2007 Toyota Tundra

Submitted: Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 21:36
ThreadID: 37207 Views:2820 Replies:9 FollowUps:23
This Thread has been Archived
Be nice if we got these here in Australia , take a gander at the towing capacity in the specs , I love that white Auto shifter too,On show at the 2006 Chicago Auto Show

The new Tundra is a bigger truck. The Tundra's wheelbase has been stretched 10 inches to 138.3 inches on the standard cab. The wheelbase on the Double Cab is 150.5 inches.--------------------

Site Link
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 21:42

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 21:42
I should have added the link to the show because the 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is a massive Pickup

Site Link
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 191547

Follow Up By: F4Phantom - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 21:49

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 21:49
piece of crap
0
FollowupID: 449337

Follow Up By: F4Phantom - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 21:49

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 21:49
piece of unrefined crap
0
FollowupID: 449338

Follow Up By: Derek from Affordable Batteries & Radiators - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 21:52

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 21:52
Not even 4wd.

0
FollowupID: 449339

Follow Up By: GaryInOz (Vic) - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:25

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:25
Semi for "civvies"

Not that much different to the Hummer for hairdressers...

Still leaves the question, WHY? To pick up a quart of milk from the corner store? To drop the kids at soccer???? WHY???????????????????????????????
0
FollowupID: 449353

Follow Up By: George - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:27

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:27
They come in many options including various configuration of 4x4 and are far better than anything available here. The most annoying part is the pricing in US:
$16,155 – $33,575, and you could probably do better with a bit of haggling. If they ever get here we could probably multiply the above by 4...
Cheers
0
FollowupID: 449354

Follow Up By: andoland - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:07

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 04:07
I saw one of those in Colorado the other day and didn't know what the hell it was. I would never own one but it was pretty impressive driving past.

Ando
0
FollowupID: 449381

Follow Up By: GaryInOz (Vic) - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 22:47

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 22:47
"...but it was pretty impressive driving past...."

especially the artificial sunset for half an hour at 2.00pm LOL
0
FollowupID: 449583

Follow Up By: andoland - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 23:49

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 23:49
Yeah, it was a bit like that.
0
FollowupID: 449606

Reply By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:15

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:15
4.5t towinjg capacity isn't bad...
AnswerID: 191555

Follow Up By: GaryInOz (Vic) - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:31

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:31
How many people need to tow anything that weighs 4.5 ton?? (three average sized cars) And with a combined weight of in excess of 8 ton should they be driving it on a normal licence anyway (no additional licence needed in US for these vehicles). I really don't undersytand the mentality of people that buy these things as runabouts/trophy vehicles............
0
FollowupID: 449355

Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 23:10

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 23:10
Probably only horsey people would need it Gary... And I am all for the introduction of licensing to tow everything from the garden 6x4 upward...
0
FollowupID: 449366

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 23:19

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 23:19
Blue
Yeh nice Pickup but It amazes me just how many people see these things and then say like GaryInOz that everyone is going to use it as a runabout, but thats the city attitude I guess and how city people think , to them there is no country and there is no people who two 2/3/4 horses in a float , nah i guess they could do it with the Falcon , and the same bloke would tow his 25 ft loaded Caravan with his Commodore, So horses for courses ,and when you think about it Blue 4.5 tonnes is not hard to exceed ...not if you got a wife ...my van is a 20ft and with all my stuff in it i bet its going about 2t plus the cruiser goes 3 tonne when full of fuel, but I don't need a larger vehicle for what I do ,

Doug
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 449368

Follow Up By: Marn - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 21:22

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 21:22
Why have more classes of licenses???? To give those bludgers in the government more money?? Those pricks get enough now.
0
FollowupID: 449548

Follow Up By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 21:42

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 21:42
Marn, mate I've seen too many knob ends do too much damage to themselves and others trying to tow a 6x4 trailer... Almost lost count of how many times I've ordered idiots out of their cars so I can back their trailer in/out/around and stop them doing more damage... Too many seem to fail to remember their car is now 4 or 5m longer when changing lanes, cornering, trying to negotiate McD's drive through... I could go on all day about the stupid things I've seen people do with trailers on cars... In the Army we had to pass a test before we could tow a trailer, valuable skills learnt there and it should be the same in civi life.

OK, stepping down from soapbox now...
0
FollowupID: 449553

Follow Up By: Marn - Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 20:33

Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 20:33
Yeah Isee your point in the training side of things but you know as well as i do that the government wont introduce these things without fees. You want to drive a car- $30 please. You want to drive a 4WD- Another $30 please. You want to tow a trailer- another $30 please.You want to tow a caravan-Another $30 please...........$600 a year + insurance is enough for me anyway....:)
0
FollowupID: 449783

Follow Up By: GaryInOz (Vic) - Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 20:56

Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 20:56
Marn, I totally agree with the additional licences, the thing wouldd be to actually have to do a decent amount of prac/theory before it is issued(similar to motor bike/light truck). It would be pointless issuing licences like recreational fishing licences where "ya pays ya money, ya gets ya ticket".

Benefits??? Say goodnight to "Mums taxi", "trophy" vehicles, and ppl that haven't got a clue how to drive them in the first place. If you are driving something that weighs in at almost the same as an unladen medium truck, with the same sort of handling and CofG issues, then why shouldn't you need a special licence to drive them????

Practical upshot??? Less ppl in 4WD's having accidents (deaths and injuries) and possibly less insurance cost per year (no more Coles carpark fender benders by "Mum's taxi").

So which would you prefer, an extra $200-400 for the extra lessons and driving test once, or an extra $??? EVERY YEAR on your insurance? That pretty much is how the situation is at the moment.
0
FollowupID: 449785

Follow Up By: Marn - Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 21:34

Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 21:34
I am talking more about the extreme amount of money that the RTA enjoys taking off you every year.
0
FollowupID: 449789

Reply By: Sarg - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:46

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:46
And it DEFINITLY looks better than the fugly Hilux available here .
AnswerID: 191561

Follow Up By: George - Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:48

Monday, Aug 28, 2006 at 22:48
Hell yeah...
0
FollowupID: 449359

Reply By: Member - Andy Q (VIC) - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 00:11

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 00:11
....Guys!, guys!, guys we're talkin about a yank tank here, lets not get carried away
andy
AnswerID: 191572

Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:18

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:18
What's wrong with Yank Tanks?

I can't wait for GM to release the Hummer H3 in Australia in about 12 months time.
I just hope it will be available with a diesel donk option and I'm getting one.

The right hand drive Hummer is to be made in South Africa so it will have an "international flavour".

Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 191597

Follow Up By: GaryInOz (Vic) - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:26

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:26
It'll break down on both sides of the road..............
0
FollowupID: 449396

Reply By: Member - John R (NSW) - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:42

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:42
No wonder we're running out of oil :-)
AnswerID: 191607

Reply By: Willem - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:31

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:31
The Americans luv their cars and trucks.

Most of these vehicles shown are really only for pavement driving. One is hard pressed to find a gravel road in California. I did find a good bush track in Oregon but was driving in my brothers' diesel Benz 300 so had to take it easy.

A couple of days ago a bloke passed thu town driving what looked like a stretched Twincab Ford F350 towng a huge horsefloat. I would not even be able to afford to fill its fuel tank...lol

One thing about the American vehicles is that they are comfy!!!!!
AnswerID: 191614

Follow Up By: Plantman - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 17:48

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 17:48
You obviously never made it to the Californian sierras. There's plenty of off roading there, especially over gnarly granite boulder country. And plenty of enthusiasts with serious off road machines.
0
FollowupID: 449504

Follow Up By: Willem - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 17:58

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 17:58
Smart arse. Re-read what I said. There are tracks in the high country, I know that.
0
FollowupID: 449508

Follow Up By: Plantman - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 22:23

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 22:23
I read what you said.

No need for that. Was merely adding comment from experience as there is plenty of gravel roads and was not intended to stir.
0
FollowupID: 449572

Follow Up By: Willem - Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:17

Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:17
OK
0
FollowupID: 449639

Reply By: Fusion - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:47

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:47
The front end of the Tundra looks very much like the 'preview' images & drawings I've seen of the new Cruiser in 4by mags etc. Would make sense that the new Cruiser would look like it. It certainly far better looking than the Hilux. (Although the lux has grown on me a bit since shooting one & spending a day in it)

Here's a better front 3/4 image:

Tundra

Aaron.
AnswerID: 191633

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (W.A) - Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:58

Tuesday, Aug 29, 2006 at 11:58
I like the look of the new Hilux too , much nicer than the old one. and the Tundra looks absolutly fabulous, , but yeh a lot of the others here on the Forum have got their heads stuck in the sand and want to stay in the Ford Maverick,Suzuki X90 and Rocsta era and see every thing else as not worthy of a mention , just have a look at some of the childish remarks and it makes one wonder.

Doug
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 449448

Reply By: MAVERICK(WA) - Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:04

Wednesday, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:04
just the thing to move those bloody excels and 'babes in lancers' off the freeway - when can i get one???? rgds
Slow down and relax......

Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 191743

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)