Mobile Phone Coverage Warning.
Submitted: Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 16:46
ThreadID:
104639
Views:
7115
Replies:
13
FollowUps:
20
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Michael P (QLD)
Hi,
Recently our friends at Telstra decided that they were not charging me enough for Mobile,
home & internet bundle.
Shopping around came up with a couple of packages that I was comfortable with.
Package A
Home & Internet.
\
Package B Mobile. Offering Telstra coverage, 98.5% of Australia via the 3G & 2G networks okay I can handle the slower speed.
On a recent trip to Western QLD, NW SA & NT. had very little coverage past
Dalby
Some in
Roxby Downs .
Rang the company from
Birdsville was told my handset was probably faulty.
The result companies buying wholesale from Telstra are not getting the full Telstra coverage.
Did not affect me greatly as I carry a sat phone and only wanted the mobile as a convenience. Could Affect the next person though.
Limited service was available (000). though.
Regards
Mike
Reply By: Notso - Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 18:00
Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 18:00
I have no complaints about Telstra's service.
In 2000 I travelled around Aus for 12 months, used a laptop and Mobile phone tethered for internet access. Cost me around $120.00 per month for that.
In 2009 I did the same sort of trip, Mobile phone tethered to laptop.
Cost around $40.00 per month, service better, faster, more reliable.
Any towns with 500 or more
population, and a whole heap with less, are covered. I guess if we want more than that then a Sat Phone is the answer, but there again I met a fella in
Palm Valley who couldn't get a signal on his. Valley walls too high.
AnswerID:
519402
Reply By: Ron N - Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 18:05
Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 18:05
If you've ever dealt with the alternatives, as in Optus and Vodaphone, then you start to appreciate just how much coverage Telstra has!
I seem to recall some deal about the mobile phone coverage around
Kalbarri a few years ago. Because there was some deal between Telstra and the
Kalbarri-ites, Telstra only agreed to put in a tower if they had exclusive coverage of the area covered by the tower.
This meant if you were with another carrier, it wasn't possible to roam using Telstras tower, because no roaming agreements had been put in place by Telstra for that area.
AnswerID:
519403
Reply By: Tim - Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 21:21
Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 21:21
Just a quick war story about mobiles.
Only last year I was about 200km from the nearest town with mobile coverage and got a freckle of reception in which time I got about 10 missed call texts with one saying there was an urgent job (emergency
services) and I was being recalled. I couldn't for the life of me find that half a freckle of service again so I went into the nearest
homestead I could find to use their land line. I couldn't find any one there and I struggled to get a conversation through on the UHF as they were some distance out. So I re-
check the time on my phone and sure enough full service. Turns out the
home stead area which was only about 3 or 4 buildings and a workshop had a little telstra Next g tower on its roof and it gave perfect reception within about 500m of the
homestead. I still don't know who the owners are and why they had their own mobile "tower" but worked perfectly.
Got a sat phone now so no need to go back either.
Tim
AnswerID:
519414
Reply By: Member - Wamuranman - Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 21:57
Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 21:57
Here is a recent Technology News article. Telstra is going from strength to strength. While some Telcos are still trying to solve problems with their 3G network Telstra has perfected 3G and 4G and is working on 6G. I rejoined Telstra after trying others and am happy to pay a premium price for a premium service.
Telstra trials next-gen mobile technologyBy Andrew Mudie
- September 11, 2013
In an attempt to further improve its standing as the provider of the fastest mobile broadband in Australia, (ASX: TLS) has announced that it has begun trials of the next generation of broadband technology. The technology, called ‘carrier aggregation’, or LTE-A, joins three separate radio frequencies together in order to provide superior internet speeds.
Laboratory testing has demonstrated download speeds of 450 megabits per second (MBPS) for the technology. These speeds will most likely not be repeatable in a commercial setup when thousands of users are connected to the service, but speeds of 150 MBPS appear reasonable. This compares
well with the proposed NBN speeds of 100 MBPS (Labour’s fibre to the
home) and 50 MBPS (Liberal’s fibre to the node).
Telstra has not detailed how long until the technology will be ready to roll out across Australia, although at present there is only one phone on the market capable of using it. To coincide with the rollout of the world’s first LTE-A network by SK Telecom in South Korea, Samsung has released a version of its flagship Galaxy S4 with the correct radios to use the technology. SK Telecom has advertised actual data speeds of up to 150 MBPS which would download an 800MB movie in around 43 seconds.
Carriers in North America and Russia have expressed an interest in developing LTE-A networks in the next 6 to 12 months, with more expected to follow in a similar manner to the rollout of the now-common 4G technology.
The next generation (6G) of the technology is expected to produce actual speeds of up to 300 MBPS.
Telstra was the first to set up a 4G network in Australia and look like it’ll be the first to set up the next generation network too. The network, when available, will likely draw more customers to the telco and allow the company to charge higher rates for faster data. With the NBN forcing Telstra to compete more evenly with other internet providers for cable-based internet, growing market share in mobile will become more important if the company is to continue growing value for shareholders.
AnswerID:
519421
Follow Up By: Bob Y. - Qld - Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 22:33
Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 22:33
Had time to use my iPad in Mt Isa last week, and surprised to see they have 4G.
Bit of a Telstra fan myself. When you live in western Qld, you don't have much choice. On odd occasions, late at night, I've received SMS' at over 100kms from the nearest cell, without any external aerial.
They just need to add some more cells along some of the major highways. Am sure these would soon pay for themselves, with use by most travellers.
Bob.
FollowupID:
799545
Reply By: The Bantam - Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 22:33
Tuesday, Oct 08, 2013 at 22:33
One thing to bear in mind is that many of the current crop of expensive smart phones have very poor low signal performance.
These days I run a $100 Nokia Asha...and it spanks almost everybody elses smart phone that I know for reception reliability.
I can make and recieve calls in the house with the Asha no problems but the handbrake has to go out in the yard to get a reliable signal from her HTC.
If you want good low signal performance and any results at all in some
places, you realy have to chose your phone
well.
cheers
AnswerID:
519423
Follow Up By: Candace S. - Wednesday, Oct 09, 2013 at 11:08
Wednesday, Oct 09, 2013 at 11:08
And to take that a few steps further...back in the days of analog cell phone service, my phone with a little pull-out antenna could make and receive calls from
places I now can't with today's fancy phones. (I'm talking about the mountains and deserts here in the U.S.)
FollowupID:
799558
Follow Up By: Ron N - Wednesday, Oct 09, 2013 at 17:44
Wednesday, Oct 09, 2013 at 17:44
Candace - Yep, the old analog phones had fabulous "skip" ability. I understand this was due to the signal strength from the analog towers, and the power of the old analog phones. Digital towers don't produce the same signal strength.
My first mobile in 1990 was a Uniden "brick" phone with 3 watt output!
I can recall making a call on my old Uniden from my a high point on my
farm 110kms South of
Perth - and it was picked up and relayed by the analog transmitter at
Geraldton - 425kms North of
Perth!!
FollowupID:
799591
Follow Up By: The Bantam - Wednesday, Oct 09, 2013 at 19:53
Wednesday, Oct 09, 2013 at 19:53
actually in Australia the power output of both the phones and the bases has not changed.
The range of the current generations of mobile phones is intentionally limited and for very good reason.
The term is latencey.
Because of the speed of the stream of data that travels to and from the handset, the range has to be limited......its to to with the time taken for the signal to travel to the phone and back.
No matter how much gain in the aerial or how strong the signal could be if a phone was modified.....the maximum range limit would be the same.
The range would also be limited if the above was not so, in an effort to allow more phones to be serviced by more bases closer together.
If the range was too far, each phone would be dealing with too many bases.
cheers
FollowupID:
799600