Brand New Patrol : 4.2TDi or 3.0TD for towing a 1600kg Boat?

Submitted: Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:56
ThreadID: 16957 Views:4138 Replies:14 FollowUps:23
This Thread has been Archived
I'll be Buying the New Patrol very soon. I had my sights on the 4.2TDi but the salesman reckons that i'm wasting my money on the 4.2TDi if all i'll be towing is a 1600kg boat. He said the 3.0TD has no problems towing under 2500kg and that i'm better off spending that $7000kg on other gear.

What are your thoughts, should I save the $7000 which I can spend on accesories ie, dual battery, bullbar, lights, fridge etc or pay the extra $7000 and get the 4.2TDi?
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:59

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:59
Pay the extra $7000 and get the 4.2TDi without fail.

You will NEVER EVER regret it.
AnswerID: 79693

Follow Up By: Utemad - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:20

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:20
I can feel another 200 reply post coming on!!!!

Plenty of stuff in the archives on this (and I mean PLENTY).
0
FollowupID: 339071

Follow Up By: Member - Luxoluk - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 13:36

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 13:36
Have you looked at the Toyota range?? Bound to be something there and no questions over reliablilty, resale, technology etc etc etc...!! Cheers
0
FollowupID: 339093

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 23:01

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 23:01
"... no questions over reliablilty, resale, technology etc etc etc...!! "
what problems are there with the 4.2? apart from none.

Theres a reason the 3.0 is CHEAPER.... pay for what you get.
0
FollowupID: 339211

Follow Up By: Member - Luxoluk - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 23:28

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 23:28
Glad to see you couldn't resist letting that one go to the keeper! Cheers
0
FollowupID: 339221

Reply By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:24

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:24
Gday John,

Mate, are you intending on doing trips etc or is it just soley for towing? If just for towing, you'd be better of getting the 4.8 petrol!

But by the sounds of things with all of those accessories, you will be travelling. Do you care too much about long term economy, resale value? The series III 3L seems to have overcome it's teething problems and is indeed quite a good performer.

The new TDI is a TD6 and although tough as nails, is about as quick as well. Very sluggish, and a bit of an underpeformer. You would be looking at around $1,500-2,000 to bring it up a good tow vehicle, especially if towing 1,600kgs.

The 3L is more computerised which means you can plug in a Ditronic and get 20% increase in 5 minutes. But the old donk being the near mechanical 4.2 is proven and will last a flamin long time!

Pros and cons, you just have to weigh up your needs. There are drivers of both on this forum so get as much info as you can then make your decision.

Good luck mate,

Chris.
AnswerID: 79700

Reply By: Chaz - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:33

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 12:33
Hi John,
Why would you want to pay $7000 more for less power and torque?
Why pay more for the privilege of higher registration and insurance fees?
Why would you want to pay more for higher maintenance and servicing?
And why pay more for higher fuel consumption?
Apart from the reliability issues with the early 3.0 liters, I see no reason to choose the 4.2 over the 3.0.
You'll hear strong opinions on both, but the 3.0l won the most economical large 4wd award last year, so if cost is an issue, there is no choice.
Just my opinion
AnswerID: 79702

Follow Up By: Michael ( Moss Vale NSW) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 13:28

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 13:28
Hi John, I dont know what Chaz drives but first hand is if you can afford the 4,2 buy it , you will get the 7 grand back when you sell, You will be able to sell very easily if you sell privately, much more easily than the 3.0L. Less to go wrong and less stressed engine. The diff ratios are higher in the 4.2 so you dont have the enging ringing in your ears at 120kph & much better low down torque. The sales guy would rather sell you a 3.0l because he probably has a heap of them in stock and its probably better to sell you one of the floor than lose you to some other dealer if you have to wait tooo long for a 4.2tdi from him.
0
FollowupID: 339090

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:56

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:56
Why would you want to pay $7000 more for less power and torque?
Why pay more for the privilege of higher registration and insurance fees?
Why would you want to pay more for higher maintenance and servicing?
And why pay more for higher fuel consumption?
~~~~~~
1) better resale
2) Better reliability
3) Bullet proof at least 800,000klm engine
4) Higher Insurance? Bzzzzzzzzz.
5) higher maintenance and servicing?
6) THEY SOUND LIKE A REAL ENGINE
I could go on, but CBF...
0
FollowupID: 339264

Follow Up By: Chaz - Wednesday, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:21

Wednesday, Oct 13, 2004 at 01:21
Truckster,
I know that there is no way in the world that anyone could convince you that the 3.0 is worth a mention, but I chose one over the 4.2 because of those reasons. They are all valid and based on facts, resale and reliability didn't come into it because I probably won't keep it past 100,000ks and I see no point in spending another $7000 just to hope I get it back when I sell! I only had $50,000 to spend, so it was either a 3.0l patrol or some other make of vehicle. I think I got a good deal and I'm very happy with the car as I see you are with yours.
Cheers
0
FollowupID: 339342

Reply By: cokeaddict - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 13:47

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 13:47
Hi John,
I am on my second 4.2 GQ
First one hit 600,000 Kms without problems. Reason for selling it was I wanted a turbo for extra power up hills while towing my new trailer. Got excellent money for my old girl. Sorry i sold it actually. The one i have now is in mint condition and will stay that way for as long as i can keep it that way. 214,00 kms old now and tight as new. The way i see it, YES it is down on power on the 3ltr but if your not in a hurry to get to your destination then i cant see what the fuss is all about.

In short, go the 4.2. reliability to the max. And as some others stated, money back when you sell it.

Just my shillings worth.
AnswerID: 79711

Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 14:36

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 14:36
Hi JohnZA,

I have a 2003 GU 3.0TD that I have had for nearly 12 months now after selling my 1HZ 4.2 diesel 80 series. I regularly tow a 1.6T offroad van and could not be happier with it.

There is a lot of debate on this forum about the 3.0TD engine and I am not going to get drawn in to it, however all I will say is that I am VERY happy with the 3.0 Theres a lot of armchair critics of the 3.0 but if you talk to OWNERS of the 3.0TD, all are very happy (but note that the series II (~2000 to mid 2001) did have issues ).

As for towing, there is simply no comparison between the GU 3.0TD (with Dtronic)and my old 80 series 4.2 diesel (non turbo but with extractors and 2 1/2 exhaust). While the 3.0 does not have the same torque at idle as a 4.2TD, as soon as revs are greater than ~900 rpm there is more torque availble and I do not have an issue with it. I am more concerned about the lack of low range gearing in the whole GU range compared to my cruiser (low ratio of 2.0 compared to cruiser 2.5).

At ~1200rpm there is 350Nm and max torque of 420Nm is at 2,000rpm. What was a 3rd gear hill in the cruiser is easily tackled in 5th with the 3.0TD, there is THAT much difference (272Nm cruiser vs 420Nm Dtronic GU). I have not driven the "new" 3.0TD, but max torque without Dtronic is up from 354Nm to 380Nm.

I have not towed with a GU4.2TD, but there is a very noticeable difference in power when driving and assume it would transalte to a similair difference when towing. However, the 4.2TD is a VERY competent tow vehicle and I am sure you would be very happy with it if you went down that track.

In short I am very happy with the 3.0TD. It makes a great tow vehicle, has great fuel economy (11.5 L/100 city and 15.7 L/100 towing 1.6T at 100km/hr - probably a lot better with a boat due to lower profile) and I would not hesitate to go the same way given the current vehicles and prices in the market.

Cheers

Captain
AnswerID: 79719

Follow Up By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 14:51

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 14:51
Hear Hear!

Actually mate, I have noticed the gearing. I was having my first 'hard' play out on some firetrails last at Mt Tamborine last weekend.

Going down a steep chopped out section of track and was definitely going to fast for my liking. Turned on the air con to knock it down a bit. The GQ was great as it crawled and idled around 550rpm but I found both the mix of 750-800 rpm and the gearing way too fast for my liking...Had the brakes on hard and still had that funny little flutter as I dropped into the hole...

Cheers

Chris.
0
FollowupID: 339101

Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 15:07

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 15:07
Hi Chris,

Yeah, I know exactly what you mean. Nissan has arguably the best drivetrain and stock suspension available for 4WDriving, yet they put a bleep y 2.0:1 low range ratio!!! Even the VW Tourag has a 2.7:1 - go figure???

Apart from that, its a great offroad package regardless of which engine one chooses.

Cheers

Captain
0
FollowupID: 339107

Follow Up By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 15:16

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 15:16
Captain,

Agreed! Whichever way he goes, he'll have a win...although my locker failed to engage yesterday when I needed it most, it's going back to my fitter on Thursday, but I had to push the patrol pretty hard to get back up this hill, even with the power I have these days...

I have a small noise now coming somewhere from the drivetrain, sounds like a clunk noise, like the noise you get when your suspension is working really hard. Happens when I steer and under acceleration and/or over bumps. Needle in a haystack but any ideas? I think it may be something that's let go and is swinging in the breeze...

Chris.
0
FollowupID: 339109

Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 15:26

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 15:26
Hi Chris,

I have a rattling/knocking type noise from the front right when offroad. It turned out to be the "cover" on the front spring housing. Mine was simply a piece of thin metal held in place by a couple of screws. It rattled under certain conditions and I stopped many a time thing something was caught/loose but could never find it. Finally accidently tapped it when cleaning mud out and bingo all became clear. Hopefully yours is something similair.

With your lift kit, is it perhaps the anti roll bar. It must be moved a fair way now from its original position and may be too close under suspension movement?

Cheers

Captain
0
FollowupID: 339113

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 23:02

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 23:02
"but if you talk to OWNERS of the 3.0TD, all are very happy"

I'd put $100 on that being wrong.
0
FollowupID: 339214

Reply By: TD6 - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 15:51

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 15:51
If you're planning on doing a lot of towing then the only real choice is the 4.2. Proven reliability, good resale, and economical. I drag just under a 2 tonne boat up and down the east coast without problems. Originally with a GQ 4.2 and now a GU 4.2 TDi. The only advantage of the 3.0 in this area is it's pull off the mark. It is definitely quicker than the 4.2 but then again who cares. Most people buy a diesel as a work horse not a race car. To satisfy your curiosity go to any of the trailer boat Game Fishing comps around Aust and see how many of the boys are towing big boats with 3.0 vs 4.2
AnswerID: 79732

Reply By: Kiwi Ray - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 16:06

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 16:06
Stick with the 4.2 bigger engine less stress and proven.
Bigger enginrs generaly have a more useable power and torque band at the revs use normally drive at, not up close to the red line
Ray
AnswerID: 79735

Reply By: Flash - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 16:35

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 16:35
Manual or Auto?
The 3.0 in a manual is a bit hard on clutches due lack of low down torque.
I've had my 4.2 for fourteen years, and it is quite simply the most reliable car I've had in my whole life- and by a wide margain. NOTHING has broken apart from the clock.
I eventually got around to bolting on a turbo and now it goes like the clappers.
The newer 4.2's get much worse economy than my old girl, probably anti pollution gear eg: exhaust gas recirculation etc.

What would I buy in a new one tomorrow.......
Probably a 3.0
With oil heading for $55 a barrel and possibly not stopping for a long time yet I think it's no contest.
Everybody I know with later 3.0's love their vehicles without exception.

(For that matter I know a few owners of early 3.0's and no problems!)
Cheers
AnswerID: 79747

Follow Up By: JohnZA - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 08:02

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 08:02
Definately going manual Flash.
0
FollowupID: 339238

Follow Up By: Flash - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:20

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 10:20
With a 3 litre you would miss the low down torque of the 4.2.
The 3.0's have no grunt till you get more revs up- makes the decision harder!
Good luck.
0
FollowupID: 339252

Follow Up By: JohnZA - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:20

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 11:20
I been reading about this Safari Dtronic for the 3.0TD. It looks impressive as it gives consideable improvement over the whole rev range. Power goes up (15%) from 116kw at just over 3500revs to a broader 133kw centred around the same revs. Torque has also jumped (19%) from 354Nm at 2000rpm to 420Nm, with 380Nm being available from just off idle at 1500rpm right through to 3000rpm.

With the new manual patrol does that mean power goes up from 118KW to 136KW and torque from 380Nm to 452Nm?

They also state that they get at least 5% better economy and can prolong clutch life by allowing the driver to let the clutch out earlier and then accelerate afterwards.
0
FollowupID: 339272

Reply By: Member -Dodger - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 17:56

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 17:56
Mines a 4.2td not the cooled job, it has towed 1.8 tonne for three yrs and handles it with ease. Yes its heavier on fuel but thats the way it is at least with very little in the way of computer tech it can be fixed in the bush with very little no how however after 120 grand still waitin for trouble.
I used to have a handle on life, but it broke.

Cheers Dodg.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 79760

Reply By: sean - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 21:11

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 21:11
I have had both and towed with both.

The 3 litre wins hands down as a tow vehicle. It is better powered and more economical - especially when towing.

The 4.2 (current model) in my experience is not good tow vehicle by any measure.

Maybe check the 4.8 as said by others.

Sean
AnswerID: 79804

Follow Up By: TD6 - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 21:48

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 21:48
Depends on how far you want to tow.

I know when I kicked the girl in the guts at Port Douglas I'm going to get home without the help of Nissan or some electronic expert.
0
FollowupID: 339191

Follow Up By: sean - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:28

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:28
TD6, how do you find yours for power and economy when you tow. Mine is woeful. Agree with the peace of mind though after having had an early 3 litre.

Standard Td6 is so gutless that at 100 even towing and small one tonne loaded trailer, cant overtake without miles and miles of room. Road trains, well just forget it.

Cant see the point in having to spend all that money on a 4.2 then have to spend another 2500 and lose some of the reliability so as to make it go if its a tow vehicle that one wants.

If we are talking about tow vehicles , then outright bush reliability si not hte issue. Anywhere that you can tow a 1600kg boat is not gonna be a problem if you get some electrical problem. Cant see why so many people get so concerned with the relaibilty issue when roadside assist will do the job and lets face it, where are all the late model nissan failures???

Sean
0
FollowupID: 339233

Follow Up By: TD6 - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:08

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:08
Sean,

I think you and I have swapped notes on this issue before on another forum. From memory you were getting lousy economy and a distinct lack of pull around the 100k mark. Mine is the opposite. As an example last year I towed a Kimberly camper with a 12 ft tinny on top, outboard, 4 people with relevant camping gear from Sydney to Arhnem Land. I averaged 12 ltr / 100 k. As far as power is concerned I don't have an issue. Sitting on 100 - 110 I still have a heap of power to pull out around road trains etc. As a matter of fact it is one of the things I enjoy about driving this model. In the old GQ I was always looking for the right opportunity to overtake and then work my way back through the box for the right gear. With the TD6 I can just stamp on it in 5th and go around most situations.
Out of interest I did this trip with a mate in a 3.0 ltr with a Dtronics. He was also towing a CT. Along the Barkly at one point he commented over the radio that his auto was constantly kicking back from top and he felt that he was pushing the motor too hard. Can't remember the revs he said but we were sitting on about 115 k at the time. Out of curiosity I pulled out to see if I could go around him and I did this with ease.
I have done nothing to the motor as far as mods are concerned. Has a Safari Snorkel, Duel fuel filter system, and I run standard everything in the oil, air and fuel filter elements. At that time I had approx 25k on the clock. 2003 model.
Possibly a case of a Wednesday build vs a Friday build, I don't know.
0
FollowupID: 339277

Reply By: Suba Mac - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 22:10

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 22:10
I have read a lot about both these vehicles and if you read the Nov 2004 4x4 Aust it tends to suggest that Nissan want to drop the 4.2 as it would cost too much to redevelop it for the Euro emission standards.

You will get plenty of debate from people who own the vehicles and the one eyed lovers of the 4.2. I would suggest you speak do a couple of things to settle the argument for yourself:

See if you can get some accurate power torque curves and gearbox / diff ratios to prove what is said about whether the 3.0 does actually work harder and/ or rev its guts out (plus take them both for a test drive). If the dealer is serious about selling you either of these vehicles that should be able to loan you the car for at least a couple of hours (you are making a $50k purchase here)

Speak to some independant people that service and maintain both vehicles and get their opinions.

Chris
AnswerID: 79823

Follow Up By: Member - Chris M (QLD) - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:38
Nissans opinion is that the 3L is better. I've been through all of that...and the ST is much better than the DX in offroad conditions. I laughed, pretended to agree, cried poor and bought a DX 4.2TDI. Only reason I bought the 4.2 is because I owned a 4.2TD in the GQ. Never a problem, and my motto is if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Nissan may want to drop the motor, but all said and done, I'd say there'll be alot of people keeping the TD42 until it dies!

My neighbour tows a new 21 ft caravan with his 3L, just got back from FNQ without a hitch. So all in all, depends on whether you want low end power to tow or top end. If you want it all, go the 4.8!
0
FollowupID: 339235

Reply By: angler - Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 23:33

Monday, Oct 11, 2004 at 23:33
Mine is a 3 litre turbo automatic and I tow over two tonnes. I get about 6K/L on tow and around 9K/L without the van. I love it, great car, bit rough to ride in, lousy tyre life with the originals but that's the tyres problem not Nissan. I am looking for a second hand Dtronic without much luck so far. (cant afford a new one)
AnswerID: 79837

Follow Up By: Old Johno [NSW] - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:44

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:44
Angler, I have a D'Tronics unit for a 3.0 litre GU that is about 18months old, I have just purchased a 4.2 & do not need the D'tronics any longer so will sell the unit for approx half price if you are interested
Send a reply if interested
0
FollowupID: 339278

Follow Up By: JohnZA - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 13:45

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 13:45
Old Johno, any particular reason why you got rid of the 3.0TD with the Dtronic and went for the 4.2TDi ????

Also whats the difference between the 2 with regards to towing and fuel economy?
0
FollowupID: 339285

Follow Up By: Old Johno [NSW] - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 15:14

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 15:14
JohnZA,
I was mainly looking for the low down towing capacity as a couple of my mates have similar vehicles and where very happy with them.
The 3.0 litre I had towed well but was an automatic and I was worried that with long hauls and with the gears going up & down continuously it might not be good at the end of the day [I have previosly had an Automatic blow up out of Cobar]. I wanted to trade to a manual and when looking at the power ratings considered that the 4.2 might suit me better.
I have 7,000km's on the clock of the 4.2 & have had the 3" Mandril bent exhaust fitted, incl the 3" bend from the turbo and the high flow muffler[Power difference is notable] . We have just done a run from Sydney through brisbane, toowoomba, Kingaroy, Dalby, goondiwindi & back to Sydney [3,800km's in 3 weeks] & am moore than happy with the 4.2.
Whilst we had the 3.0litre we did a trip up through Mt isa, Alice & return to Sydney via the Murray towing the same van [10,000km's in 5 weeks] and was also more than happy.
Towing consumption woud be fairly similar & even possibly slightly better with the 3.0 litre but I do not regret purchasing the 4.2
0
FollowupID: 339294

Reply By: JohnZA - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 07:50

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 07:50
Wow, thanks for all your replies everyone, much appreciated!!!!

I think i'll ask if I can test drive both vehicles for a couple of hours including towing the boat if they let me that is.

Another question I have is, by installing a dtronic on the 3.0TD, how much will this stress the engine more?
AnswerID: 79857

Follow Up By: angler - Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 21:12

Tuesday, Oct 12, 2004 at 21:12
OLD Johno,

Quite interested in the dtronic. write direct to info@nqcc.com.au

Angler
0
FollowupID: 339327

Reply By: JohnZA - Monday, Oct 18, 2004 at 13:02

Monday, Oct 18, 2004 at 13:02
Took both for a test drive with the boat on the back. The 4.2TDi definately felt more comfortable on take off and definately had less revs when cruising at 80km. The 3.0td defiantely felt like it was being worked harder.

AnswerID: 80685

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)