Tuesday, Jul 14, 2009 at 10:41
Jetcrew,
I've looked at the
KYOCERA 130 Watt Solar panel Link.
The 130 Watt Kyocera panel's physical size is very small @ less than 1 square Mt, indicating very high performance characteristics.
For comparison my Sharp panel's physical size is 1 sq Mt for only 123 Watts and the BP 125 Watt panel is also 1 sq Mt, indicating the Kyocera panel produces more (peak) power and from a much smaller sized panel.
Mandrakes panel is: 140 Watt, 18 Volts, 7.78 Amps, but no physical size is mentioned, (that I'm aware of) so no direct comparison can be made as to it's efficiencies at peak performance, which is not too important as you will be working in the ½ to ¾ capacity most of the time anyway, hence the "low performance" characteristics are just, if not far more, important anyway.
Note:
I'm not suggesting Mandrakes panel is inferior in any way
as information is not available to make direct comparison.
Maîneÿ . . .
FollowupID:
641681