Wednesday, Aug 02, 2006 at 14:02
Well hevs, touched on a favourite issue there!
Had it on a Maverick (carby), and two Commodores (VN and VS series II - fuel injected). While admittedly fuel costs were lower, I had to constantly take account of the gas factor in everyday driving.
. more frequent trips to service station - crap fuel consumption
. loss of power, even on computerised/injected vehicles
. remember to leave it on petrol when turned off or there would be - cold morning starting issues
. backfires, blowing off air cleaner cover etc. and on one infamous occasion at
Stockton with the Maverick, blowing the muffler apart through a backfire (there is a much longer story associated with that particular incident, but it could be directly attributed to the fact that it was a dual fuel vehicle)
. collateral issues to do with the fact that they were non-factory installations, eg it can be unreliable, and as someone pointed out above, hard to fix in the bush, and can be more prone to problems. On the GQ, the petrol tank had to be replaced by the gas cylinder, and a secondary tank installed. No one realised that the new tank was rubbing on brakelines, out of site under the vehicle. We found out the hard way when the brakes stopped working one day, when it finally wore through the brake line on a trip through the Alps to Corryong. Now that was interesting!
. fuel range in the bush
. the petrol side of the engine is also compromised and doesn't perform as
well as standard - although this aspect is better with computer controlled engines
. takes a long time to recoup original outlay, which is even greater if you have to add a fuel tank, or re site the rear wheel.
I now have a dieself 4WD (Patrol GQ) and a petrol car, and would never go gas again.
Hendo
AnswerID:
186728