RoofRack Deflectors

Submitted: Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 14:53
ThreadID: 27983 Views:3794 Replies:10 FollowUps:17
This Thread has been Archived
I notice some of the deflectors mounted on Racks are as steep as 70 to 80 degs (off horizontal). These must be as aerodynamic as a house brick, and would probably be more efficient with no deflector at all. Try holding your hand out the window at say 100 kph at a steep angle??
My theory is a deflector should in fact be a spoiler and at about 110kph sits at about 45 degs (lower angle for lower speeds). The spoiler should terminate into a rounded leading edge to 'spoil' that air coming off the windsreen UNDER the rack where most disturbance is.
Mine is shaped like a distorted 6 (side elevation)- with the spoiler part taken from a mould of a Cessna wing, leading into a 60mm dia leading edge. The centreline of this tube is in line with the floor of the rack.
Also, side Vortex Generators ( like on a front wing of F1 cars) eliminate the turbulance of the side 'trusses'.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: V8troopie - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 15:13

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 15:13
Let me guess, you are driving a speedway car? LOL

your point is taken but there are limits to what shape deflector I am willing to install. At present its a home made affair, made from acrylic sheeting with the leading edge rounded back (25mm radius) under the deflector. Angle is about 45 deg. Its mounted over the troopy cabin, about 400mm forward of the roof rack and has a small solar panel mounted between the deflector and roof rack.

Klaus
AnswerID: 138817

Follow Up By: signman - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 15:23

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 15:23
No- not a speedway car. However the priciple follows a lot of my time setting up Formula race cars.
I'd say your setup would be well on the way for efficiency.
0
FollowupID: 392570

Reply By: Moggs - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 15:22

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 15:22
The answer is unequivocally yes....or maybe...or no. What was the question again? LOL.

Seriously, any wind deflector at any angle has got to be better than non at all, especially if you have boxes or jerries stored up there.

The weirdest deflectors I have seen are those horizontal base mounted ones on some ARB racks - very strange.

You are a deep thinking man signman! ;-)
AnswerID: 138821

Follow Up By: signman - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 15:58

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 15:58
Not necessarily that "any wind deflector at any angle has got to be better than non (sic) at all". With boxes and jerrys on the rack you are in fact cutting down all that turbulance created by the cross bars and (if you have it) mesh floor of the rack.
More turbulance is created with an empty rack, especially if the cross bars are of square section.
0
FollowupID: 392581

Follow Up By: Moggs - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 16:06

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 16:06
ok, fair call. I don't know about these things - it just seemed to me that a loaded rack would have more wind resistance than an empty one re: surface area.
0
FollowupID: 392586

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 20:09

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 20:09
HIJACK

hey moggs. ever heard of issues with the genuine Nissan immobilizer? Wifes is fubar, nissan says $1000's to fix.
It will open door, but not unimmobilize the donk - EG car wont start.. New batteries in remotes, and both remotes do the same.

They said to go to "a mate of mine who is an auto spark".. in otherwords gettin work for a mate of theirs..

Thoughts?
0
FollowupID: 392617

Follow Up By: Moggs - Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:27

Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 06:27
Hi there Truckster. No, have never heard of anyone with a Pathy having problems with the imobiliser. What year and model is your wife's Pathy? Mine is a 99 ST, which means the imobiliser is Nissan and the central locking is after market - if yours is a pre 2003 model ST it might be the same - might explain why the central locking is working independant of the imobiliser. I'll check with a few guys on the Pathy forum who used to work at Nissan and see what they have to say about the problem. I'll get back to you.
0
FollowupID: 392716

Follow Up By: Moggs - Sunday, Nov 13, 2005 at 23:20

Sunday, Nov 13, 2005 at 23:20
Hi Truckster, I asked re the above on the Pathy forum. No-one has ever had an issue with their immobiliser on a Pathy as far as I can tell. The only real suggestions they had was 1. to check if it plays up at different locations - one of the guys (Jimmy) reckons he has seen immobilisers play up in some areas due to radio interference. 2. Replace the immobiliser with an aftermarket one (like Zylux) for $300-$400. I have had a Zylux in mine for 6 years without issue - is an immobiliser and does the central locking. Good luck with it! (sorry about the hijack in this thread)
0
FollowupID: 392951

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Sunday, Nov 20, 2005 at 23:44

Sunday, Nov 20, 2005 at 23:44
Thanks Moggs.
Where did you get your xylophone thingy from, how hard to fit?

Local Nissan dealer didnt even move the car when we took it there! But had the car all day...
0
FollowupID: 393867

Reply By: Sky Pilot - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 16:20

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 16:20
I had an '83 Rangie with an alloy roof rack which carried an extra spare tyre at the front. I installed a 75W solar panel as a spoiler at about 40 degrees to the horizontal at the front of the rack. It started lower than the roof rack floor and about 30cm in front of the rack and ended up covering most of the spare tyre. It worked very well in both roles. My fuel economy was no worse with the roof rack full than without a roof rack at all. It also generated enough energy to keep a deep cycle battery for the Engel fully charged. I was initially worried about stones, but after a 20,000km, trip, no problems at all.
AnswerID: 138830

Follow Up By: Richard - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 18:29

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 18:29
Ive been contemplating a wind deflector now that my basket is pemanently on the roof. I will move the spare from under the rear and put it in the basket where it acts as a ground anchor.
Using a solar panel as a wind deflector sounds like a great idea as I also have a Pirahna isolator which accepts a solar panel charge. What wattage panel did you use and how did you attach it?
0
FollowupID: 392602

Follow Up By: Sky Pilot - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 19:12

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 19:12
Geez Richard, now you're stretching my memory. I installed it in 1996. From memory, and I sold the car 7 odd years ago.

it was a 65W or 75W panel about 1100mm*500mm and it came with wiring diagrams and a solar regulator to allow you to join it into the 12V system. It was easy enough for me to follow anyway. I just plugged it into a cigarette lighter plug in the rear of the car which was attached to a deep cycle battery. That battery only ran the fridge and a fluoro and it coped for 14 weeks with no problems.

I seem to recall the solar panel put out about 17V and 4.5A. I purchased it from the Bias Boating Warehouse catalogue and it was about $600+. Actually, I have their latest catalogue and there is an 80W BP Solar unit for $718.00 - 1210mm*537mm - could be a bit wide for many vehicles. The Rangey was a wider than Japanese vehicle and it handled the 1100*500 easily. There is an 1110*502 65W unit (must be the one I had) for $570.

Sorry probably not much help, but there has been a lot of water under the bridge since that trip.
0
FollowupID: 392607

Reply By: Member - Beatit (QLD) - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 16:50

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 16:50
I have a Stessle deflector!

Kind regards
AnswerID: 138833

Follow Up By: signman - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 16:55

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 16:55
I can't imagine how much air would be buffering around in that!!
0
FollowupID: 392591

Follow Up By: Sky Pilot - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 19:13

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 19:13
I think it needs some of those little Formula 1 side wings to stablise it.
0
FollowupID: 392608

Reply By: Member - Roachie (SA) - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 17:20

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 17:20
I have a full-length ARB steel rack with a mesh floor. I recently removed the aluminium deflector which had fitted over 12 months ago, cos I figured it was causing more air drag than it was saving. This is due to the fact that the full-length rack comes quite close to the windscreen.....the deflector was mounted using 4 "U" bolts/muffler clamps at 4 convenient spots on the lower frame of the rack (the ARB jobbie has a short section of solid floor about 10" back from the front lower frame and this has 4 half-circle cut-outs, convenient for the "U" bolt).

The aluminium deflector ended up being about the same angle as the windscreen and just above the windscreen (with about a half inch gap in between). The top of the deflector was about 1" above the top bar of the rack. I think it marginally reduced the wind-noise, but I doubt that it did anything for the fuel economy either way. So; off it came.
AnswerID: 138839

Reply By: Lone Wolf - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 18:06

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 18:06
Well, not being one to idly sit by, and watch, I will throw my two cents in as well.

I have actually considered making up my own Bernoulli roller, with a variable speed stepper motor and speed controller. This would allow me to program in the required RPM for different speeds, so as to give a constant vacuum over the rack at all speeds.

I have actually built one of these rollers, and was quite amazed at it's power. I was experimenting with it one day, and it knocked me off of a scaffold I was using to test it.

I still have the tube, and it's axle assembly, so I should turn up another axle assembly on my lathe, and give it a try.

Cheers

Wolfie
AnswerID: 138848

Follow Up By: V8troopie - Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 00:46

Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 00:46
Wolfie, you win. I bet half the blokes here dont have a clue what you're talking about. LOL

Klaus
0
FollowupID: 392700

Follow Up By: Lone Wolf - Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 07:58

Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 07:58
Think of a 75 - 100 mm. diameter tube, in front of your rack, like a roller. Not unlike the ladder rollers you'd commonly see on the rear of say, a Telstra van.

Now, this roller is motor driven, so that it ti turns in a clockwise direction if you are looking at it from the left hand side of the vehicle.

This has the same effect as a wing, which gives a low & high pressure area above & below. The areas can be rotated around the tube by simply adjusting the speed of rotation to suit.

Google the term, and you may also happen to see Jaques Costeau's ship, the "Calypso" in the results. This was made in the eighties, using the same principle as its sail.

Cheers

Wolfie
0
FollowupID: 392725

Follow Up By: signman - Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:57

Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:57
G'day Wolfie
There is no need to go to a mechanically driven foil. If the deflector has an upper surface NACA foil shape, it will actually 'fly' at the optimum angle created by the low pressure over this surface. At 60 kph about 20 degs/ 80 kph 35 degs and at 110 kph- 45 degs. Let Mr Bernoulli do all the work.
My wing is only about 280mm deep, and has stub axles through the centre of the leading edge tube. From as low as 60 kph you can feel the lift. The wing is made with fiberglass and is quite light in weight but sturdy.
By the way- the side vortex generators need only be about 150mm x100mm (aluminium).
0
FollowupID: 392730

Reply By: Member - Drew T (VIC) - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 18:07

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 18:07
I have a standard 'Tradesman Engineering' roofrack with mesh floor .. it came with a smallish piece of flat perspex mounted to the leading edge at about 45degrees .. but despite that the rack made a terrible noise. I went back to 'Tradesman Engineering' to see what they could do. They shortened the rack by about 15cm so it wasn't as close to the widscreen. Reduced the noise a bit but not much. Don't understand why these manufactures don't work out the least wind resistance/turbulance in the design phase by using a wind tunnel.

Is there actually a proven way of making roof racks aerodynamic .. & has anyone done it yet? (ie: along the lines of signmans post)

Are those rounded ARB ones any good?
AnswerID: 138849

Reply By: awill4x4 - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 19:16

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 19:16
I've built lots of alloy roofracks over the years and my best advice for those who enquire about wind deflectors is simple. "Don't Bother".
As a specialist Tig welder I've tried various designs of deflectors and basically it's simply not worth the effort. The best approach to selecting a roofrack is use one that's about 3/4s the length of the roofline, if you have a full length rack up to the windscreen it will be noisy and collect the air as it spills off the screen. Take a look at the windscreen angle on your car and imagine the air as it is pushed upwards by the screen and make sure your rack is behind that area. You'll have a rack which is much quieter and has less drag as well.
As for square tube vs round tube I've noticed no difference between the two, I've got square tube on my GQ it makes the same noise as a round one, no better, no worse.
Regards Andrew.
AnswerID: 138854

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 20:09

Thursday, Nov 10, 2005 at 20:09
did them DVD's work?
0
FollowupID: 392618

Follow Up By: awill4x4 - Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 20:31

Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 20:31
I've only watched a couple all the way through Bruce, one was OK all the way and the 05 OBC had some break up of the pic for a while then cleared up.
Thanks Bruce.
0
FollowupID: 392818

Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:45

Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:45
Now I've got this theory that if I was to give the Jack another 8" lift, I could mount a "roof rack" UNDERNEATH the vehicle. Not only would this reduce the air drag flowing over the roof, but the extra weight when loaded would lower the centre of gravity and therefore reduce its ability to roll.

I just need to work out how to lift the car enough to enable easy loading/unloading of the rack:-)

Na, on reflection I think I will continue to tow the camper, or off-road trailer.

And like Beatit, I use a Stessl deflector, about 3.4 metres long and just so high.
Good in the mud with the outboard mounted.
Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 138926

Follow Up By: signman - Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 09:03

Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 09:03
Now thats called 'ground effects' and a whole new debate.
0
FollowupID: 392732

Reply By: Mike DiD - Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 20:47

Friday, Nov 11, 2005 at 20:47
The reason race cars have "Air Dams" below the bumperbar is to eliminate losses from turbulent airflow under the vehicle.

I assume that with a roof rack you would get least resistance by eliminating airflow under the roofrack. Therefore a deflector that continued the line of the windscreen would seem to be the best approach.

AnswerID: 139034

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)