Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 19:58
Bob
Your basic premise is flawed: it is not the population size which causes poverty but the legacy of centuries of exploitation. eg. Taiwan has 718 people per sq. km. yet it would take a man only 1.6 years to purchase a Land Cruiser. Japan has 340 people per. sq. km and it would take a man 1.4 years to purchase a Land Cruiser. Hong Kong has 7000 people per sq. km and it would take a man 1.2 years to purchase a Land Cruiser.
In a third world country with no Medicare, no age care, no mental health care and damn all else care it's _essential_ to have a number of children to ensure you are taken care of in your old age or if you suffer an accident. Even a broken leg may cause a crippling injury because you can't afford to have it set properly. Without children you will be reduced to begging in order to get food to stay alive.
And on the 1pm news on ABC radio today I heard that some Ethiopians are selling their children for US$1.50 into prostitution or service - I don't imagine any of us who have been parents would think they could do that easily.
China's "One Child Policy" was a failure
http://www.overpopulation.com/faq/population_control/one_child.html
Not only that but are you _really_ advocating a system where women are dragged screaming into abortion clinics to have their baby aborted?!
High infant mortality in the third world is not caused by the size of the birth rate but by a severe lack of medical facilities and even more by the fact that very few people have the money to pay for their medical treatment.
The European countries shamelessly exploited Africa and the Far East for a long time - Europeans were doing exactly that until very recently in South Africa. Indeed the slave trade was a respected method of earning a living until the late 1800s (I think?).
Quote from the following site:
http://www.globalissues.org/TradeRelated/Debt.asp
"Debt has crippled many developing countries. Often based on loans taken out by prior rulers and dictators (many of which various Western nations put into power to suit their interests), millions face poorer and poorer living standards as precious resources are diverted to debt repayment."
And that so the banks and major institutions of The West can make fat profits and pay substantial dividends to shareholders (superannuation funds, ie. you and me!).
Harvey Norman are selling wide screen TV sets for $10,000 - that's 10 years income for a family in Benin - perhaps we should consider that the next time we sit down to watch Star Wars?
The people of New
York use more energy _purely_ in commuting to and from work in one week than all the people of Africa use in one year.
So what's the deal guys? Bollocks to the lot of them? Or is there something of an imbalance of wealth here?
Mike Harding
mike_harding@fastmail.fm
PS. Bob, I don't think the criticsm was aimed at you but more at other posters to this thread.
FollowupID:
389540