GU PATROL 4.2lt TD & 3lt TD pricing

Submitted: Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 16:34
ThreadID: 15748 Views:4639 Replies:7 FollowUps:6
This Thread has been Archived
Howdy one and all

I'm currently in the market to purchase a new 4wd for tax reasons and looking at either the 3lt or the 4.2lt TD GU Patrol. But what I can't figure out is the pricing difference for the same spec 4wd the 4.2 is nearly 8 grand more than the 3lt. And for sure it's not 8 grand better. I know the 3lt has had it's problems and the 4.2 is reliable but 8 grand more come on bit hard to chew for me.

Any one out there with there thoughts.

Rossco
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: RickB - Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 16:58

Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 16:58
Rossco,
I have been looking at both of these vehicles but am keener on the 4.2. The 4.2 TD are harder to find as it seems people want to hang onto them longer - as you said, it could be to do with the excellent history of that engine. I guess the 3.0 is still to suffering from earlier publicity.

Rick
AnswerID: 73587

Follow Up By: Michael - Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 20:32

Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 20:32
Hi Ya, i think its still suffering from ongoing reliability...
0
FollowupID: 333716

Reply By: andysgu - Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 17:59

Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 17:59
Hi Rossco
Apart from the 8 grand theres also the servicing the 4.2 is every 5,ooo kms and the 3lt every 1o,ooo kms . Performance on paper looks the same taking both for a spin back to back might find a diffrence . They certanly sound diffrent the trims are the same and you still get the same crappy cd radio so with the 8 grand you can get a good cd player tyres bullbar winch and heaps more.
Andy.
AnswerID: 73592

Follow Up By: Michael - Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 20:39

Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 20:39
If you buy a 3.0l. you may need the good Cd player....keep you entertained..whilst waiting for the NRMA..... LOL
0
FollowupID: 333717

Reply By: Michael - Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 20:30

Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 20:30
Hey Truckster, i think you are needed.. Please Explain.......
AnswerID: 73607

Reply By: Michael - Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 20:35

Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 20:35
Hi there Rossco 100 series... Toyota i guess,,, what are you trying to tell us? that you are crossing to the other side of town. to........ NISSAN???
AnswerID: 73610

Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 21:32

Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 21:32
Hi Rossco,

I too sure don't understand Nissans price strategy. I went through the same questions when I bought my GU and simply cannot justify the $8K, especially when the 3.0TD drives better and has better fuel economy.

There are obviously no R & D costs left for Nissan to justify the difference, also the manufacturing tooling would be well and truly paid for. I reckon the 4.2TD would actually be cheaper to produce than the 3.0TD, so where is the $8K difference!!!

Also, resale of both 3.0TD and 4.2TD is 67% @ 3 years, so again no price justification on resale advantage. Throw in the 5,000km vs 10,000km service intervals and only makes the 3.0TD look better again.

All I can put it down to is that they plan at some stage to bring out the 4.5TD (3.0TD + 2 cylinders) and want to keep the price roughly the same. At the moment, any 4.2TD sold is a lot of cream to Nissan IMHO.

Cheers

Captain
AnswerID: 73622

Follow Up By: Billy - Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:15

Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 08:15
Captain,

I agree with you, at these kind of volumes pricing has less to do with cost of sale and more to do with market positioning. I'm not sure how interested Nissan are in selling 4.2's to anyone other than some of the commercial cab-chassis buyers who obviously demand it and pay a fleet rate. I suppose they figure, put 8 grand on it in the wagon and if anyone is still keen, then great!.
0
FollowupID: 333749

Reply By: Member - Cocka - Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 21:47

Sunday, Aug 22, 2004 at 21:47
Rossco I've got the 3.0 & bought it privately with 15k on the clock and fully fitted out. It was at a great price and great buy. I mention this only to say that it has served me very well for touring which I think is where the two vehicles (4.2 & 3.0) would be comparable.

My only reservation with the 3.0 is in the towing department, here I have a 2tonne twin axel boat trailer that I like to pull around. Whilst the wagon does the job around Syd and say up to the central coast, I don't know that I would take it all the way to Qld. This is where the 4.2 would show its muscle, maybe that's the way I'll go some time in the future.
AnswerID: 73628

Reply By: GUPatrol - Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:48

Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 10:48
Rossco,

When I bought my GU TD4.2 in 1999, the choice was easy, there was a choice of 4.2 or 2.8....
A friend of mine however bought his Patrol in 2003 and asked my opinion, so we drove both the 4.2 and the 3.0, although some people say the 3.0 drives better I disagree, I would say it is different car, drives totally different.. I like the laziness of the 4.2 for bush work and the peace of mind (reliability), but the 3.0L rocks in the city as it is fast and agile compared to the lazy 4.2...
With regards to power on paper, what you have to look at which is more important than the power itself is at what rpm does the engine develop that power?
Ie: the 3.0L has a very narrow power band between 3000 to 4000 rpm it sings, but the 4.2 power band starts at 1500-1800 rpm and don't rev it above 3200 rpm because you ain't gone get anymore...
Going back to my friends purchase, we decided that for value for money (back then it was $5 grand) he should go for the 3.0L...
He did, but in a year he has had more troubles than mine in five years and mine has triple the kms....
All the problems mentioned in this forum are true, from the pulley bearings, air sensors, ECUs and engines blowing up, I have seen them all at close range... I have several close friends who bought them...
So in my opinion if the 3.0L was reliable, no problems...I like it, it goes well and it is excellent value for money... But is it value for money if it brakes down just as you are about to head off on your trip or even worse, during the trip?? And then you have to wait three weeks for the engine to be replaced?
Also, when Nissan replaces the engine (they perforate pistons) they only give you one year or 20000kms warranty, does that tell you anything??
The 4.2 on the other side, it is old technology, lazy etc but goes forever, Nissan still uses it in the civilian buses even in naturaly aspirated form....
Check the workshop manuals for both, you will find the engine tolerances on both, the 4.2 can be machined (ie head machining) exchange injectors, etc...
The 3.0L shows, no tolerances for machining, throw away and replace with a new one, no exchange injectors... etc etc....
I can't understand Nissan's pricing strategy either, but it is what suits you what matters not how much money they make...
Do you know how much money does Telstra/Optus make on each SMS??
Good luck with you choice....
AnswerID: 73663

Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:18

Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 11:18
Hi GUPatrol,

I can't say I agree with your statement "the 3.0L has a very narrow power band between 3000 to 4000 rpm it sings". Did you know that the max torque of 354Nm (20Nm more than the '99 4.2TD) is developed at 2,000 rpm? And that 80% of max torque is available from 1,500rpm to 3,500rpm?. That, IMHO, is far from a narrow torque band. But the 3.0TD does suffer from low torque just off idle (but "fixed" with a Dtronic).

In the interests of balanced reporting, you fail to mention about the issues of 4.2TD have with overheating (fixed when Nissan put the bigger radiator in with the intercooler) or the harmonic balancer issues. But fully agree that overall, the 4.2TD has had far less issues than 3.0TD.

While the series II 3.0TD had more than its fair share of problems, the series III is well sorted. There isn't a vehicle made that is problem free and if you look at the sheer number of 3.0TD sold compared to 4.2TD, then you will see % wise there will be more issues even though the reliability is on par. The reputation of the 3.0TD suffered badly because of the series II and many lump all GU 3.0TD motors as the same, which they are not.

Cheers

Captain
0
FollowupID: 333767

Follow Up By: GUPatrol - Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:41

Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:41
Captain,

I am not interested in a debate.
I am aware of the figures but did you actually put them in a dyno and see how the torque figures on the 3.0L drop quickly once below those rpm?
I am not bagging the 3.0L in fact I like it and on the recent London to Sydney rally, a friend of mine towed a support trailer with one of them and when a rally car broke down they were towing trailer and rally car for a while and did a superb job.
I just posted some facts.
About the overheating problems on 4.2s in 190000kms and several tough trips (inc towing) mine has never overheated...
Harmonic balancer.. Don't know I never had any problems and I never heard more than one example of that.
With regards to sale numbers, count the GQs since 1988 and the Civilian buses and the 4.2 outnumbers the 3.0L.
But as I said, I am not into a debate to find out which one is better....
Will
0
FollowupID: 333771

Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 17:12

Monday, Aug 23, 2004 at 17:12
Hi Will,

Nah, not trying to start a debate. I suppose I get a bit defensive of the GU series III 3.0TD, cause it seems to get bagged so much when IMHO I don't think it deserves it.

All of us have different reasons on why they choose a vehicle and it would be a sad day if we all wanted the same one! I hear what you say about the torque curve and agree that it drops quickly at low rpms. But I have a Dtronic and that makes a big difference.

But I should stick to comparing standard engines, not Dtronic modifed ones (the 4.2TD responds very nicely to a bigger turbo and freeflow exhaust and improves it out of sight - more than evens up any difference).

Cheers

Captain
0
FollowupID: 333792

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)