Digital cameras - whats good value
Submitted: Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 00:44
ThreadID:
18237
Views:
4759
Replies:
31
FollowUps:
20
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Captain (WA)
I am looking to buy a digital camera in the 3-5 megapixel range, mainly for holiday/family snap shots, nothing too complicated, something that you point, adjust the zoom and shoot. But some things I would like are;
1) rechargeable Li batteries (current one eats 4xAA as fast as I can feed it),
2) quick press and save (current camera takes up to a second from the button push to what it actually shoots)
3) Good LCD screen (current one is virtually invisible in daylight)
As you have probably figured, its about time I updated my current camera (it was the latest model many years ago!). While I would like to be able to take a good picture, I don't need a huge mega pixel count or countless manual functions with F stop variations or whatever that is :) I have looked at a Kodak 3 MP with 3x optical zoom and it has a neat rotary button for different modes. While this looks good for the novice (me!!!), is it good in practice? I currently have a 256mb CF card so it would be convinient if the new camera took CF cards, but thats not critical.
My budget is in the $300-$500 range, and I would simply like a camera thats good value and suits my needs, any recommendations would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Captain
Reply By: Member -Dodger - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:28
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:28
Hi Captain,
Have a look at the Finepix by FUJI range they are an amature's dream easy to use and up to 5 megapixel when required. Yes they are adjustable for the Megapixel. Take great shots when in auto mode with the flash used when the camera thinks it's required however they take an xd card. However if you have a lap top then you down load and organise the pics as you go. I do this as the memory (
mine) is not as good as the cameras. Also they are not too hard on batteries, I have ben using recharge batts for about three yrs on all my small elecs and have gone back to the normal duracell as they last
well and the recharge do not. Also I have been in the hot regions around 40 to 50 deg C mark and the recharge batts die in the heat.
As lap tops are quite cheap at the moment I would suggest that if you do not have one then get one as they have a lot more uses when travlin than you think.
AnswerID:
86713
Reply By: Oz Feroz - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:47
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 01:47
Hi Captain, I did the same a couple of months ago, and after a long research on reviews and articles, and test with my mates cameras, I bought a canon Ixus 430. Its a bit out of your budget (if u
shop around u can get for about $580), but it will make you happy. Light, compact dimensions, quite long battery life (dedicated rechargeable lithium battery), quick shoot, burst shoot ( the capacity to shoot up to five pics per second, to get that magic but fast moment...), AVI movie capable with audio, 4 megapixels, big CCD (what makes the pics detailed), it uses Compact Flash cards, it has many good manual settings plus a reliable totally auto mode, very user friendly,good x3 optical zoom(total x11 with the digital one), sharp 118000 pixel LCD screen, always visible. Ah, last thing: it makes unbelievable crisp, natural pictures. U can check here to have more info: www.dpreview.com/reviews/read_opinions.asp?prodkey=canon_s410
(it says Canon 410, but that's the USA name of our 430). I know the price is a bit higher than u are looking for, but it worths the sacrifice; beside, the new version (Ixus Digital 40) it's just out on the market, so with a bit of patience u will see the 430 price dropping down soon soon....hope this can help your choice, have a good day, bye
AnswerID:
86715
Follow Up By: Member - Bruce (San Diego) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:07
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:07
Captain,
In my business I use the Kodak 3 megapixle, I take up to 100 photos a day and have had no problems in 2 years. The reasons I like it:
1. Its simple
2. I can take up to 500 photos on a charge
3. With the docking cradle/charger its always charged ready to go
4. I have not replaced the battery in two years
5. very simple to download photos
6. at the same quality settings it actually seems to take better photos than my Pentax 1std SLR digital with Tamaron lens.
Kodax gets my vote.
Bruce
FollowupID:
345279
Follow Up By: Member - Mungo Explorer (NSW) - Sunday, Dec 05, 2004 at 03:54
Sunday, Dec 05, 2004 at 03:54
I've just ordered that one - it was the small size and rugged construction that made me do it. I have several cameras, both digital and film, but was really looking for something I can just slip into the pocket when out and about. Plus, the current deal of camera plus due sublimation printer for a total of $580 was just too good to resist...
FollowupID:
346079
Reply By: motherhen - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:17
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 02:17
I've seen some really good prices in Retravision catelogues and Harvey Norman. Even specialist camera shops would be worth, and you may get a bit more advice to help you choose than by purchasing from a non-specialist store.
Choice magazine (if you're not a member - do check it out at your library) did tests on the medium price range in their October magazine. The models in the shops are generally one bigger and better than those in the test, but it will give you a guide. That's how rapidly they are changing.
Well worth a look at Choice before you buy. You can also go to www.choiceextra.com.au, where you can "buy" reports. Most have a shutter delay of around ½ a second - this is shown in the chart in the magazine. Makes it hard getting baby pictures - but at least you can take a quick succession of shots and just delete the worst ones.
My very cheap BenQ "point and shoot" 1.3 mp has achieved some brilliant shots - but i am looking to upgrade evntually. I will choose one with the extra big veiwing screen so i can see it! Trouble is - unlike buying real estate - these cameras just keep coming out with more for less $s - so i'm not buying quite yet. I will also choose one with good lens and optical zoom, and plent y of memory for travelling.
AnswerID:
86717
Follow Up By: Squizzy - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:20
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:20
Take Motherhens advice.
These sort of questions always demand an answer from biased people. It is like 'what is the best 4WD vehicle to buy?'
Geoff.
FollowupID:
345283
Follow Up By: Des Lexic - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:38
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:38
check out this site www.dpreview it has all the info on all the camera's
FollowupID:
345319
Reply By: Nudenut - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:55
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 07:55
i got the missus an Optio 555
great little Camera
has a good optical zoom capabilities also...and very small camera but bit more than your budget....but have a look .....maybe they might convince you to be allowed to be "sold up"
AnswerID:
86730
Reply By: Matt14 - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:11
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:11
Captain
There is currently a run out on Olympus C725 model.
Its 3.3megapixel and 8x Optical zoom.
Pretty hard to beat for value!
Might be hard to find by now. Try some online camera stores!
cheers
AnswerID:
86733
Reply By: Member - Brian (Gold Coast) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:15
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:15
Captain,
we went through this dilemma two years ago, bought a 2 meg pixel Panasonic, it's a good camera and has taken some great shots, us being very basic users. My only gripe with it is the delay between the button and the "save", as you mentioned. We are now looking to upgrade our video cam, so we're going through it all again!
The thing is to have a really good look around and compare the ones you are interested in. I then compare "specs" on the internet to make a short list, by doing the homework away from the salesman you can make your mind up unbiased.
Definitely
shop around for the best prices, I don't know about WA, but the retailers here, like Harvey, Retra, etc will slice the price to get the sale!
Hope this helps and good luck! Let us know what you end up with!
AnswerID:
86734
Reply By: old-plodder - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:36
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 08:36
If you wasnt to compare them and see whats available, go to the web site
http://www.dpreview.com/
Prices in Us dollars though. Good selection page, put in pixels, zoom etc.
John C
AnswerID:
86738
Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:12
Reply By: MrBitchi - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:36
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:36
Captain, couple more things to consider.
I find just about any LCD screen is pretty useless in
bright sunlight. Find a camera that gives you all the info you need through the viewfinder (that's how all cameras where used until recently anyway) and just use the LCD to review, or in low light. Turning the LCD off will also save your batteries.
I also find I need to use my reading glasses to read the tiny screen, whereas I can use my Canon SLR just fine without them. PITA to have to carry them all the time.
I have a Pentax Optio S3, $198 from BigW. Great camera for happy snaps (3.2MP, 3xOptical) and so small it drops in your pocket or in the console no probs, but I have the same issue with the LCD. Unfortunately this camera doesn't show all details in the viewfinder so I still have to use the LCD to check focus etc. I'll know what to look for next time.
AnswerID:
86755
Follow Up By: theshadows - Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 21:37
Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 21:37
EVF's cost a lot of money....only the the hight end Fuji and minoltta's have them atm. some lecia's and canon and nikon as
well but you up over a grand for one.
shadow
FollowupID:
345728
Follow Up By: MrBitchi - Friday, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:08
Friday, Dec 03, 2004 at 09:08
Nikon Coolpix 4800 from centre.net for $629, Canon Powershot S1 IS $620 same place.
First two I found with google so must be many more around this price range. The canon also has a rotating LCD screen. Pretty good value me thinks.
Has to be the only way to go.
John
FollowupID:
345762
Reply By: flappan - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:37
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:37
I've got a Fuji S3000. 3.2mp, and 10X Optical zoom.
Thats been ungraded to the S3500. 4mp but dropped to 6X Zoom.
I know a few guys with the Fuji S5000 and really happy with those , and they have also been upgraded to the S5500.
Haven't heard of anyone unhappy with their Fuji product.
I wouldn't touch the lower end Kodaks with a barge pole. Their medium/topend stuff is pretty good , but their point and shoot cameras leave a bit to be desired in my opinion.
AnswerID:
86756
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:53
Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 11:53
I have the S602Z its great, thinkin of gettin the S7000 now..
depends on deals..
I want 8-10x Optical Zoom!
FollowupID:
345574
Reply By: Member - Rick (S.A.) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:37
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 09:37
Just got a Fuji Finepix S 3500. 6 x optical zoom; 4 mill pixels; XD card; pict bridge; 4 flash modes, timer, playback, whitebalance, etc, etc. Also has a mode called quality which is about resolution
v easy to use. takes alkaline or Ni-MH rechargeable batteries. Has manual/movie/scene position/auto mode dial, so you can use it like a traditional camera. I have noticed in very
bright outdoor light it is easier to use the view finder to compose a shot, rather than the LCD screen.
good value- paid $ 399 - after moving up from a nil optical zoom 2 mp kodak. I regard myself as a novice.
cheers
IMHO harvey Norman etc are not/don't attempt to be the cheapest. I went to a genuine camera
shop - got discounts on all the peripherals as
well.
AnswerID:
86757
Reply By: Member - Anni M (SA) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:13
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:13
HI Captain,
I'm in the business of upgrading my wonderful Canon A70, it has been SO good that I have fallen in love with photography and am going for the Canon Pro1, which is not what you are looking for. However, I can't recommend the Canons enough. The menu is intuitive, and they use very good lenses. I have rechargeable AA batteries, with a 12volt charger, as
well as 240volt so I can recharge the batteries when we are travelling, and it takes literally hundreds of pictures before I need to charge them again. Canon cameras still take CF cards, though I'm told that all the cameras are heading towards SD cards. I would advise using a specialist camera
shop, as I have found that the prices are cheaper than at
places like Harvey Norman, and you can usually bargain them into giving a camera bag etc with the camera. Get a god camera bag too, so that you camera is properly protected from dust and
water.
So my recommendation would be a Canon A80 (I think that is the latest model) - fabulous cameras!
Happy snapping while you're travelling
Anni
AnswerID:
86760
Follow Up By: Willem - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:32
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:32
Adding on to what Anni has said.......I bought a Canon A60 as my introduction to digital pics and I love the little camera. It is only a 2mp but does what I require of it at the moment. It came with a full battery charger kit, batteries and 16MB card. I added a 128MB card. All for $500.
My only detrimental observation at this point in time is the shutter speed as mentioned in a post above. No doubt later upgraded models are better and quicker.
My SLR Minolta is gathering dust and destined to the scrap heap of print films. How technology affects our lives!
FollowupID:
345317
Follow Up By: Gajm (VIC) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:33
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:33
I'd go along with the Canon A series, I started with the A10, it is extremely simple to use and we still use it today. I also have a Canon powershot G5, which has a lot more features that I thought I wanted, but found I never use, so I am sorry I didn't just stick with the A's, they are a
well thought out design and you'd have no trouble just pointing and shooting. I think they are up to the A95 now.
As someone else said, check out
http://dpreview.com
FollowupID:
345318
Follow Up By: sean - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 21:43
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 21:43
I concurr.
I have had a number of digital cameras including olympus, kodak, nikon and canon and even a digital slr.
For a budget I would ONLY consider the Canon A series. A75, A80, A85 etc. Takes AA that are rechargeable and last for hundreds of shots. If you are remote and cant charge then drop in 4 AA alkalines. Takes very good pics. Good color and good exposure. Very robust too and can take repeated drops onto concrete. Any idiot can get consistent good pics.
But to be sure go to DPreview or other similar sites and ONLY buy the camera that gets consistent 5 star ratings from owners.
There are lots of 3, 4 and 5 megapixel duds out there.
Good luck
Sean
FollowupID:
345473
Reply By: paul v - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:36
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:36
Kodak have got a very nice 5mp 10x optical zoom number..it's a great little camera..only trick...only 32mb on board memory so you get stung for quite expensive cf cards.. but that goes for all the larger mp camera's in that catagory...Beware very small camera's ..heaps get lost ..If you are also in the market for a phone Nokia have released a 5mp camera phone..where will it end..
PV
Kiwi Down Under
AnswerID:
86765
Reply By: Smocky - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:54
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 11:54
Hi Captain,
Happy to provide some input on a subject I can contribute to. (After getting all of the help on other subjects.)
Stick to a manufacturer that makes cameras and visual equipment. Avoid manufacturers that do all, as they tend to have some fundamental problems. By this, I mean CANON are exellent and IMO pick of the bunch. FinePix are good also.
Avoid makes like HP where it's just another product they don't know much about. My brother has a HP and has had no end of trouble, plus he chews batteries like nothing else.
I use, sell and recommend the Canon IXUS for general use. They are small, sturdy, take excellent pictures, have great battery life, a good LCD screen and use CF memory, which I like. The Canon's with the DIGIC processor are excellent.
I would also avoid cameras with a dock. I know people say they are easy, BUT they are a major point of failure. Also, avoid cameras that charge the battery when IN the camera. This leaves your camera open to spikes and also means you can't use it when you are charging it. I have a Canon IXUSII among others and it has a very good Li-Ion removable battery. I have a second battery and the camera comes with a separate charging unit. Takes about 60 minutes to fully charge and about a month to drain.
As a general tip too, if you half press the "shoot" button, the camera will make it's calibrations and prepare to take the photo. Then you can press the button the rest of the way when you are ready (subject smiling for example) and it will IMMEDIATELY take the photo.
Good luck. Please by all means let me know if you have any specific questions and I'd be more than happy to help out. Have received some great advice from this site and more than happy to contribute.
Cheers,
Smocky.
AnswerID:
86780
Reply By: Member - Andrew(WA) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:01
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:01
Captain
I searched high and low for months before making my decision on a KODAK DX6490.
Absolutley brilliant. Easy to use, large LCD, 10 x optical zoom, point and shoot.
They also have a quality lens (Schneider Kreuznach Variogon)
Just make sure you check them out before making a choice.
They were over a Grand when new 18 months ago but have now been superseeded. Ebay offers these run out models with a dock station and 256 meg card (thats around 400pics) for around $680
I know thats a bit more than you wanted to spend but you won't be disappointed.
There is better quality V value for money on the market in my opinion.
cheers
AnswerID:
86782
Reply By: MrBitchi - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:08
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:08
BTW, this is the cheapest online place I've found to buy cameras. Also lists the specs of various models making comparisons easier.
Also has heaps of other gear.....
Centre.net
John
AnswerID:
86785
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 13:01
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 13:01
checked them, dirtcheap is still cheaper, but upto $200 on some models!
FollowupID:
345357
Follow Up By: MrBitchi - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 13:15
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 13:15
Hmmm.... Looks like it still pays to
shop around. At the moment Centre has the Canon EOS 300D (the camera I'd LIKE to own) for $1499, Dirtcheap has same for $1553
FollowupID:
345363
Follow Up By: Smocky - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 17:19
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 17:19
I can get these at reseller price at would be happy to help forumites out if interested.
Cheers,
Smocky
FollowupID:
345408
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 22:57
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 22:57
What is reseller price, and where are you?
Im interested in 8x optical, and 5megapixel doesnt have to be SLR, but if I can get something REASONABLE in SLR that doesnt need the top $ lens I will get one..
Let me know.
FollowupID:
345496
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 15:24
Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 15:24
Smocky: mail me fu_kew@hotmail.com with a price on the 300D im keen...
FollowupID:
345642
Reply By: theshadows - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:26
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:26
300-500 is quite a range however CF cards do limit it quite a bit. the best you going to get is the canon range and fuji finepix. they have the best white balance and easy of controls.
Shop around for the CF compaitbility because most of the smaller ones are now Xd cards due to smaller size.
Dont be taken in by Kodak print share thing they have going. Kodak imaging software in the camera isnt the best and the optics are quite substandard with the kodak lens......the screiderlens are a lot better.
Canon are are very good though main stream. Make sure the camera has pictbridge software and connection so you can print on all the new printers.Though I dont own a canon I have used a lot amd they are one of my favourites for simple good looking true to life picture 90% of the time.
Fuji what can I say the camera's feel a lttle cheeply made but the quality of the lens and software are fantastic. They are a lot better than kodak and olyimpus.
They do need some imput sometimes to get the best shot and playing with the manual setting....or the scene dial. however you will enjoy the camera's .
Not quite to canon's standard of quality but cheeper in price.
nikon cool pics have some great products but as far as I now now at that range run the CF cards.
my pic of a good camera ricoh capio rx 3 meg 3.6 opitcal zoom $299 at camera house right now on special { normal price 499} great camera i own the earlier RR30 as my general one and out performs one grand cameras. however it takes SD cards..... so no good for you.
Go to a good camera
shop and ask to see phots they have taken with the camera than grab one you self for an hour and take some shots. the only way to work out what you like.
few pointers.......
digital zoom dosnt work....its not a feature.
get a camera pictbridge ready
3meg is good for normal photos
5 meg are good forA4 size shots.
1 meg is good for web work.
160 * vidoe is useless. buy a cam corder.
buy 2 smaller mem cards than 1 large one.Just in case one gets corrupted you wont lose all your shots.
shadow
AnswerID:
86791
Follow Up By: Smocky - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:52
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:52
I agree with all of this.
Defintately DON'T buy a camera for digital zoom or video. I think you have your priorities right in the original post though.
Even though I use a 3M IXUS for happy snaps, I only use on medium settings and this is fine for printing to 5x7".
Cheers again,
Smocky
FollowupID:
345353
Reply By: Tony N. (VIC) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:30
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:30
Captain,
I had the problem of not being able to take multipule pics rapidly with my camera as I had it set to the best quality (usually around 2200x1700). This would take over a full sec to save the pic to the memory card.
I then spoke to a friend who used to be a professional photographer and he said that if I reduced the quality setting to average (1024 x 768) then they would be ok for quality and also would save much quicker.
Did this and now I can take 4 to 5 shots per sec and get the shot I want and the camera will just stop shooting until the pics had been copied to the mem card.
So I would suggest that you look for something that has good optical zoom (at least 3x and above) and average Megapixel (3 and above). You should find what you are looking for at most good camera stores and then look on the net for the best price.
Tony N.
AnswerID:
86794
Follow Up By: Tony N. (VIC) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:33
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:33
One thing I forgot to mention is when I get my next camera I will be looking for one that has an LCD screen that tilts. Then I can hold it over my head, when in a crowd, and tilt the lcd so I can still see what I am taking a pic of.
Tony N.
FollowupID:
345346
Reply By: Member - Luxoluk - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:42
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:42
I bought a 4 megapixel camera off ebay recently for under $200. Shares some components from brand name cameras. If you know what you are looking for and what is a good price it may be an option for you. Mine will be a junker for the glovebox and at that price will not be prescious about its treatment. Its an option!! Cheers
AnswerID:
86797
Reply By: banjobush - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 13:25
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 13:25
If i am a good girl, Santa is going to bring me an Olympus mju410 it has an all
weather resistant metal body, with extra seals etc so dust and light mists of water cannot penetrate it. it is compact. has 4 mgp has a bit of a movie feature as well. it is small and compact enough has optical zoom also which is a big plus, and from living on a property it can take a bit of a beating etc by being in dust etc. just my two bobs worth. and you can pick one up on ebay from $300 upwards or about $499 at Camera House.
AnswerID:
86807
Follow Up By: theshadows - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 21:55
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 21:55
but olympus has yet to fix the Highlight blooming and white balance problems with the CCD......not good for outday sunny days. How you find the lens correcton I found it not that good and requires a lot of work in photoshop to correct the perspection distortion on buildings.
shadow
FollowupID:
345474
Reply By: Member - Captain (WA) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 15:56
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 15:56
Hi All,
Thanks for the fantastic response. I will check out all the mentioned cameras on the net and see what I come up with.
Once again, thanks to all who took the time to reply, it shows what a great
forum this is, not only for 4WD things either!
Cheers
Captain
AnswerID:
86828
Reply By: Gossy - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 16:59
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 16:59
sorry I'm late but one important factor. Some cameras have internal plastic lenses to get the price down. Some like the Optio 555 still have glass lenses all the way. How does this affect things? A 3megapixel camera with good lenses can give a better shot than a 5 megapixel with plastic lenses. Pays to ask at the counter.
AnswerID:
86833
Reply By: Willykj - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 17:03
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 17:03
Hi Captain,
I agree with Andrew's comments re the Kodak DX6490. I bought one a few months ago & it is great - it comes with lots of recommendations.
You will find the 10 optical zoom very useful. As far as I am aware it is still a current model - it's just that Kodak have brought outr a similiar model at around the $900 mark. I have seen the 4mp model around just over $500.
Willy
AnswerID:
86835
Reply By: Pluto - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 17:13
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 17:13
Hi Captain,
Long time no email.
Some food for thought. Many of the low to mid range compact digital cameras are powered by AA batteries. High capacity Nickel Metal Hydride rechargable batteries are available in AA sizes. Keep this in mind and the range of cameras that will suit your needs is much wider.
You can also use the rechargeables for other power hungry purposes, like hand held
GPS units.
I'll message you.
AnswerID:
86837
Reply By: Member - Sand Man (SA) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 17:25
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 17:25
Gee, I must be in the minority
I have a Canon A80 and I like it, BUT!
Not impressed with Red Eye when using the flash at night.
(Yes, I have the Red Eye function turned on)
My Canon EOS SLR 35mm camera eats the digital in this area.
AnswerID:
86840
Reply By: Dave - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 18:35
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 18:35
Hi Captain,
I have just bought the Canon A85 recently and I have been researching digital cameras for quite a while.
The Canon A85 is just fantastic, the Canon A70 is their biggest selling camera in Canons 75 year history and the A85 is the the 4MG equivelant.
By the way 4MG cameras are equal to 35mm cameras as far as reproduction qualities go.
The Canon A85 takes any sort of AA battery and the NIMH 2300ma rechargeables are fantastic.
Hope this helps,
Dave.
AnswerID:
86849
Reply By: Member - Clive G (WA) - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 18:59
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 18:59
Captain
Give Skip a call, he will look after you.
Clive
AnswerID:
86853
Reply By: Bilbo - Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 23:11
Wednesday, Dec 01, 2004 at 23:11
Does anybody know if the 'pre-digital' Nikon lenses will fit a Nikon digital camera. I have an Nikon F70 film camera with a heap of lenses and it would be great if I could just buy a Nikon Digital body.
This subscribes to the Nikon legend that any lense made since 1947 will fit any Nikon camera made since then - with a minor loss of function in some cases.
Bilbo
AnswerID:
86888
Follow Up By: theshadows - Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 14:59
Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 14:59
In a nut shell yes.
the D70 runs a "F" mount with af contacts.
So any f mount lens will ft and if the len is AF compliant then the AF will work as well.
But remember to use the 1.5 multiplier effect on all old 35 mm lens when transfering across to the D70 \100
FollowupID:
345635
Reply By: Bob Y. - Qld - Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:53
Thursday, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:53
Captain,
Plenty of responses...pick me, pick me!!!
Wife has a Sony DSC-W1, 5 meg, 3X zoom, cost >$700 few months back, now About $550 in Brissy last week.
Have an "old" Kodak DX3600, 2.2 meg, which is very basic, but am surprised with images, blown up to A4. Wouldn't win a competition, but good for record.
Personal choice at moment is either new Kodak, w/- 10x Zoom and 5 meg( about $840), or Olympus C-770, w/- 10X zoom and 4 meg(about $750). Pentax SLR film camera, is heading into storage soon, I'd say.
Feel the ability to be carried around in one's pocket, for "once-in-a-lifetime" shots, is one of the Digi cameras great points.
Happy buying,
Hooroo...
AnswerID:
86958
Reply By: ol55 - Saturday, Dec 04, 2004 at 23:28
Saturday, Dec 04, 2004 at 23:28
yeah guys, my 2 cents worth -
Just get the biggest lens you can afford and the biggest OPTICAL zoom you can afford.
have had the Kodak DX6490 for a year now and Love it. 10X optical zoom on a large lens to start with gives excellent results. SD cards can be had for around $80 for 512 and $130 for 1 gig. The camera goes for $599 in
Brisbane at the mo, with the 5megapixell version going for about $900. Very large lcd display, excellent longevity from battery (used all day out at Palm Valley and no where near flat), quality of photos excellent.
AnswerID:
87307
Reply By: Lone Wolf - Sunday, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:08
Sunday, Dec 05, 2004 at 08:08
You know the funniest thing?
By the time you have read all the recommendations, from start to finish, and have a look at the original post date, there have probably been 3 new models released onto the market, and about one third of the recommendations have now been made obsolete!!!
Well, I am probably exaggerating a little, but...... buy ANY monthly camera magazine, and see how many new models rock up in a month. Like about 6, which is about 1 1/2 @ week!
I have stayed away from giving my recommendation, as I am new to the digital field, and my needs are different from yours. I bought Tracy a 5 MP init a couple of months ago, and it gets a hammering..... very happy with it. I think that pretty much most of the units you will see in the shops will be of equal spec & value.
Cheers
Wolfie
AnswerID:
87313
Follow Up By: Member - Captain (WA) - Sunday, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:36
Sunday, Dec 05, 2004 at 12:36
Your not wrong there Wolfie!!! I have done the right" thing and checked all the recommended models etc... But one thing that did come through was that the cannon was the most recommended model. One of the front runners for me at the moment is the Cannon A85, takes my current CF card but I need to buy rechargables for it. The best price I have seen so far is ~$420 from dirtcheap.com.au, but still want a case and rechargeables. Will see what other prices I can dig up.
Thanks once again to all for your advise.
Cheers
Captain
FollowupID:
346110