mod a vehicle. There's a lot of excitement about possible gains and just a little less worry about possible issues. My GQ comp ute had an 'a' framed rear for massive travel, and there were quite a few 'oh didn't think that would happen moments' as we went down that road.
Sites like outerlimits4x4 and pirate4x4 have dedicated 'bible' sections where people like myself have recorded tech information and links about all manner of modifications and repairs to all manner of vehicles over the last 15 odd years, so people who want to mod their rover/patrol/cruiser/hilux etc can research what they are about to do to their cars, and find out the ramifications before they find out the expensive way like we all did before knowledge was shared so easily over the internet. Old mate will now have the knowledge that what appears to be a garden variety 2" lifted adjustable shock will not also act as a limiting strap on the rear (guess) of a patrol with the sway bar disconnected. What he also needs to know is that if he puts a longer shock in, he's going to need to limit his upper travel 9(or inboard and invert the long shocks) and he's also going to need to fab up some spring retainers or limit straps to stop
the springs from simply falling out when it flexes.
AnswerID:
499746
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:36
Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:36
Its all good fun and experience all right GBC , I can imagine the effort and rewards behind your A frame rear end.
In this case the owners have a different objective and very limited budget - that being to get max articulation with least body roll whilst containing over 300kw - this is done by scrapping the swaybars and using much heavier springs - actually it all works
well mostly - at least the reason for fitting some limit straps has now become evident without me giving someone another lecture.
FollowupID:
775743
Follow Up By: gbc - Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:49
Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 08:49
Nice - bump steer city off the panhard without the swaybars? I can see why they are using adjustable shocks - they help a lot. I do miss having play cars sometimes, just don't miss not being able to afford a pit crew each night after we raced and broke it.
FollowupID:
775744
Reply By: Member - PJR (NSW) - Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:09
Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:09
I cannot believe what I read; "removing the sway bar" and not appearing to compensate for it's removal. I consider that dumb.
One thing that has annoyed me since we first started "playing" around with ours cars car and in particular their
suspension. And that is half baked or half done modifications that are not engineered and proven safely before installation can kill. Just because "lots do it" does not mean its the right way to go. And this thread and in particular the initial photo is evidence of my concern. Yes it costs funds to do it properly. So what! Both your life and others on the road or those filming/watching you in the bush are at stake. I am not preaching the enormous overplay on OH&S here that abounds these days. Just plain old common sense. Remember that!!
I learnt the hard way having a bad prang and damaging my Kingswood. Doug Chivas of Holden Dealer Team fame wisened me up and taught me a lot about car modification safety and project management side of it. Not the mechanicals as I am not "skilled" that way. He is the old bloke of rally fame who pushed the Holden at
bathurst years ago. Good bloke and a very wise man. (RIP)
If you are going to do something don't mess around with safety and good engineering practices. If you cannot afford the full job then design it to be done in affordable and properly engineered stages. ie get the right shocks for the longer springs and fit them first. If its worth doing then its worth doing properly.
Phil
AnswerID:
499747
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:10
Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:10
I wouldn't be to hard on them Phil - most of us played around with our cars and some of us stil do ( gives oneself a smack on hand).
A lesson was learnt without to much cost and learnt on private land not out on the road.
All in all I'm happy.
FollowupID:
775746
Follow Up By: Member - PJR (NSW) - Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:30
Tuesday, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:30
I hear what you are saying Robin. And yes a lot did fiddle with their cars. But I am sure that most didn't do anything as silly and dangerous as just remove an important part of the
suspension.
Anything we did, and I am talking about a few decades back, was generally cosmetic. Maybe with a paint job, bit of pinstriping or wider
wheels. I even put a heater in the Kingswood! They were an option.
Not to just take a part off.
Phil
This was my toy. I painted the white bits and fitted the
driving lights.
FollowupID:
775748