Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 07:55
Everyone
I need enlightenment on this subject, because I am obviously 'missing' something.
Given Facts:
(1) The firearm were invented as both an Defensive & Offensive weapon of lethal force in the arena of waged warfare.
(2) The projectile it discharges is designed to , kill, maim or injure what ever it strikes - never to provide an orgasm.
(3) It projects a sense of aggression, power, control, confidence into the holder of such a weapon.
(4) In the absence of the aforementioned arena of waged warfare, the sporting area was invented to keep ones skills with firearms at the cutting edge so to speak.
(5) The Firearm has been readily adopted as both a personal aggressive/self defence weapon of choice in the civilian arena.
(6) The Firearm was/has been used as a tool to collect/obtain sustenance to sustain life.
(7) The firearm is also used to destroy declared vermin/feral
pests
Debate:
when
(a) there is no state of warfare declared
(b) stable government, and rule of law exists
(c) the defence Forces provide all the firearm training/playing one could wish for (and time off the streets to prevent dealing & stealing)
(d) the civilian authorised authority (Police) provide aggressive & defensive lethal and non lethal force
(e) Food and sustence is provided in abundance.
(f)
Pests are destroyed by licenced contractors
What is the driving need to get out there and play with an object that issues nothing but lethal force out of the end of it.
Now before you get all excited and start labelling me as a 'whatever' I must admit the following:
(i) Born and raised in the goldfields of WA shortly after WWII where our diet was a large proportion of 'under ground mutton' collected at the point of a .22 rifle
(ii) Actively involved in the eradication of declared vermin from farming areas using firearms
(iii) Some time in the Army including a 'holiday' in Sth Vietnam
(iv) Govt employment ever since (iii) where I am issued with and constantly surrounded by firearms with mandatory handling and 'use of ' re-certifications.
Conclusion:
I am all 'gunned out' and cannot understand peoples fascination with these things other than to experience the above mentioned perceived sense of aggression, power, control and confidence.
When there is someone else 'out there' with one of these things loaded and waving same around in your direction it changes your whole outlook on firearms
Makes you wish they hadn't been invented.
AnswerID:
245567
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:18
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:18
All diamonds and other jewelry - not directly used in industrial cutting and abrasive equipment should be removed from there owners.
Robin Miller
FollowupID:
506598
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:34
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:34
>I need enlightenment on this subject
No you don't. You, clearly, have a very fixed and, no doubt, immovable opinion on the subject; your post is simply intended to provoke argument.
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
506601
Follow Up By: Andrew Main - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:35
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:35
Lucy,
So from the description of your life it seems as if it is your own personal feelings towards firearms and your own inability to deal with your past that shapes your feelings and not rational argument.
If we let everyone who had traumatic experiences ban whatever it was that caused that (guns, cars, dogs, swimming pools etc etc) then I suspect most things would be banned.
FollowupID:
506602
Follow Up By: Member - 'Lucy' - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:42
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:42
Ah! a touch of national service with tour of Iraq is what's needed these days.
On your return (if you return) you will have all those tax free dollars to buy as much jewellery and diamonds as you wish.
Will look good as
well, if you have arms and fingers to put them on or something to hand them off of that is.
FollowupID:
506604
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:45
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:45
I think you'll find most injuries in Iraq are caused by explosives not firearms.
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
506606
Follow Up By: Member - Ian W (NSW) - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:52
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 08:52
Right! That's it!
The game of Darts is definitely out! We don't wish to encourage any expertise in the use of these sharp, silent, deadly little projectiles.
Ian
FollowupID:
506609
Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 09:04
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 09:04
Love it Ian :
But you know the funny thing is (and I believe it highlights much of this irrational approach to firearms we see) I also do a little archery and people are always interested in this and, usually, consider it to be a fine sport with a long history quite suitable for
young children (which it is) and no one advocates the banning of bows and arrows. Yet my 70 lb compound bow is far more capable of inflicting serious injury than my .22 rifle.
I suspect the reason is largely that a simplistic demonising of bows has not occurred in the media in the same way it has for firearms.
Mike Harding
FollowupID:
506613
Follow Up By: Crocabout - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:03
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:03
Lucy,
"experience the above mentioned perceived sense of aggression, power, control and confidence."
Sounds like the feeling a lot of
young people (and older) have when they get behind the wheel of a car. I feel a lot safer going to the rifle range or shooting in the bush with a few mates than I do driving up the Pacific Hwy.
There are far more injuries/deaths from speeding in motor vehicles, a lot of them to innocent people caused by others who have the feeling you describe above, and yet we havn't banned cars, m/bikes, etc.
If we follow your line of thinking, the only people who should be able to drive a motor vehicle is those who are proffessional drivers or have an absolute requirement for them in their employment. There would be no
RECREATION driving, ie, 4x4 driving or sight seeing or
camping, etc.
Kind of makes me wonder what you are even doing on a site such as this??
Croc
FollowupID:
506620
Follow Up By: Member - 'Lucy' - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:20
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:20
If you dudes read my opening line you will see it quite clearly states:
I need enlightenment on this subject, because I am obviously 'missing' something.
I now quite clearly see how remiss I was on this subject and now consider myself enlightened as
well as informed on what I was missing, as
well as a whole host of things I didn't know before.
This
forum is such a wonderful intelligence resource.
Thank you all
FollowupID:
506626
Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:55
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:55
That's a nice reply Lucy
I really value having a logical discussion with people whose
views
may be different from
mine .
Robin Miller
FollowupID:
506638
Follow Up By: Member - Ian W (NSW) - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 13:17
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 13:17
Mike,
It's now many more years than I care to admit to since I last used a sporting firearm.
I have however over the last few years accompanied my son to an SSAA Range when he opts to take the old fart out for the afternoon.
I found the experience very interesting and was surprised at the time spent by most of the participants in tuning up their firearms, sighting them in, developing loads experimenting with projectile weights etc: to achieve the optimum result. I was also surprised at just how few projectiles were fired by the majority of the participants.
At times there were groups with their heads together over scales and hand-loading books and they looked about as exiting and dangerous as a wild chess tournament.
Quite frankly unless challenged by the technical aspects of the sport I would suggest that most people would find it utterly boring, (and safe).
Lets not however take the time to investigate or learn a little of that which we condemn, why take the trouble to know anything about the subjects we damn?
I'm not a shooter, I'm not a member of the SSAA, I do however admire the dedication and expertise displayed by those at the range, just as I enjoy my visits and admire the skills of the modelling engineers at
Sydney Model
Park and Wasco Siding on the lower Blue Mountains.
Needless to say that I've never seen any wild eyed, slathering, foam flecked child killing shooters or model engineers.
Ian
FollowupID:
506641
Follow Up By: Wombat - Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 15:09
Friday, Jun 08, 2007 at 15:09
I don't think you require any enlightenment on this subject Lucy. In fact, I think your summation of the logic behind gun ownership is enlightening.
FollowupID:
506663