Emergency communication - do you have a sat phone?

Submitted: Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:47
ThreadID: 87483 Views:5496 Replies:19 FollowUps:52
This Thread has been Archived

Related Pages

Stopped to help a family yesterday rolled over twice on the Oodnadatta Track. Lcukily no one was seriously hurt, but without a sat phone couldnt call for help. We always carry a sat phone, so we stopped and stayed with them till help arrived. It took multiple phone calls to 000, and a direct one to Port Augusta polive station to raise help.Port Augusta couldn't contact anyone closer, so help was very delayed.

How many here travel without a sat phone? worth considering about how you might contact help in an emergency before it happens.

Sorry about the slightly preach-y post, but I hate to think of situations deteriorating because someone cant contact help.
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:55

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:55
Hi

We do not own or carry a Sat phone, but have a HF Radio and PLB. I have been a member of VKF 737 Network since 1994 and if help is needed, I know that it does not matter where in this great country of ours, someone is out that to hear your call and they help that the operators is nothing but first rate and professional.

Cheers


Stephen
Smile like a Crocodile

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 459570

Follow Up By: Livin On The Road - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:13

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:13
We tossed up getting an Hf or sat phone. Just something to be able to contact someone.
0
FollowupID: 733139

Follow Up By: Member - Richard L (WA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:48

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:48
Only trouble with just an HF radio is if you role and destroy your aerial ....no comm

Richard
0
FollowupID: 733146

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:50

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:50
Hi Stephen, HF radio is fine and we have one too, but after a rollover I would not be too confident the my antenna would still be intact. Yes, I do carry a length of cable to use as a long-wire antenna but there are limitations with that also, especially in an emergency situation. VKS737 can be very useful to obtain weather and road information and to organize drop-off of spares by another member but for life-and-limb emergencies it would be hard to beat a satellite phone. I have both, but if I had to make a choice I would select a satellite phone over a HF radio.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733147

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 14:00

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 14:00
Hi Richard

The original point was what type of emergency communications do you carry.

Fare enough if I roll there is a very good chance that I will damage my antenna (even though I carry it on the roof). Providing that I am not hurt, my GPS PLB will be but into action immediately, with the officials knowing my exact location within 5 metres!

Hi Allan

When we purchased our HF Radio a very long time ago, a Sat phone was never heard off. Yes we have thought about getting one and it is on the list of things to buy.

It is like many situations, you hope that you will never have to try out what you have in a life threatening situation. Are you heading bush again this year.


Cheers


Stephen
Smile like a Crocodile

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733148

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 14:38

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 14:38
Yes Stephen, we are going to the Nullabor with Connie and Mick. Would have done some earlier treks but the road conditions were limiting. The route to the Nullabor in late September will depend on road conditions but I am hoping for a Simpson crossing again.Googs Track is also on the agenda for part of it. So this will probably be the only long trek for 2011. Troopy is all ready with new rear springs after breaking a couple of leaves on the Central Desert trip. These have given a 40mm rear lift so the Old Girl (Troopy of course) is wearing high heels! And she goes in next week for a upgrade of the rear fuel tank to 150 litres giving 330 total. Enough to go darn near anywhere without jerry cans on the roof.

Went out yesterday in the Troopy for a 'pleasant drive' so did not bother with the Satphone, MaxTraks, Hi-lift jack and did not even have the HF antenna fitted (have to remove it for garaging). Got some 'good advice' at Jimna about an interesting and not-too-difficult forest track and came close to trouble due to bogs and washouts. So for all my pontificating about communications I could have had egg on my face, or worse. Mind you, Roz is a good walker if needed!

Hope to catch-up again.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733150

Follow Up By: Member - Richard L (WA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 14:41

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 14:41
Hi Stephan

Sure your plb will give your location.....but you still have no actual communication which in the case of serious injury it may be extremely useful to be able to talk to someone who may be able to provide some valuable assistance

Cheers
Richard
0
FollowupID: 733152

Follow Up By: The Landy - Sunday, Jul 24, 2011 at 16:39

Sunday, Jul 24, 2011 at 16:39
Hard to know what is best in the case of a roll-over. Sure a HF antenna could be damaged and not operate, although we have the new style auto-tune that sits within the bull-bar offering far greater protection. But in a roll-over both HF and sat-phone require user input to either dial a number, or locate one within an address book, and the operator may be incapable of using either apparatus.

Personally I think a PLB should be at the top of the list, a simple button push tells someone that you have an emergency and need help immediately and will pinpoint your location. Spot tracking devices might also be worth considering as you can pre-populate a message that will SMS/email a family member. You could put a ‘I have had an accident and need immediate assistance’ on it, one button press and the nature of your trouble is understood and your position automatically recorded. I had such a message on our Spot device during our recent trip ready to go in need...

There are pros and cons for both HF and sat-phones... Use whichever you are more comfortable with, or both if the budget allows it.
0
FollowupID: 734472

Reply By: Litlbalt - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:59

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:59
We intend on hiring one if or a mate has one who may be tagging along

Can I ask who was in the vehicle as I know people out on the Oodnadatta at the moment.
AnswerID: 459571

Follow Up By: Livin On The Road - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:17

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:17
It was a family on 5, they had three kids aged 2,4 and 6 in the car. We didnt get their names... they barely spoke, but had friends with them who had a 2 and 4 year olds.
0
FollowupID: 733141

Follow Up By: Litlbalt - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 15:31

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 15:31
No them thanks for letting me know, we were able to contact our family they were in mobile range.
0
FollowupID: 733250

Reply By: olcoolone - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:02

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:02
I would say a fair few .....

"I don't need a sat phone, it's just more money for something I'm NEVER going to use and besides that someone with one will come by a offer help.... wont they?"

Some people put $10 on their lives and other a hell of a lot more.

We always travel with sat phone, GPS PLB, Spot and HF radio.

People think they aren't going that far and don't need good comms but try walking 5 kilometers with a broken leg.

I'm a big advocate of being self sufficient and prepared for the unknown.
AnswerID: 459572

Follow Up By: Livin On The Road - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:18

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:18
I hoped we'd never have to use it. But it's the peace of mind knowing we can contact help, even if it is hours and hours away.
0
FollowupID: 733143

Follow Up By: Member - Russnic [NZ] - Saturday, Jul 23, 2011 at 19:11

Saturday, Jul 23, 2011 at 19:11
Roger
Just like insurance, you only need it when something goes wrong
0371 out
0
FollowupID: 734419

Reply By: Fatso - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:42

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 13:42
I don't have one & don't intend to get one.
I never even lived in a house that had a telephone until the mid eighties. Never had any communication difficulties either.
We were more isolated 10 miles from home back then than you are on the Oodnadatta Road today. Didn't bother us then & still doesn't.
A few times now I have come across people that have rolled & quite a few more that have had mechanical breakdowns. It has all been dealt with without the need of under 10 year available technology.
Tell you what. You wouldn't want to be one of those galoots that goes into a trance & starts walking around in circles as soon as they put a phone to their ear on that Oodnadatta Road if you have got one. You could get skittled.
AnswerID: 459573

Follow Up By: snoopyone - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 14:54

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 14:54
You would make a good mate for some of our politicians.

They still live in the past as well.

Just cos you have made out without modern stuff doesnt mean we all have to.

Would be great to be in the middle of nowhere with a badly injured person
and they die because someone DOESNT NEED MODERN communications.

Better to have one and not need it than to need it and not have it.

I guess a box of matches would help you could send smoke signals LOL
0
FollowupID: 733153

Follow Up By: Member - Ralph K (WA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 16:37

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 16:37
Onya Fatso...
I'm with you, too much cotton wool and nannying these days. Might as well stay at home and watch tv.
Can't go anywhere off the beaten track these days without GPS, UHF, VHF, EPIRB, Sat Phone, IPod, IPhone, IPad, and latest common rail diesel....much too dangerous!!
Give me preparation and common sense any day.
Rather a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy!

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733158

Follow Up By: murrayman - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 16:54

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 16:54
ditto fatso, One of out last great bushman, Lenny Beadell set out in a series one landy, that run on petrol, 3 60 litre drums of fuel stapped to the roof, no radio, no sat phone, no engel, no gas cooker and no bloody socks on his feet. Bugger me he not only survived but he made all these roads for all of us travell on. Kinda says something about modern day travellers dosnt it. cheers mm
0
FollowupID: 733160

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:06

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:06
Murrayman, Len Beadell carried a HF radio in his Landrover.Woomera range channel amongst others.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733162

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:08

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:08
Murraynan

Len did actually have a HF Radio and regular contact with Woomera.

Cheers

Stephen
Smile like a Crocodile

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733163

Follow Up By: Fatso - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:51

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:51
Snoopyone, I think you have taken my comment in a way I never intended.
I am not against people not carrying modern communication.
I am saying that I don't need it. They might feel more secure with it, but I and the majority of people driving around the dirt highways can't be bothered.
Same with GPS navigation. Paper maps & a bit of brain power may have taken me the long way around a few times, but it certainly has not caused any distress.
0
FollowupID: 733173

Follow Up By: Fatso - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:57

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:57
Forgot to put in that the bloke that rolled was never put in danger because he never had a sat phone.
IT WAS HIS DRIVING SKILLS THAT DID IT.
0
FollowupID: 733175

Follow Up By: murrayman - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:09

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:09
hi guys, I will stand corrected but i thought len did not get the radio till later on on his travells. Tis hard to have contact with woomera when it wasnt there yet. He started mapping in 1946 and he only chose the site of woomera in march 1947. The town wasnt started to be built until mid 47. cheers mm
0
FollowupID: 733178

Follow Up By: Member Al (Sunshine Coast) - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:37

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:37
Murrayman, Len Beadell did have a HF radio and regular contact from the very beginning of his Range survey work. Although Woomera Village did not exist he had contact with both Adelaide HQ and soon after with Major Bennett's camp near Koolymilka on the proposed Range area. These were military establishment radio networks and at this time Len was still in the Australian Army. Later when he commenced the road building work he had an additional contact at the Range establishment. There was activity at the Range well before the Village was built or indeed even named.
Page 21 of 'Too Long in the Bush' refers also to Len's vehicle radio at the outset of the roadbuilding. Do not be fooled, Len was a great storyteller but imprudent he was not. He well knew the perils of the remote bush and took appropriate care.

Cheers
Allan

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733284

Follow Up By: Rob! - Tuesday, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:41

Tuesday, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:41
Just because someone doesn't use modern communications and is still around, it does not mean that it is not needed. By definition, those that needed it and didn't have it are no longer around to tell their tale.

I'll bet Burke and Wills would have loved to have it, but they didn't.
0
FollowupID: 733329

Follow Up By: Sandman - Wednesday, Jul 27, 2011 at 21:24

Wednesday, Jul 27, 2011 at 21:24
Everyone has choices, if folks want to go back to basics then go for it. I live out in Alice and am doing the Tanami in 6 weeks time.

Definitely preparation is the KEY to a successful trip and in doing so I've already found the 2nd battery is dodgey and the compressor can pump 2 tyres and then overheats and cant get past 30 ! Bought a new ARB compressor, a reasonable deflator and a new battery. Car is getting services before we go..

In saying that I'm taking the CODAN, SPOT (to let friends know where we are), Iridium sat phone and some amateur radio gear.

I don't plan on wasting time waiting for repairs and I want to enjoy the time away. I might be over-prepared and understand it might still go pear shaped but if it does, it was meant to go pear shaped :-)

Pete in Alice
0
FollowupID: 734782

Reply By: Member - sassenach.girl (QLD) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 15:07

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 15:07
We will be carrying a UHF, a Sat phone and our mobiles. Should have all bases covered with those. I hope everyone in the rollover was ok.

Sass.

AnswerID: 459579

Follow Up By: Member - Stephen L (Clare SA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:07

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:07
Hi Sass

Your only reliable communications is your Sat Phone. The only time that we have been remote and had mobile phone coverage was along the Trans Access Road from Rawlinna and Kalgoorlie, which is put in for the Trains.

A good number of years ago when we logged in for morning skeds on the VKS 737 HF Network, the operators put out an emergency call for all vehicles travelling along the Oodnadatta Track to keep and eye out for a vehicle and large caravan that had no contact with family and friends for a few days.

Around an hour later, a call came out over the HF that the vehicle and van had been found safely. They had become bogged in mud and told the people that found them that they thought that their mobile phone would work out there.

This them come down to another dilemma for Sat Phones.....if the people that found them did not have a HF Radio, they would not have known that there way an emergency call put out by the Network. Yes Sat Phone are good, but unless you have been in regular contact with the outside world, you will have no idea what is going on where you are.



Have a great and safe trip as you travel, and keep us all informed of your travels.


Cheers


Stephen
Smile like a Crocodile

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733177

Follow Up By: Member - sassenach.girl (QLD) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:34

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:34
Thanks for your comments Stephen. This is precisely why we're taking a Sat Phone. We figure the mobiles will be enough in cities and towns, though with two small girls, I want to make sure we can contact someone at all times, hence the Sat Phone.

Sass.

0
FollowupID: 733180

Reply By: Member - hopbush - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:05

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:05
I travel solo into remote areas a fair bit and wouldn't leave home without my sat phone. Not only is it a great companion...I can chat to my family regularly, but it gives peace of mind and is the difference between proper self sufficiency and relying on others for assistance.
I have used my sat phone twice to summon help for broken down vehicles and believe it is irresponsible to travel into very remote areas without adequate communications. I also have a Spot tracker and other bits and pieces but no HF radio.
Tony (Brisbane)
2005 D4D hilux extra cab
AnswerID: 459592

Follow Up By: Member - Ralph K (WA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:24

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:24
Hoppy.
So by having the sat phone is the difference between "proper self sufficiency and and relying on others"?
So I guess if you get into trouble, you dont use the sat phone because you would then "be relying on others" instead you would be self sufficient and resolve your own problems.
Rather a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy!

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733165

Follow Up By: Member - Ralph K (WA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:25

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:25
Hoppy.
So by having the sat phone is the difference between "proper self sufficiency and and relying on others"?
So I guess if you get into trouble, you dont use the sat phone because you would then "be relying on others" instead you would be self sufficient and resolve your own problems.
Rather a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy!

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733166

Follow Up By: Member - hopbush - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:52

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 17:52
Ralph, what I meant was by having a satellite phone (or HF radio, PLB, Spot, EPIRB) I don't have to sit on the side of the road waiting for someone who may or may not turn up, particularly in a case of injury or accident, be it me or someone else. I can take charge of my own problem.
I agree that it doesn't matter what sort of communications you have or how many vehicles or experts you may be travelling with, you may still have to summon outside help if a solution to your problem is beyond everyone, but at least you can call for help.
Also, travellers have died in the deserts because they could not tell anyone of their plight.
Tony
0
FollowupID: 733174

Reply By: member - mazcan - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:14

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:14
hi to all
interesting thread and glad the people involved in the double roll escapes serous injury concidering they were only small children what a terrifying experience for them perhaps they were all strapped in with a seat belt??
i have never owned or used hf or a sat phone and hva done 1500km's on one trip without either and got through but thats a chance some of us have taken but i'm but i was younger then but have seen hf used on one trip but agree the aerial damage is a big probability in a roll over

but those who have spoken out in favour of a sat phone and feel so secure because they are carrying one
have completely overlooked the fact that a sat phone could also get destroyed or thrown out of the vehicle and/or beyond an injured persons reach in a severe rollover and be rendered useless
but i agree 2 or 3 systems is better safety insurance than none at all and it is strickly a personel choice
not mandatory but ive never taken things totally for granted either as there's risks involved in all travel in isolated areas
my 2 bobs worth
cheers
barry
AnswerID: 459598

Reply By: Rockape - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:41

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:41
On a lighter note, I always carry a new pair of new double pluggers in case of an emergency + a carton of cool ale and a backup chook.

AnswerID: 459603

Follow Up By: Fatso - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:41

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:41
Well prepared for all situations there Rockape.
So long as the double pluggers aren't white ones.
0
FollowupID: 733193

Follow Up By: Rockape - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:00

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:00
Fatso,
missus stood on the back of my pluggers yesterday, plugs didnt give way but the thong split at the toes, I gave her what for and demanded new pluggers, her highness then tells me I have old ones sitting in the cupboard, well I tells her I want
new ones and I wont take no for an answer, she then explains the facts of life something about would you like it or would you not, I then back peddles big time.

I retract all I have said as I have to admit my darling wife (and I mean that) has never used that as a weapon.

Have a good one
RA.
0
FollowupID: 733194

Reply By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:41

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 18:41
Everyone forgets the UHF repeater stations.

Oodnadatta Track is covered by a series of at least 5 UHF Repeater stations. These repaters would put them into contact with the local pastoralists.
Chances are that they people on the scene had the communications but didn't know how to use them. A map of SA repeater locations is here and is one of the important things I carry.

We came across a rolled Landcruiser about 150K east of Birdsville one year. We were the second on the scene - arriving 10 minutes after the accident. The first person on the scene had already made contact with the nearest property using his UHF repeater, and they were on their way to assist. The sat phone in our group was hit and miss - couldn't be relied upon as it kept dropping out, and when calling Birdsville Police we just got an answering machine.
AnswerID: 459604

Follow Up By: Member - hopbush - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:08

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:08
A valid comment Phil, regarding repeaters that is, but also, a lot of these areas are not as remote now as they once were as there are always vehicles travelling on these tracks and I guess help will turn up sooner or later with or without comms.
I suppose every little bit helps and something positive can be said for every type of communication, so long as travellers are carrying something and know and understand their benefits and otherwise.
I have seen dopes in the Simpson Desert without a uhf radio or flag which is madness, particularly when you meet them on the top of a sandhill.
Stephen L also made a good point about the advantage of a HF radio being able to receive generic messages and warnings.
Tony
0
FollowupID: 733186

Follow Up By: Member - Phil G (SA) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:24

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:24
Gday Tony,

Yeah, I was on the Oodnadatta Track myself last week - stacks of traffic compared to 30 years ago! I agree it is not "remote" at this time of year. Might be considered remote in January.

Comms is something that depends on where we are going and who I'm travelling with. I've not found a need for a sat phone. My own system is:

#1 UHF with or without repeater, so you need to know what repeater is used in the area or try them out one by one.
#2 HF radio - VKS737 and I can also phone out using the bushphone network. I carry a spare wire that I can substitute for the autotune if the autotune is broken.
#3 I carry a PLB in the centre console so that if I were trapped in the vehicle, I can still activate it. The PLB complements all forms of communications.

Cheers
Phil
0
FollowupID: 733188

Follow Up By: Member - hopbush - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:00

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:00
Hi Phil,

I was on the Birdsville track (and others) in mid June 2011 travelling north, and whilst I didn't see any vehicles travelling in the same direction as me, I saw at least one I guess every hour heading south. A week or so prior to that I travelled the Connie Sue Highway from Cocklebiddy to Warburton and did not see one fellow traveller for the entire 3 day journey, so it's horses for courses!
I carry my Iridium Sat phone with external aerial, a UHF mounted in car, and a couple of 2 watt handhelds, also a spot tracker with SOS, and a next G Telstra rural with external aerial. I also carry a car mounted netbook computer with oziexplorer and Hema maps and two GPS's, one a handheld Garmin GPSmap 62s with v3 topo and a Garmin nuvi with v4 topo. I therefore feel at ease and confident about travelling alone and then just hope my car hangs together....it's never let me down yet.
Tony
0
FollowupID: 733195

Reply By: Bigfish - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:06

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:06
Cant believe some of the absolute garbage expressed about people carrying a satfone. A satfone is another piece of equipment that although not vital, it is a great piece of equipment that has a real likelihood of saving lives in an emergency. I have 2. One is mounted in the car via aerial on bullbar and the other is in a pelican type case in the car. Have used either one numerous times when assistance reqd. It is so much more reliable than any radio system. The people who drive out in remote areas and denounce them as just another nanny state issue or an exaggerated toy are fools! No two ways about it. They give such a great piece of mind to an outback traveller as well...thus making for a much more relaxed journey. Have lived in remote area for 17 years and travelled some VERY remote areas. Go for an IRIDIUM satfone and enjoy your trip. Carry a list of fone numbers you feel will be of help also.
cheers
AnswerID: 459606

Follow Up By: Member - hopbush - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:29

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 19:29
I'm with you bigfish, I have the latest Iridium set up in my car; I see it as a neccessary addition to the equipment carried in a car set up for remote travel. I also research my trips and carry a list of phone numbers for police stations throughout the trip, RFDS numbers, also roadhouses, park rangers, pubs etc. I also have a basic list of repeaters (if any) for each area.
Also, like you by the sound of it I go into areas where there are often no cars, no people, no repeaters, no stations, no nothing, and I often do it solo. I may not be the brightest bloke in the world but i'm not the silliest either.
Tony
0
FollowupID: 733189

Reply By: Michael ( Moss Vale NSW) - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:24

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:24
What was the reason for rolling on the Odnadatta Track?? Michael
Patrol 4.2TDi 2003

Retired 2016 and now Out and About!

Somewhere you want to explore ? There is no time like the present.

Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 459613

Follow Up By: Fatso - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 07:41

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 07:41
simply BAD DRIVING. Nothing else.
All the fancy gizmos in the world can't fix that
0
FollowupID: 733214

Follow Up By: Robin Miller - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 07:42

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 07:42
That was going to be my question Michael , we need better info of this subject , I was told by guys at Copley that they recover about 1 per day.

Sat phone , HF or UHF usage is all after the fact - we need to concentrate on not rolling over in the first place.
Robin Miller

Member
My Profile  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 733215

Follow Up By: Member - Krakka - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:06

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:06
FATSO, How do you know it was simply "BAD DRIVING"? You never had a blowout, a roo or other animal jump out in front of you, someone else in the car could have caused a distraction, particularly with I think it was with 3 young kiddies?????
0
FollowupID: 733277

Follow Up By: Fatso - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:51

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:51
Well if it was any of those excuses that you implied could cause the accident I would definately put it down to bad driving.
If it was a blowout it would be the drivers fault. If the blowout was caused by impact the driver was not driving to suit the conditions. If it was due to a faulty tyre the driver was at fault for not checking the suitability of the vehicle to be driven.
If it were an animal on the road it would be the drivers fault. Not driving to suit the conditions again.
If it were a distraction. That again is the drivers fault.
Try & blame whoever else you want, but in a single vehicle accident on that road only 1 person is to blame.
That is the person in controll of the vehicle.
I would bet London to a brick excessive speed was the main contributing factor. The speed is of course controlled by the driver.
0
FollowupID: 733287

Follow Up By: snoopyone - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 20:04

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 20:04
FATSO
Im sure you have never had any trouble due to your self confessed perfectness.

However us mere mortals do have accidents and are grateful when the panic stops and there is no one around to help that we have some form of communication to reassure us that help is at hand.

If you want to go without thats fine but try not to judge others.

You were not there you dont know the cause any more than we do so.

Lots of things happen to good drivers as well as not so good ones so dont judge others when you have no idea of the facts
0
FollowupID: 733289

Follow Up By: Fatso - Tuesday, Jul 12, 2011 at 14:49

Tuesday, Jul 12, 2011 at 14:49
Snoops man, I am not perfect & do not profess to be.
I have had a couple of accidents & many near mishaps in my driving career & have always taken responsibility for my mistakes.
My accidents have always been caused as a result of bad driving.
If it had have been good driving it would have had a good outcome.
It did not.
0
FollowupID: 733343

Follow Up By: Member - Krakka - Tuesday, Jul 12, 2011 at 17:01

Tuesday, Jul 12, 2011 at 17:01
FATSO, YOU ARE A GENUINE bleep .
0
FollowupID: 733358

Follow Up By: Member - John Baas (WA) - Friday, Jul 15, 2011 at 20:45

Friday, Jul 15, 2011 at 20:45
That's a bit harsh.

At the risk of being bleeped, I think FATSO has a good point. :-)

Cheers.
0
FollowupID: 733643

Follow Up By: Member - Krakka - Wednesday, Jul 27, 2011 at 23:03

Wednesday, Jul 27, 2011 at 23:03
Which one JB?
0
FollowupID: 734793

Follow Up By: Member - John Baas (WA) - Wednesday, Jul 27, 2011 at 23:17

Wednesday, Jul 27, 2011 at 23:17
s'thruth Peter.

I have just re-read and I am quite at a loss to explain my empathy.

Must have been: "I am not perfect & do not profess to be".

:-)

Cheers.
0
FollowupID: 734794

Reply By: Member - Joe n Mel n kids (FNQ - Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 22:12

Sunday, Jul 10, 2011 at 22:12
Wow it is a hot topic ............... well some know me and i live remote and work remote and travel around a little bit but mostly in very isolated places and yep i own a sat phone, do own an EPIRB but prefer the sat phone, HF was great for its day but dont roll with one, you lose the battery and the anntennea and it dont work ....

BUT i have a question to all of you guys who own sat phones, when did you last make a call with it ???? I always have ours plugged in to the charger and always check to see if it is charging, take it everyware we go ..... the other day i gave it to a staff member to take out bush with them and when i went to explain how to use it i could not for the life of me remember the PIN, i was certain i had it written down but could not find it anyware ...... fat lot of good it would have been if i needed it eh ... i then discovered that our work phone was not able to make calls to sat phones so me leaving our sat phone number for them to call us was also a waste of time ......

So GET OUT THE sat phones and make a test call, teach all that you travel with how to use it as it aint worth squat if you dont know how to use it eh ..
Cheers
Joe
AnswerID: 459617

Follow Up By: Bigfish - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:32

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 06:32
My handheld is checked and recharged every month. Ny car one is tetsed weekly.
Made 5 calls on hand held last week BUT at moment issues with car mount that are to addressed this week. I know you are out Doomadgee way Noel and that is a remote area where I would consider not travelling unless sat fone in vehicle. EPIRB...Only good if someone can find and activate and even then it is only a positioning device. Have seen quite a few accidently set off!
cheers
0
FollowupID: 733211

Reply By: olcoolone - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 09:02

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 09:02
I want to put another perspective on the use of sat phones and HFRadio

Nearly everyone here has only talked about using the sat phone or HF Radio to help someone, what about when a close family member or friend has to make urgent contact with you regarding a incident at home.

You wife, husband, child, grandchild, mum or dad takes seriously ill or an accident and they don't think they will make it till the end of the week or worse still one of them has passed away and your not due home for another 14 weeks.... the funeral is in 8 days..... or they need you for support during tough times .

Now I know most will make regular contact but there are many times you can't for a few days or weeks due to no comms.

How would you feel.... getting home from a fantastic trip, happy and excited to tell the family only to be told about a serious incident that happened while you were away.

Some might say that will never happen but I've heard it across the HF more then a few times for uses of the HF or to look out for a non HF equipped traveller and ask them to call such and such re an issue at home.
AnswerID: 459626

Follow Up By: ben_gv3 - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:17

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:17
If everyone thought like that no-one would ever leave home just in case...

If it's meant to be then it's meant to be.
0
FollowupID: 733227

Follow Up By: Member - Michael J (SA) - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 13:20

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 13:20
Richard that is, of course, a very valid reason to carry a reliable means of communication when in remote areas.

As for your comment ben_gv3, not worth a NOG.

Last year whilst I was on an extended, and very remote, trip I was given the news that my daughter had just been diagnosed with breast cancer.

Using the sat phone I was able to make regular contact as I travelled back home.

Anyone that states they do not need good quality communication when travelling remote is, in my opinion, not adequately prepared and not worth travelling with.


Michael J
0
FollowupID: 733234

Follow Up By: olcoolone - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 14:44

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 14:44
G'day Michael, about 3 years ago we had a death in the family whilst we were camping on the Cooper Creek, if we had no sat phone we would of missed the funeral by 2 days.

Even tough man who don't think good comms is needed when traveling still CRY when something goes wrong.

Even Tom Kruse had HF radio and he was a lot tougher and had more experience then most.
0
FollowupID: 733241

Follow Up By: Hairy (WA) - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 14:57

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 14:57
"Anyone that states they do not need good quality communication when travelling remote is, in my opinion, not adequately prepared and not worth travelling with.

Maybe thats why you need good quality communiction? Because nobody travels with you???? And If your that prepared you will already have one , so why would your travelling companions need one as well....LOL
If Im on my own I just tell people where Im going..........never needed HF/Sat phone/ epirb yet..touch wood.
And I know you will all go off about this , but, if someone died while I was away, there would be jack I could do about it?
0
FollowupID: 733247

Follow Up By: Member - Michael J (SA) - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 17:55

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 17:55
Hairy,

As I stated, my opinion only. Just like ar@$holes, we’ve all got one.

“And I know you will all go off about this, but, if someone died while I was away, there would be jack I could do about it?”

Can’t see why anyone would ‘go off’ at you. After all it’s your prerogative to do as you see fit.

I guess we just have different family values.


Cheers
Michael
0
FollowupID: 733263

Follow Up By: Member - Krakka - Tuesday, Jul 12, 2011 at 18:08

Tuesday, Jul 12, 2011 at 18:08
Hairy, you are right. Their would be jack you could do if someone is already dead, BUT I would like to be at any of my family's funeral if possible, or close friend for that matter. Just my thoughts.
0
FollowupID: 733372

Follow Up By: fisho64 - Friday, Jul 15, 2011 at 22:19

Friday, Jul 15, 2011 at 22:19
I work at sea and its a regular occurence amongst the crew of a death in the family that cant be attended.
For that purpose, while a satphone etc is important for some during outback travel, its NOT a matter of life and death as per this thread, more a tool of convenience.
Foreign though it may be to some in modern life, there ARE still workers these days who have to accept that as part and parcel of their chosen profession.

I dont know that its a reason to beat people over the head about lack of comms, just personal choice.
0
FollowupID: 733649

Reply By: snoopyone - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:58

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:58
All this just goes to show some people can get their head in the sand without even rolling a vehicle

ROFLMAO
AnswerID: 459634

Reply By: Member - jlAU (SA) - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:47

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:47
What was the question again??
AnswerID: 459668

Reply By: Fatso - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:26

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:26
Check out Spero in thread 87500 ( I think that's the thread number).
He has towed a 32 year old Millard to Cape York with a 17 year old Nissan with 425,000 k on the clock without incident.
If he wasted his money on a sat phone instead of applying some sound driving & life practices he would have to double his capitol investment.
AnswerID: 459676

Follow Up By: Member - jlAU (SA) - Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:32

Monday, Jul 11, 2011 at 19:32
are you serious. you need to get a grip. everyone for their own though!
0
FollowupID: 733282

Reply By: Whitewulf - Wednesday, Jul 13, 2011 at 13:58

Wednesday, Jul 13, 2011 at 13:58
Don't have a sat or HF, have uhf as we don't go total off road to remote areas yet. Once the kids are older and the wife and I leave and travel/work then yes its a must I think.

Would hate to be stuck in the middle of no where in trouble at an old age. Not saying its worse than a young age. But for what the wife and I plan in a few years Its better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.
AnswerID: 459830

Reply By: Mark - Friday, Jul 15, 2011 at 20:27

Friday, Jul 15, 2011 at 20:27
We bought a sat phone when travelling through Africa solo in a 4wd a few years ago. We thought of it as an extension to our travel insurance, never used it which was the intention from the start but it was a nice feeling to know it was there if we needed it.
AnswerID: 460039

Reply By: Zebra400 - Saturday, Jul 16, 2011 at 07:49

Saturday, Jul 16, 2011 at 07:49
I have been reading everyone's comments to your views about owning a sat phone.

Having emergency equipment is definitely a must if you plan to head outback on your own - something we love doing.

There are many different forms of emergency equipment available on the market. The sat phone is one of these. Other forms of emergency equipment are HF radios, epirbs & Spot units. Everyone has there own views on which one is best.

From our experience, having just one form of emergency equipment can be an issue for us if it doesnt work when required in an emergency situation.

A good point raised about HF radios, is that if your emergency is because of rolling your vehicle, then the antenna will most likely be broken. However, there are many other emergency situations where the radio will still work.

With all emergency equipment, we are relying on the unit to be working when it is most needed. For us, when travelling outback on our own, we carry an HF radio & 2 spot units. You might think this is a bit of over kill, but in an emergency situation, we want to make sure we can get out. We also carry a second HF antenna in case our main one gets damaged.

Remember, Sat phones can break down as well. totally relying on one form of communication when travelling on your own is running a high risk, especiially if you like travelling on outback roads whre you dont see another vehicle all day.

Yes, we have had to use our HF for an emergency recovery about 5 years ago. I tired to ring RACV (my recovery insurer) but the RACV operator did not understand what an HF radio telephone call was, so hung up on me twice. Plan B had me calling VKS737 radio network in Adelaide. This was a much better option on that day - they contacted RACV who then contacted the RA in South Australia who then contacted the roadhouse at Nullabor to get a recovery vehicle out to us.

As you experienced with your emergency situation, one call did not solve the problem. Also our SPOT unit was tracking our trip and if the HF contact failed, we would have activated our emergency SPOT.

So in summary, owning a sat phone is good for emergency situations, but it is not the only form of emergency equipment. It is just one - for us we prefer to have more than one form - plus of course our mobile which helps a lot when near a Telstra tower - with our last trip to the Kimberley, we were amazed just how many places we could get out on our mobile with an external vehicle antenna.

Laurie




AnswerID: 460058

Sponsored Links