Fines

Submitted: Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:32
ThreadID: 82427 Views:5798 Replies:16 FollowUps:25
This Thread has been Archived
I have recently received an infringement notice issued by the dept. of conservation and land management (WA) accusing me of throwing a cigarette but out of my car window. Incidentally I do not smoke. When I asked them for proof of the alleged offence they would not or could not give it to me but expected me to pay the fine. I am , therefore going to have the case taken to court.
There is too much of these spot fines about and people paying them without question. What happened to INOCENT UNTL PROOVEN GUILTY which is the backbone of British justice.
Even when we go to the shops we have to proof our innocents that we have not stolen anything
Back Expand Un-Read 0 Moderator

Reply By: Member - Redbakk (WA) - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:39

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:39
Ray...what were the circunstances that led to this offence?....give us a description.
AnswerID: 435642

Follow Up By: Rossco 09 - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:01

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:01
Was anyone else in the car and do they smoke? If anyone else was in the car would they be willing to write a witness statement saying it wasn't you? Is it possible to get a cert./note from your regular doctor stating that you do not smoke? Did you get any details of the person who issued the fine and did they say anything stupid or contradictory?

I ask this because if this does get to a court room, I would love to see you stick right up their arses (well at least the judge who's on your side will).
0
FollowupID: 706955

Reply By: Member - joc45 (WA) - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:03

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:03
CALM?
It's been DEC for some years now.
Sounds bogus. I don't think DEC have any authority to fine people over cigarette butts.
Re innocent until proven guilty, most traffic offences are on-the-spot fines. You may choose to pay up then and there, or take it to court.
Gerry
AnswerID: 435647

Reply By: TerraFirma - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:22

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 12:22
Ray, It's as simple as phoning them and giving them the rego details. There is no requirement for proof, I could call them because you peeved me off one day. So yes take it to court. Just make sure no one else borrowed your car and was smoking etc.
AnswerID: 435648

Reply By: wato35 - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:26

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 13:26
I got done by a different mob, but the story is similar. I got a parking fine and I did not see any signs at the time. It was my 1st fine of any type in 32 years behind the wheel. I went back to the exact parking spot with my camera. There was 1 sign there that was concealed by a tree covered with leaves. If you walked 360 degrees around the sign, it would be lucky to have 15% of the sign visible (and that was from the road), so when I parked down from the and them walked past the sign I could not see anything. So I sent in a report along with a number of photos expecting to get off. But that was not the case, I would have to take them to court. I don't know how much would it cost me so I just paid the fine.
AnswerID: 435657

Reply By: Honky - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:05

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:05
Some years back I pulled up a Coonabarabran on a wide bend to tell the other group with us to go a bit further to the park.
There was a sign at the beginning and another one a lot further up but when I pulled up you could not see any sing nor was it a dangerous corner.
I was standing next to the car and a cop pulled up behind me and booked me.
I complained and said I did not see the sign and besides I only pulled up to tell the other party to go to the park.
Wouldn't listen so I said I would see him in court.
To make matters works it was a company car I was driving and the only people who can contest a parking fine is the registered owner.
Paid the fine.

Honky
AnswerID: 435665

Follow Up By: vk1dx - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:45

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 14:45
I thought the driver was responsible for the fine. So next time I get caught speeding in a work car I shouild not pay the fine because the boss is the registered owner not me. Strange. What if I was booked as a pedestrian for jay walking. Who is the "registered owner" in that case.

Sorry Honky but something does not read true.

Phil
0
FollowupID: 706846

Follow Up By: Tim - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 00:07

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 00:07
Parking fines are issued to vehicles, traffic fines are issued to drivers. There is always exceptions but that is the general rule. There r offences where the company can also be fined in the example of some heavy vehicle offences. The rta also is an exception with their speed cameras which are issued in the first instance to the registered owner.
0
FollowupID: 706932

Follow Up By: vk1dx - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:14

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:14
When you think of it that kind of makes sense. But I do think the driver is the one who should be able to defend the charge. But the law does not always follow commen sense.

No worries.

We got pinged one minute after we had parked in a 2 hour zone years ago (1970). I challenged it and got off. You see my wife was breast feeding and with breast feeding the time is very important. But the clincher was that the magistrate was a mother and asked my wife a few questions about timing of the feeding. Five minutes after the case started she gave the parking officer one of the biggest "Judge Judy" howlings and told him to write a letter of apology with a copy to her. She also gave us the chance to add any comments. It was like Christmas. Its obvious the bloke didn't like young people doing up their cars and thought he would ping us. I followed him outside and when I called him he took off like a startled rabbit. We also got the letter of apology and awarded costs for a day off work, meals and petrol. YEY!!!!!! A perfect day.
Phil



0
FollowupID: 706957

Reply By: Member - Oldbaz. NSW. - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 16:00

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 16:00
While I am in full support of your apparent injustice in this case, I do suggest you assess the possible costs if you go down in Court. You may incur the costs of the
Dept. as well as your own. While victory may be sweet, a loss will be far more
expensive than the fine. Little consolation, I know, but if you are around long enough, everyone suffers this sort of thing at least once......oldbaz.
AnswerID: 435683

Follow Up By: 93 Navara - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 16:59

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 16:59
Onus is still on issuer to provide a prima facie case. Should the complainant (witness) not provide a statement then the matter will not even proceed to court. Should a witness (singular) provide a statement and you win as the matter is one on one, you will have your costs paid by the prosecution.
Good luck
0
FollowupID: 706864

Reply By: Kimba10 - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 16:58

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 16:58
Take it to court. My wife was done for neg driving 7 years ago for "FAILING TO ENTER ROUNDABOUT SAFELY AND GIVE WAY TO HER RIGHT" she was hit on drivers side so cop said straight away she was at fault, didnt want to listen to the facts Told the cop we'l see him in court along with pics and written statements by witnesses, that was 7 years ago havnt heard a thing. I could have chased it up as NRMA said if proven not at fault we would get our excess back. The NRMA at first increased our green slip price (as they class you a liability) but after showing them pics and statements etc we got it for the normal price, they even said they agreed with us but unfortunately for the excess they have to go by the police report. Problem is for most of us its too costly to take things to court so most cop it on the chin and pay up but if your lucky to have an endless suplly of cash you seem to be able to beat the courts. look at John Singlton, got done for memeory was 165k on the F3 some years ago in his Bently ?? some thing like that, got off it as the vehicle was built for cruising at those speeds, if that was you or me we'd be sitting in the back of a paddy wagon, unless of course you have plenty of $$$. As mentioned above anybody could ring up and say you through a but out the window, Id want pictures of the proof like a speed camera. I thought the go was with this issue with buts is they had to have 3 complaints from 3 different people and those people had to be willing to give their details before anything could be done ??You can represent yourself for minimal costs.Regards Steve
AnswerID: 435693

Follow Up By: Mike DiD - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 14:10

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 14:10
Deopends on the biasses of the Magistrate.

A woman was booked for doing 174km/hr on the F3 while FIVE TIMES over the alcohol limit for her P licence.

Did she go to gaol for recklessly endangering lives ? No, she copped a $75 fine because she's managed to get herself pregnant before the court case !!!!
0
FollowupID: 706988

Follow Up By: Begaboy - Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 14:47

Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 14:47
Neg driving .... a friend droped his bike on a round about - it had just started raining and a TRUCK has spilt diesel on the road ....

He got booked for neg driving as he dropped his bike

please explain to me how this is fair ? was he meant to get off his bike at the round about - walk the round about - test the road for traction then proceed ?

Bb
0
FollowupID: 707083

Reply By: oz doc - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 17:05

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 17:05
HI Ray, with respect to the replies above- in this day and age going to court is all about what is legal. It has nothing to do with what is right or wrong, what is fair or just, what is moral or ethical.Only what is legal. I'm pretty sure there are a few cost free avenues you could take to clarify your legal position before you enter the courtroom. I would start by requesting an explanation of the fine but do it in writing- makes a world of difference. doc.
AnswerID: 435695

Follow Up By: Rob! - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:54

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:54
...and in what day and age did the courts follow what is fair and just or moral.
The law and justice have always been separate.
0
FollowupID: 706982

Reply By: Sand Man (SA) - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 18:16

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 18:16
Rather than take the case to court, advise the department in written format that you do not accept the fine as you do not smoke, so it can't have been you.

If they wish to proceed with taking you to court for non-payment of a ficticious fine, it will be at their effort and expense. You would have a good case as a non smoker and the Judge would more than likely find in your favour.

Stick it to them Ray.


Bill.
Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

AnswerID: 435709

Follow Up By: Tim - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 00:11

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 00:11
Non payment of a fine will simply result in a suspended licence and/or cancelled rego on your car. Once this action has been taken you no longer have the right to have the matter heard at court.
0
FollowupID: 706933

Follow Up By: Sand Man (SA) - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 07:29

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 07:29
C'mon Tim,

That can only happen as a result of a court hearing where you are able to plead your case.

Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 706947

Follow Up By: Tim - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:52

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:52
I'm talking about NSW and I know QLD and VIC are the same.
A suspended licence is very differant from a disqualified licence. The RTA can suspend your licence at any time for a number of reasons including non payment of fines, medically unfit, following the commision of certain offences.
The police can suspend you r licence following the commision of particular offences (about 4) or following a mid range or high range drink driving charge.

The court can then disqualify you from driving (if you have commited an offence and have to face the magistrate).

Some states may vary a little bit however I can't imagine they would differ too greatly.

It comes from section 66 of the Fines Act (see below)

66Suspension or cancellation of driver licence

(1) The Roads and Traffic Authority must, without further notice, suspend any driver licence of a fine defaulter against whom it is required to take enforcement action for the balance of the period of the licence.

(1A) The Roads and Traffic Authority must suspend the driver licence of a fine defaulter even if the State Debt Recovery Office has:

(a) granted an extension of time for the payment of the fine, or

(b) allowed the fine defaulter to pay the fine by instalments,

after requiring the Roads and Traffic Authority to take enforcement action.

(2) If the driver licence is suspended and:

(a) where the State Debt Recovery Office has granted the fine defaulter an extension of time for payment of the fine, the fine remains unpaid for at least 6 months after the extended due date, or

(b) where the State Debt Recovery Office has allowed the payment of a fine by instalments, an instalment remains unpaid for at least 6 months, or

(c) in any other case, the fine concerned remains unpaid for at least 6 months,

the Roads and Traffic Authority must, if the State Debt Recovery Office so directs, cancel the licence.

(3) The Roads and Traffic Authority is to remove the suspension of a driver licence if the State Debt Recovery Office so directs.

(3A) The obligation to suspend the driver licence of a fine defaulter under subsection (1) extends to any licence that is already suspended when enforcement action is required to be taken under this Division. Accordingly, if the period of suspension comes to an end before the expiry of the licence, the Roads and Traffic Authority is then to take action under subsection (1) to further suspend the licence if the State Debt Recovery Office so directs.

(4) The State Debt Recovery Office (or the Roads and Traffic Authority on its behalf) may notify the fine defaulter of the enforcement action taken under this section, but a failure to notify the fine defaulter does not affect that action.

(5) Despite the suspension or cancellation of a driver licence under this section, a court or the Roads and Traffic Authority may exercise a function under another Act to suspend or cancel the licence.

Tim
0
FollowupID: 706962

Follow Up By: Sand Man (SA) - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 18:32

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 18:32
Oh Tim,

You are on a different planet mate.

The examples you are giving come from Road Transport and Police Agencies, which is a completely different issue from that originally posted by Ray.

What this post is about is an "infringement notice" for want of a better word, apparently incorrectly issued by the Dept. of Conservation by someone that possibly has no real jurisdiction to issue a fine without conclusive evidence that such an offence took place.

That's the way I read it anyway.


Bill.
Bill


I'm diagonally parked in a parallel Universe!

Member
My Profile  My Blog  My Position  Send Message

0
FollowupID: 707007

Follow Up By: Rob! - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 20:08

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 20:08
Tim,

It seems like you've been hitting the books too hard.

This fine has nothing to do with ones licence or the registration of ones car.

The departemnt of conservation has no jurisdiction of these matters.
0
FollowupID: 707020

Follow Up By: Tim - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 20:40

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 20:40
We may have to agree to disagree here. I do work in the industry of handing out fines and quite a lot of people were very surprised not that long ago following an election. People who failed to vote got a $75 bunger in the mail and fail to pay that caused their licences to be suspended.
The organisation is state debt recovery and it covers any state issued fines. The SDRO inform the RTA who then follow section 66 as above.
The Dept of conservation are the same as national parks, fisheries, maritime councils etc etc. They all have power to issue fines under the fines act.

Again, I am talking about NSW here. The following schedule is a list of the acts which are covered under section 66. As you will see, there is all sorts of acts with nothing to do with motor vehicles or driving however the first step on non payment is exactly the same.

Schedule 1 Statutory provisions under which penalty notices issued

(Section 20)
Animal Diseases (Emergency Outbreaks) Act 1991, section 71A
Apiaries Act 1985, section 42A
Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007, section 64
Associations Incorporation Act 2009, section 93
Barangaroo Delivery Authority Act 2009, section 45
Biofuels Act 2007, section 29
Building Professionals Act 2005, section 92
Business Names Act 2002, section 32
Casino Control Act 1992, section 168A
Casino, Liquor and Gaming Control Authority Act 2007, section 46
Centennial Park and Moore Park Trust Act 1983, section 24
Classification (Publications, Films and Computer Games) Enforcement Act 1995, section 61A
Commercial Agents and Private Inquiry Agents Act 2004, section 28
Companion Animals Act 1998, section 92
Contaminated Land Management Act 1997, section 92A
Conveyancers Licensing Act 2003, section 158
Court Security Act 2005, section 29
Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999, section 97
Criminal Procedure Act 1986, section 333
Crown Lands Act 1989, section 162
Dangerous Goods (Road and Rail Transport) Act 2008, section 48
Deer Act 2006, section 33
Electricity (Consumer Safety) Act 2004, section 47
Electricity Supply Act 1995, section 103A
Energy and Utilities Administration Act 1987, section 46A
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, section 127A
Exhibited Animals Protection Act 1986, section 46A
Explosives Act 2003, section 34
Fair Trading Act 1987, section 64
Firearms Act 1996, section 85A
Fisheries Management Act 1994, section 276
Fitness Services (Pre-paid Fees) Act 2000, section 16
Food Act 2003, section 120
Forestry Act 1916, section 46A
Futures Industry (New South Wales) Code, section 149
Game and Feral Animal Control Act 2002, section 57
Gaming Machines Act 2001, section 203
Gene Technology (GM Crop Moratorium) Act 2003, section 35
Graffiti Control Act 2008, section 16
Hemp Industry Act 2008, section 45
Home Building Act 1989, section 138A
Hunter Water Act 1991, section 31A
Impounding Act 1993, section 36
Inclosed Lands Protection Act 1901, section 10
Industrial Relations Act 1996, section 396 (including as applied to and for the purposes of Part 2 of the Industrial Relations (Child Employment) Act 2006 by section 16 of that Act)
Jury Act 1977, section 64
Jury Act 1977, section 66
Landlord and Tenant (Rental Bonds) Act 1977, section 15A
Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002, section 235
Liquor Act 2007, section 150
Local Government Act 1993, section 314 or 679
Lord Howe Island Act 1953, section 37B
Marine Parks Act 1997, section 38
Marine Safety Act 1998, section 126
Maritime Services Act 1935, section 30D
Meat Industry Act 1978, section 76A
Mining Act 1992, section 375A
Motor Dealers Act 1974, section 53E
Motor Vehicle Repairs Act 1980, section 87A
National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974, section 160
Native Vegetation Act 2003, section 43
Non-Indigenous Animals Act 1987, section 27A
Noxious Weeds Act 1993, section 63
Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000, section 108
Parliamentary Electorates and Elections Act 1912, section 120C
Parramatta Park Trust Act 2001, section 30
Passenger Transport Act 1990, section 59
Pawnbrokers and Second-hand Dealers Act 1996, section 26
Pesticides Act 1999, section 76
Petroleum (Onshore) Act 1991, section 137A
Photo Card Act 2005, section 34
Plant Diseases Act 1924, section 19
Plantations and Reafforestation Act 1999, section 62
Ports and Maritime Administration Act 1995, section 100
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979, section 33E
Property, Stock and Business Agents Act 2002, section 216
Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, section 224
Public Health (Tobacco) Act 2008, section 50
Radiation Control Act 1990, section 25A
Rail Safety Act 2008, section 139
Redfern–Waterloo Authority Act 2004, section 47
Registered Clubs Act 1976, section 66
Registration of Interests in Goods Act 1986, section 19A
Residential Parks Act 1998, section 149
Retail Leases Act 1994, section 16P
Retirement Villages Act 1999, section 184
Road Transport (General) Act 2005, Part 5.3
Roads Act 1993, section 243
Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust Act 1980, section 22B
Rural Fires Act 1997, section 131
Rural Lands Protection Act 1998, section 206
Security Industry Act 1997, section 45A
Smoke-free Environment Act 2000, section 20A
Sporting Venues Authorities Act 2008, section 38
Sporting Venues (Invasions) Act 2003, section 12
State Sports Centre Trust Act 1984, section 20B
Stock (Chemical Residues) Act 1975, section 15A
Stock Diseases Act 1923, section 20O
Stock Foods Act 1940, section 32A
Stock Medicines Act 1989, section 60A
Summary Offences Act 1988, section 29, 29A or 29B
Swimming Pools Act 1992, section 35
Sydney Cricket and Sports Ground Act 1978, section 30A
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority Act 1998, section 43A
Sydney Olympic Park Authority Act 2001, section 79
Sydney Water Act 1994, section 50
Sydney Water Catchment Management Act 1998, section 65
Tow Truck Industry Act 1998, section 89
Transport Administration Act 1988, section 117
Unlawful Gambling Act 1998, section 52
Valuers Act 2003, section 42
Veterinary Practice Act 2003, section 101
Vocational Education and Training Act 2005, section 45
Water Industry Competition Act 2006, section 82
Water Management Act 2000, section 365
Weapons Prohibition Act 1998, section 42
Western Sydney Parklands Act 2006, section 48
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, section 246
World Youth Day Act 2006, section 55

If you still disagree then please indicate the source of the legislation you are talking about.
0
FollowupID: 707030

Follow Up By: Rob! - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 20:44

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 20:44
Well, I am glad I don't live in NSW then. Perhaps all you NSW people should have a good chat to the people that represent you.
0
FollowupID: 707031

Follow Up By: Mike DiD - Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 21:59

Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 21:59
When I travelled by train regularly I would frequently see people get huge fines for minor offences - the officers would say "sorry, I have no discretion".

A year later I saw two officers tell some youngsters to get off the train and buy tickets - I asked them why they didn't fine them for fare evasion - "there's an election coming up in 4 weeks - they've told us to be lenient"
0
FollowupID: 707101

Follow Up By: Pezza QLD - Sunday, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:23

Sunday, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:23
Tim is 100% correct, QLD is the same, they call the dept S.P.E.R. (State Penalties Enforcement Registry ).
Any unpaid fines of ANY sort are passed on to sper, who then have the power to suspend your licence until said fine is paid.
This is off their website,

"From 1 January 2010, amended legislation allows SPER to suspend your driver licence for all types of offences, not just motor vehicle related offences."

The result of corrupt, greedy governments.

Cheers
Pezza
0
FollowupID: 707138

Reply By: Member - Carl- Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 18:49

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 18:49
Ray,

I hear you. While driving in Russia a few years ago we were pulled over for speeding. (I was not driving). We were supposed to be doing 140 kilometers an hour in a 60 zone.

Arrest material in Australia. We were given the option of paying the fine directly to the officer or be arrested. We paid. It was Australian $3.45. We left slowly.
AnswerID: 435715

Follow Up By: Member - MYPRADO - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:36

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 23:36
My wife is Russian and said cops do it to get extra cash and are a slimy bunch, of course if you do not pay you end up in jail for weeks, on the positive side they are catching crooked cops and put them in a separate cop jail as inmates in normal jails kill them for obvious reasons. Society must speak up so justice prevails.
Before going to court you have the right to access their records, any wrong doing will be recorded on their personal files. Never say die.
0
FollowupID: 706930

Follow Up By: Fab72 - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:59

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:59
Carl...obviously forgot his lunch money at home.

I was in a car with a mate of mine driving. He got pulled over for speeding and the cop informed him the fine was $170. My mate had the gaul to ask the cop if there was a discount for cash.

Apparently, there is no haggle option for cash.

Fab.
0
FollowupID: 706963

Reply By: Best Off Road - Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 20:27

Thursday, Nov 11, 2010 at 20:27
Here's how you do it (at least in Victoria), I know I've done it.

You reply with a Stat Dec attached stating it was not you. Their next step, if they can be bothered, is to contact the "dobber" and ascertain if such said "dobber" is prepared to attend court.

The effort involved on their part is too hard and it's easier for them to let it go. Write a letter and attach a Stat Dec, it will never get to court.

Cheers,

Jim Best.



AnswerID: 435728

Follow Up By: 93 Navara - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:38

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 08:38
Not too hard, depends whether the witness wishes to make a statement.
0
FollowupID: 706953

Reply By: The Landy - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:00

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 09:00
I suspect only tow choices; pay the fine or be prepared to go to court to plead your case to a magistrate. From what you have said I suspect going to court is fair enough....

I suspect the notion of Innocent until proven guilty stands....but you need to go to court to demonstrate your innocence....
AnswerID: 435763

Follow Up By: Rob! - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:57

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:57
If he goes to court the other party has to prove his guilt first. It may be that after the judge sees the evidence he or she will through it out and there'll be no case to answer.
0
FollowupID: 706984

Reply By: Gone Bush (WA) - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 14:01

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 14:01
Ray,

as one poster said above, it hasn't been called CALM for years.

Did the letter ask you to post a cheque, or deposit to a bank account (probably in Nigeria)?

I would be treating it as a scam until you get a follow up.

cheers

I'm glad I ain't too scared to be lazy
- Augustus McCrae (Lonesome Dove)

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message

AnswerID: 435782

Reply By: Mike DiD - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 14:21

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 14:21
"What happened to INOCENT UNTL PROVEN GUILTY which is the backbone of British justice. "

Ha !!! NSW was finding it too hard to find offenders, so years ago they changed it so you are guilty unless you can prove innocence.

If there's been a Bottle Shop robbery and the police walk around the corner and see you with an unopened bottle of whisky because you're off to a party and you have long hair (and they can't find anyone else to show that they've solved another crime) you are guilty unless YOU can prove your innocence under NSW law.

But they've done such a good snow job (a previous premier used to be a Public Relations Consultant) that 99% of the population has no idea - just like the illegality of carrying any knife in NSW.
AnswerID: 435786

Follow Up By: Rob! - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 20:14

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 20:14
Interesting are you able to identify which law you are refering to? ...or did you hear it on a current afair?

NSW legislation
0
FollowupID: 707023

Follow Up By: 93 Navara - Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 23:50

Friday, Nov 12, 2010 at 23:50
Got to love a fine thread to bring the 'stories' out of the closet......
0
FollowupID: 707044

Follow Up By: Mike DiD - Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 22:03

Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 22:03
From a lawyer specialising in Criminal Law - but the government depends on the ignorance of the masses to erode our democracy - thankyou for confirming it..
0
FollowupID: 707102

Follow Up By: 93 Navara - Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 23:39

Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 23:39
Always happy to oblige someones gibberish
0
FollowupID: 707107

Reply By: Begaboy - Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 14:42

Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 14:42
HI there , It may have been Mistaken identity - ie car in front of you throws butt out , its later hours you car drives over cigarette and make it "spark" as the wind drags it down the road - looks like you threw it out .....

I had a friend who was a naval cop , she would often observe people throwing butts out the window, record time - date- location - car rego and description inc driver - then forward to police or EPA who would send out the fine ... ( as a public officer her word was accepted by authority - this was years ago - may be different now )

so just remember this those of you that smoke and throw the butts out the window ....... i hear the excuse that the butts make the car smell , but what you dont realize ( the smnokers that is ) that the car already smells like that- YOU just dont notice it as much as a non smoker does - keep a coke can with a little water in it in your drink holder - put buts in that - then your ashtray stays clean and can is easily disposed of when you get home
AnswerID: 435863

Reply By: The Explorer - Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 22:26

Saturday, Nov 13, 2010 at 22:26
Come in Spinners....
I sent one final shout after him to stick to the track, to which he replied “All right,” That was the last ever seen of Gibson - E Giles 23 April 1874

Lifetime Member
My Profile  My Blog  Send Message
Moderator

AnswerID: 435893

Sponsored Links

Popular Products (9)