Trojan Deep Cycle
Submitted: Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 16:07
ThreadID:
17265
Views:
5017
Replies:
5
FollowUps:
8
This Thread has been Archived
Glenno
Hi,
Looking at purchasing a Trojan 130A/hr deep cycle battery. Does anyone have an opinion (good or bad) on these batteries?
It will be connected to a piranha system and wired into the tray of the 'lux.
Cheers,
Glenn.
Reply By: Member - Jimbo (VIC) - Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 18:25
Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 18:25
Trojan are reputed to be the finest wet cycle DC's available, with a price to match. I would guess the one you are looking at will cost $250-300. At this price you could consider an "AGM" battery. A 100 amp Fullriver or Remco (both Chinese) will set you back around $250, or a Lifeline (USA) $350.
Conventional wet cell DC's will only accept charge at around 5 amps/hr which means you have to do a lot of driving each day to get them charged. They also only charge to about 80% capacity from and alternator. They need a solid charge from a 3 stage 240 volt charger (very expensive) to get to full capacity. An AGM on the other hand will accept a huge rate of charge. In testing my AGM (as scientifically as I could with a multimeter) it took 20 amps in 20 minutes from the alternator.
It's worth some thought.
Have a look here, it's a great site.
http://www.windsun.com/Batteries/Battery_FAQ.htm#AGM,%20or%20Absorbed%20Glass%20Mat%20Batteries
Also have a chat to the bloke at Federal Batteries in
Sydney, they have a 1300 number in the yellow pages. He knows his stuff.
Good luck,
Jim.
AnswerID:
81455
Follow Up By: Glenno - Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 19:22
Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 19:22
Thanks Jim,
Ill give Federal a call.
The reason I was going the typical style Deep Cycle is that I have another deep cycle battery in the circuit, plus a solar regulator. So I didnt want to have to change the system, apart from dropping another battery into the circuit.
Ill see what Federal have to say.
Cheers,
Glenn.
FollowupID:
340667
Follow Up By: V8troopie - Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:07
Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:07
Glenno, I had two of these trojan batteries on my sailboat. They are rather fussy regarding maintenance and
mine seemed to guzzle
water, being charged by a small solar panel. I have replaced them with ACDelco sealed deep cycle batteries.
One of the trojan's is still in the back of the troopie, running the small Engel fridge occasionally but it had lost its original capacity long since (its 5 years old now). The other had expired.
I was not particularly impressed with the cell covers, I think they loose
water far too easily. The terminal posts are good, though.
If you go for these expensive batteries make sure your solar regulator is working correctly and do check the
water level frequently.
Klaus
FollowupID:
340708
Reply By: Crackles - Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 20:44
Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 20:44
Glenn. Have had 2 Trojan Deep cycles in my Cruiser for over 1 & 1/2 years & they work brilliantly. I have actually got rid of the starting battery & wired the two deep cycles in parralell. They run the fridge & lights for 4 days & still have enough to start the diesel. Many on this
forum rag the deep cycle batteries stating they're too slow to accept charge, couldn't be used for starting & are not suitable for winching but on all 3 accounts in practice I've found this not to be the case. The Trojan is arguably the best deep cycle battery & in your system together with the solar charge circut would probably be ideal. (Trojan are highly recomended by WA Solar)
They have handled being shook up on the Cape, Simpson & Canning & that is what you pay the extra $ for. Cheers Craig...............
AnswerID:
81467
Follow Up By: Boeing - Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 21:03
Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 21:03
Craig, Do you have any problems with the deep cycle battery "sweating" ie the acid affects the accessory terminals causing the exposed wire to get the white acid build up on them. I have the magnum deep cycle battery which was purchased from WA Solar.
Regards
Mark
FollowupID:
340685
Follow Up By: brett - Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 21:07
Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 21:07
I cannot see any reason why a deep cycle will not charge at the same rate as a cranking, the amount of charge accepted is governed by the internal resistance of the battery. Stick a current meter on a flat DC and you will see it taking up around 40 amps, same as any wet cell battery. Only thing with a DC is the plates are not designed to give or take high currents, so slight chance of damage but I've regularly put 40 amps in my DC and still going strong. I have a cranking battery as a main a DC as an AUX and a cranking in my camper trailer and they all charge up fine, after a few hours on the road both the DC and the battery in the trailer are close to full.
FollowupID:
340688
Follow Up By: Member - Jimbo (VIC) - Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 21:08
Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 21:08
Crackles' comments about Trojans being used as start batteries are
well documented. The two in parralel is reputed to work
well.
Apparently the Vic Coppers had Trojans fitted so that they could run flashing lights at accident scenes, and still be able to drive away.
Just not sure they're the most cost effective way for
camping etc, but I could be wrong.
Cheers,
Jim.
FollowupID:
340689
Follow Up By: Crackles - Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 22:12
Sunday, Oct 24, 2004 at 22:12
Mark. Yes I do get a little acid around the battery top which in the past has resulted in the "white powder stuff" but have sprayed the terminals with CRC terminal spray & problem solved.
Jim. My justification for spending $500 on the 2 deep cycles(total 230 amp hour) was to have a set up that I could
camp for 3 or 4 days without starting the engine. I have no Battery management system, no solar panel & no generator so for my needs it probably has been cost effective. For someone else eg: who drives less &
winches more or camps in one spot for a week it probably would be no good. Cheers Craig...........
FollowupID:
340695
Reply By: Member - Sand Man (SA) - Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:44
Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 07:44
The AGM type of battery is certainly worth consideration.
However, the physical size may be an issue. I would replace my wet deep cycle battery with an AGM type (when it expires) if it wasn't too bloody big to fit in the cradle.
AnswerID:
81495
Follow Up By: Member - Jeff M (WA) - Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 14:38
Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 14:38
Everyone always goes on about the voltage being too low from your altanator to charge a deep cycle. I have an 80/amp/hr DC battery and it's getting 14.1V from the altanator and is happy as a pig in sht.
Charges very quickly (compared to what I had been told about DCs) and I have had no problems with it. It's also been absolutally hammered flat a few times too.
I don't think many modern cars only output 13.8v anymore. Most I've measured are around 14v.
The surf (with no major accessoires going) will charge 14v even at idle. With the headlights on you need to increase the idle slightly to get a full charge rate. It'll sit around 13.8v with lights on at low idle.
FollowupID:
340775
Reply By: Member - Collyn R (WA) - Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:48
Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 10:48
Brett
Charge rate is indeed governed by the internal resistance of the battery, but as deep cycle batteries have far fewer but thicker plates, their internal resistance is higher than that of a starter battery. The heat generated whilst charging thus limits their charge rate to about 25% of the amp/hour capacity (to about 60% charge) then to 10-15% thereon. In practice, heat build up is the ultimate determinant of charging rate and top quality charging systems use battery temperature monitoring to govern charge rate.
It is true that a deep cycle is unlikely to charge at a rate much over 5 amps from a conventional alternator/regulator, but this is because the voltage is really too low. For the same reason, conventional lead acid batteries (both starter and deep cycle) will not charge much beyond 70% from a standard car alternator/regulator system. Because of voltage drop, caravan batteries are more commonly limited to about 65% charge.
Many solar regulators will supply boost voltage as high as 15 volts, as will (smart) three-stage battery chargers. Both will bring a deep cycle battery to
well over 90% charge.
So-called 'smart regulators' are obtainable for vehicle alternators (and i have had one on my OKA for years) but most are incompatible with computer engine management systems. They are very effective otherwise however.
Mine will charge the OKA's 450 amp/hr battery bank at up to 100 amps. There are several suppliers of these devices in Australia.
Re
water usage. A correctly charging deep cycle battery should use about a centimetre of
water every 8-12 weeks in temperate climates. If less, it is probably being undercharged.
As with gel cells, AGM batteries have very low internal resistance. This enables them to charge quickly from as little as 14.1 volts. Their recommended float voltage is however lower than most (typically 13.2-13.3 volts) and there are reports of shorter than expected battery life in hot areas that is believed to be caused by this.
Further, AGM battery makers advise that the products should not be charged in parallel with standard batteries. Many people ignore this advice however.
Incidentally - most of the above re internal resistance and charging rate etc was described by Peukart in a paper written in 1897! (Anyone interested in Peukart's Law, drop me an email and I'll email you a copy).
Collyn Rivers
AnswerID:
81528
Reply By: Member - Kevin R (QLD) - Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 11:16
Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 11:16
Glenn,
I have trojan 130 amp/hr deep cycle. Have just returned from
cairns -
darwin via gulf return with only good things to say about it. It didnt use any
water ad handled the corrugations without any problems. I think i paid about $230 for it in
cairns.
Cheers
Kevin
AnswerID:
81534
Follow Up By: Glenno - Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 16:08
Monday, Oct 25, 2004 at 16:08
Best I could get was $280 from the distributor in Qld, and $260 from a retailer on the north side.
Have to hunt around for a cheaper supplier. I cant believe
Cairns is cheaper!!!???
FollowupID:
340793