Sunday, Oct 02, 2011 at 17:20
I was just thinking about this topic whilst hanging out the washing.....
For those doubters of distance educatin for kids, what difference is it from travelling families, compared to kids who do school of the air / distance education from rural communities and farms?
If nothing else, the kids would be much better at
geography than most :)
Whislt most kids that do distance ed end up getting shipped off to boarding school for high school, all those kids seem to do pretty
well for themselves and often half end up at a uni of some kind and do pretty
well for themselves before returning back to the land. (Yes i do know this - i used to be a
farm hand on school holidays and saw first hand when the kids came back for school holidays from boarding school).
The other statement made many posts above - "If you wish to travel in order to educate the children rather than as a bit of fun then go overseas and travel.
There is little difference in culture or environment between
Broome and
Melbourne or
Perth and
Cairns but there is a huge difference between (say) Paris and Bangkok or Beirut and Trondheim or Madras and Kuala Lumpur – that is where your children will learn not from seeing the same
supermarket chain after 3000km of driving. "
I'll tell ya what, come over to outback WA and i can show you how different the rest of Australia is compared to WA. I sure learnt alot when we moved here.
Every town has a different perspective on issues, and culture wise - Kalgoorlie is made up of 70% kiwi's, 15% South Africans and 15% Austalian (indigenous and non indigenous) and everything else including Chinese, Indian, European, and sooo many more backgrounds. And i am not exagerating - there are stickers on cars here "
Kalgoorlie-Boulder the capital of New Zealand".
FollowupID:
740706