Misled by online mapping or GPS?

Submitted: Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 14:25
ThreadID: 40170 Views:2949 Replies:2 FollowUps:14
This Thread has been Archived
Hi All,

An interesting story in many forms of media about the sad death of a father in the U.S. The Sydney Morning Herald Technology section is one source

Gets me to wondering just how accurate are these new fangled online mapping systems and do we rely on them far too much.

Yes, I am well aware that GPS , well some of them are very accurate..not much good if you don't have a map to use with it or dont knowhow to use it ...or... don't know what to do if it doesn't work.

I still use maps and ask locals etc. even though I do have a GPS but unless I am way off track it remains under the seat.

peterll
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Willem - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 14:50

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 14:50
It definitely implies that the person was misled by ONLINE mapping as the route he had taken was not good for winter travel. Local authorities could also be to blasme for not putting up warning signs.

GPS's are accurate to within 100metres most of the time. I have used mine to get to the exact spot in the Simpson Desert across trackless country.

The majority of map users on this forum use a laptop or equivalent and run software such as Oziexplorer with a GPS connected and the accuracy is pretty good. Mapping comes by way of National Mapping or Private Map Makers.
AnswerID: 209295

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 16:27

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 16:27
"accurate to 100metres"
How old is your GPS willem? :-))

They have been accurate to under 10 metres for a long time now. I use the UBD street maps on Oziexplorer and they almost always have me on the correct side of the road! I use a Garmin GPS 11+ which is 6 years old.

I bet you wish you had one in the Suzuki in 1987!
0
FollowupID: 469285

Follow Up By: Member - Toytruck (SA) - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 19:05

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 19:05
Phil,
doesn't matter how old the GPS unit is. The yanks used to "intentionally", introduce an error to the network in order to put a stop to the civilian society (Terrorists), building a missile loaded with GPS navigation as a guidance system. By doing this no system would ever be accurate. The error was constantly changed so no GPS was ever very accurate. This particular project had a name but I cannot for the life of me think of it......it's Friday arvo and I've vaporised a few cordials. In Defence we developed DGPS which Triangulated a position and calculated a real position. Yes the error was that secret that defence did not know what the current programmed error was.

This error was removed....in the very late 90's I think which then introduced the ability for conventional GPS units to be much more accurate. Some advertise to within under 10 meters.

I know...I Project Manage the production of advanced weapons systems for Oz Defence and......other countries.

Toytruck
0
FollowupID: 469321

Follow Up By: F4Phantom - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 21:00

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 21:00
Interesting story that and have known about it for a long time. Funny thing is I am not sure the error was in the network I think it was programmed into the individual GPS. I know this sounds crazy because how do you licence all the GPS makers to program in the error all over the world. But the reason for me thinking this is because we were out bush and someone had an old machine which still produced the 100m error. This means it was getting correct info and then adding in the error internally. I would like to know more if anyone know better than this.
0
FollowupID: 469344

Follow Up By: Willem - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 21:01

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 21:01
Hey Phil

LOL....4years of age...a Magellan 330

If you ever get to the Geo Centre of the Simpson you will find a 3-4 metre structure denoting the place. I found that my GPS was about 10 metres out of alignment with the structure according to the satellites.

About 20 metres away to the south there is another plaque stating NO!...THIS is the Geo Centre. Then a further 100 metres away another plaque stating THIS is the correct positioning for the Geo Centre......wait for it....some 20 metres to the west of that one yet another plaque.

Well, in the GeoCentre you can't go wrong as it is all flat earth(apart from a few bumps here and there....dunes) but imagine if you were driving along a steep mountain track in the mist, relying on your GPS...LOL

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 469345

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:15

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:15
ToyTruck,
hmmm I've had some SA red tonight too ( a nice Tatachilla cleanskin Shiraz), so I apologise if I'm a bit jovial.....Thanks for the info - I guess that means that GPS is only ever likely to be accurate when our US friends are no longer at war. :-))

Willem,
I'd love to go out there and help find your long lost Geographical Centre of the Simpson from 1987. Sounds like there's a heap more Centres out there now! I guess thats progress. But if this drought continues, the desert will be twice as big, the centre will move and you and Stephen L can go out there and redefine it again :-)))

Next issue will be global warming. With the icecaps melting, we have some great news - Lake Eyre will be full of water all the time - tourism will be booming - the Simpson Desert Resort Complex and Golf Course at Kallakoopah Creek will become the Gold Coast of the Centre. I guess they could then scrap the name "Lake Eyre" and rename it the "Great Inland Sea" - poor Charles Sturt would turn in his grave of he knew that he was 250 years ahead of his time.

I had better shut up now :-)))
0
FollowupID: 469362

Follow Up By: geocacher (djcache) - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:22

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:22
Selective availability - or induced military error - was turned off in 2001 and spawned the birth of geocaching as a sport.

Even with only a 4 or 5 satellites you can reliably expect accuracy better than 15 metres if they are on a good spread.

The exception to the rule is deep in the valleys of the high country, the concrete canyons of the CBD or in other situations where you have a narrow spread of satellites directly overhead.

The 100m plus problem is a thing of the past.

Or geocaching wouldn't work. 27000 plus finds a week internationally is pretty compelling evidence.

www.geocaching.com

Dave
0
FollowupID: 469363

Follow Up By: Willem - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:46

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:46
Allright I will rephrase what I meant to say.... lol

GPS are accurate up to 10 metres...dunno where the other 0 came from...typo?
0
FollowupID: 469369

Follow Up By: Willem - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:53

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:53
Phil

Are you free mid July 07? Going out there again for the last time after the National Gathering. Hoping to do product test of suspension parts at the same time as well.

Yes the Red must be good as you are waxing lyrical...lol
0
FollowupID: 469370

Follow Up By: geocacher (djcache) - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 23:00

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 23:00
Another red Willem?

It improves my pool game, might work on your typing...

:o)

Dave
0
FollowupID: 469372

Follow Up By: Willem - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 23:27

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 23:27
Dave

To me RED=Gout....so no red for me...lol

Bundy and coke...Yes! or a VB or a good White or some Rocketfuel!!!
0
FollowupID: 469379

Follow Up By: geocacher (djcache) - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 23:36

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 23:36
Ah, that's no good Willem. Gout's a bugger.

As for the Bundy, I'm with you there. Right now as a matter of fact. The cans of magic were on special for cod opening last weekend - and there's only a couple left.

Good weekend and lots of fish. Oh and cans...

Dave
0
FollowupID: 469380

Follow Up By: Member - Toytruck (SA) - Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:42

Sunday, Dec 10, 2006 at 09:42
F4Phantom,
I know this thread is getting pretty long but just in reply. I can guarantee that the error was in the network. This enabled the American Government to change the error on a regular basis to stop any unfriendly people working it out. There may have been an error programmed into individual units however I am unaware of this. If a terrorist had a unit that he or she (best be politically correct) wanted to use as a guidance system for a rocket of some kind and was able to work out the error that was programmed into the unit then you could allow for the error. By having it in the network no one ever knew what the error was and it was changed regularly.

Toytruck
0
FollowupID: 469620

Follow Up By: F4Phantom - Monday, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:27

Monday, Dec 11, 2006 at 12:27
Hey TTruck, what you say makes perfect sense and the idea that the error is in the unit itself is quite silly. But the problem is I dont know how to account for the fact that under 1 year ago (way after the error was taken away) we were in the bush with a pre-error correction unit, so basicly a very old one. It was hooked to a computer and maps. It was off around 100m all the time. Everyone just told me it was one of the old error units. never really made sense to me tho. The only think I can think of is if the map was raster and the unit was having trouble getting a good signal. Also the map calibration could have been off. but that would be on the basis that these guys calibrated their own map which I doubt.
0
FollowupID: 469781

Reply By: Bilbo - Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:23

Friday, Dec 08, 2006 at 22:23
I'm not sure whether it was the satellite end or the GPS end of things that had the "Selective Availability" (error factor) but a mate of mine used to work at Magellan in Osborne Park in Perth.

When the First Gulf War was on, they could always tell when the Yanks were on a mission over Iraq as all thier GPS testing devices went to 100% accuracy in a few seconds. When it was all over, the error came back on again.

Hmm,,,,

Bilbo
AnswerID: 209380

Follow Up By: Pajman Pete (SA) - Saturday, Dec 09, 2006 at 23:42

Saturday, Dec 09, 2006 at 23:42
re your second paragraph, probably correct Bilbo. In 91 a lot of units didn't have milspec GPS which could read the "P" code - the military encrypted signal which was accurate. The US and UK military went out and bought a whole pile of civilian GPS gear to outfit their ground units an turned off Selective Availability when needed.

Selective Availability was a satellite end fuzzing of the signal.

Cheers

Pete
0
FollowupID: 469583

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)