GPS v Speedo reading

I have read some other threads, but I would like some up to date info.
My GPS says I am doing 110 k's, but my speedo shows about 113 /114 k's.
I believe the GPS would be correct as its using satellites to calculate the speed.
The boys in blue may let me off at 113 k's (in a 110 k zone), but the camera will not.
Has anyone got any proof?

Thanks

Wato
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:27

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:27
I'm not sure what you are worried about Wato.....Do 110km/h using your speedo and you'll never get a fine (assuming the appropriate speed zone).

When doing 110km/h on your speedo, you may only be doing 108km/h or thereabouts in reality, so you are on the safe side. IIRC Australian Design Rules stipulate that it should be in this range, so it seems to be all good.

Hope this helps,

Andrew
AnswerID: 467418

Reply By: Robin Miller - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:27

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:27
If you want proof Wato - drop you tyre pressures right down and do 2 runs
eg 40 psi then 20psi.

The gps reading of 110 will now occur when your speedo reads 120 whatever , instead of 113 and the camera won't flash.

If the camera does flash , please send any bills to me addressed as
Santa Clause
1 ICY lane
North Pole.
AnswerID: 467420

Follow Up By: wato35 - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:00

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:00
Robin
I might do 3 runs, I will put the left hand side tyres to 20 psi and keep the right side at 40 psi.
0
FollowupID: 741547

Reply By: TerraFirma - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:28

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:28
Your GPS is the accurate reading and yes it is common for your vehicles speedo to overead it's speed, not a bad thing imo. The camera typically knocks off 3 kms. If a camera books you for 115km's hour you were most likely doing close to 118kms. Use your GPS for an accurate speed Wato. Nice and easy.

I know that my vehicle is overeading by around 4-5KM's hour at 100KM's so I also keep this in mind if my GPS is not on.
AnswerID: 467421

Reply By: The Landy - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:45

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:45
The principle for calculating both is the same so they should essentially be the same, speed camera versus GPS. Your Speedo reading is another matter altogether, and depending on tyre size etc may over-read or under-read actual speed as recorded by the GPS or speed camera.

Cheers
AnswerID: 467424

Reply By: chisel - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:49

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:49
Your speedo should never under-read (I believe it is illegal for it to under-read) - so reading 113kph when your actual road speed is 110kph is good, and fairly typical.

AnswerID: 467426

Reply By: snoopyone - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:59

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:59
It is legal in Australia for car speedos to read up to 10% fast.

They are not allowed to read slow.

EG my wifes car reads 107kph at 100kph

mine reads 103 at 100.

Asked dealers about it and they said

A they cant fix it and

B they dont have to cos its legal.

To fix it would take a set of tyres 40mm larger which in itself is illegal in QLD
AnswerID: 467427

Follow Up By: Member - nick b - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 22:04

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 22:04
gooday all , this is the case from 2006 on speedo's read a higher speed .

I have run my car's through the road side speedo checks to check the gps , very close .
cheers nick
Cheers Nick

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 741618

Follow Up By: Member - joc45 (WA) - Friday, Oct 14, 2011 at 23:53

Friday, Oct 14, 2011 at 23:53
Interesting about being illegal if it reads slow.
And that the dealer can't do anything about it.
Twice I have been booked for speeding due to a speedo reading slow; once in a hired Patrol, and once in my dear old mum's Mazda Metro. Both I proved out to be reading slow after I checked them with a gps. Both vehicles were standard as far as tyres go.
If it's illegal to have a slow speedo, then surely the dealer must be responsible for correcting a manufacturing fault regardless of what he says.

Interestingly, my own Patrol reads about 5km/h fast at 110, despite already running higher profile tyres than standard (the odo is spot-on, though). With factory tyres, it would be running pretty close to 10km/h fast.
Gerry

0
FollowupID: 741790

Reply By: Andrew & Jen - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:11

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:11
Wato35
Does your state have 5km markers along the main roads?
If it does, find a flat straight stretch that you maintain a steady 100kph.
It takes 3 mins to travel 5kms @ 100kph
If you find the speedo needs to be on 103 kph to achieve 3 mins, that will give you the % error that, assuming it is linear, can be applied across the speed range, viz, +3%.
One of my vehicles is +4% (this went from +5 to +4 when I changed to a new set of tyres), another +3% and a third (the LC with D694 265/75R16 tyres) is -4%
If you can't find the 5km markers, main roads often have small 1km markers, often a white post with black numbers set back behind the shoulder and used by the road authority. These are more accurate than the 5km markers.
Cheers
Andrew
AnswerID: 467429

Reply By: member - mazcan - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:41

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:41
hi wato35
its quiet a common fault for speedo's to read several k's fast my vw golf reads 6k's fast so i use the gps
also the vw speedo doesnt have a defined 110k marking if i drive by the vw speedo other driviers are overtaking me continually like im a sunday driver

my mazda bravo reads 4k's fast and various other vehicles / navara /ford /subaru
i have owned have also been 4ks fast
except for a nissan pulsar that my daughter had was the only vehicle i have seen that was exact at all speeds
i have been through countless speed cameras and radars/multinovas while driving on gps speed and have never been booked
i lock the cruise controll on the gps reading and sit back and enjoy the drive
stop worrying over a common problem
cheers barry
AnswerID: 467430

Reply By: Jeffrey B2 - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:08

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:08
Hi! wato35,

I have two Garmin Gps units I use either or both in the car and boat.

Also a dash board unit in the car. Another Furuno sounder in the boat.

All of them are very compatable with the car and boat speed.

The boat speed does vary with the Gps. because of the effects of wind and tide.

The Furuno sounder is very compatable with the Electronic speedo in the boat dashboard as both register speed through the water, not over the ground.

There can be many variables you just have to work it all out.

Have fun Haji-Baba

AnswerID: 467445

Reply By: Jon B2 - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:22

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:22
You are correct in your belief GPS is correct, your speedo is not 100%.
AnswerID: 467446

Follow Up By: Member - Alan H (QLD) - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 18:29

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 18:29
GPS is only accurate in a straight line. Not accurate around curves dependent on sampling rate and change of direction.

Alan
0
FollowupID: 741594

Follow Up By: equinox - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 20:42

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 20:42
You also obviously need velocity for a GPS to work out its distance from one GPS point to another GPS point. The accuracy would depend on the number of satellites, speed of processor, triangulation, PDOP etc..

If you were at a known point for example and your GPS said you were 1 metre south of that point and then you went to another known point 100 metres to the north and your GPS said your were 1 metre north of that point. Then your GPS would think that you have traveled 102 metres instead of 100 - not conducive for extremely accurate velocity measurements.

Cheers
Alan

Looking for adventure.
In whatever comes our way.



Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 741608

Reply By: aboutfivebucks (Pilbara) - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 19:11

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 19:11
i think your speedo is reading land speed and your GPS is reading air speed - due to the earths rotation. this is made worse when travelling in an east west direction.
for accurate gps measurement, drive in a north/south direction.
sometimes the effect of airspeed is greater when driving into a headwind - youll notice you've used more fuel - but in effect - you've covered more air distance.


good luck.
i'm no rocket surgeon.






AnswerID: 467459

Follow Up By: landseka - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 23:05

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 23:05
I've heard it all now...lol

0
FollowupID: 741622

Follow Up By: Rob! - Thursday, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:39

Thursday, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:39
I think you are barking up the wrong tree here. Earth's rotation would already be calculated into the GPS measurements. Do you want to know why?

Because the earth's equator goes through about 40 000 km per 24 hours. That's almost 1700 km/h. So unless he's getting those sorts of speeds on his GPS it's highly unlikely the rotation of the earth has anything to do with it.
0
FollowupID: 741642

Reply By: tony&bron - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 19:36

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 19:36
I was sitting at are red light the other day
the gps said i was doing 7 kph

tony
AnswerID: 467461

Follow Up By: landseka - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 23:07

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 23:07
Maybe it was windy...ha ha
0
FollowupID: 741623

Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 20:31

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 20:31
Wow, what a variety of answers.
Your GPS will show the exact speed, unless it's a real cheapie.

To cover themselves, vehicle manufacturers err on the side of "safety" and calibrate the speedo to read 3k's or so higher than actual road speed.
Any reasonable quality GPS will show the correct reading.

My wife's last company car (an imported model) actually read the exact speed as confirmed by two different GPS devices I own.
Both my vehicle and my wife's current vehicle read 3 kilometres faster than the GPS units show.

Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 467465

Reply By: snoopyone - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 22:26

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 22:26
Here is the rule Plain and simple

From 1 July 2006 newly introduced models of a vehicle available on the market must comply with ADR 18/03. Also, from 1 July 2007 any newly manufactured vehicle (excluding mopeds) must comply with this rule.

This new rule requires that the speedo must not indicate a speed less than the vehicle’s true speed or a speed greater than the vehicle’s true speed by an amount more than 10 percent plus 4 km/h.

That is, at a true vehicle speed of 100km/h the speedo must read between 100km/h and 114km/h. An alternative way to look at it is; at an indicated speed of 100km/h, the vehicle may actually be travelling at between 86 km/h and 100km/h.
AnswerID: 467480

Follow Up By: Member - Andrew (QLD) - Thursday, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:47

Thursday, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:47
More like between 87 and 96 km/h in the final example ;)

Andrew
0
FollowupID: 741644

Reply By: Rockape - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 22:53

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 22:53
Wato,
over many years and comparing GPS readings in my vehicles and talking to some old mates in trucks. Here are my readings. Little car 109kph on speedo and this is really 100kph. Cruiser reading is speedo 96kph, real speed is 100kph.

Proof no.... but I push the limit all the time at 109kph and all I have I receive is the odd flash from a candy car. When I stuff up and that has been twice in the last 5 years, I have both times been booked at 111kph or 1 point in Qld. I am happy that the GPS is accurate for me.

Have a safe one,

RA.
AnswerID: 467481

Reply By: Simon (NT) - Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 23:41

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2011 at 23:41
I've found that TomTom GPS units gave me the most accurate reading I've ever seen.

Whilst in the police over in the UK (I was there for just over 5 years) I tested my TomTom against Police speed checking devices (various types including calibrated speedo's and VASCAR units etc, and I found that the TomTom was accurate as hell, the only difference with it was that there was about a half to 1 second delay with it's reading of the accurate speed over what the vehicle mounted units were reading, though this is obviously because of the time to send a ping to a satellite and back.

The TomTom was tested to 140 MPH and was accurate the entire way up and down!




That said, I got a speeding fine for doing 73 in a 60 kph zone in Alice Springs a couple of months back. My speedo in my 1989 Nissan Pathfinder was playing up - but I haven't used my TomTom for 2 years because essentially we've got 4 roads out here out of town, so I don't need it!
I have worked out that while my car was doing 73 kph and getting the speeding fine I was only aware of it doing 54 to 56 kph because my speedo was THAT far out... It showed mid 80's when I was doing 101 on the TomTom!
Scary thought really... and it's worth checking your vehicles speedo v a satnav unit.

All vehicles up until some time in the early 2000 years were expected to be up to 10% out on their speedo (reading high), thus why the police MUST give a 10% LEEWAY when giving out fines.
So if the speed limit is 70 kph you shouldn't be fined until you EXCEED 77 kph if you have one of these earlier vehicles, but later vehicles are supposed to have more accurate speedo's and you'll get a fine a lot quicker.

Oh, on the note of GPS units, I tested a GARMIN v my TomTom, the Garmin was supplied by the force that I was working with. I found that not only did it MIS-CALCULATE routes (which wasn't acceptable when trying to get somewhere on blue lights and sirens), it's speed readings would fluctuate sometimes by as much as 5 to 10 MPH for no reason at all, while the TomTom kept a steady speed reading that was found to be accurate.

SO, not only can you not always trust your speedo and it's a good idea to check and replace it if it's not reading correctly, you can't actually use a GPS unit as a defence in court as it is NOT an APPROVED speed checking device.

Anyway, hopefully this has added more light to this discussion and not muddied the waters too far...

Simon
AnswerID: 467483

Follow Up By: snoopyone - Thursday, Oct 13, 2011 at 09:23

Thursday, Oct 13, 2011 at 09:23
Maybe as far as new cars accuracy Read my reply about our VW's

Rule changed in 2006
0
FollowupID: 741635

Follow Up By: Simon (NT) - Friday, Oct 14, 2011 at 22:12

Friday, Oct 14, 2011 at 22:12
Yeah, it's bloody brilliant isn't it ;-)
Would be far nicer just to produce new vehicles with a calibrated speedo and be done with it - then if you get a speeding fine you KNOW that you were speeding.

Oh well.
0
FollowupID: 741782

Follow Up By: Pesty SA - Saturday, Oct 15, 2011 at 20:08

Saturday, Oct 15, 2011 at 20:08
Cant totally agree Simon, as a Navigator is not as accurate as a proper GPS, I have checked mine with 3 units at 1 time and the GPS's all read exactly the same.

Cheers Pesty
0
FollowupID: 741849

Follow Up By: Simon (NT) - Wednesday, Oct 19, 2011 at 23:31

Wednesday, Oct 19, 2011 at 23:31
Hi Pesty,

Sorry, I don't understand?

Are you saying that my TomTom GPS unit was not as accurate? Despite my checking it against a BMW's "Calibrated" speedo AND a VASCAR speed checking device used across the ENTIRE United Kingdom to issue speeding fines - and it was only out by a 0.5 of a second difference, other than that it was spot on with the speeds up to 140 MILES per hour?

I'm really sorry but I'm lost, because what I said above was that my TomTom was perfect with it's speed reading up to 140 MPH... and I don't know many people who've even travelled that fast, let alone done it legally and checked their GPS SATNAV units at those speeds, yet you are disagreeing that it would be correct because you checked 3 units at one time and they all read the same??? and I checked my unit against the Garmin unit installed in the same police vehicle against the calibrated speedo and the VASCAR unit and my TomTom was spot on and the Garmin wasn't (though it might just have been THAT particular Garmin)... but I'm a bit lost.

By the way, for the sake of pointing out that TomTom Navigator is the program that runs on a phone or other unit, my TomTom is a TomTom One V2, dedicated GPS receiving unit.

Anyway... the point still stands that the TomTom was more accurate than the speedo in most vehicles and the Garmin unit in the vehicle that I checked it against, and it stood up to the test against a UK Home Office Approved speed checking device (the VASCAR and the Calibrated Speedo).

But hey, why am I even worrying about it? To be honest I could type out 300 articles on here and not even get a reply, I'm happy to actually have something to reply to, so thanks for that..

Simon
0
FollowupID: 742325

Follow Up By: Member - Boo Boo (NSW) - Monday, Oct 24, 2011 at 21:32

Monday, Oct 24, 2011 at 21:32
For what it's worth my Tomtom and Troopy both read the same.

The Dmax however will read 100kph and the Tomtom 96kph.

At 104kph on the speedo the Tomtom reads 110kph.

In other words the speedo is way under.

T think traffic behind the Dmax towing a caravan at 90kph would get a bit ticked off because in reality I would only be doing about 86kph.

0
FollowupID: 742753

Follow Up By: Simon (NT) - Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 22:17

Tuesday, Oct 25, 2011 at 22:17
Boo Boo,

It might be worthwhile getting your speedo checked out, something there isn't right for sure. But of course as long as you are aware and don't exceed the speed limit as you know it to be from checking you'll be ok, but it's always better to be safe rather than sorry as someday you might forget that the speedo is under.

:)
0
FollowupID: 742845

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)