Wednesday, Feb 17, 2010 at 13:49
Agree with Chris. There are 2 issues to resolve - If you are travelling with others and want to talk to them or to other traffic within 5 or 10 km, a UHF is excellent. If you need local help in an emergency, UHF with its limited range may be very useful. If though you expect to travel alone away from much travelled tracks, your choice is between
hf radio and satellite phone. Both cost $$$.
A sat phone will connect you to the world sometimes or mostly, depending on which network you use. In an emergency you will (probably) be able to call for assistance if you know who to call and if the satellites are in the right place. Any sat phone call is very expensive.
Hf radio is not always useful either, but has a number of advantages in my opinion. If you have a vehicle or personal mishap where there's very little traffic, an hf call may
well reach someone not far away. The sat phone won't. As a member of an hf network you can call in and let the world know where you are and that you're OK or in trouble. You can receive messages relayed from
home. You can also have very limited phone capability. Hf covers the whole continent, though like any radio system it is subject to changing radio characteristics in the atmosphere.
If you intend going seriously off on your own, a Personal Locator
Beacon (EPIRB) is a valuable fallback option. Press a button and it will alert the rescue
services to a life threatening situation and its location. It provides no other communications.
HTH
John | J and V
"Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted."
- Albert Einstein
Lifetime Member My Profile My Blog Send Message |
FollowupID:
674241