no more photos

Submitted: Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 18:36
ThreadID: 24623 Views:1757 Replies:8 FollowUps:4
This Thread has been Archived
the quality is destroyed and its so bloody small you need a magnifying glass to see and the system still will not accept it so no more phots its not worth the hassle

grumpy old bastard
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Outbackluva - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 18:59

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 18:59
Steve,
Can't help you with your picture problems, but your sister tells me that your last statement is definitely correct, you are a grumpy old bastard.
Only three weeks till were all all off again.

Outbakluva and BILaw
AnswerID: 119815

Follow Up By: GOB & denny vic member - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 19:04

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 19:04
yes but which way ?? doesnt realy matter as long as we are away

steve
0
FollowupID: 374890

Reply By: WheelTravel - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 19:25

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 19:25
Hey Fella,

It shouldn't be so.

Get Easy Thumbnails and you can get them down to 20k and looking great in under a minute.

Cheers

AnswerID: 119829

Follow Up By: GOB & denny vic member - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 19:42

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 19:42
goodday wheels
thats what i am using thats whats so frustrating

steve
0
FollowupID: 374896

Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 20:48

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 20:48
Steve whats the problem?, Its the best program I have seen for this use.
VKS737 - Mobile 6352 (Selcall 6352)

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 374919

Reply By: Member - Crazie (VIC) - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 20:38

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 20:38
Steve

I use photoshop or photostudioand just use re-size to save in under 50k, i do not worry about the pixal size, seems to always be under, I just reduce and save it untill it is just under 50K. I see what you mean, I just looked at a few pics in your gallery.

good luck mate

Ads
AnswerID: 119855

Reply By: Bob of KAOS - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 20:39

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 20:39
GOB
Yours photos are fine. Maybe get your eyes checked.
AnswerID: 119858

Reply By: GOB & denny vic member - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 20:58

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 20:58
i used thumbs to resize the existing photos in the gallrery fine but i have some more to go in i downsized 1 to27k and it still wont go in .a couple of light trails on monash freeway

steve
AnswerID: 119862

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Tuesday, Jul 12, 2005 at 15:53

Tuesday, Jul 12, 2005 at 15:53
resize the photos OR compress them?

You can compress them 4:2 which REALLY drops th' KB, but stays the same size.
again, scream if ya need help
0
FollowupID: 375036

Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 21:23

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 21:23
Open the esky one evening, and I'll drop in, ya got my # call :)
AnswerID: 119874

Reply By: Bega Photographer - Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 23:55

Monday, Jul 11, 2005 at 23:55
Hi Grumpy.

Are you trying to use the thumbnails as your resized photos? If so, disgard the thumbnails and use the resized images.

You should resize your photos to 400 x 300 pixels at 80% quality/compression. This will give you images of a suitable size and quality at about 25 to 35 KB. They will also load quickly which means people will stick around to view them.

Do not multiple save your images. Resize them in one go.

If you need to move them around, copy and paste, do not multiple save.

Give this a go and please let me know how you get on. If there is a call for it I'll write a small, basic tutorial on resizing images.

You might like to have a look at the images on my website which have been resized as above.
Laurie's Rustic Website

Regards,
Laurie.
AnswerID: 119895

Reply By: theshadows - Tuesday, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:07

Tuesday, Jul 12, 2005 at 07:07
GOB drop your DPI to under 72 DPI. then at 25 percent compression with progresive loadiing you will get a 320 by 240 picture on the screen. that should be just under 50 K

shadow
AnswerID: 119906

Sponsored Links