Saturday, Sep 25, 2010 at 01:35
1. If being formulaicly relevant to the topic on ExOz is the rule, then not much would get posted. And in any case, my reply is relevant; land management, land use and misuse, and land access are inextricably intertwined and problematic issues.
Just because you don't like my response doesn't make it irrelevant. :-)
2. As to the misconseption, the 'public pleasure' is certainly not such. Not even a misconception. The term "utter nonsense" as a rebuke is not very polite either and quite uncalled for. I'm hurt.
The legality or otherwise of the lessees is entirely up to Parliament, at least in WA. Parliament is at the pleasure of the people - ask Tony and Julia if they disagree. Source - democracy 100.
The leases last came up for renewal, I think, this year, (I'll chk if you politely ask me) and large chunks thereof are going to be excised for conservation purposes.
But not enough... By a long long way.
3. Yes, but commonsense has to apply. And then there are the politics of RARA land. If they get too much up the noses of the 98% of the voters who are alienated from our wide brown land some pastoralists will become even less of a bouquet than they are now.
4. No I don't; that's only your opinion. Do you knock on doors 50 kays from your 1600 hours stop??? And, like I said, but you choose to ignore, I do when I sensibly can.
Cheers.
FollowupID:
702111