Thursday, Nov 22, 2007 at 23:49
Hi leeb1973
I used to have a Windsor Rapid Offroad 13'6" van and reckon it was great. It would be my pick by far of the ones you have mentioned.
I have since changed over to a camper trailer due to the type of tracks I normally go on as I did a fair bit of panel damage, especially on one trip in particular. The van itself surived
well, but when snaking around trees,
well the aluminium sides and awning copped a real hiding to the point both sides of the van and the awning were replaced.
While I have never had the time to be away for more than a couple of weeks at a time in either camper or van, I personally wouldn't want to be in the camper trailer for much more than a month (wife + 2 kids, 10&8). But I wouldn't hesitiate to do a lap for 12 months in the Rapid.
We only had the porta potty and shower tent and my wife would definetly prefer an internal shower/
toilet. In fact it would be compulsory if we ever did a big trip, but thats not to say you couldn't cope without one.
The Rapid has more than enough storage, to the point you take far more than you need - and thats with a family of 4. If you cannot fit all you need into the Rapid, you are taking way too much. We used to have a Kayak, fishing rods, totem tennis, football, basket ball, huge amount of 4WD recovery gear, clothes rack, 4 folding chairs + folding lounge, 2 tables, BBQ, etc... heaps of clothes both warm & cold weather, enough food for 2 weeks and even had an iron (blame SWMBO) and this was all packed away. Way too much i know but thats what happens when you have the space (we are more economical in the camper trailer but still take way too much).
We used to spent probably an equal amount of time
free camping and caravan parks - as much due to circumstances but my preference was
free camping while my wife prefered the parks. We only used the annexe if staying for more than say 3 days. Too much effort to put up and not really required for short stays. But it does give you more room to spread out if in one spot for a while.
I have used both a 1HZ 80 series and a 3.0TD GU as the tow vehicle for the Rapid. You cannot comapre how much better the 3.0TD was than the 1HZ. Fuel economy averaged 15.7l/100kms vs 18l/100kms in the 1HZ. While the 1HZ could cruise at 100km/hr, even the
sign of a
hill would have 4th gear and back to 80km/hr and overtaking was a rare occurence.
The 3.0TD GU easily cruises in 5th up small hills and 4th maintained 100km/hr on virtually all other hills. Overtaking was relatively easy and once found myself doing 140km/hr (do not condone this, but did not realise I had picked up this much speed). And all this while getting better fuel economy! A lot of people do not like the GU 3.0TD, but thats usually because they haven't had one.
As far as vehicle stability goes, both the GU and cruiser were fine. In the cruiser I had 300pound rear springs and while this was great when loaded, it was too stiff when just city running. On the GU i put in airbags and this is FAR better. Pump the up when loaded and let them down when back home in the city.
Hope some of this helps.
Cheers
Captain
AnswerID:
273239