Rear carmera.s And Mirror
Submitted: Wednesday, Apr 30, 2014 at 19:09
ThreadID:
107548
Views:
2204
Replies:
6
FollowUps:
3
This Thread has been Archived
new boy
Have a mate who has just brought a van and installed a camera at the rear, he,s claiming he doesnt need mirrors as he can see down the side of the van with the car mirrors and behind due to the camera.I still think he need extended mirrors whose right????
Reply By: The Bantam - Wednesday, Apr 30, 2014 at 22:39
Wednesday, Apr 30, 2014 at 22:39
Cameras are a great thing...but as said earlier, they do not resolve light as reliably as a mirror...in certain light conditions they are completly useless.
The other thing with cameras is that they are not direct vision and their field of verw may be different to the eye...thus the perspecive is distorted .....this makes judging distance, angles and proportion a bit deceptive and unreliable.
I have a camera on the back of my ute and I use it and need it every day.....but there is no way I would rely on it alone....I want some big mirrors too.
cheers
AnswerID:
531546
Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Thursday, May 01, 2014 at 07:41
Thursday, May 01, 2014 at 07:41
While we are on mirrors, one of the most ridiculous ADR rules is the one concerning curved mirrors. You know, the ones that state a warning that vehicles are closer than you think. They give a wider view but destroy the distance perception.
It is my experience that passing vehicles most often "cut in front" too soon after passing as they think they are further away. This is often dangerous at 100kph or more.
I just couldn't get used to reversing with a trailer and have had both my mirrors replaced with straight mirror glass. Now the distance judgement is fine and the left hand wide angle is achieved with a cheap circular mirror stuck in a corner of the full mirror.
The right hand mirror doesn't need wide angle so that stays "straight", but distance wise, what you see is an accurate representation of distance, making reversing much easier.
AnswerID:
531559