3.0l Gu engine failures

Submitted: Tuesday, Sep 05, 2006 at 19:58
ThreadID: 37463 Views:9618 Replies:8 FollowUps:13
This Thread has been Archived
I know this is a regularly talked about issue for the 3.0l to have problems around the 100k mark. Appeared the problem was with the 2000-2001 models and supposedly fixed after that. I have recently read of a late 2002 model having similar problems. I would like to hear if anyone else has had problems with models made after 2001. My 2002 Gu is going in for its 100k service next week prior to a three week trip QLD-NSW-SA.
Thanks.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Angler - Tuesday, Sep 05, 2006 at 21:22

Tuesday, Sep 05, 2006 at 21:22
I have a mate with a 2000 model that has 215,000 K's on the clock and the only thing that has gone wrong was the intercooler sprung a leak. The vehicle is an auto and is serviced localy every 10,000K.
Mine is a 2003 model auto and so far the glovebox lid has been changed under warranty due to paint rubbing off. Only 60,000 on the clock so far.

Pooley
AnswerID: 193028

Reply By: On Patrol - Tuesday, Sep 05, 2006 at 21:35

Tuesday, Sep 05, 2006 at 21:35
Codaro
My series 3 (2003) model is fitted with the 8.5lt sump and supposedly modified pistons. My car has over 150000km on the clock and regularly does 110 kph runs to Melb from Syd, no problem.

The problem, as I know it is, with pre mod cars, that is models with the 6ltr sump.

The problem seems to be when the vehicle is driven for long periods at 100-120kph that they sometimes use oil.

When the oil level drops so to does the splash of oil under the pistons causing them to overheat and fail.

The solution is, to check you oil level every few hundred Km to see if yours is one of the engines that use oil at speed, because not all or even most do that.

This is a wise precaution on any engine.

I had a NEW Misibushi van that used NO oil around town but a run to Newcastle from Sydney saw me use 1ltr of oil even when the motor was NEW through to 200000.

ALWAYS CHECK YOU OIL, that goes for ANY make and model.
There are thousands of 3ltr Patrols out there doing just fine.

Common sence should be your guide, not the scare mongers that love to knock any vehicle that is not the same as theirs.

On Patrol
AnswerID: 193038

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Tuesday, Sep 05, 2006 at 23:11

Tuesday, Sep 05, 2006 at 23:11
dont know much about the patrol specifically but I would be suprised if the under piston "splash" was just that?
All high performance diesels (and petrols for that matter) that I know of use a spray up under the crown to remove heat. If the oil level fell enough to stop this then it would have no oil pressure at all?
correct me if I am wrong, all you patrol experts and detractors!
0
FollowupID: 450868

Follow Up By: nonon - Tuesday, Sep 05, 2006 at 23:27

Tuesday, Sep 05, 2006 at 23:27
Interesting to note that in my 2000 patrol owners manual it states oil capacity as 5.7L

When I do an oil change without changing the filter [every 5,000] I fill nearly two 5 litre containers, yet the book tells me I should use only 5.2L

That's quite a difference.
0
FollowupID: 450874

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:00

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 10:00
one fix was a shorter dipstick LMAO! and they didnt even replace then, they cut them...
0
FollowupID: 450915

Follow Up By: blown4by - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 15:10

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 15:10
There is no such thing as "splash" lubrication under the piston crowns. There are spray nozzles fitted in the little end of the connecting rods to which oil is fed under pressure from the oil pump which gets its supply of oil from a pick up pipe in the BOTTOM of the sump so even if the oil level drops below the add mark on the dipstick oil will still be sprayed under the piston crown until such time as the oil level gets so low that the pump runs out of oil by which time you have got more problems than just lack of oil to the underside of the pistons. What the problem was that the dipsticks fitted were too long resulting in insufficient oil capacity in the sump even though the stick indicated the sump was "full". This causes the oil to run hotter degrading the oil additive package faster making it less able to do its job properly. Added to that during engine production some spray nozzles were misaligned resulting in the spray not going exactly where it should have which caused overheating of the pistons. I agree with your comments re checking oil and when travelling this should be done every morning. The comments in your last paragraph are spot on.
0
FollowupID: 450975

Follow Up By: Leroy - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 15:44

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 15:44
nonon, when the did the dipstick mod you needed more oil to fill to that level. I think sump capacity is now is 8.3 litres.

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 450981

Reply By: PhilZD30Patrol - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:14

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 09:14
Hello Codaro

1. The 2000 / 2001 ZD30 owners hand book specified engine oil changes at max. of 15,000kms. For extreme conditions (e.g. towing, dusty conditions or stop start city traffic?) change oil and filter every 7,500kms.

I was verbaly advised by a motor dealer that Nissan revised the oil and filter maximum change kilometres down to 5,000 kms once they started to experience engine failures. no written advice.

2. The 2000 / 2001 ZD30 owners hand book specified a range of engine oils. I used 15W - 40 CF or CF-4 as it seemed most suitable for Australian conditions.

It clearly states NOT to use CG oil.

3. I was given a copy of a Service Bulletin which I have copied below. It was a copy of a copy so I don't accept responsibility if it is incorrect.

Bulletin No: MAO4-001
Re: Revised Engine Oil Specification
Applied Model: Y61 & D22
Applied range: ZD3O Engines

Please be advised that the specification for the 011 fill on the ZD30 has been revised. Engine Oils that meet the specification listed below are the only oils that are permitted for use in the ZD30 Engine. 011 Specification: ACEA A3 or JASO DH.1. Nissan strongly recommend that a viscosity rating of 10W40 be used. For specific viscosity relating to ambient temperature ranges please refer to the viscosity chart in the relevant workshop manual.

Note: API CG-4 0118 must never be used In the ZD30 engine.

To support the revision in oil specification, Nissan has developed a
semi-synthetic 10W-40 engine oil that meets all the operational demands of this engine. The revision of the new oil specification is retrospective and will apply to all ZD30 engines.

The oil will be available from Nissan Parts & Accessories in 51t and 200lt Quantities using the following part numbers.
51t- B3005-10W40PK
2001t- B3200..10W40PK

4. The 2000 / 2001 ZD30 ZD30 owners manual has a replacement sticker over the engine oil capacity specification revising the sump capacity fill including filter to 8.1 litres. I believe this was placed in the owners manual when the sump capacity modifications were performed.

5. All major oil companies web sites that I have looked at, now specify CF 10W-40 engine oil and 5,000kms oil change periods for the ZD30.

Hope this is helpful
Keep on 4wding in your Patrol!
Phil
AnswerID: 193087

Reply By: TerraFirma - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 16:05

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 16:05
Yes the earlier diesel engines had much smaller sumps and oil capacities and therefore if the oil became contaminated you would risk doing engine damage. The newer vehicles seem to have much bigger sumps and oil capacities meaning theres more oil to go around and less risk of damage. The typical rule of thumbs apply, change your oil and filter regurlarly and use the best quality oil, we hear of problems here and there and although I am a Toyota driver it's fair to say Nissan have suffered via the Rumourmill more so than real issues. Real engine issues were suffered by the Gen 111 at one stage, Holden, not sure Nissan ever had major problems, more a case of isolated cases here and there. If I am wrong please correct me.
AnswerID: 193166

Reply By: Codaro - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 17:20

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 17:20
Thanks everyone for your input. It has been invaluable. Having only had the vehicle for 18 months.... previously a toyota owner!!!...I was not aware of this problem.

Thanks!
AnswerID: 193173

Reply By: jdpatrol - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 17:42

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 17:42
Codaro

I just have to comment on the fact that you've hardly been inundated with experiences!

I wonder about the extent of the problem. It exists no doubt about it. But at times I think others exaggerate to stick it to us 3.0l TD owners, perhaps to inflate the value of their own vehicles by making ours seem very undesirable.

I have 3 3.0l TD in my family. There are numerous 3.0l TD in my 4wd club. Many are getting up there in km's. Yet I have no personal experience of the problem.

Ours is Dec 03. We try to do the right thing - service it regularly, and check oils, filters regularly etc , and we go bush with confidence. It gets real punishment. More than ever, I don't want a thirsty 4.2 Patrol or a break diff Toyo [but still regard these as great vehicles] - and I do have personal experience of these issues!

JD
AnswerID: 193179

Follow Up By: awill4x4 - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 19:51

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 19:51
Yes, and the people below also have personal experiences regarding ZD30 engines and in each and every case it was a failure needing a complete engine rebuild and not including turbo, clutch, AFM, gearbox problems that have also been noted in the past.
I found these instances in one hours looking it speaks volumes to me regarding ZD30's and their potential for catastrophic engine failure. I'm sure there's lots of others I've missed as well.
Regards Andrew.

ZD 30 Engine Failures.

Explore Oz Forum.

Daggs.
Blown_zd30-------------------------- 244K
Roly.
AJB------------------------------------196K
Pud & Barb--------------------------165K
Bulla. (daughters car)
Yakodi--------------------------------130K
Plugger.
JR -------------------------------------130K
Mike.
B & M. -------------------------------126K
Emackj--------------------------------157K

Nissan Club members.

Graeme Wise. -----------------------72K

Outerlimits members

Manno74
Poo-trol-------------------------------66K
Wendle--------------------------------115K 2001
Rustys---------------------------------67K 2001

Patrol 4x4.com forum

Mickyd-------------------------------- 2002
Waveriders--------------------------- 98K 2002
Bushy127------------------------------195K
Redeye---------------------------------190K
Link-------------------------------------82K 2000
Pat3L
LesleyPerry---------------------------83K 2001
Scratch---------------------------------89K 2002
Stephan--------------------------------150K

0
FollowupID: 451039

Follow Up By: Leroy - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 21:33

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 21:33
but note they are all early model 3.0l not later!!

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 451061

Follow Up By: jdpatrol - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 21:34

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 21:34
Andrew

I did acknowledge that the problem exists. Just not in my personal experience. You got these mainly from forum searches - that's a powerful way of finding a problem - but how many involved people around you.

About 6 weeks ago we were out 4wdriving - 1 LC and 1 Jeep did in diff's and on the same day on another club run there was another LC diff blow-up. I count those as occurring in my circle - I saw it or knew the people involved. Yet, people carry on like no other 4wd has a problem.

I'll say it again, I enjoy using my vehicle and I do it with confidence.

JD
0
FollowupID: 451062

Follow Up By: awill4x4 - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 23:34

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 23:34
Leroy, I'll hazard a guess that the later ones haven't as yet racked up the kms and saying that a friend of mine was travelling north towing his caravan in his series 3 GU ZD30 had his turbo fail on Monday.
To have 12 members on this one forum here to have engine failures requiring a complete engine rebuild is staggering, imagine how many others are happening out there in suburbia that we don't hear about.
The engine builder we deal with around the corner has had 2 in from a local Nissan dealer who has sub contracted out the engine assembly and vehicle install. I don't know these people's names or I would have added them to the list as well.
I'm glad you guys are happy with your ZD30's but I think they are a highly stressed little motor hauling around too much weight and I don't think they will ever be likely to last as long or do as many kms as the TD42.
Regards Andrew.

0
FollowupID: 451093

Follow Up By: Leroy - Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 23:44

Wednesday, Sep 06, 2006 at 23:44
you still have to look at the facts that the early 3.0l failed early in their life and are still failing today. the later batch of 3.0l aren't failing early in their life and there has been the odd early GU3 3.0ll failure which I feel is a manufaturing overlap of product from the GU2 to the GU 3 but nowhere near the extent of the 00-01 engines.

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 451095

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:00

Thursday, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:00
you forgot a few more club members - one picked his up from nissan drove 100mtrs up road to Yota dealer and drove out in his 100.. he had traded the 3.0 in while it was being rebuilt ROTFLMAO!
0
FollowupID: 451151

Reply By: Flash - Thursday, Sep 07, 2006 at 19:04

Thursday, Sep 07, 2006 at 19:04
It all has to be kept in perspective!
Although I have an elderly TD42 and love it, especially after biting the bullet and turbo'ing it, I have NEVER heard of a 2003 or later ZD30 blowing up. Not ever! Have seen plenty with lots of kilometres, including a relation with 300,000+klms (courier type work)
I also know personally of lots of earlier models and know of only one problem (2000), -Nissan completly replaced the motor OUT of extended warranty for the princely sum of $900, though obviously some others do have trouble....
LandCruisers...?
I personally know of five blown diffs, one gearbox, and two engines destroyed by "bottom end" bearing failures. AND a very recent one which broke a timing belt and destroyed the engine!
Other brands... don't start me!
All brands can have their dud's!
Keep it in perspective.......
AnswerID: 193329

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Thursday, Sep 07, 2006 at 23:19

Thursday, Sep 07, 2006 at 23:19
>> I have NEVER heard of a 2003 or later ZD30 blowing up
Look for posts by Darren (cant remember his nick on here), he had 2 at his work.
0
FollowupID: 451304

Reply By: fourstall2000 - Tuesday, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:26

Tuesday, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:26
The story that small sump capacity was causing the ZD30 failures is rubbish,this has been Nissans excuse all along (even to the consumer affairs and newspaper journalists).
My engine blew at 118,000 kms and had already been recalled early in its life for the shorter dipstick.
Quite obviously a manufacturing fault,either materials quality or design/assembly errror caused these failures.
Rather than make this public it was less destructive to the companys reputation to push on with the low oil level story.
I believe that when the failures were occuring several changes to piston design were made to attempt to solve the problem.
Quite clearly the failures were related to either piston design or lubrication flow to this area.
Personally I think the spray pattern and oil flows were the problem and some how related to the additional oil sensor which is fitted below the Turbo on the later models.
Can any one explain the function of this sensor?
My 2000 model has now done 70,000 hard kms on its 2003 motor and is going fine.
We have just returned from a 10,000km outback trip and its going like a train,but there is always that nagging doubt in your mind due to Nissan never revealing the real truth on the cause of failures.
Regards
AnswerID: 194102

Follow Up By: Leroy - Tuesday, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:56

Tuesday, Sep 12, 2006 at 09:56
According to the mech at the dealer where I get mine serviced, he said its a switch and not a sensor.

Leroy
0
FollowupID: 452002

Sponsored Links