Permit System for Aboriginal Land

Can anyone tell me what has happened re. the abolition of the permit system for Aboriginal land?
I've been searching the net for the past few days and have only found information stating that it has been abolished in the Northern Territory. But nothing on any other states.
Thanks again for any info
Cheers
Tony
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Wizard1 - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:56

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:56
From what I've seen in the media it was a proposal and hasn't yet been finalsed. The aboriginal land council's, etc are putting in objections which have to be considered before any final decision.

The abolishion of the permits will open up their land to everyone and their dog. At least is you had to go to the effort of getting a permit it made some think twice.

When I lived in the NT there was never a drama getting a permit. The system allowed a means of funding the upkeep of camping areas, a permament ranger staff and maintenance of the roads.

I think we should keep it.
AnswerID: 259023

Reply By: Tony 12 - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:16

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:16
I agree totally, but just wondered where we stood right now. I'm planning a trip into APY land next year and have been lucky enough to get to know someone from there who is going to help us get the permits etc. But have said that if they abolish the current system, I still feel it appropriate that the traditional owners have knowedge of our visit. Plus if we do get into trouble, they would be more likely to be willing to help us. :-)
Thanks for the info, that explains why I couldn't find much about it.
cheers
Tony
AnswerID: 259026

Reply By: Andrew from Vivid Adventures - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:06

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:06
The permit system for access to Aboriginal Land is not being abolished.

The Feds are talking about abolishing the permit system for access to Aboriginal Communities - I think only in the NT, but that is different from saying that they were abolishing it altogether.

HTH
Andrew who finds that getting permits is not so hard when you can talk to a real person! Just finding that person is the hard bit.
AnswerID: 259029

Reply By: ross - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:26

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:26
Ive only had to get permits once but it was simple and painless.
The best thing about the permit system is it requires all people travelling through there to be registered somewhere.

It goes a long way to keeping the booze and drug runners out of the aboriginal communities.

I dont think its been abolished anywhere yet. If the elders wish it to remain in place ,Im all for it.
AnswerID: 259031

Follow Up By: Member - Davoe (Nullagine) - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 15:30

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 15:30
on which planet?
drug and grog runners wouldnt get permits - only law abiding citezans. how many permits get checked certainly i never have had one checked. if i was selling booze etc i would just drive in
0
FollowupID: 520518

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 16:47

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 16:47
LOL exactly how does the Permit system stop "booze and drug runners" ???????
0
FollowupID: 520522

Follow Up By: Mike Harding - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 16:59

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 16:59
>exactly how does the Permit system stop "booze and drug runners" ?

In just the same way that imposing rigorous firearms restrictions on the public stops firearms crime.

Mike Harding
0
FollowupID: 520524

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 17:04

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 17:04
But of course, at the thought of all that paperwork, the crims throw up their arms in despair and go straight - and they all lived happily ever after :))))))
0
FollowupID: 520527

Follow Up By: Hairy - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 17:19

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 17:19
Hahaha!
"It goes a long way to keeping the booze and drug runners out of the aboriginal communities."

Most grog runners dont need permits anyway! They are Aboriginal!
As for permits...Like Ive said before, as long as my taxes are paying for the roads, shops, fuel stations, power, schools, houses etc, etc,etc why shouldnt I be allowed to access them.
If aboriginal people want to sell paintings and other art they need to let people in to buy them. All the access the government wants to allow is be able to access the services in the main part of the communities, not outstaions and sacred sites. No different than any other town!
Good on them I reckon.
And no as far as I am aware the laws havent been passed yet.

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 520528

Follow Up By: DIO - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 18:26

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 18:26
Mike, there are no restriction or limitations placed on anyone with a lawful reason to possess firearms. The restrictions you are probably referring to were in the form of increased control and testing regard issuing of licences. Yes some particular classes of firearms were restricted but generally for a law abiding responsible citizen there's no problem. Pity they don't impose similar restrictions and testing on vehicle ownership/usage and issuing of driving licences. Might help to reduce the road toll. Who knows - wishful thinking !!
0
FollowupID: 520537

Follow Up By: Gramps (NSW) - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 19:08

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 19:08
DIO,

I think you missed the point :)))
0
FollowupID: 520543

Follow Up By: Dusty2 - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 19:13

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 19:13
thought you might have say on this one hairy.i can't disagree with you. equal rights for ....all . dusty2
0
FollowupID: 520544

Follow Up By: Andrew from Vivid Adventures - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 19:32

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 19:32
Hi Hairy,

The laws were passed hurriedly through the hallowed halls of Parliament in Canberra on the 17th...

http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s2008398.htm

Cheers
Andrew.
0
FollowupID: 520547

Reply By: MEMBER - Darian (SA) - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:40

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:40
Yep - the Feds can only impose their agenda on the NT at present - the states will probably stay as is on this topic.
AnswerID: 259032

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 18:18

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 18:18
Thats interesting Darian,
I know of a couple of people who have recently travelled the Colson Track and gone through Madigan's camps 3,4 and 5 with the blessing of the CLC - they didn't even require permits. CLC told them that no permits were required for this area. This was previously a no-go aea.

Phil
0
FollowupID: 520534

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen L (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 19:46

Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 19:46
Hi Phil G
Could you please let me know who they contacted. I phoned the CLC today for accessing the full length of the Colson Track and was told by the permit officer that permits are not issued and that it is still closed to the general public.

Regards

Stephen
Who has been here

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 520717

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 21:22

Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 21:22
Hi Stephen,
He phoned the CLC, and spoke to someone who said that he didn't require a permit for the Colson or the 3 camps. He was surprised and questioned her further, and she phoned him back later with confirmation from her boss that no permits were required. On the Colson he met up with another traveller who got the same answer from the CLC office. I'll cc you my friend's email address.

Cheers
Phil
0
FollowupID: 520752

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen L (SA) - Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 22:00

Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 22:00
Hi Phil
Thanks for that.
I was surprised at my call today and even mentioned about the scrapping of the permit system. The Lady I spoke to then went and checked with here supervisor and the answer was no permit and I am not to travel on this closed road.
I will ring again tomorrow and see what happens again.

Cheers

Stephen
Who has been here

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 520768

Reply By: Gerhardp1 - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:15

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:15
There was a recent post where someone took more than 3 months to get their permit.

Hardly painless.

Permits should not be required to travel the "arterial" roads even if they cross Aboriginal land. Those roads are common use roads, they are built and paid for and maintained by the Australian taxpayer.

Elsewhere in the country, roads are public. when new ones are built, the Gov't will acquire part or all of your farm/residential block whether you like it or not. This indicates to me that the Australian land is actually owned by the Country, no matter whose name is on the title.

I don't need a permit to drive from Melbourne to Sydney, even though I drive over land which used to belong to someone before the freeway was built.

I shouldn't need a permit for any other road my taxes have built either.
AnswerID: 259037

Follow Up By: Bilbo - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:37

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:37
Hear, hear, Gerhard,,,,,,,,,well said.

Bilbo
0
FollowupID: 520499

Reply By: Member - peter C (WA) - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 15:20

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 15:20
I don't remember seeing a reason for little john changing/abolishing the permit system?

Anyway, I agree that a permit should not be needed to use a 'road' but there are good reasons to seek consent from the traditional owners in most circumstances. So I'll be behaving as though nothing has changed.
AnswerID: 259065

Follow Up By: Andrew from Vivid Adventures - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 16:14

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 16:14
Little Johnny doesn't need reasons but here are a few recent articles:

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/08/08/1999878.htm

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22251191-16947,00.html

From what I can tell though, the only change to permit system included in the NT National Emergency Response Bill that I think was passed is that if you had a permit to bring alcohol someplace, the Minister has the right to stop you from doing that.

http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/Repository/Legis/Bills/Linked/07080710.pdf
0
FollowupID: 520519

Follow Up By: Andrew from Vivid Adventures - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 16:29

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 16:29
My first pass reading of this other bill... of which there appears no end, is that it does embody some additional rights of access, but I think you have to be there in some relevant official capacity.

http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/piweb/Repository/Legis/Bills/Linked/07080711.pdf

It makes a special case of the community land and the roads that get you there.
0
FollowupID: 520521

Follow Up By: Member - peter C (WA) - Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 16:12

Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 16:12
Thanks Andrew.

Some good information (and speculation) in those articles. Can't bring myself to start on the bill though.

Still left concluding there are good and bad aspects of this intervention but I can only guess at what is really intended (protect kids vs easier access for mining, etc?) Looks like politics to me.
0
FollowupID: 520691

Reply By: Hairy - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 20:03

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 20:03
Just heard on the news John Howard is going out to Handys for lunch tommorrow? I hope hes got a permit....more to the point, have you Handy?
What time do you want us there?
We'd hate to be late! Hey Dusty 2
AnswerID: 259114

Reply By: Member - Mick O (VIC) - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 20:33

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 20:33
If I understand what they've been saying over the past few weeks, it was more for the abolition of permits to enter the actual communities. Aboriginal land would still require permits to travel through but in doing so, you would be able to attend communities for fuel, food, etc which until now have been cloced. The idea being, you would pump cash into the local economy.Well have to wait and see what happens I suppose.

Mick.

''We knew from the experience of well-known travelers that the
trip would doubtless be attended with much hardship.''
Richard Maurice - 1903

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 259124

Reply By: Steve from Top End Explorer Tours - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 22:02

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 22:02
The legislation to abolish permits to aboriginal land in the NT, has been passed in parliament.

This 500 page document was not read by Mal Brough or NT senator Nigel Scullion or NT federal MP Dave Tollner, and perhaps many others before voting on it.

You can only travel from point of entry to a community and or Gov building, you can stray no more than 30mts either side of the road and any land that is owned buy an individual is now private property.

As at October 1st Kakadu will be alcohol free with the exemption of Cooinda, South Alligator motor inn and Jabiru township.

Cheers Steve.
AnswerID: 259153

Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 23:17

Monday, Aug 27, 2007 at 23:17
election year, bleep and wind to keep the peasants happy, nothin will change in the end

Cryoman from here is out there at moment, he had to get 10 permits all up for his trek he is on at moment.
AnswerID: 259166

Reply By: Tony 12 - Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:55

Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:55
Hey Truckster
I'm interested in how your mate got permission to enter APY Lands. I've just been refused, even with the help of a local.
Cheers
Tony
AnswerID: 259211

Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 22:34

Tuesday, Aug 28, 2007 at 22:34
No idea.. would have to ask him. HF may work lol
0
FollowupID: 520780

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)