DID YOU KNOW THIS ? NEXT G

Submitted: Wednesday, Sep 19, 2007 at 22:27
ThreadID: 49866 Views:3366 Replies:11 FollowUps:15
This Thread has been Archived
Hi all,

A little town down the track had a cdma tower and good cdma reception..........then a next G tower was built but interfered with the cdma reception...........so, they turned down the power of the next G.......but it was interfered with by the power from cdma...........so they turned that down.
Cut a story short, niether cdma or ng are any good now.
Since spoken to a teck and he confirms this is happening all over ?????????

Cheers..............BIGDOG
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Muddy doe (SA) - Wednesday, Sep 19, 2007 at 22:28

Wednesday, Sep 19, 2007 at 22:28
Which is exactly why Telstra want to shut down CDMA ASAP so they can ramp up the power on NextG......... or so they keep saying!

Will have to wait and see what difference (if any) it makes.

Muddy
AnswerID: 263055

Reply By: Member - Doug T (Qld) - Wednesday, Sep 19, 2007 at 23:11

Wednesday, Sep 19, 2007 at 23:11
C................R...................A.....................P...just another of the phone fairy tale stories.

gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 263063

Follow Up By: Sand Man (SA) - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 01:46

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 01:46
Yes, I would have to agree Doug.

There is no way in the world Telstra would compromise the performance of NextG over an old technology that will be defunct in 4 months or so. And why would they build a new tower, rather than use the existing (CDMA) one.
Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 524669

Follow Up By: MartyB - Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 22:58

Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 22:58
Sorry Doug and Sandman,
There are plenty of Next G bases not working at full power yet, because Telstra must maintain the standard of the CDMA service. Telstra is in a catch 22 situation, they must prove Next G has better coverage than CDMA to be allowed to turn off CDMA knowing full well that Next G service will improve greatly after CDMA is turned off. They are doing this by firstly installing a CDMA base co located with every CDMA base then infilling black spots with extra Next G bases. Best thing that can happen is Telstra is allowed to get rid of CDMA and get rid of this duplicated network rubbish. Wait and see how good Next G is when this happens.
from Marty.
PS Yes I do work for the big T.
0
FollowupID: 524950

Follow Up By: Member - Doug T (Qld) - Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 23:38

Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 23:38
Marty
I have had the feeling all along that Next G will improve as the system progresses , You can go back months and find any of my replies on the subject and you won't find a post of mine with a negative opinion , We won't go down the antenna subject on this post only to say all knows my thoughts on that , give it a few more months and we'll see just how good this is going to be '

Doug
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 524954

Reply By: Kumunara (NT) - Wednesday, Sep 19, 2007 at 23:57

Wednesday, Sep 19, 2007 at 23:57
Big Dog



Was at Wugularr recently and got excellent reception with next G.

I have no complaints re next G.




Tjilpi
Life's great and it just keeps getting better

Member
My Profile  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 263068

Reply By: Member - Bucky (VIC) - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:24

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 06:24
Next G,,,,, what crap, we still have to go outside the house, to talk properly on my TELSTRA 3G phone. Stay inside and talk and it slowly dies.

And the same story, is repeated all over country Oz.

I hope you are right Muddy, about turning up the power, it could be good, but only time will tell

As far as I am concerned its just another money making venture for TELSTRA.

Cheers
Bucky
AnswerID: 263076

Follow Up By: Member No 1- Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:38

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:38
ditto...also same with old digital ...both of them...
0
FollowupID: 524677

Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:50

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:50
I would suggest you may have a handset issue if its all over the country.
As your statement is contradicted by others who post boasting exceptional service.
VKS737 - Mobile 6352 (Selcall 6352)

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 524716

Reply By: Grungle - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:09

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:09
I wouldn't believe it Bigdog.

Why - firstly Next-G equipment is being installed onto the same tower and comms huts as CDMA as you do not need to build a new tower due to there being plenty of room for new equipment and Telstra are not going to spend over $200k erecting a new tower if there is one already there.

Secondly systems are designed with appropriate filtering fitted (as required by the ACMA) and channel designation (allocated by the ACMA after an engineering analysis) so that there sufficient channel seperation and no interference from other channels.

Towers frequently have several users on them and the only reason why you would get interference is because the ACMA didn't do their job properly, the installer of the equipment did it wrong (highly unlikely due to the checks required to bring equipment online), someone else on the tower / close by does not have appropriate filtering (such as a council, SES, amature club etc) or there is something that is mixing the various signals and creating an interfering harmonic (we recently had a piece of rusty guttering that when wet would mix FM Broadcast signals and interfere with the local councils VHF repeater).

How do I know this? For a couple of reasons, we do repairs and audits for Vodafone on their sites, repairs to Optus equipment when they fail, and we are contracted to install Next-G into 100 sites throughout central Queensland and that is just the cellular sites.

I have heard a lot of stories and theories on the CDMA / Next-G saga and have experienced the difference in reception between the 2 whilst travelling through CQ (carrying both phones). I can say that there are coverage differences between them but as a whole, it 'Should' be a good system when it is fully operational.

There is a legal requirement to abide by the regulations that are laid out by the ACMA and if the above story were true, they would be all over it in a flash. Not only that, but I dare say the Telecommunications Ombudsman wouldn't be far behind.

Makes for a good yarn though.

Regards
David
AnswerID: 263081

Follow Up By: disco1942 - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 13:44

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 13:44
David

ACMA do not co-ordinate the cell stations on any of the mobile phone bands. Those slices of spectrum are all licensed by spectrum licenses - or in other simple words the telephone companies own the spectrum Australia wide and have to do their own co-ordination.

PeterD
PeterD
Retired radio and electronics technician

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 524722

Follow Up By: Grungle - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 18:46

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 18:46
Hi Peter,

Not entirely correct. The carriers do have to apply for a licence within the spectrum asigned to PTS or Public Telecommunications Service. This can be broken down into 2 classes which come under PMTS (Public Mobile Telecommunication Service). More info -> http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/1001/pc=PC_1297

There is no way that the Carriers could co-ordinate the allocation of frequencies within a spectrum amongst themselves and it is for this reason why we have the ACMA in existance so as to be the 'Only' authority to co-ordinate 'All' Licencing within Australia.

You can see the various licences, their owners/operators, frequncies, emissions etc at this site -> http://web.acma.gov.au/pls/radcom/site_search.site_lookup?pSITE_ID=134720 This is one of the Optus sites we visit up here in CQ and as can be seen lists the frequency that they are permitted to operate on. There is actually a band of frequencies that they are legally allowed to use which is based on the main centre frequency listed.

As part of the licencing requirements for carriers, the equipment is to display a label of some sort that lists the licence number as issued by the ACMA, the operator, location, emission designation and a couple of other things. I have to record this information on each job form I do when we attend site to repair faults so am familiar with it.

Some examples of telecommunications equipment that do not require licencing through the ACMA are WLAN which is covered under a 'Class Licence' ie as long as the equipment is approved for use within Australia by meeting the Australian Standard and displays the 'C-Tick' then it can be operated without a licence.

Regards
David
0
FollowupID: 524772

Follow Up By: disco1942 - Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 01:02

Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 01:02
David

Your second link is only part of the licensing record. If you go to the bottom section you will notice that this is the screen that details the frequency assignments. Click on the License number and you will see the licence for the Optus 900MHz spectrum, you will see that there are 8764 assignments attached to that licence. This spectrum does not need any co-ordination as there is little chance of interference to other services. When a phone company wishes to install another cell they send in the details of the assignments and they are just entered on the database - or they were when I was assigning. The only time we checked for interference potential was for Apparatus Licences, not for spectrum or class licences.

PeterD
PeterD
Retired radio and electronics technician

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 524844

Reply By: madcow - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:27

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:27
Had a laugh a couple of weeks ago. My Vodaphone had service but a mates next G had nothing while another had reception with his CDMA. Downstream from Yarrawonga.
AnswerID: 263085

Reply By: Member - Sam (NSW) - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:37

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 07:37
Check out post 49407. There was a bit of info covered here as to why performance is as it is at the moment (ie not fulll power yet, poorly performing phones etc)
AnswerID: 263087

Reply By:- Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:43

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 08:43
I have never been a great fan of privatizing Telstra but if it had to happen all the equipment should have been left in the hands of the government ie. Telecom and Telstra and all the others rent from them. At the moment Telstra appears to be very bossy to the detriment of the general public and the other operators.
Also does anybody know if and when a next g phone will be out for just making phone calls as I don't want a camera as I already have one I don't want a video player as I already have one. Just my point of view
AnswerID: 263096

Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:49

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 12:49
"to the detriment of the general public and the other operators"

Who gives a $hit about other operators who are foreign owned and only want a free ride from Telstra.
If they really want to compete then let then build their own system with the same coverage as Next G.
VKS737 - Mobile 6352 (Selcall 6352)

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 524714

Follow Up By: StephenF10 - Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 13:42

Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 13:42
If the phone can have a camera and video recorder without compromising anything else then why not? I don't always go out loaded down with a still camera and a video camera so it's good to know that I can use the phone if I have to. If I didn't have the phone video I couldn't have captured my grandson's first crawling movements recently. Sure, it's crap quality but point is that it WAS recorded.

Stephen.
0
FollowupID: 524889

Follow Up By: Muddy doe (SA) - Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 19:01

Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 19:01
The problems here Stephen are two fold as I see it:

1: Imagine how small the handset could be if it did not have the extra hardware/circuitry for camera/mp3 player ect. Or alternatively how much extra space could be devoted to more battery for better endurance.

2: Many people work or enter secured premises where cameras are not allowed for commercial confidenciality or security reasons. Can still have a phone, but no imaging devices.

No NextG phone currently does voice only.

Many people may never ever use thier phone for anything more advanced than voice calls. They JUST want a phone. Why should they be forced to pay for a higher cost device that incorporates technology they will never use? All this is is Telstra just trying to coax people to use more services that they really want to and make more $$$$.

Cheers
Muddy
0
FollowupID: 524929

Reply By: Member - Karl - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 09:53

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 09:53
Name the town so we can ring someone to find out first hand - assuming they have reception :-)))))

Other than that sounds like a good furphy to me.

Karl
AnswerID: 263112

Reply By: Robin Miller - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 14:50

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 14:50
Hi BigDog

Can't comment on any particular towers , but that senario
is technically very possible.

Central to the performance of CDMA type systems is power control.
It is much more critical than with GSM.

Early on in the development of these systems one strong phone
could reduce the range of others in a network and cause dropouts
to those in weak signal areas when switched on.

This happens a lot less these days as the phones and towers
adjust there power up to 1000 times a second to keep
the network in balance.

When two different systems are close together this control
becomes more difficult and at the extremes can break down.

Robin Miller
AnswerID: 263173

Follow Up By: Muddy doe (SA) - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 19:13

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 19:13
Good point Robin.

Someone on here posted a link recently to a Tech Tips article on the Moonraker site which talked about why boosters are banned. They basically drown out other phones in the same cell and even surrounding cells. The cell towers actually instruct each handset how much transmitting powewr to use. Non compliant devices (boosters) don't accept these instructions and this can result in a whole cell being disrupted.

There MIGHT be something in this point from Telstra about the two networks competing in terms of power on close frequencies but the Telstra have shown themselves in the past to be the masters of spin and bulldust on occasions so all we can do is wait and see.

Cheers
Muddy
0
FollowupID: 524775

Follow Up By: Muddy doe (SA) - Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 19:22

Thursday, Sep 20, 2007 at 19:22
Here is the link to the article that I mentioned.

Cheers
0
FollowupID: 524779

Follow Up By: Member - Ian F (WA) - Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 18:29

Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 18:29
People who complain about Telstra should change to Optus or Vodaphone then they will see how good the Telstra service is.
I have just come from a trip to Warrnambool and the only trouble I had with Telstra nextG was between Norsman and the WA/SA border. I will stick to Telstra
Ian
0
FollowupID: 524923

Reply By: Axel [ the real one ] - Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 18:50

Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 18:50
One of the biggest loads of c r a p is / was / continues to be the so called "privatisation" of government owned companies /infrasructure ,,, We ,each and everyone owned telstra /telecom and now we pay for a Few shareholders and obscene salaries and a so called performance bonus for 3rd rate service ,
AnswerID: 263351

Follow Up By: Muddy doe (SA) - Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 18:55

Friday, Sep 21, 2007 at 18:55
Have to agree with you there Axel.

I think they should have split Telstra and sold off the retail stuff with the networks infrastructure side remaining in public hands.

Cheers
Muddy
0
FollowupID: 524926

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)