Legal or not

Submitted: Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 20:53
ThreadID: 46242 Views:3726 Replies:18 FollowUps:27
This Thread has been Archived
I guess we all know that it is a big no no in this country to use mobile cell phones while driving , and it even creates legal problems when using hands free it seems . But what about using CB's 27 mhz or uhf's or HF mic's ? I have tried to google but have not got any real evidence , has anyone found anything to say for sure you can use (or not use ) CB or HF radios whilst driving ?

Thanks

Peter in Broken Hill
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Muddy doe (SA) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:06

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:06
I rang the local cop shop a while back with this very question and came away with no answers whatsoever! The copper did not actually know.

Would love to know myself.

Muddy
AnswerID: 244499

Reply By: blue one - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:18

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:18
SHHHHSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
AnswerID: 244505

Follow Up By: Member - Boo Boo (NSW) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:20

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:20
blue one

I'm with you

regards bob
0
FollowupID: 505581

Reply By: Motherhen - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:25

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:25
In WA, where the law against using a mobile phone when driving came in more recently than in the other states, it is permissible to use the hand held speaker on your two way.
Motherhen

Red desert dreaming

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 244507

Reply By: Member - Patrol Geoff (QLD) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:40

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:40
In Queensland, according to: http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/T/TrantOpRURR99.pdf

s300:
"a driver ... must not use a hand-held mobile phone while the vehicle is moving, or is stationary but not parked." It then goes on to say "mobile phone does not include a CB radio or any other two-way radio".

-geoff
AnswerID: 244512

Reply By: Member - Barry (NT) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:40

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:40
Hi

see Aust Road Rule 300 mobiles are out,,,,, radios are OK - UNLESS state law contradicts this but then the precedence would be the Commonwealth legislation I would presume.

Site Link

Cheers Barry
AnswerID: 244513

Follow Up By: Sand Man (SA) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 23:53

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 23:53
There was an article in the Sunday Mail today stating that Aust Road Rule 300 has been recently amended to allow the use of mobiles with a "hands free kit".

The problem appears to be the time it takes for the States to pick up on the changes and bring their own rules in line. Then there is the interpretation being placed on them by Magistrates who never use common sense.

In a country like Australia where we all drive on the same side of the road (usually) there should only need to be ONE source, the Australian Road Rules.
Of course, this wouldn't take into account the weird rules such as Victoria's application of turning right from the far left lane when there is a tram track present.

My vehicle phone kit allows me to talk on the phone without touching anything. the phone connects by bluetooth, answers automatically and disconnects when the caller hangs up. It is a no brainer. The distraction is no different than if I was talking to someone physically sitting in the car.

On the other hand, I have seen diccheads texting while driving and have followed people (usually women) who not only talk for a considerable period of time with the phone clamped to their ear with one hand , but use hand signals at the same time with the other one, even though the person on the other end can't see them.

There are truly people out there whose gene pool is that depleted that they should not be allowed to breathe, let alone drive.

That is why the rest of us have to live with such stupid rules and stupid interpretations. Simply because a minority spoil it for the majority.
Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 505545

Follow Up By: AdlelaideGeorge - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:52

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:52
Hi

I wonder if that's correct- Rule 300 states that a mobile can't be used:

unless the driver is exempt from this rule under another law of this jurisdiction.

That means another Federal law [i.e. this jurisdiction] I would think - on the principle that Commonwealth overules State to the extent of any inconsistency.

Happy day

George
0
FollowupID: 505573

Follow Up By: AdlelaideGeorge - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:58

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 08:58
Hi again

I withdraw that Your Honour - just noticed that each State expressly includes the Australian Road Rules in its laws - so in SA the Australian Road Rules are headed: South Australia-Australian Road Rules.

So that means that the reference to 'this jurisdiction' means "unless the driver is exempt from this rule under a law of this [(South Australian] jurisdiction."

Sorry about that...........

Happy days

George

0
FollowupID: 505574

Follow Up By: Kumunara (NT) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 13:09

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 13:09
AdelaideGeorge

The ARR were agreed upon by every state / territory and are regulations. The idea was to get rid of the ridiculous situation of each state having different road rules.

As to using radio handsets there is no rule prohibiting them under the ARR.

Tjilpi
Life's great and it just keeps getting better

Member
My Profile  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 505631

Follow Up By: Middle Jeff - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 14:31

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 14:31
Hi all

Emergency services are exempt, so don't get smart and have a go at a copper on the phone.

Have fun

Craig
0
FollowupID: 505646

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 14:59

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 14:59
>> Aust Road Rule 300 has been recently amended to allow the use of mobiles with a "hands free kit".

Not in the Bracks state.. he is exempt from all logical laws.
0
FollowupID: 505649

Reply By: Member - extfilm (NSW) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:40

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:40
I am under the impression you are allowed to use a uhf or similar device whilst driving in NSW. I proved this point when I was escorting a semi trailer with my 3 diggers on it. During the October long weekend in 05, I was pulled over for a booze bus and the truck was not. So whilst my vehicle was still moving and coming to a stop, a policeman was standing next to my vehicle to give me directions I grabbed my mic and simply told the truck driver I would catch up to him on the M2. The policeman patiently waited for the reply and then guided me to the spot to get breath tested. He did not say a word about me talking on the uhf.
And yes I had been drinking and had about 4 cans of Beam during the past 4 hours. I had finished my last one 10 mins prior to being pulled up........ should have been over the limit but they said "Thank you sir" and waved me on.
AnswerID: 244514

Follow Up By: Muzzgit [WA] - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:59

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:59
I think part of the difficulty in making it illegal would be telling everyone that coppers can do it but no-one else can!!!
0
FollowupID: 505492

Follow Up By: Member - Tony J (NSW) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:55

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 05:55
Our oversize permits state the each vehicle *must* have effective two-way communications with each other. I read that as saying it would be an offence *not* to have or use the two-way. It would be interesting to see if a mobile phone would be classed as two-way comms (obviously in a signal area) when escorting oversized vehicles.
0
FollowupID: 505554

Follow Up By: D-Jack - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 23:53

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 23:53
Muzzgit, coppers are only exempt if they are acting in bonafide duties reasonably requiring the mobile phone to be used (eg if talking to a victim who is following an offender and giving up to date locations). No copper driving should really be using a mobile phone if they have a partner with them.
0
FollowupID: 505870

Reply By: Derek from Affordable Batteries & Radiators - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:41

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:41
Grey area....

Same as lighting a smoke.

It takes two hands. (Worse than a cell phone)

What about eating a burger while driving ??

I have seen people swaying all over the road and as I pass them see they are tring to eat a pie or burger.

AnswerID: 244516

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:08

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:08
A mate got nailed for lighting a smoke whilst driving down near Esperance.
0
FollowupID: 505495

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:19

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:19
Derek,

Why on earth would you need two hands to light a smoke? I assume you are a non-smoker.
0
FollowupID: 505503

Follow Up By: Derek from Affordable Batteries & Radiators - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:24

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:24
Don't smoke.

Remember my dad before he died of a lung problem. He used to use a lighter and lean on the wheel with 2 hands sheiding the cig while tring to light it.

0
FollowupID: 505506

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:26

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:26
Habit. I work outside and light my smoke with one hand and cupping it from the wind with the other. Feels wierd doing it any other way.
0
FollowupID: 505510

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:27

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:27
Easier to just close the window. Never had a drama when I used to smoke. Sorry about your Dad. It took a lot of them, mine included.
0
FollowupID: 505512

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:30

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:30
V8Diesel,

I see your point. I was the same.
0
FollowupID: 505513

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:33

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:33
Gramps, try brushing your teeth using the other hand tomorrow morning or swap your knife and fork hands. You'll see what I mean. Windows are only good if you've got them.

If it wasn't for habit, most probably wouldn't smoke anyway. It's a powerful thing. I'd argue habit is just as 'addictive' as nicotine.
0
FollowupID: 505516

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:36

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:36
LOL V8Diesel, all my cars have had windows :)))))
0
FollowupID: 505518

Follow Up By: V8Diesel - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:52

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:52
Yes, but graders, rollers, dozers, tractors, loaders, cold planers, stablisers, hiabs, cranes and cherry pickers don't. I'm more worried about skin cancer;-)

My old 40 series had no roof or doors at all so I used to wear my motorbike leathers and helmet when it rained. Got a few looks in that one hahaha.

0
FollowupID: 505525

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:59

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:59
Hahahahaha there's a bloke I see on the road a couple of times each week. He rides a Harley, mid fifties, helmet, goggles, long grey beard that flares out both sides of his face into the wind AND he's always puffing away on a cigar whilst in motion !!!! Almost pi$$ meself laughing.
0
FollowupID: 505529

Reply By: Member - Wayne N (QLD) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:42

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:42
Yes, it is quite legal to use 2-ways when driving in Queensland.

It is actually a legal requirement of pilot and police escort vehicles to use 2-ways to remain in contact with their wide-loads when on the road.

cheers

Wayne
Crossing the Wenlock

Member
My Profile  Send Message

AnswerID: 244518

Follow Up By: Muddy doe (SA) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:51

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:51
As a Country Fire Service volunteer we have been trained that emergency services (while on duty) have an exemption as far as using mobiles while driving is concerned. The training was silent on the use of radios whilst driving but it is so much a part of driving during an incident that it is obviously allowed.

Just always wondered about the position in terms of using radios on the move for recreational purposes.

Muddy
0
FollowupID: 505485

Reply By: Member - Littleborgy (SA) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:42

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:42
I was wondering this exact same thing myself today... will be watching this space closely
AnswerID: 244519

Follow Up By: Member - Littleborgy (SA) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:45

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:45
Ok, forgive my slow reply. lol
0
FollowupID: 505481

Reply By: Muddy doe (SA) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:45

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:45
Also wonder if any difference between using a hand-held UHF or just the corded mic of a fixed UHF set???

I sometimes loan out my 5W handheld if driving with another vehicle. Would not want to get them in the poo!

Muddy
AnswerID: 244521

Reply By: DIO - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:49

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 21:49
There is no specific mention regarding the use of or prohibiting the use of hand held/CB radio in Australian Road Rules (May 2007 version). That however is not to say that it is not an offence in any particular State. I recall that it was an offence in Victoria some years ago but don't know if that was repealled with the introduction of ARR.

Just because there may not be a specific offence to prohibit the use of radios (CB/Hand Held etc/whatever) that doesn't mean that you can't or won't be pinched for using one. Remember that at all times a motorist/driver must Drive with Due car and Consideration. The offence of Due Care can in reality be applied to almost any action of behaviour that may be exhibited by the driver this would of course include scratching your ear, straightening your hair (ladies), putting make up on, drinking from can, bottle, cup etc, reading a paper, map book, eating a pie or pasty, sandwich, cake, fruit. I could go on but by now you should be getting the idea that Due Care can be determined based on the action or behaviour relative to the act of driving. It is not a difficult offence to establish or prove in court.

The bottom line is, that you can be pinched for almost any action or behaviour whilst driving regardless of whether it is in the Statutes or not i.e. if it constitutes Due Car (lack of) or lack of Consideration. Of course the offence might even constitute driving in a Manner Dangerous if the action or behaviour warranted it.

Check with your particular State regarding any specific law. For the sake of your Licence (and safety of others) don't disregard the above.

p.s. for those that might raise it as an issue, drivers of Police and Emergency Vehicles are exempt from most Road Traffic Laws whilst in the execution of their duty. That doesn't include going to the shop for morning tea or similar.
AnswerID: 244524

Follow Up By: Member - Littleborgy (SA) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:11

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:11
"drivers of Police and Emergency Vehicles are exempt from most Road Traffic Laws whilst in the execution of their duty"

Hi DIO,
Not wanting to sound smart, but does that include patrolling an area? I was behind a police car while coming up to a "stop" sign & the driver just seemed to ignore the fact that it was a "stop" sign & continued on as if it were a "give way" sign... As i said, i don't want to sound smart, just want to know

Cheers, Brad
0
FollowupID: 505497

Follow Up By: Member - Tim - Stratford (VIC) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:08

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:08
In Victoria police are exempt from the Road Rules whilst executing their duty. This doesn't give an exemption to the more serious road offences such as 0.05 etc.

The old law regarding phones and radios was "....use hand-held communictaion device whilst driving..." - This could be anything from a CB, UHF, Mobile phone or even the synthesiser (sp) that throat injury persons use to talk!

Law has now been changed and it specifies "...mobile phone..", but yes, police are exempt from this one too when on duty. I'm with every-one else and reckon the UHF is ok.
0
FollowupID: 505575

Follow Up By: phil - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 14:58

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 14:58
Member - Tim - Stratford (VIC) posted this followup
In Victoria police are exempt from the Road Rules whilst executing their duty. This doesn't give an exemption to the more serious road offences such as 0.05 etc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually drivers of emergency vehicles must have 0.00 blood alcohol when responding to a call. This applies to police, rural fire service, ambulance etc.

Phil I
0
FollowupID: 505648

Reply By: Member - extfilm (NSW) - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:36

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 22:36
Ok have done a little research and have come up with this for NSW
http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/rulesregulations/downloads/p18.pdf
Scroll down to page 307

Basically says Mobile fones not to be used by the driver whilst the vehicle is moving.
Quoted
"Mobile phone does not include CB radio or other 2 way radio"
AnswerID: 244537

Follow Up By: MintabiePete (NSW) - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:34

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 09:34
Thanks , thats what I was looking for , but I guess you can have different interpretations of that too , it says "Mobile phone does not include CB radio or other 2 way radio" fair enough , but it doesnt say if you can use them legally , it just says that CB radio or other 2 way radio are not mobile phones .

And I also take note of what DIO says "The bottom line is, that you can be pinched for almost any action or behaviour whilst driving regardless of whether it is in the Statutes or not i.e. if it constitutes Due Car (lack of) or lack of Consideration. Of course the offence might even constitute driving in a Manner Dangerous if the action or behaviour warranted it."

But the way I am going to interpret it , is that I can use my uhf if I want to talk to a truckie going along the road , and not take any unnecessary risks when trying to answer it :)

Thanks to you all for your thoughts and info :)

Peter in Broken Hill

0
FollowupID: 505583

Reply By: Gerhardp1 - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 23:00

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 23:00
You've all missed the obvious point -

There are not enough CBs in use to warrant a law for them, as the potential revenue collection is not there. So there's no law.

On the other hand, everyone has a mobile, so there's a great deal of revenue available.

I am not advocating texting/mobile phone use while driving, and I don't answer my mobile while driving. The thing tells me who rang, and when I feel like it and am stopped, I ring back.

But as DIO points out, a cop can get you for anything he/she feels like. You can beat a false charge but it will cost you large amounts of money, stress, and time to go to court.
AnswerID: 244540

Reply By: Member - Au-2 - Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 23:18

Sunday, Jun 03, 2007 at 23:18
I was in Supacheap today and became aware (as you do) of voice overhead telling me that it was illegal to use a mob phone while driving, even with hands free type, then the voice informed the listener that it was not a good idea to even have conversations with passengers!

I immediately pictured many vehicles stuck in traffic jams filled with people NOT talking, in case the flash for cash caught them in the middle of speech and they got fined. We'd all have to zip our lips with duct tape if they made that the law! What would it do for the road ragers? Mental hospitals/jails would be full of road stressed crazies!!
OzeSheila.
AnswerID: 244548

Reply By: Outa Bounds - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:28

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:28
Ha ha, couldn't help myself imagining having your mobile on speaker phone mode and holding it up to your mouth like a cb whenever it's your turn to talk!

But but officer......

Seriously thought I can see the point that using a cb you press the button say what you're going to & put the thing down until it's your turn again. Best of all if it's not convenient to pick up the handpiece the other person just waits a tad longer for your response. Mobiles are a bit different and probably do require more concentration plus having to hold to your ear the whole time (no including handsfree kits and the like).

Mobiles on handsfree shouldn't be much different to talking with your passengers.

Ah when travelling we're out of range with the mobile most of the time anyway, and if people really want to contact us they will leave a message that can be retreived at the next town.
AnswerID: 244571

Reply By: Sea-Dog - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:31

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 10:31
As an ex copper I can say that the CB thing is pretty much wrapped up in other legislation as far as if an accident or dangerous situation occurs etc..

You would most probably be hit with a charge (depending on your state) similar to "Driving without due care and attention" and the copper would use the fact that you were talking on the CB as a point of evidence..

If you either cause an accident or dangerous situation you can be charged and the CB would simply be fuel for the prosecutor... whether legal or not!

The smoking thing is exactly the same... drop a smoke in your lap and have a prang.... it is your fault and they will hit you with pretty much the same charge.

Wear sunnies at night (and yes I have seen this one also) and have a prang.. same deal!

Do something totally irresponsible and you will wear a dangerous driving charge!!

The mobile phone legislation is in place because every man and his dog has a mobile and it needed to be specifically legislated...

cheers
AnswerID: 244599

Follow Up By: Gerhardp1 - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:13

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 12:13
The mobile phone legislation is in place because every man and his dog has a mobile and it needed to be specifically legislated... and it has massive revenue potential

You seem to have got cut off in mid sentence, sea-dog...:)

Bloody hell - I think the USA govt must rake in a fortune with the sunnies at night rule

This post is TIC...

0
FollowupID: 505621

Reply By: 93 Navara - Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 14:26

Monday, Jun 04, 2007 at 14:26
In Victoria the legislation use to refer to 'use handheld communications device' which encompassed uhf etc. This has since been ammended with the intro of the Aus road rules, and it now refers to 'handheld mobile phone', so we're all in the clear.
The only issue that would remain is the offence of failing to have full control of the vehicle. If you're driving is not affected obviously to the boys in blue whilst your on the uhf, drinking, smoking, eating etc then you're fine. A bit of common sense and you're right.
Ben
AnswerID: 244654

Reply By: cruser - Thursday, Jun 07, 2007 at 16:47

Thursday, Jun 07, 2007 at 16:47
hi Peter
2 months coming back frm canberra to sydney been taking on a cb cop pulled me over suspecting it was a moblile when he saw it was a cb did not fine me just say ok and went on. so i asume it is legal.

mark

AnswerID: 245415

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)