Wednesday, Sep 10, 2014 at 12:10
C'mon Alloy, ........... have you actually seen the park in question?
Of course unpowered sites are furtherest away, and as I said, that can be an attraction. But this one is quite remote and old. Water had been run to it, but it was NOT WORKING! Did not ask for grass!
Are you related to the park operators?
This area was NOT in development as a camping area. It was a patch of bare soil surrounded by piles of rubbish, old machinery, demolished building materials and general rubbish. IT WAS A RUBBISH TIP. We are accustomed to 'roughing it' but this was extreme and ugly and unhealthy.
The camp kitchen was actually closer to the 'non-powered' area than to the powered sites, but was in a poor state of maintenance and unhygienic. We actually decided to not use it.
It was late in the day, we did not know where an alternative park was, so we grudgingly put up with it. But never again!
I suggest that unless you have actually inspected it, you keep your critical comments to yourself.
Incidentally, it was not a whinge here. It was a warning to others as clearly it has not been cleaned up since we visited 12 months ago.
FollowupID:
823468