Sunday History Photo / NT

Submitted: Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:23
ThreadID: 82728 Views:5505 Replies:7 FollowUps:4
This Thread has been Archived
The research for this site has taken about 8 months just trying to locate photo’s showing the station as it was when Operational, I finally received some from the USA along with a whole lot of text that has filled in many missing links of information. All up I have been working on the site for over 15 months.

The U.S. Naval Supplementary Radio Station, Adelaide River, Northern Territory, Australia, was conceived by the Fleet Radio Unit, Melbourne (FRUMEL) in late 1942 to establish an intercept station in Northern Australia to cover Japanese shore-based and afloat communications in the islands north of Australia. The plan was formalized in a 15 January 1943 letter from FRUMEL to the Commander, Southwest Pacific Force which proposed the establishment of, “. . . a U. S. Navy Intercept Station at Adelaide River to cover high and intermediate frequency Orange ((Japanese)) radio transmissions from the South China Sea – South Pacific area.
A 29 January 1943 message from FRUMEL to OPNAV and COM14 reported that ENS K. E. Goodwin (for information on ENS Goodwin and other personnel assigned to Adelaide River, see Appendix B), and Radio Electrician S. A. Burnett had departed Melbourne that day to conduct a site survey around Darwin and Adelaide River for the establishment of the proposed intercept station. A request had already been submitted to the U. S. Army for a dedicated 24-hour teletype channel to be activated as soon as construction was completed.
On 24 March, a message from the U. S. Army Base Section ONE to LCDR R. J. Fabian, USN, Australian Commonwealth Naval Board, Melbourne, reported that ground at the Adelaide River site was to be broken on 25 March but completion, then not anticipated before 15 April, was dependent upon the arrival of the building materials. On 25 March, it was reported that the personnel and supplies from Melbourne had arrived on 23 March 1943, and the personnel were billeted and messing at the U. S. Army Base Section ONE.
Image Could Not Be Found
On 27 March 1943, the unit was designated as Fleet Radio Unit, Adelaide River Detachment, and its location was given as about two miles northeast of Adelaide River, Northern Territory, and about 75 miles south of Darwin.
On 8 April, the station was referred to as the U. S. Naval Detachment, Adelaide River, Northern Territory, Australia. At the same time, a Commander, SEVENTH Fleet (CON7THFLT) letter to OP-20G stated, in part, that the total initial complement at Adelaide River was to be two officers, 18 intercept operators, one Machinist’s Mate, and two Ship’s Cooks. For operations, they would have six HRO receivers, one RAK-2 receiver and two RAS-1 receivers. A Model DAG HFDF set was available and it was planned to ship it to the station in the near future to assist in target identification.

Image Could Not Be Found
Image Could Not Be Found

On 16 May 1943, ENS Goodwin reported the new projected completion date for construction as 28 May. From his description, construction of the operations building, power house, barracks, mess hall and officers’ quarters was complete with most equipment installed and working; only finishing touches remained to be accomplished.
The land comprised about three acres situated on two slight elevations and bisected by the “Old Mount Bundy Road”, no longer in use. He also stated that the buildings had been camouflaged by the Allied Works Council personnel with a spray job of green and brown shades in irregular patches. Roof edges were staggered to preclude straight lines.
Fresh meat was usually available for issue six days out of the week with tinned fish provided on Friday. The cigarette issue was three cartons per month and the beer ration was one bottle per man per week, when available. Cigarettes, beer, and clothing were obtained from the Army Quartermaster. Some recreation material including books, a radio, and a phonograph had been obtained from the Army and the Red Cross. Bug proofing of buildings could only be accomplished by use of an extremely fine mesh screen. Blackout of the operations room was considered practical in that no direct light could be seen from the air.

Image Could Not Be Found

LTJG Goodwin was also informed of the shipment of two Diesel generators; one slated for Adelaide River and the second for a planned intercept and HFDF station at Cooktown. The original generating plant provided for the station had consisted of two 5 KVA and one 18.5 KVA gasoline-powered generators. Due to problems in obtaining spare parts and increasing station power requirements, the 18.5 KVA generator was ultimately replaced by the 18 KVA Diesel unit with the two 5 KVA gasoline units in standby. In June 1944, a 20KVA 6600/440V transformer was installed by the Allied Works Council. This power source was capable of handling the station’s total power requirements with the exception of the transmitter site at the Mount Bundy Homestead.

Image Could Not Be Found
Image Could Not Be Found

Image Could Not Be Found
Image Could Not Be Found

Image Could Not Be Found
Image Could Not Be Found

With the end of the war, action to decommission Adelaide River was initiated. On 6 September 1945,
Action to close Adelaide River was initiated shortly thereafter. On 21 September the U. S. Naval Detachment, FRUMEL, reported to OP-20G and FRUPAC that the equipment had been removed from Adelaide River and was being loaded at Darwin for shipment to the Naval Supply Deport, Brisbane., Personnel were either already enroute or at least scheduled to return to Melbourne, the last to arrive by 30 September, where they would await orders and transportation.
On 21 September 1945, the Officer in Charge, U. S. Naval Detachment, Fleet Radio Unit, Navy 136 (FRUMEL) officially reported to the Commander, U. S. Naval Forces, Australia/New Guinea, that the Officer in Charge, U. S. Naval Supplementary Radio Station, Adelaide River, Northern Territory, had reported the station decommissioned effective 21 September. All U. S. Navy material and equipment had been removed and personnel had departed. On 17 October 1945, the return of the property to Australian control and Mt Bundy Station was acknowledged.


.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Doug T (NT) - Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:31

Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 02:31
If any of you plan a trip to the Top End NT next years tourist season , do pop in if your in Adelaide River, I would be happy to show the site , it's only 650m away from home.
for further information and photo's visit the EO PlacesSITE

.
gift by Daughter

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 437101

Reply By: Fred G NSW - Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:03

Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 07:03
That's a great effort Doug. Thanks for a very interesting read.

There is so much military history in the north of Australia from WW2. I think many younger Australians don't realise, or were never taught, the signifigance of those efforts to protect our northern borders.

As a kid growing up in the top end, I remember much of the war was still in evidence, with damaged buildings and military infrastructure and discarded vehicles providing us with much opportunity to explore them.

I haven't been back up there since 1968, but will be back in the next year or so, god willing, so look forward to that, and a visit to Mt. Bundy Stn.

Thanks Doug.

Fred.
AnswerID: 437106

Reply By: Member - John Q (QLD) - Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:19

Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:19
Hi Doug,

Thanks for your effort & persistence in putting this story together. Well done & gives a further insight to what happened during those times.

John
AnswerID: 437136

Reply By: Member - Leigh (Vic) - Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:45

Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 11:45
Hi Doug. Thanks mate, a great piece of research and it's one for the "bucket" of must do's. Cheers Leigh
AnswerID: 437139

Follow Up By: Member - peter f (VIC) - Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 17:00

Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 17:00
ya gunna have to get a bigger bucket !!! ha ha
how are ya mate ?
fig
0
FollowupID: 708588

Reply By: Motherhen - Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 17:27

Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 17:27
Great research Doug. I like the current photos against each picture too.

As Fred says, the rest of us had no idea how much preparation took place in the north of the country, and how far the bombing actually went inland. I was never taught that at school and was amazed to see so much on our NT tour last year. Something like 2,000 listed war heritage sites.

"There is so much military history in the north of Australia from WW2. I think many younger Australians don't realise, or were never taught, the significance of those efforts to protect our northern borders."

Motherhen
Motherhen

Red desert dreaming

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 437175

Follow Up By: Member - Dunworkin (WA) - Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 23:39

Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 23:39
"I think many younger Australians don't realise, or were never taught, the significance of those efforts to protect our northern borders."

Hi Motherhen, it's not only the young ones that were not taught the military history of our country, I certainly was not taught any of this history.

Thanks for the History lesson Doug and all the effort you took to bring it to us.

Cheers

Deanna


Simba, our much missed baby.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 708649

Follow Up By: Motherhen - Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 23:57

Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 23:57
Me neither Deanna; but then again i am only young ;)

I had no idea of how much preparation was done right across the north of the country, particularly in NT. We learnt so much when travelling last year, and visited many historic sites and airfields. Perhaps much of it was still under the official secrecy of 25 or 50 years or however long it remains secret before release. The damage done by the bombing was also very scaled down in our history books.

Mh
Motherhen

Red desert dreaming

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 708651

Follow Up By: Member - Dunworkin (WA) - Thursday, Dec 02, 2010 at 01:16

Thursday, Dec 02, 2010 at 01:16
Hi Motherhen, I remember my parents saying about the attack on Darwin and the feeling was that if the Americans weren't there Aus could have been lost but it has only been in recent years that we had learnt a bit more about it through a friend who was actually working in Darwin when it was hit so got a bit from him but sadly he has passed on now and all his knowledge has gone with him as is usually the case.
Cheers

Deanna


Simba, our much missed baby.

Lifetime Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 709108

Reply By: Member - Willie , Sydney. - Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 18:22

Sunday, Nov 28, 2010 at 18:22
Thank you very much Doug - I enjoyed reading that.

Willie.
AnswerID: 437180

Reply By: cycadcenter - Thursday, Dec 02, 2010 at 06:33

Thursday, Dec 02, 2010 at 06:33
Hi Doug,

Thanks for that piece of history,

My Dad was a Staff Sergeant in the Army who arrived in Darwin just a couple of weeks before the first raid, and stayed until 1945. Unfortunately he passed away a couple of years ago and didn't talk much about the war up there.

A few years ago I was doing a Real Estate Valuation in San Diego and the owner happened to be Capt. Leon Rogers who was on board the USS Houston which sailed out of Darwin just before the the first raid, my dad helped load stores onto it in Darwin. As my dad was visiting us in California I arranged a lunch with the two of them which was quite memorable.

The Houston was sunk a couple of days after leaving Darwin and Rogers spent the remainder of the war in prison camp at the River Kwai.

All of Dad's photos were sent to the War Memorial in Canberra a few years ago.

I don't think many people realise the relentless pounding Darwin received during the War

Bruce
AnswerID: 437576

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)