How to improve the aerodynamics of a roof rack
Submitted: Friday, Mar 14, 2003 at 21:52
ThreadID:
3854
Views:
8266
Replies:
8
FollowUps:
7
This Thread has been Archived
Member - Alan
I have read that the cost wind resistance of a roof rack results in about 25% worse fuel consumption. That is about as much as a trailer.
Are there any cost effective ways to create an efficient airflow? I have thought about a piece of perspex bolted to the rack protruding forward at an angle of 30 degrees off the horizontal. Any comments or other suggestions would be appreciated.
Reply By: Voxson - Friday, Mar 14, 2003 at 22:08
Friday, Mar 14, 2003 at 22:08
If you sit on 90kmh... That helps heaps..
I figure if i have my roof rack on that i am in no hurry......
Regards........
PS.. But that doesnt help you much,, it is just my 3½ x 22mm² bits worth._____________________________________________
Countin the days till July 5th. *
Cape York Trip*
_____________________________________________
AnswerID:
15222
Reply By: brian - Saturday, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:58
Saturday, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:58
Alan, i have full length alloy rack on gu patrol, i fitted a perspex deflector but larger than the original,
mine goes from half an inch from the roof and extends two inches above the rack,this eliminated any wind noise from the rack. by the way my 3.l turbo,manual averages 8.5 k per litre around town with winch bull bar and heaps of other weight.from other postings on this
forum this consumption seems about normal,that being the case the roof rack doesnt appear to have that much effect .certainly not 25 %
AnswerID:
15243
Follow Up By: Member - Bob - Saturday, Mar 15, 2003 at 08:23
Saturday, Mar 15, 2003 at 08:23
That sounds like pretty good set-up Brian. I wonder if making it a bit higher so as to deflect air over the load as
well would make it even more effective? The alternative would be to place all your load in one or two of those fibre glass boxes from Thule. They look like they'd cut through the air like a hot knife through butter. With regard to fuel consumption, you would't expect much penalty at low speeds around town. You'd expect wind resistance to increase exponentially with speed (maybe 4 times as much at 120 kph as at 60 kph).
FollowupID:
9275