Wednesday, Apr 25, 2007 at 18:00
Notso posted-> "Yes of course we all know that AGMs are superior in capacity and durability when continually charged and discharged, however if you are like a good many of us we travel around a lot and then sit around for a day or so, then get up and move maybe a 100 ks or so then sit again for a day or two, now a cranking or hybrid battery will take heaps of amps and after an hour or two travelling will be back up to a reasonable state of charge. A deep cycle will take ages to get up in charge. I know an AGM takes faster charge but still not as high as a cranker"
Notso, yes as you say-> “AGM's are superior in capacity and durability when continually charged and discharged”
and by moving as you say, only a few 100 K's, AGM’s will charge much faster than any wetcell battery, either Marine, Cranking or Hybrid...
All Wetcell Cranking batteries will take far LONGER to fully charge than an AGM battery of similar capacity.
Your 'terminology' of "faster charge" is accurate & true, yes AGM's do charge FASTER and more FULLY than any wetcell battery.
However, as to what you mean by "high" eludes me?
The undisputable fact remains an AGM battery will recharge fully far quicker than any wetcell battery, simply because of their far lower internal resistance, due to their design of many thinner grids, where as the conventional wetcell battery has only 15 to 17 very large thick grids (plates) causing the internal resistance to be far higher, therefore much SLOWER recharging.
The majority of the above information is a reprint of the Exide ORBITAL battery technology brochure, they are available everywhere you can buy Exide batteries.
FollowupID:
496937