Westpac helicopter & CareFlight need your help

Submitted: Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 16:26
ThreadID: 40295 Views:6255 Replies:14 FollowUps:16
This Thread has been Archived
NSW residents:
You have no doubt heard that the Westpac Lifesaver Rescue Helicopter & Careflight Helicopter Service may be losing their contract with the NSW Government In the near future. The alternative to these well known services is a foreign company from Canada. If you wish you can support Lifesaver & Careflight, sign and leave a message on the on-line petition Listed below. Show your support !

The Westpac Life Saver Rescue Helicopter, an Australian organisation has been around for 34 years and has played a huge part in saving over 34,000 lives. Unfortunately the good work they do is now under threat, as from next year the NSW Government will be replacing the Sydney, Newcastle and Tamworth services with a foreign owned service from Canada that will COST TAX PAYERS TEN TO SIXTEEN TIMES MORE than it does currently. It would be greatly appreciated if you could sign the petition at the site below to help save this organisation and support them in continuing to do the important and LIFE SAVING work that they do. It explains the situation they are in and what you can do to help.

The Westpac Life Saver Rescue Helicopter & Careflight Helicopter Service relies on the support of the community to continue their service and now is when they need your support the most!

Thank you in advance.

Site Link

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member -Dodger - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 16:42

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 16:42
C'mon you people don't let the polies get their way.
I used to have a handle on life, but it broke.

Cheers Dodg.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 209986

Reply By: Geoff (Newcastle, NSW) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 16:49

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 16:49
Signed,

Geoff
Geoff,
Landcruiser HDJ78,
Grey hair is hereditary, you get it from children. Baldness is caused by watching the Wallabies.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 209988

Reply By: Member - Blue (VIC) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 17:11

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 17:11
Signed, 17,000 odd so far...
AnswerID: 209992

Reply By: pt_nomad - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 17:17

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 17:17
I am no longer in this industry, but the Canadian company has a strong presence in Australia. This presence is largely though the acquisition of an Australian company some years ago, Lloyd’s Helicopters. Lloyd’s (and now CHC) have a strong presence in the EMS and SAR roles in Oz and sourced a lot of their initial skill’s base from the NSCA – National Safety Council of Australia.
The NSCA lead the way in EMS, SAR and aerial fire fighting – sadly Fredo also lead the way in fraud.
It is interesting to note that the fed gvt. have finally come to realize the foresight of the NSCA in the aerial fire fighting role and now funds the seasonal import of equipment (as the NSCA did in the 80’s).
I think the EMS and SAR roles should be solely funded by government and services supplied by competent providers. If this happens to be a community group, well and good, but they should be assessed on merit, professionalism and cost effective delivery of service rather then their attachment to the community.
Essential Services such as these depending on commmunity donations for their survival are another form of hidden gvt tax.

Paul.
AnswerID: 209993

Follow Up By: Member - Vince B (NSW) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 17:37

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 17:37
Signed this afternoon. Total now 17721
0
FollowupID: 470012

Follow Up By: On Patrol - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:21

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:21
Cut the crap. Did you sign?????????
0
FollowupID: 470021

Reply By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 17:36

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 17:36
Whilst any helicopter rescue service is considered vital these days to improve the chances of survival for many injured in remote areas, and no price should ever be place on a life, it seems misleading to say that the new service will cost 10 to 16 times more.

From the Careflight website:

CareFlight has consistently met all its waiting time targets over 20 years on an annual budget from the Government of just $2.3-million. CareFlight approached NSW Health a year ago seeking an additional $750,000 to fund a larger aircraft and help reduce patient waiting times. NSW Health refused to provide any funds and suggested CareFlight “should sell its larger helicopter” if funding was a problem. Now the Government has announced it can find $23-million a year over 9 years ($187-million more than funding for CareFlight) to fund a profit-making Canadian multinational that answers only to its shareholders.

From a website supporting the Westpac Rescue Helicopter Service:

We are funded by the NSW Department of Health, corporate sponsorship and the community. Our annual budget is $6.5 million. We have to raise over $2.5 million from the community.

Just a simple addition gives an approximate costs of $6.3m (2.3+4.0) v's $23m per annum for 4 helicopters.....nothing like 10/16 times more, even though it is a substantial increase none-the-less.

An interesting read should be had of the following official media release, especially the part with regards to staffing arrangements (there seems to be no issues with loosing Doctors etc) :

http://careflight.org/_pdf/2006-12-08_dept_health_media_announcement.pdf

At the end of the day, $23m a year is peanuts for the government and should be spent on a quality service.....whether that should be given to the current providers, or to an alternative provider, is a question that is open to debate. I would think that a better option now should have been to increase the current funding of the providers to offset 100% of costs and to the point where they do not need to fundraise AND increase the service obligations at the same time (eg. new aircraft timeframes, etc), though i take it NSW Government Procurement Policy requirements would not allow this to happen.

Andrew
AnswerID: 209994

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:25

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:25
"there seems to be no issues with loosing Doctors etc) : "

Don't know where you got that from other than the "hopeful" clause in the press statement. At last count, the Careflight docs were unanimous in deciding NOT to join the new operation.

Lots of water to flow under the bridge yet, though.
0
FollowupID: 470023

Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:32

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:32
yeh, well i didn't mean to say it like that...i'll blame the edit button again ;-)

i probably should have said something along the lines of "should be no issues with loosing their jobs", though i realise it is not that simple to them.

Andrew
0
FollowupID: 470025

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:38

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:38
LOL been there, done that :)))

There's a lot more to come out of this Andrew.
0
FollowupID: 470028

Follow Up By: Geoff (Newcastle, NSW) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 22:04

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 22:04
The new service is going to cost a sheite site more than $23mil. That figure is assuming Careflight and the other charities, sponsors and donors continue at the current level of $100mil per annum!!
Careflight the charity have already stated that they will not donate to improving the bottom line of the shareholders of a public company. They just don't see there are any ethics in this sort of arrangement.

Geoff
Geoff,
Landcruiser HDJ78,
Grey hair is hereditary, you get it from children. Baldness is caused by watching the Wallabies.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 470065

Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:23

Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 07:23
$100m per year....i don't think it is anywhere near that level :-)

My figures come straight from careflights website and as such i have no reason not to believe them with the $23m/annum statement.

Andrew
0
FollowupID: 470089

Follow Up By: Geoff (Newcastle, NSW) - Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:37

Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 08:37
Don't forget Careflight aren't the only sponsor.
There's Surf Life Saving, Coal and Allied, Westpac etc. and all the direct payroll donations the don't come through Careflight.

Sufficient to say Careflight aren't going to kick the tin any longer as they are a charity and the new supplier is a public company dedicated to its shareholders.

Geoff
Geoff,
Landcruiser HDJ78,
Grey hair is hereditary, you get it from children. Baldness is caused by watching the Wallabies.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 470098

Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44

Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44
Geoff,

I would be very surprised if payroll deductions etc didn't go through Careflight, possibly as a Charitable Trust Fund, as it being a registered charity etc. Where else would the money go to? This is what i understand as the issue over handing over the money which they hold from these fundraising avenues, rightfully dissapointed....

The operational costs for our local rescue helicopter in 2006 was projected to be in the order of $3.2m, of which around 1/3 is from the Government. To think that a helicopter rescue service would cost in the order of $100m/annum is way off the figures :-) For comparitive purposes, the Qld Government contribution was ~$39m/annum for its 3 bell 412's fleet (plus backups) plus the funding (~$5.1m this year) for the regional helicopter rescue services PLUS the rest of Emergency Management Queensland (SES, surf lifesaving, VMR etc) which the fleet is managed by.

I would hazard as a guess that the Westpac sponsorship deal may be in the order of $1-2m per helicopter with NRMA being similar. Our major sponsor, RACQ, has signed up for around $1m/annum IIRC.

I find this situation interesting as we currently have CHC supplying rescue services for our area with the sponsorship situation being no different than currently happening with WHRS etc and there is absolutely no concerns whatsoever over the contract. I must admit though that we did not have a service before this so anything is considered better than nothing :-)

Andrew
0
FollowupID: 470117

Follow Up By: Geoff (Newcastle, NSW) - Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 16:27

Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 16:27
Hi Andrew,
I suspect we are both saying the same thing though I'm grouping all the funding NSW wide into one bucket as that's where it must come from under the new model of CHC. Careflight is just part of what's being replaced in NSW.

Interestingly enough the Newcastle Westpac Service is the only service in NSW that's to be left in the hands of the community, in this case Westpac Lifesaver. A cynique who knows the local political mood might say that the once safe labour seats in the Hunter Valley are struggling. The local Newcastle branch has had its ALP supplied campaign funding for the March 27th state elections increased ten fold and the sitting member has lost pre-selection.

My experience is greater with the Newcastle Westpac service than Careflight. It's significantly community funded from Westpac (obviously), Coal and Allied, direct payroll deductions (the Hunter Valley Coal Miners are significant contributors by this method) into the local, not state service and community fund raisers by the local Fund Raising Manager. There are more local corporate sponsors too, I just can't remember them all at the moment.
These local contributions stay local. Technically the local chopper is owned by the people of the Hunter Valley as the local TV station ran a telethon to replace the machine when they crashed the old one.

How do I know those bits? A close friend of mine was the local Fund Raising Manager until recently. Fascinating to talk to her about how they operate, right down to the large numbers of volunteer crew that a public company such as CHC don't have access too.
There's a whole area of OH&S a charity such as Careflight or Westpac Lifesaver can operate within a corporation cannot.

Anyway mate, there's far more to come out over the following months, may you and yours have a great Christmas.

Geoff
Geoff,
Landcruiser HDJ78,
Grey hair is hereditary, you get it from children. Baldness is caused by watching the Wallabies.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 470174

Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 16:35

Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 16:35
thanks Geoff for the insight into the local scene....what's more interesting is the fact of the Newcastle HRS being the only community based service left soon. Begs the questions :-)

Have a good one also.

Andrew
0
FollowupID: 470177

Reply By: Member - Teabag (Queanbeyan) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:09

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:09
Signed as number 17498, so keep them coming guy's.....Let's keep what is little is left to be owned and run by Australians for Australians......
AnswerID: 209996

Reply By: On Patrol - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:30

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:30
Well done Guys, keep it coming.

Both services supply and have done for a long time with minimum funding an absolute first class service. Why in hell don't the pollies fund them?????
Our club has made donations to Careflight for the 7 years of our existence.
Careflight are at the world forefront of brain injury treatment, young Sophie D is proof positive of that.

Don't talk about better service from a foreign company. Help an Australian crew with a proven record.!MPG:51!
AnswerID: 209999

Reply By: Hairy - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:32

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:32
Not from NSW but ill sign anyway!
While were on the petition signing thing...
Someone in Vic. should start petitioning the Gov. to stop aid to Korea and buy a couple of Sky Cranes for those bushfires instead???

Cheers
AnswerID: 210000

Follow Up By: On Patrol - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:38

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:38
Hairy
Better yet get the Koreans on the ground in Vic. Ther is enough of them to make a real difference.;-)
0
FollowupID: 470027

Follow Up By: Hairy - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:42

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 18:42
As long as they go back!
0
FollowupID: 470030

Reply By: Member - Norm C (QLD) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 19:27

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 19:27
So what is the story behind this? It's easy to say 'stupid incompetant government or public service', but what is the reason the government is giving.

They must believe they are getting something that the current provider can't give. A better or different service? An ability to scale up quickly in the event of a major disaster? A cheaper price? (doesn't seem so).

There must be a reason, even if it is not a good one. I'm like many others. Have grown to trust and respect the Careflight system, but I'd like to understand the issues a bit better.
AnswerID: 210007

Reply By: mchapo - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 19:34

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 19:34
I think that the Govts rationale in amalgamating rescue helicopter services under the one contract is obviously in the best interest of everybody in NSW.

The aeromedical system in NSW is ever growing, needing aircraft which can keep up with the increasing workload and distances needed .

I'm afraid neither Lifesaver or Careflight have been able to keep pace with the load over the last couple of years.

You must remember the debacle of the Wollongong rescue helicopter where Lifesaver management botched its commitment to the area, and who stepped up and supplied helicopter services to the Illawarra? Yes CHC.

Careflight couldnt maintain their large bell 412 helicopter , so they sold it and bought a second hand BK117 which most of their senior doctors wont fly in because of safety issues.

Please seek some facts before carrying on about CHC. They have been operating in Australia for many years. They run the Southcare helicopter in the ACT and the helicopter at Wollongong .
The new contract will supply 24 hour rescue helicopter services to Sydney Wollongong and the central west at Orange. The helicopters will be bigger ,faster and more capable of flying in weather conditions
AnswerID: 210008

Follow Up By: Member - John R (NSW) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 21:24

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 21:24
McHapo and PT_Nomad, you guys obviously come from an aviation background, where most people here do not.

I think it stinks how the whole process has gone for the 2 incumbents, and I would prefer them to have had the opportunity to get the contract. But as was implied in the above post, the customers deserve to be in the safest (and most capable) as possible aircraft.

CHC employs many Aussies in their local ops, including ALL their aircrew. Hopefully with their expansion, they'll pick up the excellent crews from WPAC and Careflight.
0
FollowupID: 470053

Follow Up By: On Patrol - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 23:20

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 23:20
Yeah, lets put all our eggs in the CHC basket, Hell what could go wrong???

And IF they go belly up, the Govt can bail the whole BIG mess out, somehow!!!!

What really gets my blood boiling is the state Govt wanting Westpac & CareFlight to continue fund raising, to help the shareholders of CHC.

Sing Sign Sign.

These guys ain't offering us flash new aircraft just cos they like us, they want to make a profit, which is nice for them, but bad for the organisations that have had to carry the load for the last 2 decades or more, WITH DISTINCTION, and yes they had to back trade helicopters because they were not getting the support they needed from Macquarie St.
0
FollowupID: 470075

Follow Up By: Hairy - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 23:53

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 23:53
Quote:
(On Tuesday, December 12, 2006 at 18:34
mchapo replied to the question
I think that the Govts rationale in amalgamating rescue helicopter services under the one contract is obviously in the best interest of everybody in NSW.
Please seek some facts before carrying on about CHC. )

When has our Gov. done anything rational???
Rather than get someone else to do it why not help the local mob!!!!
They can afford to throw BILLIONS of dollars away on shiit that the average Australian would disagree on (if they new) and send our money overseas!!!!

Like I said in an early post ..dont give money to some country that hates us, next year and spend it on US and our well being!!!!
Call me whatever you want but I cant see the logic in it!
Im with you On Patrol

Cheers

0
FollowupID: 470078

Reply By: Member - Errol (York WA) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 20:15

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 20:15
Singed ! 18175 now .
AnswerID: 210012

Reply By: Geoff (Newcastle, NSW) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 21:47

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 21:47
More and more interesting,

Please support my shareholders, Link Everyday there seems to be something a little more dodgy revealed.

Geoff
Geoff,
Landcruiser HDJ78,
Grey hair is hereditary, you get it from children. Baldness is caused by watching the Wallabies.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 210034

Reply By: Member - Brian H (QLD) - Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 21:56

Tuesday, Dec 12, 2006 at 21:56
Well I'm 18400 something.

Great service - great country - keep it OWNED AND RUN by AUSSIES Jobs to the AUSSIES.

Brian
AnswerID: 210041

Reply By: lc79 - Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 09:23

Wednesday, Dec 13, 2006 at 09:23
Signed 19637 and counting.......

I never new Errol Flynn had so many relo's in politics.
AnswerID: 210105

Sponsored Links