Caltex..........

Submitted: Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 13:56
ThreadID: 36207 Views:4405 Replies:16 FollowUps:47
This Thread has been Archived
I know this subject will bore some people here and it has been discussed more than ones but I just found this report very interesting and it is giving me the sh^%$.
I will not buy Caltex petrol for the next 6 month and hope I can find others to do the same.
Have a read at this
Site Link
We are the ones who let them do this and we could show them how we feel. Not driving doesn't work but ignoring the company with the biggest profit could work.

Reiner
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Des Lexic - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:04

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:04
Reiner, isn't Mobil, Shell and BP doing the same thing? The other operators are charging the same amount for their fuel so one could assume that they are all shafting us.
AnswerID: 185607

Follow Up By: Member - Reiner G (QLD) 4124 - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:12

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:12
Yes but Caltex made the biggest profit from the big 4. If we picked the most greedy company every 6 month and don't give them our money I bet they get the message. I know a lot of people and we all do why not use our power?

Reiner
0
FollowupID: 442447

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 19:20

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 19:20
Didn't think this forum was that big.................
0
FollowupID: 442543

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:09

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:09
>>>> If we picked the most greedy company every 6 month and don't give them our money I bet they get the message. I know a lot of people and we all do why not use our power?

LMAO! Thats a funny as that email that goes around saying similar...
0
FollowupID: 442654

Reply By: Laura B - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:19

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:19
Its not all the companies pulling the profits.....when petrol was selling at .90cpl the govt was getting 54.7 cpl .......... now its at 1.40 have a guess at what the govt would be getting now????

We arent the ones letting them do this. They do this because they can, the govt get so much because they can, we pay this because we have to if we want to drive or catch public transport or fly or whatever......

I hate it when people come into the store and say that its all the companies fault because its not!!! Not buying caltex fuel will not stop the situation, buying from other companies will encourage them to keep doing it too and you will not be any better off. you may feel better for your little plan it will not make any difference whatsoever. Caltex doesnt know what your plan is and losing however much a week you spend on fuel will not make them go bankrupt.

all IMHO

Laura
AnswerID: 185609

Follow Up By: Member - Reiner G (QLD) 4124 - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:09

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:09
of course it would work if we all ignored Caltex for a while.......I'm not saying lets make Caltex go bankrupt all I'm saying is give them the message that we are sick and tired of getting over charged. In the US the petrol companies get a kick in the a%% if they did what they do here but we just bend over and ask for more.
I will stick with my plan and not buy Caltex and I still believe if the browsers stayed empty for a while they would start scratching heads.

Reiner
0
FollowupID: 442484

Follow Up By: Member - andrew B (Kununurra) - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:24

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:24
I don't think the gov has upped its rates, so the 50c rise would put 5c extra tax, the rest being for the oil companies

Cheers andrew
0
FollowupID: 442489

Follow Up By: Laura B - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:52

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:52
yeah - if "we all ignored caltex for a while" - yeah maybe but the chances of that are so slim its not funny!!!

remember that there are multi million dollar companies that have fleet deals with fuel cards, not just caltex but all the majors have this......

having only the odd person stick up for this is not going to change anything, not even ringing the complaints hotline...

I agree it sux but in reality 99.9% of the country arent really going to do what you are going to do......they just want petrol so they dont have to walk......

If you think its dear here buy a full tanks worth in England and then i think there is a right to complain!!!LOL!!! A small car costs AU$100 or more to fill where here it costs about $50-60......

Im not bagging ou out or anything, dont get me wrong, I just think that the odd person is not going to make a difference......and what happens if your out in woop woop and there is only caltex...do you run out down the road or fill up....or are you on a bike!!??

LB
0
FollowupID: 442500

Follow Up By: Bilbo - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 00:25

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 00:25
Laura B,

I'm sure the tax on fuel is a fixed excise tax and not a percentage tax. i.e if fuel is $1.50 per litre, "the guvmint" get about 60 cents. If it's $2.00 per litre they still only get "about 60 cents".

But what is anoying is that we pay GST on the total price of fuel - including the excise tax amount. And that is " a tax on a tax". Which, incidentally, is illegal. Has anyone thought to tell Costello this?

Bilbo

0
FollowupID: 442625

Follow Up By: Member - Reiner G (QLD) 4124 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:26

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:26
And I remember very well that we got promised ( to sell the GST) that the excise tax will be replaced by GST which would make fuel and transport cheaper.
They must have forgotten that one.........now we pay both.
Now Costello wants the top job.........he is not getting it if I can help it.
People forget stuff to easy.

Reiner
0
FollowupID: 442630

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:18

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:18
>>of course it would work if we all ignored Caltex for a while.......

So,
1) how long do you think it would take them to up the price on the week/mth that your buying from them to compensate? - they know your doing it.
They wont miss out on profit - or even worse, they will just UP the price across the board to "teach us a lesson".. they have what you need. remember the age old SUPPLY N' DEMAND?

2) they are multi BILLION$ companies.. your $20.00 profit doesnt mean bleep to them. - even 2000 of your friends $20.00 means less than a maggots left nut.

3) there are only a certain amount of COMPANIES that sell fuel in Australia.. EG: Shell get fuel from Caltex in some states, and BP sell to others, and others to others..

So, it wont make bleep difference.

The only ones your hurting are the service station OWNERS....

Have a look back thru the archives for a thread that was EXACTLY the same as this dribble, a post by Eric, he used to run servo's.... hes probably on the floor laughing too hard, thats why he hasnt replied.
0
FollowupID: 442655

Follow Up By: tex1972 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:22

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:22
isn't funny statefleet (nsw govt fleet company) just changed thier fuel contract to caltex
0
FollowupID: 442840

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:53

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:53
"And I remember very well that we got promised ( to sell the GST) that the excise tax will be replaced by GST which would make fuel and transport cheaper.
They must have forgotten that one.........now we pay both."

Im quite certain that GST was never going to replace it. What did happen though was that the "fuel tax" was renamed "excise" as you cant have a tax on a tax.
0
FollowupID: 442873

Follow Up By: tex1972 - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:25

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:25
definition of excise

An internal tax imposed on the production, sale, or consumption of a commodity or the use of a service within a country: excises on tobacco, liquor, and long-distance telephone calls.
A licensing charge or a fee levied for certain privileges.

tr.v. ex·cised, ex·cis·ing, ex·cis·es
To levy an excise on.

so all this is just crxp from the govt we already have tax on taxes
0
FollowupID: 442889

Reply By: Member - Beatit (QLD) - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:24

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:24
Boycott the lot (including the Gov't) and ride a push bike.

Kind regards
AnswerID: 185612

Follow Up By: Laura B - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:26

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:26
its takes me 20 min to get to town and that includes going over 2 mountains....the govt can keep getting my money!!!

LB
0
FollowupID: 442453

Follow Up By: Member - Beatit (QLD) - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:30

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:30
Hi Laura,

Where's your sense of adventure?

Started riding to work a couple of days a week five months ago and it now takes me 30 minutes for the 10.5 K trip. No fuel or tax is plenty of incentive but there is more - great scenery, fresh air and some improvement to my health.

Kind regards
0
FollowupID: 442454

Follow Up By: Member No 1- Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 15:21

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 15:21
i'm with Laura...and i dont need to drive over any mountains....or even small hills for that matter...its easier to drive
0
FollowupID: 442467

Follow Up By: Laura B - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:45

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:45
I will have the sense of adventure when my 3 and 1 yr ld have grown up and wouldnt need carrying and when im not prega's!!!!LOL!!! Na really I would if I didnt have to take the kids everywhere i went and could take my time.....

my friend lost his license fr 12 months and had to ride to work....a 20 min trip in the car down the hwy...he got pretty fast after a while and got fit and lost 40 kg!!!

Laura
0
FollowupID: 442497

Follow Up By: Member No 1- Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:47

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:47
40kg???? sounds like something swmbo should be doing
0
FollowupID: 442498

Follow Up By: ro-dah-o (WA) - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:07

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:07
It was a pleasure knowing you LOL!!
0
FollowupID: 442504

Follow Up By: Mr Fawlty - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:35

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:35
Dr told me I need to loose 32kg.....Suggested riding a bike, eating less etc etc...Only problem with the bicycle is geting a sheet of MDF home from Bunnings with a head wind... a real bugger.
0
FollowupID: 442515

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 19:29

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 19:29
Like Beatit, I started riding a bike to work after moving house this year - 20minutes - its quicker than driving, and parking the truck, and can go all the way along Linear Park, meaning I hopefully won't get killed in the process. In 6 months I've lost 2 kilos :-))))
0
FollowupID: 442547

Follow Up By: Member - Bware (Tweed Valley) - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 17:36

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 17:36
Yeah, the bike option doesn't sound too good. Just the idea of riding 40km's to or from work makes me feel like another beer; let alone the mountain, the highway with B-doubles, riding home at 2 a.m. after work possibly in fog or rain..... But gee whiz, I'll be fit when the B-double hits me at 3 a.m. in the fog LOL
0
FollowupID: 442797

Reply By: Landie - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:27

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:27
The reason oil companies are getting away with it is because there is generally a shortage of refining capacity worldwide. Greater demand, less supply, prices go up. Not that it makes it any more palatable mind you, but at least explains why it is happening.

But there are many examples of the same. Why does holiday accommodation cost more during the school holidays? The cost of the plane ticket to get you there mysteriously goes up despite the fact that logically it doesn’t cost an airline any more to fly than it did when there was less demand outside of the peak holiday season. I'm betting an umbrella seller marks up more on a wet and wolly winters day, than he otherwise would.

I guess we could ban them all, but then we’d have to sit at home and watch the telly, and what would that do to the price of a new one?

Of course, if you can’t beat them, hedge your fuel bill and buy shares in the company (not to be construed as financial advice!)

Landie
AnswerID: 185613

Follow Up By: Trevor R (QLD) - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 19:00

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 19:00
Dead right Landie, I've been to Tamworth many many times but one year I got stuck there at the same time as Country Music Festival and the increase in price of just about everything (including sandwiches) was enough to turn me off from spending money in this town whenever I pass through.

Welcome aboard too mate, I see your joining date in your profile.

Regards, Trevor.
0
FollowupID: 442540

Follow Up By: Landie - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 20:00

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 20:00
Hi Trevor

Thanks mate, actually I'd been a member for a couple of years, but didn't renew after we sold our Landie earlier this year. Bought another one, so thought I'd better get back on board here.

See you out there.

0
FollowupID: 442561

Reply By: Footloose - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:51

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 14:51
Having been told that around 10% of Australian households aren't concerned with fuel prices (in a previous post), I'll just rage quietly...for once.
AnswerID: 185618

Follow Up By: Member No 1- Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 15:22

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 15:22
add me in...thats make 11%
0
FollowupID: 442468

Follow Up By: Member - Reiner G (QLD) 4124 - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:17

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:17
Would that mean 90% do care? thats a lot of people. For the ones who don't care wonder how they feel ones we pay $2.30 or more........ and what about the single income Aussies with children?

Reiner
0
FollowupID: 442486

Follow Up By: Trevor R (QLD) - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 19:05

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 19:05
MN1,

can I assume that you have 200 000 people living in your house, because for you to make a 1% difference in 20 Million that's about what it equates to.
With a cute cheeky grin and those sunnies it wouldn't surprise me to hear there is.

All in fun.
Trevor.
0
FollowupID: 442541

Follow Up By: Member No 1- Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 07:40

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 07:40
the other 199998 are all women....
0
FollowupID: 442641

Follow Up By: Member - Beatit (QLD) - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:28

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:28
Well that explains your happy (?) disposition No.1. Must be a fantastic place around the luna cycle!

Kind regards
0
FollowupID: 442660

Follow Up By: Member No 1- Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:33

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:33
its alttle trying ...but i'll manage
0
FollowupID: 442662

Reply By: Barnesy - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 15:23

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 15:23
As soon as my fourby is paid off I'm buying a motor bike for getting around and keeping the fourby for travelling only.

It is disconcerting knowing that the taxes i pay on fuel and everything else i buy, a large proportion is going into fighting a 'pre-emptive' war that nobody wanted. For what? to bolster our oil supplies. Seems like an ugly roundabout.

One answer would have to be to change the way we live. Catch public transport where possible, ride a bike, buy more effecient cars, ride share etc. I can see the trucking industry struggling and rail making a big come back.

A quote: "the poor are always being f****d over by the rich, always have, always will".
AnswerID: 185623

Reply By: TerraFirma - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:36

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:36
Don't single our Caltex for going public on the maths, the others are also doing the same. Nothing we can do about it , except bend over with the Vaseline ready..!
I'd love the Labour party to go public with a policy of reducing tax on fuel, they'd win the next election. Nobody wants to do it, theres some dark alley politics going on which demonstrates that Labour or Liberal, their both the same.
AnswerID: 185633

Follow Up By: Member - Reiner G (QLD) 4124 - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:57

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:57
All the Labor Party is thinking " its our turns again to line our pockets"
Have you forgotten 17% home loan interests? Besley in the top job......what a scary thought is that.
0
FollowupID: 442522

Reply By: Redeye - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:54

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 16:54
Just to add insult to injury when in Bamaga earlier this month the price of diesel went up 20 cents from $1.5x to $1.7x because the Feral Government had removed the remote subsidy.

Wounder what other locations this effected?

Now how gives us the S**ts

Not impressed.

Redeye
AnswerID: 185635

Follow Up By: dj Patrol - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:07

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:07
Caltex wont go broke cause while they are givin the 4cents discount through the big chain store people will keep goin there just like the other brand to.

dj
0
FollowupID: 442505

Reply By: Member - Reiner G (QLD) 4124 - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:34

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 17:34
That's why they keep screwing us...........lets do nothing..........good plan.
Why think nobody is interested..........how about thinking a bit more positive, we the ones giving them our money, lets drive past Caltex and fill up on other stations how hard is that?

Reiner
AnswerID: 185641

Reply By: hopscotch - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 18:02

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 18:02
Can I suggest that we all do a couple of things .

Firstly ;lets get our facts right before we end up in more trouble than we can handle. I understand that the duty - read Federal Govt tax - on a litre of petrol is about 40 cents per litre and it is constant regardless of the final price at the pump. What does increase is the GST which rises as the final price increases. That 10% goes back to the states and I don't hear them screaming that they are getting too much.
Secondly lets be a little less emotional and look at the big picture. Have we boycotted the banks which are turning over profits in the thousands? They take our money, give us next to nothing and charge us the earth if we should want to borrow some of it back Or Telstra which made $3000 million and still can't get it's share value up.
What about Woolworths and Coles. Are we going to boycott them? They are reportedly buying bananas for about $1.80 per kg from the growers and charging $13 on the shelf. And they are only paying $1.80 because the poor buggers in north Queensland got knocked over by the cyclone. When it comes time for them to restart supplying the market I would bet the price will be much less. It was as low as 16 cents per kg just before 'Larry'

If I was a Caltex shareholder - and this is the only one of the big 4 in which you as an australian can buy shares - then I think I would be pleased that they are turning a profit after running at a loss for the previous thirty years or so. Look on the bright side at least the profit stays here which is more than can be said for the others.

Yes I agree the price of fuel seems to be higher than WE think it should be and I wonder how our new Woolworths site in town has been able to maintain diesel at $1.319 for the past three months while all the others around have been up and down like the proverbial.

Yes we are probably being taken for a ride on a whole lot of things but I don't believe that there is any real action along the line proposed which will make one scrape of difference. The other thing is that some areas don't have an option of choice. There is one brand and they take it or go without.

I feel better now. Thanks for listening (reading)

Kevin J

AnswerID: 185650

Follow Up By: Redeye - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 18:38

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 18:38
How many of us true Australians have shares in these companies.

Redeye
0
FollowupID: 442534

Reply By: Rokkitt - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 20:51

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 20:51
What about pedals in the car....:) fred flintstone style
just remember this is just the start - unfortunately the oil is gonna run out!
AnswerID: 185696

Reply By: fisho64 - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 22:05

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 22:05
Im gonna insult a few people now no doubt.

Most people are too STUPID and LAZY too bother looking for the cheaper fuel.

Most people are too STUPID too look past the 1 or 2 cents difference from supermarket fuel to independants.

Most people are too STUPID and LAZY to realize that when the independants are gone from cities they will be up bleep creek.

If a company makes the effort to shave a little more off the major retailers price, then support them. Even if they are equal.

Most people are STUPID enough not to realize that $1.42 minus 4 cents discount is the same as $1.38 at the independant.

Most people are too STUPID to work out that when fuel discounting came in at 80 cents a litre 4 cents was 5% discount. Now it is (inevitably) $1.40 that equals 2.8% discount.
When it is (inevitably up to) $2 it is only 2%.

Is anyone not STUPID enough to see where it is heading? By a couple of years time independants gone, discount is almost nothing and NO GOING BACK.

Do some research and you will see that most peoples perceptions of advertising is simple. People paying X$ at Bobs discount fuel think they are getting something better cos they get it at 4cents less than they are told it is worth. When I drove across the Nullabor last week I met an old bloke with a Patrol at Head of the Bight. We were going in opposite directions and got to talking about fuel etc.
I asked him about fuel to the west and he told me that they were all $1.80 but he had a page of vouchers for a 2 cent discount. The page only listed the expensive roadhouses. I had spoken to travellers in Port Augusta and been told Penong and Mundrabilla were the places to buy. I had filled at Penong for $1.43 and was expecting $1.52 at Mundra. This poor bugga had filled all his jerrycans and tanks at $1.78. Both these roadhouses are well within range of the cruiser/patrol.

Doesnt anyone realize how easy it is for a company to slip in here a story of a "patrol that bleep itself from using 'cheap' fuel and cost thousands to fix" or a manufacturer (Nissan has come up here in the last few days) unintentionally blaming fuel for the failure of their engine?
Doesnt anyone see that if it were the case your car wouldnt be the only one f...ed on the side of the road up from the petrol station? there would be half a dozen.

Anyone who is insulted by this statement is probably one of those referred to here.
All I can say to them is GET OVER IT.
AnswerID: 185716

Reply By: Off-track - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 22:23

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 22:23
If you use diesel you should really use Shell. Havent got the official info with me but their diesel is a better mix and normally provides me with better consumption over Caltex poo.
AnswerID: 185718

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 23:35

Thursday, Jul 27, 2006 at 23:35
please do find the "official info" and post it up here as conclusive proof!
0
FollowupID: 442619

Follow Up By: Off-track - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:29

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:29
Sound like a Doubting Thomas there fishy. I will try to find this info that was posted on a similar forum about a year ago. It was an independent spec sheet on diesel fuel brands. Basically the Shell diesel had a better RON (or whatever indicator was used) than the others.
0
FollowupID: 442661

Follow Up By: hopscotch - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 16:55

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 16:55
What part of Australia do you call home? If in Qld then your distillate will most likely be BP or Caltex. NSW will be Caltex or Shell. Vic /Tas are Shell and Mobil . SA is mostly Mobil. WA is almost 100% BP and the NT is a bit of BP Shell and imported. Supply is on what is termed Borrow & Loan basis.There are differences in the fuels but these relate to the source of the crude oil and the season in the refinery supply area eg Summer or Winter. There are currently some difference in sulphur levels as the various refineries change over to new systems to produce low contaminant (low sulphur) diesel. To the best of my experience consumption has more to do with the driver, the weight of his foot and the state of his mind than the company supplying the fuel.

Yes I have had 32 years in the oil industry. I didn't understand the whole structure then and I certainly don't think there are many who can handle the complexities of the industry completely now. It certainly is not a 'fish & chip' type market.

Kevin J

0
FollowupID: 442788

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 18:50

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 18:50
"Sound like a Doubting Thomas there fishy. I will try to find this info that was posted on a similar forum about a year ago. It was an independent spec sheet on diesel fuel brands. Basically the Shell diesel had a better RON (or whatever indicator was used) than the others."

please do feel free to post the link/data OFF TRACK, so we can proceed to eat our words!
0
FollowupID: 442815

Follow Up By: Off-track - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:52

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 20:52
What words?
0
FollowupID: 442843

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:09

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 21:09
"To the best of my experience consumption has more to do with the driver, the weight of his foot and the state of his mind than the company supplying the fuel. "

among other things, I agree with the above statement.
0
FollowupID: 442845

Follow Up By: Off-track - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:05

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:05
Of course that is true, but it is not the only factor. Anyway I am still searching the net for the Spec Sheet that I saw on a forum but have found some anecdotal stuff;
Site Link

Give me some time.
0
FollowupID: 442854

Follow Up By: Off-track - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:07

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:07
Some other interesting info on diesel;
www.aip.com.au/industry/fuel_table.htm
0
FollowupID: 442855

Follow Up By: Off-track - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:27

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:27
and some more if you like a long read. Interesting some of the stuff you find.

http://fueltaxinquiry.treasury.gov.au/content/Submissions/Industry/Sasol_198.asp#3.1.3
0
FollowupID: 442858

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:31

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:31
have had a bit of a look there but cant find any comparisons of fuel quality,
which page is it on?

anecdotal stuff is what we have here already.

Sorry to harp on but this is the sort of "anecdotal Stuff" that can easily be started by a company to scaremonger people into buying their product. Its a lot cheaper to do this than to advertise how good theirs is.

Not by any means saying you are doing this deliberately OFF TRACK, but perhaps you are perpetuating some rubbish written by someone else who is?

Gotta take everything with a grain of salt I think.
0
FollowupID: 442862

Follow Up By: Off-track - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:46

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 22:46
Site Link

Site Link

Site Link

Site Link

Site Link

What were those words again??

Type in cetane or Shell diesel into Exploroz archives.
0
FollowupID: 442868

Follow Up By: Off-track - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 23:00

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 23:00
Yes I know what you are saying but I think it is a little paranoid...unless you mention the f*tch (not gunna type full word as it makes a hyperlink) garbage. It is anecdotal but there is a fairly significant amount of it. The info I saw was on another forum site and hyperlinked to a website/page that had diesel fuel specs by brand. I am still searching.

While in Adelaide I noticed a marked difference between Caltex and Shell diesel. Now that I have escaped to the 21st Century and QLD I have to admit that I havent really tested it out as I pretty much just fill with Shell or BP.
0
FollowupID: 442875

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 23:19

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 23:19
Oh well, Im just happy we have GULL here with B20 in WA. It runs good in both my turbo diesels, is a few cents cheaper than others, and matches supermarket discounted price while supporting an independant supplier who is also making an effort to supply something a little different to the market.
0
FollowupID: 442880

Reply By: andoland - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:07

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 08:07
When will people understand that fuel companies do not control the price of oil. Oil is a commodity sold on a world market where the price is a function of supply and demand. If the price goes up because demand is high or supply is low then why wouldn't the oil companies take advantage of that, just like you or I would if it were our business and suddenly the price of our product went up?

Ando
AnswerID: 185753

Reply By: bigcol - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:10

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 09:10
We're getting ripped by the Companies. Ripped by the Aholes pumping it out of the ground and ripped by our own elected representatives.

The Companies are recording record profits so they're not trying to be friendly to the user.
The Oil Barons are controlling the price. These turds can cut and increase production as they see fit. They are the real winners.
The Government is screwing us as well.You might have cheap interest rates but you are being taxed at a rate never before seen in Australia's history.
Even as recent as last January the Howard Government increased fuel excise. The bill was passed in September 2005. So now we are paying more for our Home loans because of the inflation caused by rising costs.
When the GST that was never going to be introduced (another one of Howards lies) was bought in, fuel was around 80 to 85 cents per litre just depends on which state you lived in.
At 80c we pay 7.27c in GST.
At $1.40 we are now paying 12.72c per litre. So the highest taxing government in Australias history is now getting an extra 5.5 cents per litre in tax alone and that doesn't even include the 40c per litre excise. Or the excise that will come in a couple of years down the track on LPG and alternative fuel.
If you want to do something about the fuel prices start ringing your local representatives and start whinging about fule prices and what you will do to them via the ballot box if they sit on their hands.
The Government has by their own admission around 14 billion of OUR money in their coffers. By the reports of some economists it's more likely 18 billion. Thats even while we're at war with half the Muslim countries of the world.
Imagine how much money they'd have if we didn't follow George dubbya blindy into battle.
It's time for our grubby politicians to get off our case and give some of it back
AnswerID: 185766

Follow Up By: hopscotch - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 17:03

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 17:03
As I understand the legislation the GST goes to the State Govts and I have not heard one of the Premiers winging about how much they are receiving so I can only assume that it must be 'heaps' And what do they do for it or with it. Centainly not spent wisely in my book.

Kevin J
0
FollowupID: 442791

Reply By: fisho64 - Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:46

Friday, Jul 28, 2006 at 10:46
about 5 years back the federal gov made a big mistake (for them) by disconnecting the excise on all fuel from CPI increases.
In effect they cannot raise fuel excise on petrol/diesel without announcing it.
Actually the excise is DECREASING by CPI yearly

"Excise on petrol and diesel will remain at 38.143 cents per litre (cpl). Excise on LPG and ethanol will be 12.5 cpl – half their energy content value."
above is from Howards press release.

there has been no change in excise for mineral petrol/diesel.
Fact is we are among the lowest taxed for fuel in the western world.
AnswerID: 185801

Follow Up By: tex1972 - Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:35

Saturday, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:35
its just our bad luck that we have the long distances to drive to get anywhere and a public transport system that is about the worst in the world
0
FollowupID: 442891

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)