F250 TD fuel economy
Submitted: Wednesday, Nov 02, 2005 at 20:13
ThreadID:
27767
Views:
28075
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
13
This Thread has been Archived
Sky Pilot
My brother in law recently purchased an F250 dual cab 7.3LV8TD and is going to carry a piggy back van into the sunset in his retirement. Does anyone know what fuel economy he could expect at say 90kph?
Reply By: Val - Wednesday, Nov 02, 2005 at 20:27
Wednesday, Nov 02, 2005 at 20:27
I get around 13.5 litres per 100kms in general driving and 20 when pulling a 3.5 tonne 5th wheel - I guess the piggy back van will be somewhere in between.
Val
AnswerID:
137498
Reply By: Gerhardp1 - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 00:14
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 00:14
My son works at a Ford dealership and the general consensus there is that these vehicles drink so much they make Hummers look like teetotallers.
AnswerID:
137543
Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Widgiemooltha) - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:08
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:08
"yawn" another uninformed comment from someone thats never driven one I used an f350 for setting up and taking down camps, towing generators and big heavy exploration vans with the back fully laden I never measured economy coz I wasnt paying for fuel but I can assure you that comment is BS
FollowupID:
391216
Follow Up By: Gerhardp1 - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:18
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:18
Of course you're right.
Any 3 ton vehicle would easily obtain 7.0 litres per hundred. You only have to look at lighter cars such as the Landcruiser and Patrol, both of which frequently top the economy charts at 5.0 litres per hundred.
In the real world, you can calculate ballpark fuel consumption from the weight of the vehicle alone. For example, Falcons and Commodores weigh around 1600kg and get 12.0l/100. Cars weighing 1000kg get 6.0, cars weighing 2500kg get 22., and this behemoth without a brick of a camper on the back would weigh probably 3000kg and you're trying to tell me it will get 13.5l/100 - dream on.
You yourself admit you didn't measure economy. I guess you're just one of those geniuses that God put here to put all the rest of the d!ckheads right.
Oh, and by the way, I have driven one, and it drank fuel like the dealership said it would.
FollowupID:
391226
Follow Up By: snowman - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:25
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 10:25
I too own a 7.3td F250. My fuel figures are the same as Val's. I tow a triple horse float or a stock trailer over the
snowy mountains on a regular basis.
I'm sure people who own these vehicles would now best as to what fuel econmoy they are getting.
Gerhardp1- You most be one of the REST
FollowupID:
391247
Follow Up By: chump_boy - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:16
So where does my 3 tonne cruiser fit in? I get 10.5L/100km.
Mabey it doesn't weight as much as I think....theres a thought..
By Gerhardp's reasioning, my cruiser should be about 1800kg. Kewl. I might go and
park in North
Sydney now, so I can pay lower rates in my small vehicle.
Gerhardp, your figures may be fairly right for petrol figures. Diesel figures are a lot better than that.
Cheers
Chump
FollowupID:
391254
Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Widgiemooltha) - Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:37
Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 01:37
it didnt have a camper on the back it had a heavy caravan at the rear an a fully loaded tray and i was giving it crap to see how it goes with the load and I stand by my original comment BS how do i know if I didnt measure economy??? because I would have been walking from a remote area if it used half as much as you reckon----- genius
FollowupID:
391361
Follow Up By: chump_boy - Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:24
Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 08:24
Davo,
I think Gerhard is one of these special little people that know absolutely everything....just ask them!
Methinks he drives a large petrol 4WD, and drives it pretty hard too, from the sounds of his reasoning. Then his little fuel calculator would be pretty right. Trouble is, it doesn't take into consideration modern diesel engins.
Cheers,
Chump
FollowupID:
391369
Follow Up By: Gerhardp1 - Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:15
Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:15
To Davoe, Snowman, and Chump_boy.
Apologies for your personal insults are accepted.
Read the posts from 2 owners Roofscooter2 and Crackles for believable F250 fuel consumption figures.
FollowupID:
391371
Follow Up By: chump_boy - Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:37
Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 09:37
Gerhardp,
Apologise for what? You do not drive one of these vehicles, yet you know all about them? Come on now......
This
forum is about people sharing their experiences, not what they heard from someone. Everybody drives differently, so fuel figures will be all over the place when talking about different people in the same vehicles. As some of these are work vehicles, some would have different people driving them (ie.. apprentices at a FORD dealership). FUEL FIGURES WILL VARY!!!
Your little fuel calculator doesn't work - hardly a personal insult....
Chump
(PS...I love this nickname - you never know if it is a signature, or a comment....lol)
FollowupID:
391375
Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Widgiemooltha) - Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 13:25
Friday, Nov 04, 2005 at 13:25
Gerhardp, I think i get it now fuel consumption is obviosly a matter of perception vs expectation. The fuel consumption from tose quoted sound pretty good to me for a 7.3l truck
13.5 highway 16 with a tonne on the back 20 with the apprentice flooring it everywhere and towing a caravan(I know I did) and 30 while 4wding (dont know how much sand driving he did but the mags regulary measdure 50+ with petrol engines in sand) all of these figures are not much higher than a patrol or cruiser diesal will return in simular circumstances and
well ahead of what a petrol will return with a whole lot more loading capacity and pulling power
FollowupID:
391414
Reply By: vitara - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:46
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:46
Neighbour owns 1 works and owns the motor bike
shop, same motor and averages 13L per100kms around town, says about the same for highway. So much torque your only just touching the loud pedal. Petrol yes would agree would drink like a fish but definately not the diesel. And yes have driven it a few times would pull my house off it's foundations so much low down grunt. Regards Vitara
AnswerID:
137597
Reply By: Sea-Dog - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 16:56
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 16:56
I was thinking the same thing about my Cruiser.... Just on 3 tonne but gets over 8.5 k/litre.... That is 11.8l per 100
I would love a 7.3L 250 to cruise around in!! Unfortunately my pockets are too deep and arms too short..
Cheers
AnswerID:
137627
Reply By: Sky Pilot - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 19:45
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 19:45
God, you guys have got me thinking my brother in law has done the right thing. I was contemplating a new Cruiser diesel or GU diesel. Perhaps it should be a F250 diesel.
AnswerID:
137643
Follow Up By: colin - Saturday, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:04
Saturday, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:04
ford is pullig out of ossy selling the f series they cant stand up to the australian standards and with the small amount of units being sold not worth their while. info from a ford dealer. Col
FollowupID:
391513
Reply By: roofscooter2 - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 21:50
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 21:50
hi sky pilot ,i recently purhased 7.3 ltr diesel trayback 4x4 (steel) 1 1/2 cab & am getting around 16 ltr /100k with about tonne on it most of the time around town with some hwy running.went to
moreton island in sept. & in 4wd most of the time & it was using 30ltr /100k but what price do you put on having fun & good holiday,it also performed realy
well in the sand.there are some probs with the trucks it just depends on what & when . but you get probs with anything you buy these days it is the way of the mfing world of today.regards & don't be put off by negative input bob (qld) non mem.
AnswerID:
137673
Follow Up By: AdamC - Tuesday, Nov 08, 2005 at 18:01
Tuesday, Nov 08, 2005 at 18:01
I agree with the Scooters response. I've had my F250 CC 7.3 XLt for three years now and average 14 to 16 per 100KMS. Recent and long off road excursion saw slightly better consumption than the conservative 80 series Diesel Cruiser and patrol(s). On the highway I bettered the cruisers consumption over 300 odd Ks @ 110KMH (speed was constant other than when the Cruiser needed a nudge up the hills. If you own and or drive non turbo cruiser diesels I am sure you are familiar with that!! The down side of the effie is when you are idling in traffic, thats when the diesel just gets poured into the head to keep all the steel rotating.. BTW, try a scan gauge for realistic consumption figures!!!! It scares you when you put the foot into it!
If we really want to look at a thirsty truck, try a Rangie (petrol) for size.
By 4 now
Adam
FollowupID:
392118
Reply By: Crackles - Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 23:36
Thursday, Nov 03, 2005 at 23:36
The new work bus got 20 L per 100 on the first fill carrying a full load with ladder racks etc. I suspect it will get around 16 L per 100 when the apprentices stop seeing how fast it goes.
Cheers Craig.......
AnswerID:
137695
Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Widgiemooltha) - Saturday, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:38
Saturday, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:38
surly it is only the apprentice seeing exactly how 7.3l of turbocharged vehicle goes???? I know i couldnt drive it round the block without making sure it went ok. We had a manuel and changing gears was a heavy affair especially with the redline reached nearly straight away after it hit boost
FollowupID:
391490
Follow Up By: Crackles - Sunday, Nov 06, 2005 at 20:25
Sunday, Nov 06, 2005 at 20:25
You caught me out Dave. Maybe I did take it up to 155kph just to make sure it went ok & you're right with the gearbox too. Not really a racing shift ;-)
FollowupID:
391743
Reply By: Member - Norm C (QLD) - Tuesday, Nov 08, 2005 at 18:18
Tuesday, Nov 08, 2005 at 18:18
I have a good friend with a 7.3 lt diesel F250. He uses it to tow a 5th wheeler and for his business (earth moving) to carry gear and tow a fuel trailer.
Fuel consumption is the least of his worries. His only worry on big trips is range, which he overcomes by carrying more fuel (and therefore increasing consumption).
My read of this is that if you want a strong workhorse with a massive towing capacity, get an F250 and don't worry about fuel consumption. If you are worried about fuel consumption get something smaller and forget about towing the 5th Wheeler (or anything else real heavy). It's horses for courses.
AnswerID:
138499
Reply By: F233 - Wednesday, Nov 09, 2005 at 19:36
Wednesday, Nov 09, 2005 at 19:36
Hi all, 6 months ago i retired my 05 Sahara V8 and purchased a F250 7.3TD purely for towing my boats which range in weight between 3600Kgs and 4500Kgs and its the best tow vehicle by far that i have driven.
It averages about 16 litres per hundred around town and about 14-15 on the highway empty. When towing the bigger boat it averages 20 litres per hundred which is about 5 litres per hundred better than the cruiser ever got.
I am not a ford fan by any standards and it certainly does not compare finish wise to a cruiser but its sheer torque makes it a lot of fun to drive / tow.
Overall its much more economical than my cruiser.
cheers
R
AnswerID:
138698