1HZ powered (or UNDERpowered?!) Landcruiser

Submitted: Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:17
ThreadID: 73671 Views:66213 Replies:17 FollowUps:26
This Thread has been Archived

Related Pages

I'm looking around at various options for a long term replacement of the old faithful Jackaroo and am currently very interested in the 100-Series 'Cruisers.

While obviously, the preference would be for a late (ie. 2006) GXL TD, the TD's are fetching some rather generous amounts (good for the current owners, not so good for the would-be owners like me!). So, I've started to look more seriously at the 105 standard 'Cruisers with the naturally aspirated 1HZ engine. I understand that it is a very good engine, well known for it's long term reliability, but is also underpowered without the turbo. From reading a few threads on EO, I think I'd be steering clear of any with an aftermarket turbo so I just want to know HOW MUCH underpowered are the N/A 1HZ 105 'Cruisers? Particularly looking for feedback from people that own (or have owned) one...

The vehicle would be my only vehicle used for the every-other-day commute during the week (ie. days that I don't feel like riding the pushy) with the odd weekend camping trip, and longer range touring whenever I can save up enough annual leave for a decent trip! As I said, it would be a long-term vehicle and I'd hope to get at least 10 years out of it.
I'm not planning to tow anything regularly (and certainly nothing big - the biggest I ever put behind the Jackaroo was my brother's 750kg tare caravan - and the 3.2L V6 really worked hard to pull that!).
I'm not generally in a hurry (don't care if it takes 30sec to get to 100km/h on the flat!), but I just wonder if the 1HZ will slow down unbearably on every little gradient out on the open road? Do they cruise well at 100km/h or does it feel like it's going flat out the whole time (ie. like my old LJ80!)?
I'm also interested to hear how they go in sand (since I haven't yet been to Fraser Island or across the Simpson Desert - both of which I'd like to do), so I'd also be interested in comments from people who have actually driven one in these conditions (or even been in a convoy with one) - you can't really get much feel for this in a test-drive LOL!

PS. Robin, I'll save you the typing and put you down as a vote for "dangerously underpowered"! LOL.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Dunedigger - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:29

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:29
You could consider leaving it NA and doing a Diesel / Gas conversion.

Know it kakes a huge difference to the Nissan 4.2

Check out the Diesel Gas people and look at the graphs

Dunedigger

AnswerID: 390800

Follow Up By: Member - Amy G (SA) - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:33

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:33
I've read that Diesel/gas doesn't make much difference at all to the indirect injective engines, but is much more effective on the factory turbo/direct injection models. You may come across this in your searching of the topic anyway.
0
FollowupID: 658622

Follow Up By: Member - Amy G (SA) - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:51

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:51
Injection, not injective. Oh to have an edit button!
0
FollowupID: 658624

Follow Up By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:25

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:25
The 1HZ was one that got the LEAST gain out of gas injection, I considered it but the gains shown to me where only around 8-10% increase in power, other motors got up to 30-35%.
Shane
0
FollowupID: 658709

Reply By: Member - Amy G (SA) - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:46

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:46
Well Timbo, I just replied to you via PM, but for the benefit of anyone else interested in this thread these are my comments.

Positives of the 1HZ Cruisers
- Reliability
- Fine on the highway- 110 is no problem. Doesn't slow down unbearably on every gradient, only on the steep ones. Don't know if you'd consider it unbearably, you get used to it and it's fine- still goes faster than the big trucks!
- Beautiful cruising of bush tracks and rocky slopes
- Fine in sand, once you learn how to drive it (more skill required, honestly!)
- Fine around town. Takes a while to get up to 60 compared to a petrol car
- Gearboxes can have troubles, especially downshifting to second (though you might not notice this in a newer model for a while!). Many users solve this by changing the gearbox oil to Castrol VMX-M- great stuff :)

Negatives of 1HZ Cruisers
- You will think it's slow if you like to drive fast
- You will think it's especially slow if you want to tow a van.

As with any car, treat it well and it will treat you well. While some might consider it underpowered because it doesn't get to 100kph in 10 seconds (!!!!!), I haven't ever found it to be underpowered in an off road situation, nor while driving normally around town or on the highway. Mine cruises nicely up the hill out of Adelaide at 70-80 kph. If this is a problem for you, this isn't the car for you. If you don't mind, then once you get over the top you'll be just fine :)
AnswerID: 390803

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:45

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:45
Thanks again Amy. Yes, the reliability is a big plus (as well as the $20k odd saving over comparable models with the ever-so-desirable factory turbo!).

I don't like to drive fast, but don't want to crest every hill on the highway at 30km/h (or less!) either. I'm also not planning to tow anything like a caravan other than perhaps the occasional weekend away with a small borrowed van.
0
FollowupID: 658734

Reply By: Madfisher - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:59

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:59
Hi Tim,
mate had a troopy with the 1hz, after fiting extractors, bigger exhaust and snorke it use to surprise me how well it went. He use to use a diesel conditioner as well. Have you though about picking up an 02/03 wide track jack with the 3.5 dohc. No comparsion in power and torque to the 3.2. You can pick up very low k ones for less then $15000.To give you an idea how much grunt they have, out old 3lt paj could just stay with the Jack towing our 4.2 boat.And our old Paj felt more grunty then any 3.2 I drove(lower geared).
Sir kevs 1hz has no trouble siting on 110 or a bit more, but uses more fuel then my v6 doing so.
Cheers Pete
AnswerID: 390807

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:56

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:56
Hi Pete, sorry to talk about switching camps, eh?! :)

I've thought about the 3.5L V6 Jacks but not too seriously - I know they go a lot better than the 3.2L (I actually test-drove one before but still ended up buying the 3.2L!). I'm still a little way off deciding so who knows ... ?!

I wanted to get a diesel for my last vehicle but for the sort of money I had available at the time (just finished uni) I'd have been looking at things that were really tired. I'd like to get myself into a diesel for the fuel economy - particularly for the increased touring range (plus diesel isn't as risky to carry in jerries as ULP). I've heard you tell others that owning a 3.0L TD Jack isn't much fun though. I've looked into all the LR fuel tanks and besides being quite an expensive mod, I've read reports on EO about all the major brands having problems with dropping out and/or splitting etc. - don't want to go that way.

From what I hear the 1HZ in the 105 'Cruisers is similar to what I used to get in my Jack though (around 14.5L/100km city, around 12.5L/100km highway), but I understand they have 145L tanks standard (the Jacks only have 85L).
0
FollowupID: 658739

Follow Up By: Madfisher - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 13:39

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 13:39
Gotta agree Tim,for desert Travel you can not beat a normally aspirated 1hz for sheer reliabebilty, and yes the 3lt was way ahead of its time but the huie injection system designed by Cat let it down big time, but their are happy owners out their, me I wouldn't risk it. Not fussed on the auto in Sals auto Nullarbor either.
Cheers Pete
0
FollowupID: 658820

Reply By: Atta Boy Luther - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:59

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 21:59
Just put a set of extractors and a good two and a half inch exhaust to give it a bit more low down torque . If you are into overtaking then the naturally exasperated 1HZ is not for you .
AnswerID: 390808

Reply By: Con_Qld - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 22:21

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 22:21
I have a 2002 stock standard 1HZ wagon - but installed aftermarket autron cruise control. I drove it from Perth to Brisbane across the Nullabor at times cruising at 135km & not a problem. Have taken it to Fraser Island fully loaded many times and only got bogged once as I was in the wrong gear.
It is a great machine. Do all oil changes myself, engine, transmission, transfer case, front & rear diffs, fuel filters & air filters on a regular basis.
Sometimes wished I had more power but that is a matter of choice. Will really test it towing a 2.8 ton caravan soon so we shall see.
In summary its a great vehicle - solid as...
hope this helps...
AnswerID: 390812

Follow Up By: pop2jocem - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 22:56

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 22:56
As the owner of a 1HZ powered HZJ75 for the last 15 odd years I can only agree with with what others have posted. Done the CSR, GRR and others grossly overloaded and never felt to be underpowered, well very rarely. Con we bought a van about the weight that you are talking about and now the lack of grunt is showing up on hills and particularly with even a moderate headwind. No wind and flat road no problems cruises at 90 k's and will do more if I push it but hills and winds are a killer.

Timbo, not towing, in my humble opinion adequate power for most scenarios, towing, buy a different vehicle or at least a turbo Cruiser.

Cheers Pop
0
FollowupID: 658636

Reply By: Crackles - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 22:30

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 22:30
Have had both a 1HZ 80 & 105 series and although they are seen by some to be under powered they are more than capable offroad. What power they do have is well matched with the gearbox & has excellent low range reduction. Have to be patient when overtaking but generally highway speeds can be maintained even when towing. I ran oversized 285 tyres which increases the problem yet at the end of the day I always arrived at camp with everyone else :-)
Cheers Craig...............
AnswerID: 390813

Reply By: Member - Mark E (VIC) - Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 22:30

Tuesday, Nov 10, 2009 at 22:30
Timbo,

I can answer your questions from the perspective of an owner of just such a vehicle.

I have a 2002 version of the HZJ105R and bought it at the auctions in Dec 2005 (from memory) with 40k km on the clock. It was ex DSE and used very lightly around the outer suburbs of Melbourne, so pretty much drove like new.
At the time I decided on the Landcruiser over the Patrol, due to 2 main reasons: they were a little better on the road, smoother and quieter and I felt the Toyota dealer network was more extensive and I felt had a better reputation than the Nissan dealers, particularly after I read the various forums about the 3.0l problems and the dealers almost complete lack of recognition and assistance.

The downsides I felt were the lack of bucket seats, the spare tyre location underneath the rear of the car and of course the lack of turbo, but I felt the overall reliability and simplicity of no electronics, carpet, electric windows etc was a bonus in terms of less to go wrong in remote areas.

In relation to these issues, I have added a Kaymar spare wheel carrier, bucket seats from the GXL version (wreckers $550 pair less $150 sale of original seats), centre console plus a host of other bits and pieces that would have been added to any car.

In relation to the power of the car: in standard trim, with standard size tyres it is fine on the road....no racing car, but adequate. Once you start adding bullbars, winches, side bars, drawers, fridges, roofracks, dual batteries and lift the suspension, the power is less. Even with all this weight on the car, I find it a little slow, but adequate, expecially compared to my old BJ40 and even my previous Tdi Discovery.

I have driven this car up the East coast a few times, into Central Australia, across the Nullarbor to WA and up the West Coast, Gibb River Road, GCR and Gunbarrel Hwy and NEVER have I found it dangerously slow. You have to drive to the cars capabilities and I find it useful to communicate with the truckies if you notice them approaching fast. I let them past when I can.

I have more recently bought a camper trailer which weighs about 750kg unladen and upwards of a tonne leaded for a trip. I find it a little more frustrating at times, but like you I keep reminding myself that it's a holiday....what's the rush? I have also towed a 17' caravan for a more local trip (weight about 1700kg) and I wouldn't really want to tow something this heavy with the 1HZ more permanently.

Given all that I have said above, I am considering adding a turbo at the moment, but my thoughts are that I will need to keep this vehicle for the long term (10+ years) if I choose this path, due to the excessive cost to do it PROPERLY. From my somewhat extensive research, the 1HZ responds best to a Safari Intercooled turbo,larger exhaust and dyno tuned with appropriate EGT's in mind in order to maintain reliability. Even then, there are no guarantees that you won't damage the engine. If you research this yourself, you will uncover that there are literally thousands of 1HZ's with after-market turbos traveling all over the country without problems and a few horror stories of catastrophic failures, usually attributed to excessive performance modifications (over fuelling, boost and advanced pump timing), poor service history, especially oil and fuel system maintenance).

A couple of other 'issues' that you might like to be aware of include a slight weakness with the front diff, breaking the CWP, especially when reverse snatching or steep climbing when a front wheel may lift, spin them come down. This may be largely fixed with the addition of a locking diff and many also fit a solid pinion spacer in place of the crush spacer. They need to be set up by someone who really knows what they're doing. Also, the manual gearbox fitted to the HZJ105 is known as the R151 and is a lighter box that that fitted to the petrol and factory turbo diesel models. It has been known to fail if place under greater strain than that intended by Mr. Toyota, ie heavy towing or with aftermarket turbo.

i know there is a lot to consider, but the basic car is very reliable and I find quite comfortable and excellent for touring, provided you don't want to tow very heavy trailers/caravans and carry extreme loads.

One final point is that what I find acceptable performance, someone else would not tolerate, so there is a large degree of personal preference in selecting the right car. The 105 would have been perfect if Toyota had fitted the heavier duty H151 gearbox and the earlier 1HD-FT from the 80 series. (You could certainly modify the basic car with an engine and gearbox change as has been done by one of the members of the LCOOL group.

I hope this diatribe will help you make an informed decision.

Cheers,
Mark

AnswerID: 390814

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:22

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:22
Thanks Mark, some very useful info - I've heard of people needing to replace the seats too but, as for the power issue, probably a personal decision.

"NEVER have I found it dangerously slow. You have to drive to the cars capabilities" - I think that's probably the key: after driving it for a bit, you'll get used to knowing how much space you need to overtake someone, it's only going to be dangerous if you try to overtake when you don't have enough space. I managed to survive in a 0.8L Suzuki LJ80 and then a 1.9L 4cyl Jackaroo - I kept both of those vehicles stock-standard.

I haven't heard of so many catastrophic failures due to A/M turbos, just more wary of wearing out the engine faster (which I understand the turbo will do). I think I'll be trying to avoid vehicles with A/M turbos already installed (who knows what boost they've been running previously?!) and if a turbo is needed, I'd probably prefer to shell out the extra $$$ initially to get the factory TD rather than shelling out the $$$ later trying to add a turbo to an engine that wasn't really designed for it - I'm just trying to find out whether the turbo is really needed or not (because the extra is better used going into the home loan).

I've also read a bit about the weak front diffs and will certainly be aware of this (actually I'm very wary of it after having busted the rear diff on my previous 1.9L 4cyl Jackaroo on a steep rocky fire trail). I'm not too worried about towing as I don't intend to tow anything big, and certainly nothing regularly.

Thanks again for your input - I'll keep wondering and reading...
0
FollowupID: 658743

Reply By: Member - Bruce T (SA) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 02:18

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 02:18
Timbo,

We have a 2000 Troopy that we bought from new. We found it extremely sluggish when towing a van, particularly up a steep incline. In 2006 we fitted a Denco turbo and of course modified the exhaust system. We haven't had a spot of bother with it, get better fuel consumption and a lot more power. Those steep inclines aren't a problem any more.

Bruce and Di
AnswerID: 390824

Reply By: Robin Miller - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:46

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 07:46
Hi Timbo

You have already covered my feelings about them on the highway , but we have quite a lot of experience with them crossing the Simpson for example.

Mark E has put some useful points above , it addition I would say that they are a quite capable vehicle in the sand and are a good platform for modification.

The one we went with we had modified by fitting a hand made exhaust , retuning and it had some bits like front end strengthened.
These made a significant performance difference.
It had lockers , better breathing as well and in the slower sand country had more than enough power to pull its 285/75/16 Copper muds.

Since that trip the owner has gone with an aftermarket Turbo with low boost and its proving to be an effective modification.
AnswerID: 390835

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:25

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:25
Thanks Robin. I understand there are plenty of mods readily available for them but I was kind of looking for a vehicle that didn't need significant mods, although a better breathing exhaust isn't too significant.

What did your mate do to strengthen the front end?
0
FollowupID: 658744

Reply By: Trevor R (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:19

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:19
Timbo,

I had a 99 GXL before my Patrols and found it a lovely car to drive. I towed massive loads with it a lot and as you said, I found it dangerously underpowered for this but for the average person this would not be the case as they would not have a 6 -6.5T GCM setup and ask it to sit on the speed limit all day every day but I did anyway hehe. This is probably a contributing factor to the only real problem I had with that vehicle and that was the 2 gearbox rebuilds I had to endure. When I heard the same sounds coming from the box for the third time, I flogged it off. It had 130 000km on the dial in 18mths so it had done a heap of work in the short time frame I had it. I would look at another for a tourer if I wasn't towing but it would have to be at the right price which is hard to come by seeing as it has a Toyota badge stuck to the front grill.

Seriously look at the turbo 4.2 Patrols, they would more than likely be not much difference in price for a similar age and kilometer GXL Cruiser 1HZ but a world apart in terms of power (30% more on paper). Basically same fuel consumption from both vehicles as far as my driving goes.

Cheers, Trevor.
AnswerID: 390840

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:31

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:31
Thanks Trev, not planning to tow anything (certainly nothing big) at this stage. Will certainly be looking at any 4.2L TD Patrols I come across as I understand these are a great vehicle. I also understand they're reasonably rare, and many of them having done some hard work and, with the reputation of the 3.0L, perhaps demand for the 4.2L is increasing? These things start to make it not such good value for money - not yet as bad as the 'Cruisers! :)

Seriously, I'm planning to keep my eyes open for 4.2L TD Patrols as well but good ones don't seem easy to come by...
0
FollowupID: 658745

Reply By: slammin - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:10

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:10
As has been said so many times above. What power do you feel you require?

I like the 1hz power becaus it's taught me a lot about my need for speed. I used to be 1 of those drivers racing to the next set lights to try and get 5meters on my "opponents". Now I just cruise to the next set of lights, someone in a WRX or someother lighter faster sedan will dart around me and I'll see them at the next set of lights and be amused because for the risk of a speeding ticket or worse clipping someone and causing an accident, what have they gained 5meters. WOW! : P

The biggest issue I can see for you is the most important part of your statement "commuting". That is the biggest factor. How far is it? If you are just doing short hops do not use your LC. Mine takes 5 mins to come up to operating temperature. (verified with digital thermometer)

Diesels survive the longest when operated at 80% power for 80% of the time.
AnswerID: 390857

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:35

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:35
Excellent point I hadn't considered - the commute is only about 7-8km each way so only just even enough the get the heaters going in the V6 Jack! Maybe I'll have to ride the pushy more often (or getting a motorbike for the daily commute)!

No, I don't care to race everyone to the next red light, and if I did, I wouldn't be considering a Landcruiser... (if you want to keep up with the little hatchbacks, you should buy a little hatchback!)
0
FollowupID: 658746

Reply By: stevesub - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:22

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:22
We have a 2000 1HZ Troopy pop-top camper - all standard and love it. We know it does not have the power of a car BUT the power it does have is adequate. We can sit on 100/110kph all day with no problems using the after market cruise control and only rarely do we need to change down on hills.

We bought it in 2003 and intend to keep it for many more years and have an absolutely trouble free run except for the gearbox which gave problems in 2004 and now has noisy bearings after being filled with sand/water in a mud hole that shredded the seals.

The Troopy is great in all aspects off road incl sand and we have even towed a broken down Landie off the beaches through apporx 100m of soft sand with no problems when Landies accompanying us got stuck - an yes, I also own a Rangie. It is no where as good as the Troopy in sand, even with multiple times the horsepower and much wider tyres.

I also do like to drive fast as I raced cars for 27 years, but the Troopy suits me and my wife fine.

Stevesub
AnswerID: 390858

Reply By: qubert - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:36

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:36
be prepared to get about 450-500km from 90l tank of fuel.
a bit extra money for factory turbo but they gat about 600-700km tank. after a while it will 'pay for itself'. and the factory turbo are a brilliant engine.(later ones)
AnswerID: 390861

Follow Up By: stevesub - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 15:01

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 15:01
We get 650 to 700km from a 90L tank on our bog standard 1Hz in our 2000 Troopy at 100kph average. We have never had below 550km off road from a tank.

Stevesub
0
FollowupID: 658698

Follow Up By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:34

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:34
I get normally 600 ks before low fuel light comes on (78-80 liters) on my HZJ105.
Shane
0
FollowupID: 658711

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:38

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:38
Thanks for the info guys - perhaps the 1HZ isn't quite as economical as I thought?!

Shane, does the HZJ105 have two tanks for 145L fuel capacity (it does according to drive.com.au!) or just a single 90L tank?
0
FollowupID: 658748

Follow Up By: Member - ross m (WA) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:48

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:48
The only accurate way to talk about fuel consumption is litres/100klms or MPG.
Talking in tankfulls is nonsense unless you drive till its empty and know how much was in there.
Neither the main or aux tank will fill to 90 litres anyway.

I reguarly get 12-13 litres per 100 klms from both my 1HZ 7* series.
The weight on board doesnt effect it as much as wind resistance.
Stop and go traffic or long highway trips doesnt seem to make much difference.
0
FollowupID: 658751

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 21:18

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 21:18
I agree Ross, but km to the tank is more useful for determining touring range than "L capacity ÷ L/100km ­x 100" for exactly the reason you state: Neither the main or aux tank will fill to 90 litres
0
FollowupID: 658756

Follow Up By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 21:35

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 21:35
Hi Timbo, main tank has 90 liters, sub has 45, standard right across the range

No I've never ran mine right out (of fuel) so I don't know for sure, but running the rotory fuel pump dry WILL STUFF IT, mugs game to run it out just to see how much the fuel tanks hold.

Over Approx 12000, loaded 100-300 kg's over weight, spare tyre, oztent, highlift jack, shovel all on roofrack averaged out at 14.2l/100ks.
This included crossing the Simpson desert from east to west, and Great central road to Kalgoorlie.

To Ross... you are not right in saying that a tank full going X distance is nonsense, I was simply stating as a GUIDE that my typical day to day driving as well as the occasional 1-2 hour drive on the weekend will result in getting around 600 on the main tank before the light comes on from full, usually if I fill up to full from this point, it will take 78-80 liters, equating to around 13l/100ks.
Of course other's may get a different result, but I know how far my vehicle "should" get on a full tank,
0
FollowupID: 658757

Follow Up By: Member - ross m (WA) - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 00:23

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 00:23
Timbo How do you arrive at estimating fuel use by the tankfull is more useful?

Look at the figures quoted,they are all over the place.
650-700klms and 450-500klms and 600klms.

Shane it is nonsense unless you state the exact amount of litres used and its also silly to quote figures based on when the light comes on.
Why give guides when you know that it uses 13l/100klms?
The light comes on when you go round corners.

Its like the bloke who quotes cans of beer drunk till the next town.
0
FollowupID: 658777

Follow Up By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 15:58

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 15:58
Ross. . . you are missing my point.

I know my vehicle well enough to be able to predict how much fuel it will take once the ligh comes on, in MY HZJ 105, the fuel light doesn't come and go as it goes around corners, once on, it stays on, I can predict with reasonable accuracy how much fuel it will take, usually 78-80 liters.

You are correct in staying that to get an accurate calculation you will need to add up kilometers travelled divide by fuel used, no argument from me.

As you WELL KNOW that fuel use will vary from different drivers and conditions, as well as loads, but If my 1HZ was only getting 450k to(approx) 90L tank, when most others where getting more, I'd be wondering why.

You don't need a calculator to work out that the vehicle that only got 450 k's is using alot more fuel than the vehicle that can get 700k's, on what appears to be the same size fuel tank, so why completely dismiss this as a "guide".

Shane

0
FollowupID: 658839

Reply By: Voxson - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 14:06

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 14:06
Mine weighs in at 3800kgs all fuelled up and regularly gets 15.3 litres per 100kms...
When i am towing 1.5tonne boat or 1300kg off road trailer / boat combo it gives me 16.5 litres per 100km....
On the road not towing it is great...
And a little less great when towing...
Best car i have ever had..

AnswerID: 390868

Follow Up By: Member - Graham H (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:38

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:38
Interesting, considering its legal GVM is 3180kg.



0
FollowupID: 658732

Follow Up By: Voxson - Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 14:06

Thursday, Nov 12, 2009 at 14:06
Thank you.... I am glad to know that..
I will repack....
0
FollowupID: 658823

Reply By: Member - Redfive - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 14:34

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 14:34
Hi Timbo

I have a 2002 78 series Troopy had the same problem deciding which one to buy Factory Turbo or 1hz i didnt want electictonics so i went standard fixed the power problem with a after market Turbo and Intercooler.
Mr Denco came to the party and i never looked back done about 15000kms so far gos like a rocket i understand the gearboxs are a little fagile but if you dont drive it like your at bathurst im sure it will be ok and anyway the money you save by going 105 will pay for a gearbox the factory 100 are most likey the best engine put in a Toyota but the front end isnt if they had the 105 front end would be the best 4wd ever made on my test hill before turbo was 65kph in 3 gear and after turbo its 100kph in 5th and better on fuel
sounds like you have a thinking to do hope this helps lol

Glenn
AnswerID: 390869

Reply By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:40

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:40
Have you considered hiring one for the weekend or even a week?

You then can decide for yourself if the power thing is going to be an issue.

I have an '05 HZJ 105, with 1HZ n/a and I find it a bit lacking when its loaded, empty its ok, power is adequate, JUST.

Shane

AnswerID: 390890

Follow Up By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:48

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 16:48
. . . I forgot to add,
I've been to Fraser and across the Simmo on skinny split rims and the secret to success is tyre pressure.
There has been times more horsies would've been real handy, especially in sand, but it's always got me there.

Shane
0
FollowupID: 658713

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:42

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 20:42
Good idea Shane, I just wasn't sure how easy they were to hire now - I thought perhaps by now most hire companies would have upgraded to a current vehicle such as the VDJ76?
0
FollowupID: 658749

Follow Up By: Member - Shane D (QLD) - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 21:14

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 21:14
your right there, most co. have moved onto V8's, however there are still a few 105's that are being rented out
0
FollowupID: 658755

Reply By: StormyKnight - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 18:58

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 18:58
Yes I went from a 2H HJ60 to a 1ktze prado i.e. 60 odd kw to 96kw....

OK the Prado can accelerate faster & overtake faster (safer?) but if your the type of driver that is happy to sit on 95-100km/h instead of 100-105km/h...then the 1hz will be fine.

Those extra 40kw allows me to climb a certain hill now at 100km/h whereas in the 60 series it was 60km/h nearly having to shift to 2nd!

Offroad it will be brilliant. The low gearing of the cruiser combine with the Diesel torque & engine breaking will mean it will be a pleasure to drive in the rougher stuff & the fuel economy will be excelent - My 2H was the same.

Sand for the 2H was an issue on steeper climbs on fraser...fully loaded she would run out of puff in 2nd low & 1st low had to selected. This ofcourse resulted in a stationary restart which could have resulted in the vehicle bogging down. I also had wide tyres on which don't help with the drag effect.

How many kw is the Jack? - is this enough for what you do or not?

Cheers

AnswerID: 390906

Follow Up By: StormyKnight - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:03

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:03
PS I forgot to mention if you do any 110km/h freeway trips (Sydney-Canberra-Melbourne) you will appreciate the extra power as there are a lot of hills on that road that underpowered vehicles make it a long trip......

I would think 100kw would be about the minimum, as the Prado being an auto too & only a 4 speed, tends to spend most of its time up the hills in 3rd gear even though still on the speed limit or close to it especially if the fuel tanks are full (160L)....closer to empty it will hold top gear a lot easier.
0
FollowupID: 658730

Follow Up By: Member - Timbo - Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:41

Wednesday, Nov 11, 2009 at 19:41
Thanks StormyKnight - the hills are what I'm afraid of: both the sand hills and on the highway as I understand that these are the times a turbo helps a diesel engine the most.

The Jack was 130kW according to the specs but I'd say it probably wasn't producing quite that much by the time I sold it with almost 400,000km on it! It also developed this at 5,200rpm and I very rarely wound it up that high. The Jackaroo had more than adequate power for most things I wanted to do - except towing my brother's 'van (Oh, and dragging off the Commodores etc. - but you don't buy a 4WD if that's what you want to do LOL).
0
FollowupID: 658733

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)