Sunday, Feb 23, 2014 at 15:16
There are definately reasons why some of the radios are cheaper IronJosh.
However you may never know or be affected by those reasons.
They include simple things like electronically poor ways to internal regulate power so radio uses more than than a better design does - but would that worry you ?
Other things include the fact that they might be only 1/2 as sensitive as others and you would never know - why because more and more no longer include specifications in there user guide . A friend just got a sub minature TX 3100 for xmas but I haven't followed it thru just yet to see how it stacks up apart from fact that it communicates quite
well in convoy stuff.
I needed some more junk UHFs the other day and brought there competitor the Oricom UHF300 - these sell for around $145.
1 failed out of the box as was replaced and now I have 2 good ones.
I was interested to see how they cut corners and one of the tricks is with the scanning.
With 80 channels scaning is more of an issue these days as it takes longer.
This radio takes around 10 seconds to scan the Band in OS mode.
Now like most radios they have the ability to scan selected channels - this sounds good as out in the dessert I often like to monitor just 3 or 5 main channels.
So if you thought it would be a lot faster to scan 5 channels instead of 80 you would be wrong.
Because of low grunt processors etc when it scans it still scans 80 when set to 5 however it just doesn't stop on the other 75 if they have a signal.
Hence it still takes 10 seconds and you loose lots of ability to hear other traffic.
Note - others may bring up GS mode scanning , in this mode they
check for a priorty set channel which will be found quicker but rest of scan still takes 10 secs.
Still the UHF300 delivers what I wanted for the cheap price.
AnswerID:
527068