Friday, Feb 18, 2005 at 17:16
>I think Mike that as we have seen from you before
I didn’t realise you spoke on behalf of the whole
forum? Or is that the Royal “We”?
>the label that you attempt to apply to others is more
>fittingly applied to yourself.
Now John you know full well you took a raging dislike to me when I contested your silly figure for the number of Amateur Radio Operators in Oz. You don’t take well to being challenged. That’s fine with me – when people with attitudes like yours start liking me is the time I’ll worry.
>If you actually read what Mr Coldham is suggesting
He said:
“I happen to agree with Neil
Mitchell about the group in the community who as four wheel drivers have an aggressive bullish driving behaviour.”
I don’t know what Neil
Mitchell said and Andrew Bolt probably doesn’t either but Coldham has just confirmed that [many?] 4WD drivers exhibit “aggressive bullish driving behaviour”. And this man is president of 4WD Vic!?
>Are you perhaps suggesting that this group type does not exist ?
Jesus wept! Of course they do – and there is a similar group of people who exhibit “aggressive bullish driving behaviour” and drive Holden Barrinas – but you don’t get Holden writing e-mails confirming it to major newspaper columnists and suggesting only a Holden training course (paid for by other car owners) can redress this terrible situation, do you?
>As can be seen they [4WD Vic] are as I first stated being proactive in a
>quiet determined way.
The e-mail lacked structure. It was barely coherent in parts. It was confused. The English was poor, the spelling was incorrect and the punctuation was atrocious. Additionally it painted us as a bunch of louts who only “proper training” could save. If you call that “proactive” I’d prefer they were passive. Other than that? I quite liked it :)
>And no doubt you will reply with negative comments in regards to the VFWDA
I don’t think they need any help from me in being negative.
>but you should consider as one example that you are only able to
>continue accessing the majority of High Country Tracks due to the
>proactive relationship that this Association has with government
>bodies such as Parks
Victoria.
I say that’s rubbish and challenge you to show that “the majority of High Country Tracks” would have been closed were it not for 4WD Vic.
>And I guess you are not a member of a club so you are getting a
>free ride from this association
A free stuff-up more like.
And please excuse me but when I bought my 4WD I didn’t realise there was some sort of moral obligation on me to join a club, I just bought it because I wanted to be free to go
places – not to have to conform to other people’s ideas of what I should do.
>So your reply post also begs the question "What do you suggest?"
About what? How to make people love 4WDs? That’s an impossible task as we discovered in 1996 with firearms (who were you supporting then John? When it may not have affected you?) when a stereotype has been established (and confirmed by 4WD Vic!). The only other option is to gain political clout and scare the f*** out of some politicians and that is not going to be done by a state body who can barely write an e-mail.
>Put up or shut up
As much as you may seek to control others; I don’t need your permission to speak.
So far I’ve written to 7 Members of Parliament – federal and state (and I’ve telephoned two others), how many have you written to John?
Mike Harding
mike_harding@fastmail.fm
FollowupID:
357382