Getting closer with Google Earth
Submitted: Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:14
ThreadID:
44647
Views:
3033
Replies:
4
FollowUps:
16
This Thread has been Archived
Willem
I have been looking for some tracks and shot lines out in the Great Sandy.
Have found what I am looking for sort-of. Shot line comes into view at around 50,000feet and is visible until around the 10,000feet mark where it goes out of focus.
Have looked at Help but am none the wiser. Can one get a clearer picture closer up? I am using GE DirectX mode
Cheers
Reply By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:17
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:17
I don't bother with Google Earth anymore after I spat the dummy when I could not locate the CSR on it .
Willie
AnswerID:
235399
Follow Up By: Willem - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:26
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:26
Hahahahahaha....its there alright.
Good thing is I have laptop on mapping and then follow along with co-ordinates on Google to find the right place.
FollowupID:
496492
Follow Up By: Member - Willie , Epping .Syd. - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:16
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:16
I have waypoints from my two trips up there . I know where it is , but I still can't see it .
I would like to think that too much sex has ruined my eyesight , but unfortunately , I think it is really the lousy image on Google Earth .
Willie .
FollowupID:
496545
Reply By: disco1942 - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:39
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:39
Willem
Can you give us a couple of examples to see what you mean - just a co-ord or two.
If you mean the line overlays to indicate roads they are meant to disapear when the road comes into good view.
PeterD
AnswerID:
235411
Follow Up By: Willem - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:00
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:00
Disco
I am looking at 20 05.06.10 South and 123 31.44.13 East
Track to left is overgrown and not discernable but shot line is visible in
places.
I would like to get closer to see some of the terrain. ( I have a pretty good idea what it looks like anyway...lol)
Cheers
FollowupID:
496509
Follow Up By: disco1942 - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:21
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 23:21
Willem
I put in 20 05 06.10 S, 123 31 44.13 E and the country at this is not very good resolution. The coverage of Australia is not all the same resolution. There does not seem to be any rhyme or reason for the change in resolution boundaries. There are parts of
Sydney at low resolution and some desert regions at high resolution.
PeterD
FollowupID:
496580
Reply By: MintabiePete - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:49
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 20:49
I have not used Google earth for a while , mainly because I have Ubuntu linux as an operating system , but after seeing your post I decided to give it another go as I have upgraded to Ubuntu 7.04 Fiesty and would you believe it is that clear now . I can see the house that I used to have in the Alice very clearly and our house in
Broken Hill is recognisable . I will try to look for the seismic lines in
the desert and see how clear they are , but I am impressed with the way google earth now works in linux :)
AnswerID:
235414
Follow Up By: Willem - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:03
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:03
Not sure what you are talking about Pete
I can see my house in
Peterborough but it seems to be an old photo taken about 5 years ago
Cheers
FollowupID:
496510
Follow Up By: MintabiePete - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:30
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:30
Just me rattling on about linux , another operating system :) , yeah most likely old photos but I gave up on it before , because I could not see it very clearly . Good to see they have upgraded it With Linux Google :)
FollowupID:
496520
Reply By: Richard Kovac - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:25
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:25
Hi Willem
You will never see that detail out there, not when it's green, max zoom 10.27km, you can see the
cleared line heading NNE but cannot see the track in
The brown areas you can zoom down to 600-800 m but unless the yanks where looking for something the picks are poor..LOL
Try areal photos (maybe)
Richard
AnswerID:
235426
Follow Up By: equinox - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:49
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:49
Expensive, but effective option.
Last time I bought Aerials from the Government Contractor (2003) they cost me $53 each for the first 1 of a run and $23 each for every 1 in the run thereafter. From:
United Photo & Graphic
Services, Blackburn Victoria.
As opposed to when I purchased literally hundreds of them off Ebay for a song. :)
FollowupID:
496527
Follow Up By: Willem - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:52
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:52
Its not that serious
Just wasting precious time in front of computer waiting fort the sun to rise again. Better get some sleep later....LOL
I know where I'm going and how rough it will be. Wanna come along?
Cheers
FollowupID:
496532
Follow Up By: equinox - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:59
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:59
I know the feeling, I've got maps and photos sprawled across the desk right now.
I'd like to visit some sections of the Sandy maybe next year. Dragon Tree Soak and
Joanna Spring, come to mind. One year at a time though.
FollowupID:
496536
Follow Up By: Willem - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:07
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:07
Equinox
Dragon Tree is on my list for 08 and also Gwenneth Lakes. Where is
Joanna Spring. Have heard of it.
Cheers
FollowupID:
496539
Follow Up By: equinox - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:14
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:14
Joanna Springs was on Col.
Warburton's route.
The Famous Calvert Exp. of 1896 led by Wells had great trouble in locating it as Warbuton's Longtitude was out.
It's roughly mid-way between Dragon Tree and Gwenneth Lakes (or so we are told)
FollowupID:
496543
Follow Up By: Richard Kovac - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:23
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:23
JOANNA SPRING, WA
20 51.068S
124 11 46.716E
I wasn't serious ever ..LOL
Richard
FollowupID:
496547
Follow Up By: Willem - Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:28
Monday, Apr 23, 2007 at 22:28
Its amazing what one can dig up.
I have the book on the Calvert Expedition and in the back of it the maps of the various
explorers of that era in the north west.
I have the Lat co-ord for
Joanna Spring. Richards one is not the same...lol
FollowupID:
496551
Follow Up By: Willem - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:40
Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:40
Yeah OK So
Joanna Spring is marked on the Natmaps
Approximate position 20 04.970S and 124 11.835 E
It would seem that there is a cleared shot line running along the dune corridor to within striking distance of
Joanna Spring with no more than 15 or so dunes to cross to get there. This
cleared line comes off the one from the Kidson.
Of course cleared lines could be more overgrown than the surrounding countryside.
Could be the makings of an expedition. Start from Sandfire and then head east along Kidson.
Food for thought. Sir Willie might be interested but he would have to get better tyres for the LC. This is HD Crossply cheesecutter tyre country......lol
Cheers
FollowupID:
496614
Follow Up By: Russ n Sue - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:54
Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 08:54
Willem,
Don't you mean "start from where Sandfire USED to be"
Cheers
Russ
FollowupID:
496616
Follow Up By: Willem - Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:07
Tuesday, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:07
Ummm I believe they are still selling fuel and will rebuild what burnt down
Maybe I am wrong?
This adventure won't start until mid 2008 so that gives lots of time for planning.
Need to carry max fuel loads.
Cheers
FollowupID:
496618