Not 4WD but how about QANTAS
Submitted: Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 20:28
ThreadID:
27449
Views:
2258
Replies:
9
FollowUps:
10
This Thread has been Archived
Exploder
On the news QANTAS wanting to take its maintenance Job’s overseas.
It just bleep es me of when stuff like this happens, these LAME (Licensed aircraft Maintenance Engineers) study and work bloody hard just to break into the light aircraft industry and then get more qualifications to get onto Big Jet’s and all in the name of saving a few $$ the bean counters will Beep them off soon as they can.
These blokes are extremely highly skilled and while employers and the government are complying about the skill’s shortage in Australia hear is a Australian compony about to lay-off its maintenance staff.
Hear is something to think about. If the job’s are indeed taken overseas the New people that would now be working on them overseas, If in Australia they would not be allowed to even touch the aircraft as there Qualifications would not meet Australian/CASA Standards.
Then QANTAS say’s safety would not be compromised, Bull bleep it won’t, why do you think they have such a good safety record now.
Reply By: Scubaroo - Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 21:04
Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 21:04
I refuse to fly Qantas purely on the grounds that their ads insinuate I'm being unpatriotic for flying with any other airline.
AnswerID:
135661
Follow Up By: Exploder - Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 21:37
Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 21:37
I have never really looked at the adds from that point of view before but I never really pay much attention to adds any way.
FollowupID:
389565
Reply By: Truckster (Vic) - Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 21:14
Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 21:14
are you really shocked? give it 10 yrs and we will be like they were 20 yrs ago - no work left
AnswerID:
135663
Follow Up By: Exploder - Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 22:08
Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 22:08
I don’t know I just think it is chit how highly skilled Tradespeople get shown the door in favour of cheaper overseas workers. It’s not like they can just move into another industry, as the job they do is highly skilled but very specific
FollowupID:
389575
Follow Up By: Truckster (Vic) - Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 22:13
Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 22:13
I agree 100%..
IT is the same with India...
FollowupID:
389577
Reply By: Kiwi Kia - Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 22:01
Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 22:01
The reason they want to send the maintenance to China is cost.
Well, I bet the Chinese could run the Australian Government departments from offices in China cheaper then the local polies so why don't they do that also? Yeah right.....
Air New Zealand is about to lay off 600 engineers for the same reason as Quantas
AnswerID:
135676
Follow Up By: Exploder - Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 22:36
Friday, Oct 21, 2005 at 22:36
At the end of they day passenger safety is jeopardised, as
well as perfectly good people loosing their job’s for know good resin. If the job is done hear you know it has been done right and properly, as to work on these machines hear you must have had extensive training.
Overseas who knows how
well trained these people are, you just need to compare mishaps with other airlines when compared to QANTAS or A.N.Z I know who comes out on top and why.
FollowupID:
389581
Reply By: Member - John (Vic) - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 00:55
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 00:55
A little bit of realism has to be considered here.
When you pay $30- odd bucks to fly Melb to
Sydney something has to give.
It all comes down to money, we don't want to pay anymore than what we have to for a ticket to somewhere,
well low prices come at a cost, in this instance like a lot of manufactures in Australian have already done it means jobs going offshore.
I would say unfortunately "Get used to it" as you ain't seen nothing yet, It still surprises me that our car industry has stayed in Aus as long as it has.
"Competition, ain't it wonderful"?
AnswerID:
135687
Follow Up By: Snowy 3.0iTD - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:24
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:24
John
Just me personally, I will actually seek out Australian made and Australian owned products and
services wherever possible and don't mind paying the bit extra. If everyone adopted the same attitude companies such as Qantas and the Govt would soon get the message. It's just a pity that no-one in Australia makes a decent 4WD.
FollowupID:
389607
Follow Up By: Exploder - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:31
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:31
Well I will pay $60 a ticket if it means the Aircraft is maintained in Australia by a Qualified Australian. If you new what these guy’s have to go throe to be able to work on these aircraft you would know what I am bleep off about.
The standards in Australia for this type of work are about the highest in the world. It’s not like I am a Toyota mechanic I can service a Nissan as
well. You have to be indorsed on every aircraft you work on and for every system, and like somebody else said all the other crash courses every year you must do to lean new Information and keep your qualification and Job.
Then once the Job is done they have to put their name and License number behind it and if something goes wrong it is there ass on the line.
FollowupID:
389615
Follow Up By: Member - John (Vic) - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:51
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:51
Snowy I agree with you and I in fact do the same.
I understand exactly your point Exploder on the training and standards issues, but remember planes are maintained and serviced by many other countries and they fly many millions of hours / kilometers with little or no issue occurring.
I see it as a difficult argument to win, you don't want to pay $100,000 for a 4wd when you could buy the same item for half that because the guy building the vehicle in Australia is costing $60- plus dollars P/Hour to keep on the
shop floor as opposed to the guy in China at $1-.
Just a reflection of our society.
FollowupID:
389619
Follow Up By: Member - Poe L (NSW) - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 20:20
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 20:20
If you really want to have the aircraft maintained in Australia, we will have to be ready to pay full price for tickets; FWIW, Syd-Melb return full price (with tax) is about $800; overseas flight (such as to the US) is just under $4000.
The reality is now we are so use to cheap airfares, we don't fly with any airlines that charge anything other than cheap. What then happens is something has to give; either the airlines (several European national carriers are in strife), or the airlines have to cut costs, which means cheaper maintenance (unfortunately). Or sometime both; I wonder how much longer Air NZ can keep going, in spite of their cost cutting measures and the Govt bailout, and canibalising Ansett.
FollowupID:
389653
Reply By: V8Diesel - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:01
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:01
I fly Qantas because I trust them. I'd trust a plane that has been maintained by an Aussie in Australia with all the proper checks and balances one hell of a lot more than.......
well anywhere else on the planet. If that's a racist point of view, so be it. When I'm belting along across the Bight above the clouds, PC doesn't carry much weight to me (doesn't anywhere else for that matter but that's another story;-)).
I own some GMC gear which I think is great, but there's no way I'd want to fly in a GMC plane.........would you? Absolutely NO room for error with aircraft maintainence and I can't take my life back to Bunnings for a refund if the big bird spears in.
Ever seen asian scaffolding......I rest my case.
AnswerID:
135703
Follow Up By: Exploder - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:09
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 11:09
Yep that right we are not talking about a cheap drill or air compressor hear, It’s an aircraft there is 0 room for error.
FollowupID:
389613
Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:22
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 08:22
Just wait until Qantas has its first disaster and it will happen. The chit will really hit the fan then. (Hope I'm not on the plane though, I've got a bit more of the bush to explore yet)
AnswerID:
135705
Reply By: Member - John Thomas B (VIC) - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 10:29
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 10:29
Hi guy's My brother is one of those engineers and he has crash coarses every year to keep him up to speed.He started with Anset look what they did to them,tor it apart and scrapped one of our best companyies its a discrace what there doing.
LETS OUT SOuRCE THE PRIMINISTERS JOB MITE GET BETTER then BABY"S OVERBOARD BULL bleep >Did you vote to go to war Pig's bum.Terrorism is invented by British colonialism.This Qantis thing is tipical of there system.
I can see clearly know.
AnswerID:
135715
Reply By: Volante - Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 17:56
Saturday, Oct 22, 2005 at 17:56
like we should really care as we gave up caring a long time ago about Australian jobs and manufacturing
everybody has sat on their big fat rear ends demanding more and wanting to pay less. now everything has gone overseas so why should Qantas be any different.
you did not see one squeal about Ryco, Feltex, Yakka, Victa, Sunbeam, Kelvinator, Holeproof, all the wool and cotton weaving. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. etc. closing down.
no doubt the majority of you buy imported
orange juice and other imported food so do not pretend you now for some reason give a damn about Qantas sending all their maintenance jobs overseas
find somebody to tell who cares because you mob have not cared about anything else going overseas.
you all even sit on your fat rear ends and say nothing about them wanting to bring in guest workers and all the fraudulent immigration going on that nobody cares about that is putting Australians out of work
if you do manage to find anybody that cares suggest you give them a halo as they will be 1 out of 10 people in Australia that care
AnswerID:
135750
Follow Up By: Exploder - Sunday, Oct 23, 2005 at 15:40
Sunday, Oct 23, 2005 at 15:40
How many of those company’s have been brought out by overseas multinationals??
It completely off the point I was making anyway, if you Lawn mower fails due to poor build quality or shoddy workman ship you are out $300 maybe. If the aircraft you are on suffers a failure on a main system due to shoddy maintains from less
well trained Engineers,
well you and the 250 other people on bord could end up dead or very badly injured.
More to the point the new people overseas who could now be severing the fleet offshore, if in Australia would not be allowed to touch the aircraft until they did refresher courses then sit about 8 different exams and then be certified on each aircraft they were to work on. QANTAS can’t use overseas pilot’s to fly the aircraft for the same resin, so why should they be allowed to service aircraft offshore then come back over and operate in Australia.
For the amount of training and the Job/ Responsibility these guy’s have they are not that
well Payed either.
I am not a Aircraft Maintenance Engineer nor do I work for QANTAS, but I have had some exposure into the industry and this is not the area that you what to cut cost’s in.
FollowupID:
389709
Reply By: Member - Bradley- Monday, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35
Monday, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35
Hey champ, i'm with you, Qantas just want to get rid of their staff 'overheads' off the books, you know wages, annual leave loadings, super etc etc. And at the moment they are scaremongering to get their maintenance done by 3rd party companies who will use some of their ex staff to do the work. They did this with their engine overhaul
shop, and want to do it with their heavy and line maintenance as
well. Most of us aircraft guys ( LAME & AME) cant get a decent job in australia, its all contract (at crap rates) or casual or permanent part time etc. What a way to make a living :-)) We can get work overseas (surprise surprise) but not everyone wants to leave this great place. Qantas along with a few other big companies have been lined up by the govt to be
test cases with these new IR laws being introduced, to break the unions and conditions in place, so its going to get dirty.
At Ansett we were equal first in the world for the safest airline, but it didnt do us much good, as the owning interests used it as a huge cash cow for years and stripped it bare. Hmmmm Funny how most companies run by accountants end up the same......
And funny how every company that seems to complain about skills shortages is also trying to get concessions to 'import' staff at reduced or minimum wage.
AnswerID:
135965