Monday, Nov 26, 2007 at 21:28
Well I didn't see the show in question, but from the description posted here, they seem to have way overstated the issue.
I'd
hazard a guess that over 90% of vehicle dual
battery systems use dissimilar batteries. How come so many people get years of good service from their system?
As Mike DID has said, the amount of current a
battery draws in charging is determined by the
battery, not the alternator. They are pretty dumb devices (as are most isolators). As a
battery charges, it's internal resistance increases. With the increase in resistance it
draws less current, until when fully charged it's resistance is such that it
draws no current at all.
In a standard set up, with the aux running a
fridge overnight, when you start the engine the next day, the aux will have a lower internal resistance the the starter. If you don't have a voltage sensing isolator, the aux will draw more current than the starter initially. This is generally only an issue if you do multiple short runs with a run down aux. In this case, you could flatten the starter by repeated starting before it can get a decent charge.
There is very little chance that (as someone said above), the discharged aux will draw current from the starter and flatten the starter. With an isolator (even a simple solenoid), the two batteries are only connected when the engine is running. It is very unlikely that the aux will draw so much current that it will take all the alternator can give, and then take current from the starter as well until it is flat.
I've run dissimilar batteries for years. Currently the original Hilux starter, with up to 3 AGMs (one in Hilux, 2 in CT). All AGMs are in parallel when CT is connected. Isolation is via a simple solenoid. Had the current set up for close to 3 years. Next time (probably not till next vehicle) I will use a voltage sensing isolator (
Redarc for example) as additional protection, but in the meantime my system (and thousands of others like it) work just fine. If I was going to stuff my starter through overcharging, I think it would have happened long ago.
I suspect this segment was sponsored by someone trying to sell something. As we all know, sex sells. But fear probably does as well.
AnswerID:
273797
Follow Up By: Sand Man (SA) - Monday, Nov 26, 2007 at 21:52
Monday, Nov 26, 2007 at 21:52
Norm,
I think a little correction is appropriate here for the non electrically minded people.
"Isolation is via a simple solenoid"
A simple solenoid doesn't isolate, it just links the batteries together in parallel. And in many cases the two batteries are not only connected when the engine is running.
People tend to control the solenoid by a manual switch and if one forgets to disconnect, the batteries can remain connected together and a fault in one
battery will have a negative impact on the other. If that
battery is your starter, you could be "up the track without a spark".
Cheap installations may work, but there is a higher risk of failure.
I wouldn't be confident in the outback with such an installation.
FollowupID:
537203
Follow Up By: V8 Troopie - Monday, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:08
Monday, Nov 26, 2007 at 23:08
"As Mike DID has said, the amount of current a
battery draws in charging is determined by the
battery, not the alternator. They are pretty dumb devices (as are most isolators). As a
battery charges, it's internal resistance increases. With the increase in resistance it
draws less current, until when fully charged it's resistance is such that it
draws no current at all."
That does not make sense at all. Think of it, IF, as you say, a batteries internal resistance "increases" as its charged it would assume infinite resistance when fully charged. You cannot draw any current from a
battery wit infinite resistance.
Forget the internal resistance thing when it comes to
battery charging - it only matters on OLD batteries which have an internal resistance too high (eg. sulphated) to accept a decent charge.
The reason the current flow eases off and eventually stops is because the alternator output voltage approaches and then equals the
battery terminal voltage. No voltage difference - no current flow.
I hope that clears this furphy up :-)
Klaus
FollowupID:
537223
Follow Up By: Member -Signman - Tuesday, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:53
Tuesday, Nov 27, 2007 at 08:53
'Morning Norm
"I suspect this segment was sponsored by someone trying to sell something. As we all know, sex sells. But fear probably does as well."
In this case- NO. there was no mention or promotion of an alternative product or service, either blatantly or subliminally. Like you, I am well aware of 'product placement'...
FollowupID:
537262