Thursday, Jul 20, 2006 at 08:10
Hi Guys
The old fuel consumption thing definately has its quirks , as is why I haven't really felt the pressure to change from the 4800 which is a potentially very thirsty car.
While the diesels are capable of a lot, the actual results are often not what owners expect. I have put real difference between GU's 4.2 and 4800 at 27% but this can be quite different depending on the overall circumstances.
RE our most recent trip of 6000km thru the desserts -
Haven't got the 4.2 figures yet but the 60 series diesel with us actually paid more for fuel than our 4800 which used $1287 with average of 16.5lt/100km.
This was because we would leave early in transport sections and sit on 100 compared to 115 and we have not a thing that increases wind resistance whereas they had everthing from Hi-lift across the bullbar to loaded roofracks etc and diesel was usual 5% dearer.
We meticulous about high road pressures etc but still it was instructive to see the "Total of the tape"
Robin Miller
FollowupID:
441076