Sunday, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:18
Hi Brian, based on my personal experience i wouldn't hesitate to switch your cruiser to full synthetic.
I use
Mobil 1 (5W50) in every fourstroke we have from the Briggs and Stratton lawnmower, Robin 3.5 KVA generator, all the family cars (EFI petrol), motorcycles, Hilux Surf (1KZ-TE) and our Hino RB145 motorhome (W04CT 3.9L turbo diesel).
While some applications have been from new (after run - in) - there are a few, bought second hand, that have had reasonable high mileage when switched to synthetic.
The only vehicle that started using oil was a 1990 Ford F150 4x4 (5.8L EFI windsor engine) with around 130,000K on the clock. At the first oil change after purchase it was put on synthetic. On a trip soon after it was using oil at about 1L/1000K - which i considered excessive although is in manufacturers specification. This oil consumption continued for about 3000K and then it started improving. Eventually on a trip from
Cairns to
Darwin and return it didn't use virtully any. I suspect that the oil control rings were probably gummed up when we bought the vehicle and that the detergent action of the synthetic had cleaned them up so that they started working correctly.
We did a oil sampling/analysis exercise with the Hilux Surf. Toyota recomended oil service interval is 5000K (oli and filter) and the first synthetic was analysed at this change.
Mobil recomended extending the next change to at least 7500K, which was done and analysis done again. Still good. The service interval was then extended to 10000K (double the toyota recomendation based on mineral oil) and analysed again. Still OK!. So the next change was run out to a 15000K interval. At 15000 K the synthetic oil still had better viscosity index than NEW mineral oil! The ash levels were starting to come up, which could have been kept low if i had fitted an additional bypass filter. We decided at that stage to try for 20000K the next time - and believe it or not the
Mobil analysis came back that despite the raised ash levels, the oil was still good. Since then we have standardised on 15000K (three times the Toyota recomendation) and oil consumption has always been zilch!
When costed out - it means that although the synthetic is more expensive initially, because we have trippled our interval - then overall it is cheaper because we are only changing one filter instead of three, and the oil is lasting three times longer.
The other benefits of much better start up lubrication, low and high temp lubrication, and improved fuel consumption are all a BONUS!
Carefull monitoring of fuel consumption on all vehicles has shown an improvement between 8% and 11% on all.
As an example a Yamaha TT600 with a 20L acerbis tank would normally run the main tank out within 5K either side of 300K. Then needed to switch to reserve. After swinging it to
Mobil 1 - the 300K average immediately became 330K before running the main tank out. 30K is a long way to push a motorcycle!
I have used synthetic in Honda XR's and Yamaha TT's without problem, but know some who have had sliping clutch issues in some bikes with wet clutches. Mind you ANY friction modified mineral oil WILL cause clutch problems and motorcycle manufacturers usually have specifically recomended oils to use.
Mobil do make a full synthetic motorcycle oil - however i havent had the need for it -YET!
Go for it Brian - irrespective of brand - FULL synthetic is the way to go. Don't get the 'synthetic modified' or 'synthetic fortified' mixed up with FULL synthetic.
Tuco
AnswerID:
208300
Follow Up By: Polaris - Sunday, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:30
Sunday, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:30
BTW - the Hino motorhome is a 1986 model with 230,000 on it - recent trip from
Cairns,
Brisbane,
Sydney,
Bathurst (V8 Supercars!) then home to
Cairns via inland route - used 0.5L only despite a slightly weeping sump plug gasket.
Tuco
FollowupID:
468230