Friday, Nov 13, 2009 at 15:55
Not sure I can understand your argument. For one, despite what a lot of you seem to miss, is that the D3 is only marginally smaller than the LC200 in external dimensions, has a bigger payload and has both more power and torque than the much vaunted LC100 but nobody goes on about the LC100 being unable to tow a big van...???
So what is your suggestion of a bigger 4WD to tow a big van then?? F250/Chev Silverado.
As to the van weighing more when loaded but come on, the ATM is on the van compliance plate and THAT is what determines what you can tow it with not the TARE.
If the LC200 can tow a 3500kg van,eg Kedron ATV then so too can the D3 and just as capably. And you will note I have an LC200 and love it but when it comes to towing, I remain unconvinced about LR's prohibition of the WDH on the D3. As I have said many times before, I don't care how high you raise the rear with self levelling
suspension, you can't transfer the weight from a heavy TBM <150kg back on to the front without a WDH of some kind, simply not possible.
FollowupID:
658958