Friday, Oct 20, 2006 at 12:00
Hi one4dirt,
The GU III started in late 2001, but their were still motor updates until around mid 2002. I would prefer to get a late 2002 on only.
I personally would only go for diesel, while you pay extra upfront you recoup this every time you fill up and when it comes time to sell, you end up way in front IMHO.
Once the purchase price has been paid, you will notice every week the extra $$$ spent on petrol and end up using the vehicle more as its cheaper to say go for that Sunday 4WD.
After having a 1HZ diesel (cruiser non-turbo diesel) and then the GU 3.0TD, I doubt I could ever go back to a non-turbo. While the 1HZ is a good reliable engine, it is simply too slow for daily city driving and if you ever get a trailer,
well...
I have towed many a km with the 1HZ and now the 3.0TD and amongst other things, it is simply safer to have that much more towing power available. When you factor in 2-3 l/100km better fuel economy for the 3.0TD, its a no brainer IMHO.
If your budget can stretch to a 100 4.2TD, then that is the alternative I would look at, but personally would not go the petrols in any model. This is a personal choice and given work provides all my fuel, economy plays no part in the decision. But the 4.7 V8 cruiser is ahead of the 4.5 cruiser, both in power, economy and price!
When I bought my 3.0TD, my other choice was the 100 4.2TD, but I have been very happy with the 3.0TD. Factor in I could have had either vehicle (my work provides my choice of vehicle) and many people were surprised I went the GU 3.0TD over the GU-4.2TD or 100-4.2TD. So in my case budget was far from the prime consideration, I chose on what I rated the merits of the vehicle.
I am about to buy again and the biggest factor against another Nissan is their warranty service. While they eventually do what they should, you have to keep at them until they finally do what they should have done in the first place. Toyota generally tend to do the right thing upfront (but there are always exceptions). But I rate both vehicles on par as far as mechanical reliability goes, thus if buying out of warranty, not really an issue.
Many people point to the failures of series II 3.0TD (which was a genuine issue) and write off all 3.0TD's. However there have been significant engine changes and these vehicles are over 4 years now and have reliability as good as 4.2TD's (either GU or 100) IMHO. Nissan recalled all series II in Europe and replaced the entire motor, they would not have done that if a) there was a problem and b) they had fixed the problem. I Australia, they only replaced the dipstick - go figure...
Go back to the early 80 series 4.2TD and these had such engine problems Toyota withdrew them from sale and many months later launched the updated 4vpc motor. This engine now has legendary reliability but the point is the early 80 series had equivalent issues to the series II 3.0TD.
Anyway, hope some of the above helps. At the end of the day, any series III GU or 100 series will be a fine vehicle, previous service history plays a MUCH bigger part towards longterm reliability than what brand you buy.
Cheers
Captain
FollowupID:
459001