dc to dc chargers

Submitted: Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:53
ThreadID: 82560 Views:6355 Replies:9 FollowUps:31
This Thread has been Archived
has anyone any experience with these got a price on the new ctek unit $450 are they worth the cost ??
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: zzkazu - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:12

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:12
pepper after a lot of research the answer I came to for my SITUATION is no.. check out..

http://myswag.org/forum/index.php?topic=9565.0
AnswerID: 436295

Follow Up By: _gmd_pps - Friday, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:17

Friday, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:17
what a load of bull from the "experts"

http://www.sterling-power.com/products-battbatt-info.htm

The limit in that situation is the battery load current, mine is around 55amp for a few minutes before it goes down to about 45amp. I have Lifeline AGM 440AH (4x6v). Most unsealed cells take only about 20-25 amp max charge anyway.

have fun
gmd
0
FollowupID: 708425

Reply By: Battery Value Pty Ltd - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:46

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:46
Hello pepper,

the DC/DC unit you're referring to isn't all that smart...

Whenever a load like a fridge is connected to the battery while the DC/DC charger is also connected to the battery, it'll keep the absorption voltage up at 14.4V regardless of the battery's state of charge.
It'll only switch back to float after 12 hours.
And whenever a new cycle is started (by turning off/on the car), there will be another 12 hour countdown.

For a real life situation such as described above, this could mean that this unit behaves like a crude single stage charger, set at 14.4V.

The consequence of this is that the battery could be toast after 500~1000 hours under these operating conditions.
So this unit isn't designed for hard core months on end cruising.

cheers, Peter

AnswerID: 436297

Follow Up By: Member - Alan H (QLD) - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:53

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:53
Peter

What is a suitable piece of equipment to ensure that an AGM battery in a trailer gets a full charge. Thinking of a setup with solar and anderson plugs to vehicle.

Alan
0
FollowupID: 707568

Follow Up By: Battery Value Pty Ltd - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 13:21

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 13:21
Hello Alan,

alternator/solar is certainly going to work well if it's set up properly.

The solar regulator should be set to the absorption voltage of 14.4V.

Bulk charging is done by the alternator during cruising, and the absorption is being taken care of by the solar panel whenever the motor is switched off (this is when the 4~5A from the panel isn't getting gobbled up by the ignition/ECU etc).
So the solar current will slowly push the battery voltage up to the absorption level whenever the motor is switched off.

If the sun doesn't shine, no dramas either.
The battery will just get a bit undercharged for a day or two which doesn't hurt it much.
Or, on the other hand, if the solar current is strong (lots of installed solar Watts relative to the amount of load), the battery could see an absorption voltage for longer than the recommended daily 0.5~1 hours.
In this case, just install two diodes antiparallel in series with the solar regulator output which makes the battery only see 13.6V.
Wire a switch in parallel to the diodes.
Whenever you want the battery to see the absorption voltage of 14.4V, close the switch.
If you want it to see the float voltage, open the switch.

How is that for simplicity and your hip pocket....

cheers, Peter
0
FollowupID: 707569

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:00

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 14:00
"Whenever a load like a fridge is connected to the battery while the DC/DC charger is also connected to the battery, it'll keep the absorption voltage up at 14.4V regardless of the battery's state of charge.
It'll only switch back to float after 12 hours. "

I don't believe this to be the case when running a compressor fridge.

Since the absorption charge is maintained until the current drops to a certain level, the worst that can happen is the absorption is maintained until the fridge stops running which happens regularly.
That's certainly how my CTEK mains smart charger works.

A threeway fridge or any load which draws current continuously would be a problem.
0
FollowupID: 707570

Follow Up By: hl - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 15:32

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 15:32
As long as the battery is in "cyclic use", i.e. it is discharged to less than 70%, then 14.4V float should be perfectly acceptable. In fact, it would be beneficial.
In a situation where the fridge and other loads run all the time this would normally be the case.
0
FollowupID: 707577

Follow Up By: Battery Value Pty Ltd - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 16:02

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 16:02
Hello Lex M,

let's look at some numbers:

The DC/DC unit in question has an absorption/float switch-over threshold of 0.4A.
At 14.4V, the recommended absorption/float switch-over current of a couple of 100Ah batteries is 2A.
Because this particular DC/DC charger's switch-over threshold is so low, the absorption time will be increased by an unknown number of hours.
During this prolonged absorption stage the battery loses water and suffers from excessive positive grid corrosion.
Ultimately, the charging current will taper off to the steady state current given by the applied terminal voltage of 14.4V.

Because the batteries' steady state currents @ 14.4V are in the vicinity of the 0.4A threshold, chances are the charger misses the recommended switch-over condition for the entire duration of the motor/alternator run time.

And I haven't even taken into account the standby current of the fridge, which in effect reduces this low switch-over threshold even more.

In other words, this DC/DC charger unit isn't meant to be used while any concurrent loads are connected.
And for this major shortcoming, it's definitely over-priced.

@hl,

floating any battery at 14.4V will make it gas constantly.
That's what three stage charging is all about.

cheers, Peter

0
FollowupID: 707581

Follow Up By: hl - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:18

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:18
Ok Peter,

I see your point, but that is why I said when the battery is in cyclic use.
It would rarely get to the stage where it is gassing at 14.4V if it is discharged by say 30Ah to 40Ah every day and that charger would probably barely manage to bring it to full charge in a day's drive.
0
FollowupID: 707587

Follow Up By: Battery Value Pty Ltd - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:41

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:41
hl,

I understand your reasoning.

But after all this charger is specced 20A...

Looking at your example of 40Ah charge, 80% of which will be reached once the charger hits absorption level, then it becomes clear that it won't take long for the battery to start gassing. 1.6 hours it takes to get to 14.4V in your example.

Allowing another 30~60 minutes for charge absorption, the total time on 14.4V ought to be 3 hours max.

In long distance driving, 3 hours is nothing, so there you have it.

cheers, Peter


0
FollowupID: 707588

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 21:27

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 21:27
"Or, on the other hand, if the solar current is strong (lots of installed solar Watts relative to the amount of load), the battery could see an absorption voltage for longer than the recommended daily 0.5~1 hours."

So what you're saying is the solar charging has the same (potential) problem as the dc-dc charger. (No pun intended).


0
FollowupID: 707614

Follow Up By: Battery Value Pty Ltd - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 22:24

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 22:24
Hello Lex M,

no, the solar charging doesn't have the same potential problems as a 20A DC/DC charger.

That's because the solar regulator's output doesn't have to be isolated from the car's 12V system like the output of a DC/DC charger.

This makes solar inherently safe in regards to over-charging while the alternator is spinning.
While the motor/alternator is on, the usual loads like ignition, ECU, injectors, plus the fridge, all draw current.
Only in the unlikely case of the solar current being higher than the sum of all these load currents, then the two batteries (starter and aux) would receive a small net charging current.

Only if the motor is turned off, the full solar current (minus fridge current) will be available for battery charging.
So there is a small chance while stationary, that the absorption voltage will be reached too early in the day, which could potentially over-charge the battery during the rest of the day.

That's why I recommended to include a couple of antiparallel diodes (bridge rectifier's most suitable and economical) in series with the aux battery.
Whenever the change-over from absorption to float needs to happen (after the battery's seen 14.4V for an hour or so), flick the diode-bypass-switch, and charging continues at a lower voltage for the rest of the sunny day.

It's not all that hard is it?

cheers, Peter
0
FollowupID: 707619

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 22:54

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 22:54
Your qoutes:-
"Or, on the other hand, if the solar current is strong (lots of installed solar Watts relative to the amount of load), the battery could see an absorption voltage for longer than the recommended daily 0.5~1 hours."

"no, the solar charging doesn't have the same potential problems as a 20A DC/DC charger. "

"So there is a small chance while stationary, that the absorption voltage will be reached too early in the day, which could potentially over-charge the battery during the rest of the day.

That's why I recommended to include a couple of antiparallel diodes (bridge rectifier's most suitable and economical) in series with the aux battery.
Whenever the change-over from absorption to float needs to happen (after the battery's seen 14.4V for an hour or so), flick the diode-bypass-switch, and charging continues at a lower voltage for the rest of the sunny day."

OK let's be consistent here.
In your opinion it doesn't have the problem but here's how to fix the problem it doesn't have.

*****

"the battery could see an absorption voltage for longer than the recommended daily 0.5~1 hours."

I've yet to see this recommendation on a battery spec. Can you supply some references please. If this was a critical parameter, I suspect that most batteries in practical use would be rapidly being destroyed by the current crop of mains and solar controllers. This doesn't seem to be the case.






0
FollowupID: 707621

Follow Up By: hl - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 23:12

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 23:12
Ok Peter,

You are (incorrectly) assuming that the battery will take the full 20 amps that is available from that charger until it is full. That will not be the case at all.
The charging current with a constant voltage will taper off as the battery charges. It may be 20 Amps for a short period but as the battery fills it will reduce to just a few amps, and when the battery is full it will take very little current at 14.4V, possibly not enough to gas.
Most deep cycle and AGM batteries in cyclic service are in fact designed to be charged with up to 15V if they are to realize their full capacity. 14.4 provides a good safety buffer and in practice the battery will never be overcharged unless left on that voltage for days. Many car alternators are set at close to that voltage, certainly higher than 13.8. Mine puts out 14.3V and if your theory is correct, it would cook the battery on every long drive. I can assure you it doesn't, my original battery lasted for 8 years, I topped it up maybe 5 times.
Floating a battery usually means to sit on a fixed voltage for weeks on end in standby situations with very infrequent discharges. In that case the voltage is generally around 13.5 to 13.8, but we are talking very long periods of inactivity.

0
FollowupID: 707623

Follow Up By: Battery Value Pty Ltd - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 23:49

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 23:49
Lex M,

.....OK let's be consistent here.
In your opinion it doesn't have the problem but here's how to fix the problem it doesn't have. ...

This line of yours is borne out of your tendency to read/cite things out of context and to throw around with it in a populist way.

Here's the short form of what's been said:

DC/DC overcharges during cruising.
Solar can't overcharge because it's galvanically tied to the car's 12V system, while the DC/DC isn't.
There's no Way this shortcoming of this particular DC/DC charger can be solved easily, except - switching it off.

While stationary, there's a small chance of the solar over-charging if the absorption voltage is being reached early in the day.
This can be easily prevented by a number of measures, one of which I mentioned in my earlier posts.

...I suspect that most batteries in practical use would be rapidly being destroyed by the current crop of mains and solar controllers...

If you only would read and memorise what I already stated in this thread:

The battery would be toast after sitting on 14.4V for a combined 500~1000 hours after the charging current has tapered off to the recommended switch-over threshold. Hardly a rapid way of destroying the battery...

If the correct charging termination voltages/times/thresholds would be observed the battery would be good for 50k+ hours of operation.
The choice of charging is yours.
In regards to battery specs and manufacturer's recommendations, you're most welcome to study the subject - there's plenty of research papers and results made available online.

And that's all there's is to it.

cheers, Peter
0
FollowupID: 707629

Follow Up By: Lex M (Brisbane) - Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 00:32

Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 00:32
"This line of yours is borne out of your tendency to read/cite things out of context and to throw around with it in a populist way."

When the person is attacked the rest of the argument looses all credibility.
Or did I take that out of context......

I'm wasting no more of my time here.




0
FollowupID: 707634

Reply By: Notso - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 13:35

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 13:35
I've been using an Arrid Twin Charge now for over 5 years, still have the same 105AH sealed lead acid battery for 5 years as well.

The system works fine.
AnswerID: 436300

Follow Up By: Member -Dodger - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:51

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 17:51
I have been using the Arid twin charger as well for over ten years and the battery is still going strong.
120 Amp Hr job.
I used to have a handle on life, but it broke.

Cheers Dodg.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 707589

Reply By: Member - Scrubby (VIC) - Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 20:44

Thursday, Nov 18, 2010 at 20:44
G`day pepper2,
I am hoping for comment from the more knowledgeable battery Guru`s on this.
The whole intention of having a DC-DC Charger is in my opinion to charge any Auxiliary Batteries from the vehicle while you are travelling at a voltage that is high enough to do so.
So lets say for some reason the time/distance travelled is not sufficient to recharge your batteries from the DC-DC charger, the one you mentioned is 25 amp I think, then you either have to run the vehicle engine while stationary or suffer from under charged batteries, or charge them by a different charger ( now we have two )... not a very efficient system.

I reckon it makes more sense to fit a DC-DC charger that is going to charge the batteries as quickly as possible, lets say a 50 amp charger, it is going to do the job ( theoretically ) in half the time, OR half the distance travelled, OR charge larger capacity batteries in much the same time.
I have been getting the benefits of charging in reasonably quick time but still safely with a Stirling three stage multi function DC-DC charger.
This charger can charge at up to 14.8 volts and up to 50 amps.
It looks after 2 x 6v - 200 A/h RV GEL batteries in the rear of my wagon beautifully. But it was not cheap.

Regards,

Scrubby.
AnswerID: 436320

Reply By: William W. Wakefield - Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 07:19

Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 07:19
Pepper the Ctek D250S is worth the cost. The D250S Dual has all the same functions as the D250S with the addition to having a solar controller ability if at a later date you want to add solar panels. The D250S Dual is MPPT technology which is the latest and greatest in technical excellence.

What has been posted about the charger going onto boost for 12 hours is diatribe. There is a complete lack of qualified technical expertise on this thread. The Ctek D250S works like any other quality battery charger. To date out of all the DC to DC chargers we have tested, the Ctek D250S and D250S Dual comes out tops.
If you want to fully charge your battery the only viable method is a quality DC to DC battery charger or powering an inverter and 240V battery charger.

If you look around you can get the Ctek D250S Dual for about $360
AnswerID: 436337

Follow Up By: zzkazu - Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:08

Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:08
I have a XS25000 Ctek charger and since I will be getting an inverter I cant see any advantage in the D250S. For my situation I will be using the charger for the adsorption charging stage and not the bulk..

thoughts?
0
FollowupID: 707638

Follow Up By: William W. Wakefield - Saturday, Nov 20, 2010 at 18:47

Saturday, Nov 20, 2010 at 18:47
Or you can use the D250S Dual DC DC charger with a 240V 29A 12VDC power supply to make a mains powered battery charger. 29A power supply $50.
Advantage with D250S Dual you can use it as a solar regulator.
0
FollowupID: 707781

Reply By: Ray - Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:48

Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 08:48
Do what I do. Run 4 AWSG cable. No problems No electronics to stuff up
AnswerID: 436342

Follow Up By: William W. Wakefield - Saturday, Nov 20, 2010 at 18:48

Saturday, Nov 20, 2010 at 18:48
and a 1/2 charged battery
0
FollowupID: 707782

Reply By: downtools - Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 13:29

Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 13:29
Hi pepper,

Iv'e looked into useling dc-dc chargers of different makes for a while.
I remember reading in the specs of a "Ranox" charger about the "possible" problems of overcharging if a load was applied to the aux battery while charging.
An easy way to overcome this is to instal appropriate relays and switches so that the fridge runs off the house/main battery while travelling. Allowing the aux battery to becharged completly.
And when the engine is turned off, the fridge draws off the aux battery.
This way the aux battery will receive max and complete charge if the trip is long enough, without any chance of overcharge.
Hope this makes sense, if not, check out the Ranox site foe a circuit diagram.

good luck
Nifty
AnswerID: 436356

Follow Up By: downtools - Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 13:47

Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 13:47
Further to above,

I like the Ranox idea because the bulk, absorption and float voltages are all user adjustable.
This can overcome voltage drop between car and camper and also can be set for differents types of batteries.
There is also temperature compensation.
I've killed several batteries while travelling over the last 20 years, usually from undercharging , and when my "redarc" dies, it will be replaced with something smarter!!

Regards
Nifty
0
FollowupID: 707649

Follow Up By: William W. Wakefield - Saturday, Nov 20, 2010 at 18:52

Saturday, Nov 20, 2010 at 18:52
Nifty user adjustable is not desirable. With a quality unit like a Ctek D250S if the voltage is low it pumps up the voltage to what is required. Precision units are never adjustable they maintain correct voltage in association with the included temperature sensor. Units that are adjustable are crude in design. The Ctek includes a temperature sensor. The smartest DC DC charger is the Ctek D250S or D250S Dual.
0
FollowupID: 707784

Follow Up By: Mike DiD - Sunday, Nov 21, 2010 at 19:33

Sunday, Nov 21, 2010 at 19:33
So you think ALL Lead Acid batteries need the same voltage at the same temperature ????
0
FollowupID: 707898

Follow Up By: William W. Wakefield - Monday, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:56

Monday, Nov 22, 2010 at 06:56
Mike DiD go and read the instructions on the Ctek and you will see the Ctek automatically adjusts to the correct type of battery.
Ill informed unqualified replies without research are typical of what is posted.
If a unit today is user adjustable and not automatic detection demonstrates poor design and functionality of electronics.
0
FollowupID: 707945

Follow Up By: Allan B, Sunshine Coast, - Tuesday, Nov 23, 2010 at 18:36

Tuesday, Nov 23, 2010 at 18:36
William,

I went looking and found Ctek instructions for their D250S but could not find any reference as to how it "automatically adjusts to the correct type of battery".
It appears to me that it uses the same algorithm for any type of battery that may be connected.
The CteK instruction states: "Charging voltage 14.4v at +25c. Battery types: All types of 12v Lead Acid, WET, MF, AGM, and most GEL batteries."

In fact, I cannot see how any charger can automatically detect which type of battery is connected and therefore select the nominated charging regime for that particular battery. Bear in mind that the manufacturers of batteries specify charging requirements that differ for the different types in particular the end-point voltage.

I would be delighted if you could direct me to an authoritative source that described how a charger can determine the battery type connected.

Incidentally, I am not suggesting that the CteK D250S is not a good charger for the purposes within its specifications or that it is inappropriate for the application under discussion in this thread.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 708127

Follow Up By: Mike DiD - Tuesday, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:37

Tuesday, Nov 23, 2010 at 20:37
"Units that are adjustable are crude in design."

Another Instant Internet Expert bites the dust.
0
FollowupID: 708139

Follow Up By: Allan B, Sunshine Coast, - Wednesday, Nov 24, 2010 at 21:31

Wednesday, Nov 24, 2010 at 21:31
Yes Mike, I agree. Doesn't look as though I am going to get a response to my question re "automatic battery detection" from WWW.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 708283

Follow Up By: downtools - Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 08:59

Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 08:59
Interesting thread and as usual lots of opinions!
I confess, I am not expert in this field, but am very interested and have reserched different methods of charging multiple batteries for some time.
So basically, like most of us, I am repeating something I've read or been told by an "expert".
However, when any of these "experts" become aggressive or abusive in the way they deliver their opinion, then to me their opinion means nothing.
Needed to be said.
Nifty
0
FollowupID: 708308

Follow Up By: Allan B, Sunshine Coast, - Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:47

Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:47
Yes Nifty, if someone plays the man instead of playing the ball then it suggests that his game-skills are weak! And poor Pepper asked a simple question and, as often here, got a donnybrook for an answer.

As an electrical professional I am intrigued at the number of apparent amateurs who believe that they possess unquestionable knowledge in electrical matters and do not support their assertions with reference to a accredited source.
Even though I have a wide electrical experience I keep my expressed opinions within my knowledge. For example, whilst I have been much involved with battery charging, I have no real experience with solar systems so I keep out of that.

Fortunately, my own vehicle system is simple with both the cranking and auxiliary batteries being flooded lead-acid and in the engine bay so needing only a simple isolator system for charging. I have been able to avoid complex battery maintenance arrangements but I can see the advantage of dc-dc charging systems where the battery is located in a trailer-camper and the provision for selection of battery type.

Incidentally, I can find nothing related to Ranox that refers to possible overcharging if a load is applied to the battery during the charging activity. However I can believe that the charging procedure can be upset by a connected load. With a multi-stage charger the charge current is a component of the control program and "Bulk" or main charge termination is determined when the current decreases with battery-charge state to a pre-determined value. If a load is connected then the charger will not see the required low current state and continue bulk-charging until a timed period then switch to Maintenance Charging which is a float-charge state. However the charger may also believe that the battery is self-discharging and go to an alarm state. Suffice to say that the charger could become confused with a load connected during charging and perhaps the advice of the charger manufacturer should be sought. The alternative is to connect the load directly to the main battery whilst charging the auxiliary battery as you have done.


Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 708325

Follow Up By: downtools - Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:48

Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:48
Hi Allan,
It's been a while since I looked at the Ranox specs, but a quick flick through mentions different options for connecting the charger with a load connected before the charger.
If you're interested I can email you a copy.
cheers, Nifty.
0
FollowupID: 708329

Follow Up By: Allan B, Sunshine Coast, - Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 13:48

Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 13:48
Hi Nifty,

Yes thanks, I am interested in those Ranox specs. Email is "allan-bull@bigpond.com"
The Ranox website that I looked at is not extensive. Perhaps because they are no longer marketing the dc-dc charger.

This is what they say on their website:
"However, due to continually increasing Australian labour costs, we can not manufacture here and sell to you at a reasonable price ($465 RRP). As we strongly desire to keep this an Australian product, we reluctantly do not have units to sell, unless conditions alter. We continue to support units already sold."

Pity! Another good Australian product becomes a victim of high Australian manufacturing costs. I was tempted to use a Ranox when I first got the Troopy but decided that it was not needed for my setup.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 708336

Reply By: Tony LEE - Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 18:26

Friday, Nov 19, 2010 at 18:26
The one I have specifies that when charging a battery with any external load connected, set it to "power supply" mode. This just puts out 13.7V and so is not going to be as effective as a normal three-stage bulk charge cycle.
(I have two fridges running so it might run continuously at 14.4V)

However it does get a fair bit of charge pumped in and the 400W of solar finishes the job. They are large AGM batteries and I don't want them overcharged so am happy with this compromise.

I'll be installing a manual override and digital voltmeter in the cabin so I can monitor it better and then I will switch it back to normal 3 stage mode.
AnswerID: 436375

Follow Up By: William W. Wakefield - Saturday, Nov 20, 2010 at 18:54

Saturday, Nov 20, 2010 at 18:54
The idea is to power the equipment prior to the DC DC charger with automatic changeover. The DC DC charger is left to charge the battery. Circuit diagrams are available on another forum.
0
FollowupID: 707785

Follow Up By: Mike DiD - Sunday, Nov 21, 2010 at 19:36

Sunday, Nov 21, 2010 at 19:36
"This just puts out 13.7V and so is not going to be as effective as a normal three-stage bulk charge cycle. "

It will still charge to 100% capacity - it'll just take longer than 3-stage charging.
0
FollowupID: 707899

Reply By: _gmd_pps - Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 15:20

Thursday, Nov 25, 2010 at 15:20
I use a Sterling Battery to Battery charger.
Ordered it online from Germany for 250 Euros and a remote control too.
price here in OZ is 3 times that.
Works great, just been Perth,Newcastle,Sydney,Perth during the last 8 days and worked like a treat on my 440Ah house batteries. I am running a fridge and my ham gear from the house batteries (hf 200W, and 2m Aprs 50W + Uhf cb 5w).

Sterling is the bees knees in that field

regards
gmd
AnswerID: 436906

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)